hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: FAO activites

  1. #1

    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    2,354

    FAO activites

    www.fao.org/

    FAO's mandate
    Achieving food security for all is at the heart of FAO's efforts - to make sure people have regular access to enough high-quality food to lead active, healthy lives.

    FAO's mandate is to raise levels of nutrition, improve agricultural productivity, better the lives of rural populations and contribute to the growth of the world economy.


    So my questing is: The FAO has a budget of about 1 billion USD, yet world hunger is rampant.

    What will it take for us to finally end world hunger? Technological achievments? Social reforms? MO MONEY? A UN that doesn't suck?
    Quote Originally Posted by Devec
    Cool09 is the cancer that is corrupting our society and poisoning our children.

    WoT: Redglare[VPG]

  2. #2
    Donor Tellenta's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    6,243
    Less people to feed.

  3. #3
    Helen's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    3,501
    Cute.
    If you were a superhero you'd be The Incredible Fucktard with your ever-ready sidekick Douchetard Boy. Together, you fight intelligence and common sense where you go.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by Tellenta View Post
    Less people to feed.
    I'm pretty sure I remember (if I'm wrong, someone feel free to correct me with some stats) that the world already produces more food than every person on earth could possibly need. The major problem is most of this food is produced by only a few locations.. and so it is logistically challenging (corruption, infrastructure, etc) to get the food to where it needs to be to feed the people.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    April 14, 2011
    Posts
    1,648
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tellenta View Post
    Less people to feed.
    I'm pretty sure I remember (if I'm wrong, someone feel free to correct me with some stats) that the world already produces more food than every person on earth could possibly need. The major problem is most of this food is produced by only a few locations.. and so it is logistically challenging (corruption, infrastructure, etc) to get the food to where it needs to be to feed the people.
    One of the big problems with all of this is that a lot of poeple dont realize that in the areas with insufficient food production, we ship massive amounts of food aid to these locations trying to help out. When in reality this tends to worsen the problem because it undercuts the local agriculture which cannot compete with the low priced food aid, eventually leading to the collapse of said local agriculture & increased dependence on foreign aid and exacerbating the problem. And if that foreign aid gets cut they are really fucked. It really is a catch 22, on the one hand we dont want people to have to needlessly starve to death; and on the other we dont want to collapse their agricultural industries so that they can be eventually become self sufficient.

    Really tho, if your living somewhere you cant grow plants, its probably a bad idea to live there.


  6. #6

    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by Straight Hustlin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tellenta View Post
    Less people to feed.
    I'm pretty sure I remember (if I'm wrong, someone feel free to correct me with some stats) that the world already produces more food than every person on earth could possibly need. The major problem is most of this food is produced by only a few locations.. and so it is logistically challenging (corruption, infrastructure, etc) to get the food to where it needs to be to feed the people.
    One of the big problems with all of this is that a lot of poeple dont realize that in the areas with insufficient food production, we ship massive amounts of food aid to these locations trying to help out. When in reality this tends to worsen the problem because it undercuts the local agriculture which cannot compete with the low priced food aid, eventually leading to the collapse of said local agriculture & increased dependence on foreign aid and exacerbating the problem. And if that foreign aid gets cut they are really fucked. It really is a catch 22, on the one hand we dont want people to have to needlessly starve to death; and on the other we dont want to collapse their agricultural industries so that they can be eventually become self sufficient.

    Really tho, if your living somewhere you cant grow plants, its probably a bad idea to live there.
    I forgot about that part of the problem, too. Yeah, this is all true as well, depending on the region.

    The issue has never been "We can't produce enough food to feed everyone on the planet" though..

  7. #7
    Movember 2012
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    3,598
    itt People not getting the joke.

  8. #8
    Donor Tellenta's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    6,243
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tellenta View Post
    Less people to feed.
    I'm pretty sure I remember (if I'm wrong, someone feel free to correct me with some stats) that the world already produces more food than every person on earth could possibly need. The major problem is most of this food is produced by only a few locations.. and so it is logistically challenging (corruption, infrastructure, etc) to get the food to where it needs to be to feed the people.
    So do we blame the people for living somewhere unsustainable, or the lack of peoples desire or capability to cover other peoples whim or circumstance?

  9. #9
    Donor Tellenta's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    6,243
    Quote Originally Posted by Loire View Post
    itt People not getting the joke.
    You take what you get and roll with it. Also as jokes go while creative needed more shit posted upon it.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    August 18, 2011
    Posts
    1,748
    Quote Originally Posted by Tellenta View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tellenta View Post
    Less people to feed.
    I'm pretty sure I remember (if I'm wrong, someone feel free to correct me with some stats) that the world already produces more food than every person on earth could possibly need. The major problem is most of this food is produced by only a few locations.. and so it is logistically challenging (corruption, infrastructure, etc) to get the food to where it needs to be to feed the people.
    So do we blame the people for living somewhere unsustainable, or the lack of peoples desire or capability to cover other peoples whim or circumstance?
    Or the fact that changing climate, deserification, expanding populations, war etc etc all combine to force people into more marginally habitable/farmable areas.

    Also, Entrox will be mad

  11. #11

    Join Date
    April 14, 2011
    Posts
    1,648
    Quote Originally Posted by Loire View Post
    itt People not getting the joke.
    More like we're just trying to spare Cool09 from the wrath of the Mods for making a shitty joke.


  12. #12

    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    249
    lol @ someone neg-repping my post with the reason 'Because'.

    Someone mad.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    April 13, 2011
    Posts
    2,624
    Quote Originally Posted by Tellenta View Post
    Less people to feed.
    fewer

  14. #14
    Donor Tellenta's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    6,243
    Quote Originally Posted by elmicker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tellenta View Post
    Less people to feed.
    fewer
    Ok fine be that way. Fewer less people to feed.

  15. #15
    Donor
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    1,224
    Also, Entrox will be mad
    Qft.

  16. #16
    dotfortun's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 12, 2012
    Location
    Syndicate area, sometimes.
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by Cool09 View Post
    www.fao.org/

    FAO's mandate
    Achieving food security for all is at the heart of FAO's efforts - to make sure people have regular access to enough high-quality food to lead active, healthy lives.

    FAO's mandate is to raise levels of nutrition, improve agricultural productivity, better the lives of rural populations and contribute to the growth of the world economy.


    So my questing is: The FAO has a budget of about 1 billion USD, yet world hunger is rampant.

    What will it take for us to finally end world hunger? Technological achievments? Social reforms? MO MONEY? A UN that doesn't suck?
    Okay, so the FAO has a budget of 1b USD. Let's say that 1/7 of the world's population is starving and without clean water. Insert maths, and you suddenly realize that 1b can't purchase enough food, not to mention distribute it.

    It could help a region build sustainable farmland with greater output, but that would require more freshwater, and many places have limited access to that.
    This is how I know I am doing my job right:
    Quote Originally Posted by LordsServant View Post
    FUUUUUUUU firstpoaster

    WHY DID YOU GIVE FALCON USERS THIS IDEA?

  17. #17

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    7,014
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    ...neg-repping my post with the reason 'Because'...
    You shouldn't give people ideas...

  18. #18
    Donor cullnean's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    4,873
    Quote Originally Posted by Daneel Trevize View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    ...neg-repping my post with the reason 'Because'...
    You shouldn't give people ideas...
    indeed first ever faggot to neg rep me in return

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •