In regards to sub capital ship balancing, is ECM the only mechanic left where there's a large consensus agreeing that it's broken?
You really think ECM is the only widely far of the mark thing in all subcaps? Pause for a second and think.
There's loads of stuff that needs addressing, but that wasn't what I asked.
There's very few people who would defend ECM who aren't trolling.
I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those Thukkers, that way I wouldn't have to have any goddamn stupid useless conversations with anybody.
Originally Posted by Nu11u5
How could I forget about Drakes, at least CCP have been hinting at balancing them. We'll probably have to wait until they address BC's as a whole, though.
I still prefer canes over drakes tbh
Sent from my mobile comms unit
Joined: 18 Mar 2008
Contracts to 'Admiral Rufus' please
Make ECM remove all but one random locked target and cap your max locked targets at one. Fixed.
Drakes and Canes need fixing next. Canes to a lesser extent.
Btw, belegarath's post did miss the crux of the issue there being speed and range. That's why I love Amarr, when they're big and slow they still have massive range flexibility.
Actually an '06.
MWO: Northern Nomad
Should've scripted ECM when they scripted all the other ewar. One script to break locks, one to prevent new locks. Throw in a 75% cycle time reduction and bob's your uncle.
Falcon specialized in lock breaker module... That makes sense, cause everyone knows the Falcon/Rooks are always primary, so they a bonus like that would be a good replacement for the current ECM role.
Originally Posted by Random hopeful w-space dweller