
Originally Posted by
ChaeDoc II
There are approximately a similar number of firearm related deaths as there are vehicular related deaths in the US each year yet you need to prove that you can capably operate a vehicle for the safety of yourself and other road users. Why the hell isn't there a similar licencing process if you want to own a gun?
As a Canadian with a FAC (Firearms Acquisition Licence) I have some input on this. When I went to take my test, this was
exactly what I had to do - demonstrate that I could safely operate a firearm. This involved stuff like constantly keeping your barrel pointed in a safe direction, and never violating this rule. One fellow got shit-canned during our group exam because he violated this rule for a split second, and swept the barrel across the body of another test-taker, which the instructor swiftly pounced on. There was intense, intense coverage of the rest of the basics: know how to recognize and operate a safety, know which guns LACK a safety, know your trigger discipline, know your range discipline. Know how to make a found firearm "safe." The washout point on the written and practical tests was 80% - score below and you don't get your license. I passed at 96% and lost points for being unable to identify the racking safety on a pump-action shotgun.
I'm not sure if this is still accurate at all, but I read somewhere that Canada has more per-capita guns than the US (and a fraction of their gun murders.)
I firmly believe that Canada's intense emphasis on gun safety training during the licensing process is behind this disparity. I am not aware of similar mandatory gun safety-awareness programs existing in the US.
Bookmarks