hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 4 of 15 FirstFirst 123456714 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 287

Thread: Mars Curiosity Landing, NASA doing awesome shit ITT

  1. #61
    Donor Aea's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 13, 2011
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    1,920
    The moon is arguably a planet since according to a common definition the earth and moon are a binary system. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_planet

  2. #62
    Rakshasa The Cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 18, 2011
    Location
    Jita 4-4
    Posts
    2,818
    Quote Originally Posted by Aea View Post
    The moon is arguably a planet since according to a common definition the earth and moon are a binary system. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_planet
    In ancient greek the word that became planet described any object in the sky that wander (planet) relative to the fixed stars, so even the sun is a planet.

    So unless you want to use terminology as loosely as possible then go ahead, let's call everything not fixed in the sky for a planet and have a conversation that makes as much sense as if we'd start to call every physical object for... "object".

    "When I went over to his object last night, we started to suck each other's object but really I wanted to stick my object in his object. He hadn't gone to the object all day so I ended up with a lots of object on my object."

    Or we could just go for the IAU definition and call the moon a moon and Pluto for a dwarf planet.
    Quote Originally Posted by Random hopeful w-space dweller
    I'm excited about the nebulas, at least it's something I will see out in the wormholes.

  3. #63
    Lachesis VII's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 20, 2011
    Location
    Egghelende
    Posts
    603
    There are some decent arguments for calling the Earth-Moon system a binary planet. In addition to the above article, this one is illustrative:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbit_o...oon_around_Sun

  4. #64

    Join Date
    October 6, 2011
    Posts
    22
    I seem to remember a definition not mentioned in the wikipedia article along the lines of 'if the center of gravity of the system lies outside the radius of the largest body, then the system is a binary planet system. if it lies within, the smaller object is a satellite.'

    Seems like a very precise and reasoned definition.

    edit: its mentioned in the second wiki posted
    Last edited by olusegun obasanjo; August 6 2012 at 08:14:15 AM.

  5. #65
    Marlona Sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    3,974
    Well at least we managed a few pages before the usual anti-American bitches started butt hurt posting. Also if you don't like living here, kindly pack your shit up and get the fuck out.

  6. #66
    omeg's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    466
    Woke up early to watch it live and don't regret that. At least the start of this week is not that terrible.
    Vulnerant omnes, ultima necat.

  7. #67
    Paradox's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 24, 2011
    Location
    Deepest Darkest Devonshire
    Posts
    2,740
    Quote Originally Posted by Marlona Sky View Post
    Well at least we managed a few pages before the usual anti-American bitches started butt hurt posting. Also if you don't like living here, kindly pack your shit up and get the fuck out.
    Which anti-american posts are these?

  8. #68
    Synapse's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    1,169
    Quote Originally Posted by shaewyn View Post
    Woah, they showed the wheels of the rovers... I didn't realize they were that large! (seriously, the wheel of the curiosity rover is a solid 3ft diameter (ish))
    Was holding a scale model about 2 hours ago that was sent from JPL. It's about 2.5 feet, but I wouldnt say 3.

    Fun fact, the treads are not rubber, they are paper thin aluminum. Thin enough that they flex like quarter inch rubber though.

  9. #69
    Donor Aramendel's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Posts
    1,934

  10. #70
    Super VIP Dot Kransthow's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    (´・ω・`)
    Posts
    4,121

    Me irl while watching the live stream of the landing

  11. #71
    Movember 2012 ctrlchris's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Fuckin roos m8
    Posts
    8,081
    Big up nasa rudeboys.
    Outs to all involved

    Tapatalk etc

    Your posting is medium, its not rare and its not well done
    - Krans 26/7/12

  12. #72

    Join Date
    August 6, 2012
    Posts
    4
    Apparently the signals are being beamed to not that far from me at Tidbinbilla. It's also where most of the Apollo 11 stuff went via, despite what Parks would like you to think.

    The dishes there are powerful enough to blast a hole in the clouds and is a pretty awesome place to visit.



    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tidbinb...acking_Station


    The poster formally known as Me.

  13. #73

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    1,197
    Quote Originally Posted by wiki View Post
    Radiation assessment detector (RAD): This instrument was the first of ten MSL instruments to be turned on. On the route to Mars and while working on its surface, it will characterize the broad spectrum of radiation environment found inside the spacecraft. These measurements were never done before from the inside of a spacecraft and their main purpose is to determine the viability and shielding needs for human explorers.[86] Funded by the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters and Germany, RAD was developed by Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) and the extraterrestrial physics group at Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Germany.[86]
    Fuck yeah thats my old Uni. Also:

    Quote Originally Posted by wiki View Post
    MSL Mars Descent Imager (MARDI): During the descent to the Martian surface, MARDI will take color images at 1600×1200 pixels with a 1.3-millisecond exposure time starting at distances of about 3.7 km to near 5 meters from the ground and will take images at a rate of 5 frames per second for about 2 minutes.[60][66] MARDI has a pixel scale of 1.5 meters at 2 km to 1.5 millimeters at 2 meters and has a 90-degree circular field of view. MARDI has 8 GB of internal buffer memory that is capable of storing over 4,000 raw images. MARDI imaging will allow the mapping of surrounding terrain and the location of landing.[60] JunoCam, built for the Juno spacecraft, is based on MARDI.[67]
    So, were going to get a color vid of the landing? Thats going to be cool as hell.

  14. #74
    Smuggo's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Behind you
    Posts
    5,407
    I had intended to get up early to watch this but the comfort of bed was too much that even awesome science could not break its spell. Ah well, I'm sure there will be lots more cool shit to come out of this monstrous robot over the next decade.

  15. #75
    Movember 2011 Daco's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,465
    I thought it was only running for 23months?

    Quote Originally Posted by EntroX View Post
    i love you fhc, never change

  16. #76
    Paradox's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 24, 2011
    Location
    Deepest Darkest Devonshire
    Posts
    2,740
    Quote Originally Posted by Daco Cutter View Post
    I thought it was only running for 23months?
    They always say that about satellites, probes and rovers In reality NASA is very good at making do with what they have so I would imagine, unless the rover breaks, the actual mission duration will be much longer than that.

  17. #77
    Movember 2011 Daco's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,465
    Quote Originally Posted by Paradox View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Daco Cutter View Post
    I thought it was only running for 23months?
    They always say that about satellites, probes and rovers In reality NASA is very good at making do with what they have so I would imagine, unless the rover breaks, the actual mission duration will be much longer than that.
    I guess it is safe to say we'll atleast get some pretty awesome pictures for the next 23months from it

    Quote Originally Posted by EntroX View Post
    i love you fhc, never change

  18. #78

    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    162
    Quote Originally Posted by Paradox View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Daco Cutter View Post
    I thought it was only running for 23months?
    They always say that about satellites, probes and rovers In reality NASA is very good at making do with what they have so I would imagine, unless the rover breaks, the actual mission duration will be much longer than that.
    See Spirit for a perfect example of this.

  19. #79

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    7,019
    Edit: beaten. At least, obligatory xkcd



    The last communication with the rover was on sol 2210 (March 22, 2010)
    R.I.P.

    Meanwhile

    On July 12, 2012 (Sol 3010) solar arrays produced 523 watt-hours and 21.49 miles (34,580.05 meters) was the total distance traveled from landing.
    Last edited by Daneel Trevize; August 6 2012 at 10:36:17 AM.

  20. #80
    Rakshasa The Cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 18, 2011
    Location
    Jita 4-4
    Posts
    2,818
    Quote Originally Posted by Marlona Sky View Post
    Well at least we managed a few pages before the usual anti-American bitches started butt hurt posting. Also if you don't like living here, kindly pack your shit up and get the fuck out.
    Fuck why is all the NASA website times in PDT? UTC is the standard FFS!!!
    Last edited by Rakshasa The Cat; August 6 2012 at 10:45:23 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Random hopeful w-space dweller
    I'm excited about the nebulas, at least it's something I will see out in the wormholes.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •