hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 737 of 743 FirstFirst ... 237637687727734735736737738739740 ... LastLast
Results 14,721 to 14,740 of 14855

Thread: [PLANES] OKB Sukhoi appreciation fred

  1. #14721
    Movember 2011 RazoR's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    The Motherland
    Posts
    29,168
    No shit sherlocks. US can launch cruise missiles from it's oversized navy basically anywhere they please while ruskies opted for air-launched from supersonic bomber ones for reach.
    So how about dem supersonic bomber ban treaties?
    Last edited by RazoR; May 22 2018 at 12:16:08 AM.

  2. #14722
    Paradox's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 24, 2011
    Location
    Deepest Darkest Devonshire
    Posts
    7,921


    what is the point of talking to you if you won't even read

    nobody said supersonic bombers were banned you idiot

    The B-1A project was cancelled because of SALT. Which is something you don't even know about apparently.

    B-1B was developed to comply with the requirements and because of Carter administration speshul tactix

    I can't believe you don't understand what your are being told. It's very simple.


    Poland treats me like shit and I hate them as a result of it

  3. #14723
    Movember 2011 RazoR's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    The Motherland
    Posts
    29,168
    Quote Originally Posted by Paradox View Post


    what is the point of talking to you if you won't even read

    nobody said supersonic bombers were banned you idiot

    The B-1A project was cancelled because of SALT. Which is something you don't even know about apparently.

    B-1B was developed to comply with the requirements and because of Carter administration speshul tactix

    I can't believe you don't understand what your are being told. It's very simple.
    are you legally retarded today?

    Quote Originally Posted by Paradox View Post
    no. it's prohibited from above transonic flight (and external payloads) by treaty. not stealth

    you really should know this

  4. #14724
    Joe Appleby's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    in front of the class
    Posts
    13,777
    The F-35 has finally seen combat.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-44210403

    It was an Israeli F-35.
    nevar forget

  5. #14725
    Donor erichkknaar's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    10,272
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Appleby View Post
    The F-35 has finally seen combat.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-44210403

    It was an Israeli F-35.
    "You know that we just won the Eurovision with the song 'Toy.' Well, the F-35 is not a toy," he said.
    Fucking Eurovision.
    meh

  6. #14726

  7. #14727

    Join Date
    July 3, 2014
    Posts
    3,601
    Navy is not happy with JSF.



    The video makes a good point The Navy is in need of a air superiority fighter and well as a long range strike aircraft. It all so points out that the JSF was not intended for air superiority.

  8. #14728
    Super Ponerator Global Moderator Evelgrivion's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    12,035
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy Crush View Post
    Navy is not happy with JSF.
    The video makes a good point The Navy is in need of a air superiority fighter and well as a long range strike aircraft. It all so points out that the JSF was not intended for air superiority.
    That insinuates that the F-35 is bad at establishing air superiority.

  9. #14729
    Movember 2011 RazoR's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    The Motherland
    Posts
    29,168
    Quote Originally Posted by Evelgrivion View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy Crush View Post
    Navy is not happy with JSF.
    The video makes a good point The Navy is in need of a air superiority fighter and well as a long range strike aircraft. It all so points out that the JSF was not intended for air superiority.
    That insinuates that the F-35 is bad at establishing air superiority.
    It is only good for burning money tbf. Any other fighter with a LANTIRN can do it's job for the fraction of the cost, usually better too.

  10. #14730
    Donor erichkknaar's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    10,272
    Quote Originally Posted by RazoR View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Evelgrivion View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy Crush View Post
    Navy is not happy with JSF.
    The video makes a good point The Navy is in need of a air superiority fighter and well as a long range strike aircraft. It all so points out that the JSF was not intended for air superiority.
    That insinuates that the F-35 is bad at establishing air superiority.
    It is only good for burning money tbf. Any other fighter with a LANTIRN can do it's job for the fraction of the cost, usually better too.
    Posts video of random images of US navy planes with creepy text to voice proclaiming *stuff*

    Yep. F-35 is shit guys. Lets pack it up and go home.
    meh

  11. #14731
    Movember 2011 RazoR's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    The Motherland
    Posts
    29,168
    Quote Originally Posted by erichkknaar View Post
    Yep. F-35 is shit guys. Lets develop a fighter better than the current SuperHornet.
    fyp

  12. #14732
    Straight Hustlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 14, 2011
    Posts
    10,266
    MAKE F-22 GREAT AGAIN

      Spoiler:
    get fuckd it's always been great

  13. #14733

  14. #14734
    Frug's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    13,814
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy Crush View Post
    Navy is not happy with JSF.



    The video makes a good point The Navy is in need of a air superiority fighter and well as a long range strike aircraft. It all so points out that the JSF was not intended for air superiority.
    Quality robot voice there.

    I learned so much.

    I'm also being sarcastic.

    Quote Originally Posted by Loire
    I'm too stupid to say anything that deserves being in your magnificent signature.

  15. #14735
    Lowa [NSN]'s Avatar
    Join Date
    April 14, 2011
    Posts
    2,857
    Quote Originally Posted by erichkknaar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Appleby View Post
    The F-35 has finally seen combat.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-44210403

    It was an Israeli F-35.
    "You know that we just won the Eurovision with the song 'Toy.' Well, the F-35 is not a toy," he said.
    Fucking Eurovision.
    Yes. But Eurovision is road to peace.

    In that article it says F35 armament is 2x A2A and 2x guided bombs (+ gun). That doesnt sound right/very small payload?
    Also in that article, Drake missile spam!
    Quote Originally Posted by Tarminic View Post
    I would create a dragon made out of vaginas. Then I would create a dragon made out of dicks. Then I would have them fight to the death.

  16. #14736
    rufuske's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    2,084
    Quote Originally Posted by Candy Crush View Post
    Navy is not happy with JSF.



    The video makes a good point The Navy is in need of a air superiority fighter and well as a long range strike aircraft. It all so points out that the JSF was not intended for air superiority.
    If they can bring this
    https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/to...-bu-1575814142
    back, I will cry tears of joy.

  17. #14737
    Movember 2011 RazoR's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    The Motherland
    Posts
    29,168
    Quote Originally Posted by Straight Hustlin View Post
    MAKE F-22 GREAT AGAIN

      Spoiler:
    get fuckd it's always been great
    But it can't take off vertically!!1
      Spoiler:
    and neither can 35B with any kind of sensible loadout

  18. #14738
    walrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Fancomicidolkostümier- ungsspielgruppenzusammenkunft
    Posts
    6,137
    Quote Originally Posted by RazoR View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Supersonic gunships sounds awesome to me.
    >implying B-1 can into supersonic
    lmao
    Wikipedia says Mach 1.25. You should go and correct the article with your extensive source material.
      Spoiler:
    Quote Originally Posted by RazoR View Post
    But islamism IS a product of class warfare. Rich white countries come into developing brown dictatorships, wreck the leadership, infrastructure and economy and then act all surprised that religious fanaticism is on the rise.
    Also:
    Quote Originally Posted by Tellenta View Post
    walrus isnt a bad poster.
    Quote Originally Posted by cullnean View Post
    also i like walrus.
    Quote Originally Posted by AmaNutin View Post
    Yer a hoot

  19. #14739
    Movember 2011 RazoR's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    The Motherland
    Posts
    29,168
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by RazoR View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Supersonic gunships sounds awesome to me.
    >implying B-1 can into supersonic
    lmao
    Wikipedia says Mach 1.25. You should go and correct the article with your extensive source material.
    At altitude. That's great for 50s i guess.

  20. #14740
    Super Ponerator Global Moderator Evelgrivion's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    12,035
    Quote Originally Posted by RazoR View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by RazoR View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by walrus View Post
    Supersonic gunships sounds awesome to me.
    >implying B-1 can into supersonic
    lmao
    Wikipedia says Mach 1.25. You should go and correct the article with your extensive source material.
    At altitude. That's great for 50s i guess.
    http://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Shee...0/b-1b-lancer/

    Mach 1.2 at sea level.


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •