hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 7 of 30 FirstFirst ... 4567891017 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 583

Thread: 7.5 Patch

  1. #121
    Dahak's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Chelyabinsk-40
    Posts
    2,610
    I've just noticed that the new American 155mm has 155mm of HE penetration. That is to say, only 5mm less than the rear hull armor of a Maus, to say nothing of the body of the 50B.

    Finally, a generally useful HE round?

    Edit: Watch this T-62A get slapped by the JagdPanzer E-100.

    Last edited by Dahak; July 12 2012 at 07:00:57 PM.

  2. #122
    untilted's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    WoT: eyebot; W:EE: untilted
    Posts
    927
    played dicker max and amx elc for a few rounds.

    dicker max is meh ... that gun is nice (esp. alpha and gun depression) ... but the rest wasn't so impressive. but then again - the gameplay on the test server is quite agressive and the dicker max is quite slow and sluggish. so maybe on the live server the view range will come in handy, as it suits more a "defensive" playstyle.

    the elc on the other hand is likely one of the most fun TDs in the game. it's tiny and it's fast. :P
    Last edited by untilted; July 12 2012 at 07:28:41 PM.

  3. #123
    Skidrowpunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    1,314
    T62 with surprisingly soft sides.

    But what the fuck Patton III. Did they seriously just make those tiny ears a giant armor hole? Especially since the ear thingy sticking off the 268 are super pink armor. Also, that cupola is going to be a huge liability.

    But the Jpz E100 and T110E3 look really, fucking tough, should be fun to try to shoot them.
    world of tanks derp gun world of tanks derp gun world of tanks derp gun

    Tanks name = BS87
    Every other game = Kegger McManus

  4. #124
    untilted's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    WoT: eyebot; W:EE: untilted
    Posts
    927
    M4 vs. M18 vs. ELC

    LAWL


  5. #125
    Dahak's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Chelyabinsk-40
    Posts
    2,610
    How many crew members does it have? 1.5?

    Clown cars, man.

  6. #126
    Dirk Magnum's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 18, 2011
    Posts
    1,819
    That turret rotates, right?

  7. #127
    Dahak's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Chelyabinsk-40
    Posts
    2,610
    Quote Originally Posted by Dirk Magnum View Post
    That turret rotates, right?
    Sort of. Picture the GW Panther. There's a video one page back.

  8. #128
    Al Simmons's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    4,380
    T-62 looks OP as fuck. I'm really not sure I can be bothered to grind that much xp in the 54 though, which is currently extremely meh. By the time I get close i'll be getting raped by tier X meds and then i'll buy the stupid thing and it will get nerfed. I mean it's guaranteed that they will nerf those things.

  9. #129
    Stormscion's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    1,784
    Tested a bit.

    E50m has much better front hull armor then e50 , and it is better then any other tier10 med. Turret armor on t62 is better ofc
    Sides on t62 pretty much t54 ... or papper. Surprisingly even on test server E50m bounces shells from t62.E50m best armored in the tier10 mediums compartment.

    I am not impresed by the t62 firepower btw. Similar case of t54. Its mobility is great tho.

    Front is more sloped it is lower turns better then e50. Gun is insane ofc.

    Jgpz100 = lol no comment

  10. #130
    Donor
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    271
    Was wondering if should use 100k free exp for amx50foch (tier 9 one) but those nerfs really made deal, I thing french top td's are really not that good. Maybe Foch is better but 1948 is pretty weak unless its top tank in match.

  11. #131
    Donor
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    271
    Quote Originally Posted by Stormscion View Post
    Tested a bit.

    E50m has much better front hull armor then e50 , and it is better then any other tier10 med. Turret armor on t62 is better ofc
    Sides on t62 pretty much t54 ... or papper. Surprisingly even on test server E50m bounces shells from t62.E50m best armored in the tier10 mediums compartment.

    I am not impresed by the t62 firepower btw. Similar case of t54. Its mobility is great tho.

    Front is more sloped it is lower turns better then e50. Gun is insane ofc.

    Jgpz100 = lol no comment
    Why is t62 weak? On paper it has excellent dpm, good accuracy and aiming time. And that in small hull with heavy armored turret for hull down sniping?

  12. #132
    Movember 2011 Daco's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,466
    So I am pretty mad at the E-100/Maus "buff".

    I mean don't get me wrong I think the E-100 is fine but 100 extra Hps????? 100

    I was shooting one yesterday in my Pershing taking 250hp a shot off wth is 100 extra HPs. Atleast the top gun will be a bit more accurate and have 1.1sec quicker reload but what is really needs is more pen not more accuracy :\

    *sigh* Wargaming continues to give the middle finger.

    Quote Originally Posted by EntroX View Post
    i love you fhc, never change

  13. #133
    Dahak's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Chelyabinsk-40
    Posts
    2,610
    Quote Originally Posted by Daco Cutter View Post
    So I am pretty mad at the E-100/Maus "buff".

    I mean don't get me wrong I think the E-100 is fine but 100 extra Hps????? 100

    I was shooting one yesterday in my Pershing taking 250hp a shot off wth is 100 extra HPs. Atleast the top gun will be a bit more accurate and have 1.1sec quicker reload but what is really needs is more pen not more accuracy :\

    *sigh* Wargaming continues to give the middle finger.
    Reload is actually 1.1 seconds longer. Why? They didn't want to buff it too much.

    Also, is it just me, or can the T30 no longer mount a vertical stabilizer? Is that because of the transition to TD long ago or is that new?

      Spoiler:
    Last edited by Dahak; July 12 2012 at 11:59:00 PM.

  14. #134
    THE PUNISHED Ralara's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Fuck mondays
    Posts
    4,475
    after that matchmaker image, ive sold all T2s, and sold my t28 cos i dont like it and fuck it tbh. Sold T44 cos i dont want a T54 and the T44 just annoys me tbh - not needed when I have a type and the 13-90 - cos i dont use it much (tho it was fun, i can buy another in the future and kept the crew.

    JT
    Ferdi
    T59
    GW Panther
    T-50


    that's all i has

    and 8m credits \o/

    I AM READY.
    Hello? Oh, hello! I'm sorry it's a very bad line. No, no no... but that's not possible, she was sealed in to the Seventh Obelisk after the prayer meeting. Well, no, I get that it's important... an Egyptian Goddess loose on the Orient Express. In Space. Give us a mo....

    ... don't worry about a thing, your Majesty; we're on our way.

    Quote Originally Posted by pratell View Post
    was looking at dudes on okcupid last night

  15. #135

    Join Date
    October 22, 2011
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    663
    @Ralara: If you want a free extra garage slot, you should buy AMX 12t and (this is the important part) fill all your garage slots. Buy a shit ton of T1 Cunningham's for all I care, but unless your slots are filled, you won't get a free slot, but an open slot will be used for the new tier 5 French light.
    - don't confuse the fact that I like to be right with the rumors that I actually might be -

    EVE: retired
    WoT (EU, DaDutchDude):
    IS-4 | SU-122-54 | T-54 | IS-8 | T-44 | IS-3 | AMX 13 90 | AMX 50 100 | T32 | WZ-132 | Indien Pz | Obj 261 | Tiger | T20 | T-34-1 | Comet | SU-100M1 | KV-1S | T-34-85 | T50-2 | Tetrarch

  16. #136
    Donor
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    271
    When is patch coming, any estimate?

  17. #137
    Movember 2011 Daco's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,466
    Quote Originally Posted by Dahak View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Daco Cutter View Post
    So I am pretty mad at the E-100/Maus "buff".

    I mean don't get me wrong I think the E-100 is fine but 100 extra Hps????? 100

    I was shooting one yesterday in my Pershing taking 250hp a shot off wth is 100 extra HPs. Atleast the top gun will be a bit more accurate and have 1.1sec quicker reload but what is really needs is more pen not more accuracy :\

    *sigh* Wargaming continues to give the middle finger.
    Reload is actually 1.1 seconds longer. Why? They didn't want to buff it too much.

    Also, is it just me, or can the T30 no longer mount a vertical stabilizer? Is that because of the transition to TD long ago or is that new?

      Spoiler:
    Wait it is 1.1sec longer??????? WHY IT DOESN'T NEED TO BE!!!!!

    I have a gun rammer and 100% crew (BIA is at about 53% so it doesn't come into effect) and it is 16.89 secs on a reload, it doesn't need to be longer then that.

    DAMN YOU RUSSIAN USELESS BIASED DEVS!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by EntroX View Post
    i love you fhc, never change

  18. #138
    Dogbeast's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,399
    Quote Originally Posted by Daco Cutter View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dahak View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Daco Cutter View Post
    So I am pretty mad at the E-100/Maus "buff".

    I mean don't get me wrong I think the E-100 is fine but 100 extra Hps????? 100

    I was shooting one yesterday in my Pershing taking 250hp a shot off wth is 100 extra HPs. Atleast the top gun will be a bit more accurate and have 1.1sec quicker reload but what is really needs is more pen not more accuracy :\

    *sigh* Wargaming continues to give the middle finger.
    Reload is actually 1.1 seconds longer. Why? They didn't want to buff it too much.

    Also, is it just me, or can the T30 no longer mount a vertical stabilizer? Is that because of the transition to TD long ago or is that new?

      Spoiler:
    Wait it is 1.1sec longer??????? WHY IT DOESN'T NEED TO BE!!!!!

    I have a gun rammer and 100% crew (BIA is at about 53% so it doesn't come into effect) and it is 16.89 secs on a reload, it doesn't need to be longer then that.

    DAMN YOU RUSSIAN USELESS BIASED DEVS!!!!


    It's for "Historical Accuracy" purposes.


  19. #139
    Gibberish Generator Lusulpher's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Location
    Purtymouthland, USA
    Posts
    1,643
    2 more patches before Summer of German/Brit/American/French Rage ??


    KT size not adjusted to be the size of M4 Sherman btw...but they got around to adjusting the 261...
    "When you redo the client can we players have 3rd turret on Nagalfar? For balance reasons..." "Held up by Art Dept."- WGCCP


    I do feel vindicated that the patch thread is filled with cries of Soviet bias from better posters/players than I. !Vive le Revolucion!
    Last edited by Lusulpher; July 13 2012 at 04:34:11 AM.
    "Nobody tries penis..." - sister on topic of "bisexuals".
    "Your friends list is empty."-all forums



    Do not forget to niggrep...

  20. #140
    Dogbeast's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    2,399
    Anyone have any stat info on the other TD's aside from the JP E-100?

    I am curious about the guns/armor on the Object and French TDs specifically.



    Also, I dread the situation where I am in a German TD trying to chase down a BatChat or Lorraine arty..


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •