hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678910 LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 196

Thread: [DEVPOST] Ship balancing - round 2

  1. #121
    Varcaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 15, 2011
    Posts
    10,417
    Quote Originally Posted by RoemySchneider View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Varcaus View Post
    ECM boats versus sentry Ishtar
    Guess who wins.
    either noone or the ECM boat
    the ishtar sure cant keep the point
    ECM off grid proably can't rep so most likely can't come back on grid without being nuked.

  2. #122

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    7,155
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophichius View Post
    No one has suggested changing 20 second ECM
    P sure I put a quick reminder that ECCM should be useful like reducing jam time while not changing cycle time in the first page of eve-o responses to at least 1 recent Balance devblog thread. Hardly a new suggestion I know. CCP don't do anything, they are shit at macro-scale balance, nbs.

  3. #123
    Resi's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    1,220
    In regards to sub capital ship balancing, is ECM the only mechanic left where there's a large consensus agreeing that it's broken?

  4. #124

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    7,155
    You really think ECM is the only widely far of the mark thing in all subcaps? Pause for a second and think.

  5. #125
    Resi's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    1,220
    There's loads of stuff that needs addressing, but that wasn't what I asked.

    There's very few people who would defend ECM who aren't trolling.

  6. #126
    AmaNutin's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 21, 2011
    Location
    Fuck off
    Posts
    2,199
    Quote Originally Posted by Daneel Trevize View Post
    You really think ECM is the only widely far of the mark thing in all subcaps? Pause for a second and think.
    Drakes?
    Quote Originally Posted by Chakrai View Post
    Flirting with a woman is like flying a nanoship.

  7. #127
    Ophichius's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 15, 2011
    Location
    Hedonistic Imperative
    Posts
    2,177
    Quote Originally Posted by AmaNutin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Daneel Trevize View Post
    You really think ECM is the only widely far of the mark thing in all subcaps? Pause for a second and think.
    Drakes?
    Careful now. If CCP sees that most players agree that ECM and Drakes need fixing they might just delete Caldari and refund the skillpoints.

    -O
    I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those Thukkers, that way I wouldn't have to have any goddamn stupid useless conversations with anybody.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nu11u5
    I'm going to stick to a size where the characters' eye orbs are not the size of my skull. That's kind of disturbing.

  8. #128
    cillisia's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Portsmouth
    Posts
    671
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophichius View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by AmaNutin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Daneel Trevize View Post
    You really think ECM is the only widely far of the mark thing in all subcaps? Pause for a second and think.
    Drakes?
    Careful now. If CCP sees that most players agree that ECM and Drakes need fixing they might just delete Caldari and refund the skillpoints.

    -O
    Or have the Jove come in and replace them

    Sent from my mobile comms unit

    Joined: 18 Mar 2008
    Contracts to 'Admiral Rufus' please

  9. #129
    Resi's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    1,220
    How could I forget about Drakes, at least CCP have been hinting at balancing them. We'll probably have to wait until they address BC's as a whole, though.

  10. #130
    cillisia's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Portsmouth
    Posts
    671
    I still prefer canes over drakes tbh

    Sent from my mobile comms unit

    Joined: 18 Mar 2008
    Contracts to 'Admiral Rufus' please

  11. #131
    OrangeAfroMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 20, 2011
    Posts
    3,278
    Make ECM remove all but one random locked target and cap your max locked targets at one. Fixed.

    Drakes and Canes need fixing next. Canes to a lesser extent.

    Btw, belegarath's post did miss the crux of the issue there being speed and range. That's why I love Amarr, when they're big and slow they still have massive range flexibility.
    Actually an '06.

    EVE: OrangeAfroMan
    Dust514: Andrelommech
    MWO: Northern Nomad

  12. #132

    Join Date
    April 13, 2011
    Posts
    2,752
    Should've scripted ECM when they scripted all the other ewar. One script to break locks, one to prevent new locks. Throw in a 75% cycle time reduction and bob's your uncle.

  13. #133
    Xiang Jiao's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    6,129
    Quote Originally Posted by Daneel Trevize View Post
    You really think ECM is the only widely far of the mark thing in all subcaps? Pause for a second and think.
    I imagine you are hinting at off-grid boosting. Thread needs some cheese to go with all this w(h)ine.

      Spoiler:
    Last edited by Xiang Jiao; June 20 2012 at 08:09:09 AM.


  14. #134
    Donor Sponk's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    AU TZ
    Posts
    8,037
    Quote Originally Posted by elmicker View Post
    Should've scripted ECM when they scripted all the other ewar. One script to break locks

    one to prevent new locks.
    Contract stuff to Seraphina Amaranth.

    "You give me the awful impression - I hate to have to say - of someone who hasn't read any of the arguments against your position. Ever."

  15. #135

    Join Date
    April 13, 2011
    Posts
    2,752
    Quote Originally Posted by Sponk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by elmicker View Post
    Should've scripted ECM when they scripted all the other ewar. One script to break locks

    one to prevent new locks.
    so scrap ecm altogether eh? this i could get behind

  16. #136
    AmaNutin's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 21, 2011
    Location
    Fuck off
    Posts
    2,199
    Quote Originally Posted by elmicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Sponk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by elmicker View Post
    Should've scripted ECM when they scripted all the other ewar. One script to break locks

    one to prevent new locks.
    so scrap ecm altogether eh? this i could get behind
    We need that 4th racial ecm... would caldari get a bonus to the lockbreaker module? Still makes people inclined to use them.
    Quote Originally Posted by Chakrai View Post
    Flirting with a woman is like flying a nanoship.

  17. #137
    Varcaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 15, 2011
    Posts
    10,417
    Quote Originally Posted by AmaNutin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by elmicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Sponk View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by elmicker View Post
    Should've scripted ECM when they scripted all the other ewar. One script to break locks

    one to prevent new locks.
    so scrap ecm altogether eh? this i could get behind
    We need that 4th racial ecm... would caldari get a bonus to the lockbreaker module? Still makes people inclined to use them.
    You'd have to lock them so would need to do something else usefull as well.

  18. #138
    Rakshasa The Cat's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 18, 2011
    Location
    Jita 4-4
    Posts
    2,941
    Falcon specialized in lock breaker module... That makes sense, cause everyone knows the Falcon/Rooks are always primary, so they a bonus like that would be a good replacement for the current ECM role.
    Quote Originally Posted by Random hopeful w-space dweller
    I'm excited about the nebulas, at least it's something I will see out in the wormholes.

  19. #139

    Join Date
    September 16, 2011
    Location
    Origin.
    Posts
    629
    Quote Originally Posted by Daneel Trevize View Post
    It's not if you're solo or not, it's if you're nano or not. Your case for ECM is dependant upon constant repositioning, thus nanoing rather than bringing your own heavy tackle & big buffer/active tank to survive more up close. If you're solo and kite, you can just run away, if you're a fleet but slow & closer ranged, you still might not be able to do much to the falcon, especially if you're using sub BS guns, and even then (due to lack of TEs). Thus it is not the fleet numbers, but the composition. AKA if not frigates swarm, sucks to be armour vs dealing with ECM.

    So resume the whines about tier3s, they have the speed and the range and the dps, just not buffer.

    Also, at least EC-300s die to a large smartbomb. The last useful ability of a BS, any number of the fuckers gone in an instant. Decent ECM boats will keep coming back at range.
    If you're in a fleet and still having problems with ECM (outside of CFC Alphamael fleet with upwards of 30 Scorpions) you're just bad at this game. Period.

  20. #140
    Madner Kami's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    891
    Quote Originally Posted by Rakshasa The Cat View Post
    Falcon specialized in lock breaker module... That makes sense, cause everyone knows the Falcon/Rooks are always primary, so they a bonus like that would be a good replacement for the current ECM role.
    Ok, I'll take the bait and point the pink elephant out in this porcelain-shop more clearly: Who the fuck woud target Falcons (and Kitsunes, Rooks and Scorpions for that matter) if they were solely lockbreaker-bonused, instead leaving it till it's the only ship left of the enemy? Primary ECM and EWAR as they are in this game in general need to be an active-offensive system by default, not a passive-defensive one.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •