Epic F-86 pic
http://warbirdheritagefoundation.org..._F_0028_BH.jpg
And also, cool planes? Hustler is the name you want. Its looks killed, didn't need bombs.
Epic F-86 pic
http://warbirdheritagefoundation.org..._F_0028_BH.jpg
And also, cool planes? Hustler is the name you want. Its looks killed, didn't need bombs.
Last edited by Lief Siddhe; May 28 2012 at 08:43:43 PM.
I was somewhere around Old Man Star, on the edge of Essence, when drugs began to take hold.
Unpainted planes just look so badass... until they rust.
A Nevada Air National Guard C-130 Hercules side-by-side with a West Virginia ANG C-5 Galaxy
![]()
I grew up in Newburgh, NY right by the airport, where the ANG housed some cool shit. Saw A-10s, F15s etc. They always have at least 3-4 C5s there. They Don't fit in the hangars, the doors close around them, and the tail sticks outside.
*edit* found a pic
![]()
Last edited by Skidrowpunk; June 14 2012 at 07:49:52 PM.
world of tanks derp gun world of tanks derp gun world of tanks derp gun
Tanks name = BS87
Every other game = Kegger McManus
Imo the best of the worst of the cold war:
http://www.merkle.com/pluto/pluto.html
pretty much a missile loaded with a dozen hydrogen bombs, and powered by an unshielded nuclear reactor-ramjet; If the nukes didn't kill you, the cloud of radioactive fallout trailing the missile would.
TBH I was talking more about the technical and engineering aspect. Absolutely amazed that they managed to achieve so much (and could have possibly done more) fifty years ago.
Obviously it's a fucking horrible weapon whichever way you look at it. But damn, from a 'professional' stand point I'd give my left nut to be able to work on something like that...
What I want to know is how it drops it's bombs. If the one closest to the front drops it'd be sucked into the air intake (well not sucked, but the speed it'd be moving at would make the intake catch the bomb) and the ones further back can't be dropped since the intake is in the way.
I had no idea the C-5 was that much bigger than the C-130.
Consideringthe slam was designed to fly at treetop level, dropping the nukes would be a very bad idea. The nukes would shoot out the top like a submarine to give it some time to clear the area.
The C-5 is so huge, they considered shoving mostly unmodified intercontinental ballistic missiles into them, then dropping them out the back in mid air so they could have mobile launch sites before the Polaris program made sub-based missiles feasible.
One of these to be precise:
![]()
A huge supersonic bomber firing nuclear missiles is still the best, sorry.
![]()
Sorry but B1 has lower speed, shorter range and less payload so it's not superior in any way apart from number produced.
![]()
Bookmarks