Isn't NZ part of Tasmania?
Isn't NZ part of Tasmania?
Last edited by bundus; May 25 2012 at 06:51:11 PM.
I know what RINO stands for. I'm just amazed that you would try an argument as stupid as "But a -REAL- Republican won't vote for it, even though a Republican introduced it!"Originally Posted by indeterminacy
I'm just stating a fact. Most of them are called Republicans In Name Only (RINOs). You can "Really?" it but, it doesn't make it not true.No True Scotsman fallacy? Really?But then, not all Republicans are created equally. There are Republicans and there NYS Republicans... (they're called RINOs).What in the world gives you the idea that they won't vote for this because they're Republicans? It was a Republican that introduced the bill!
Here's a political spectrum for youI'm just stating a fact. Most of them are called Republicans In Name Only (RINOs). You can "Really?" it but, it doesn't make it not true.No True Scotsman fallacy? Really?But then, not all Republicans are created equally. There are Republicans and there NYS Republicans... (they're called RINOs).What in the world gives you the idea that they won't vote for this because they're Republicans? It was a Republican that introduced the bill!
My point, well I don't have one. I just wanted to make a graph (badly)Code:Right [ |--| |--------| |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| ]Left ^ ^ ^ True God | | Fearing Gun | | Loving | | Republicans | | | 'RINOS' | Socialist rights stealing baby killing mexicans, muslims, and commies who hate America
In a magical world where enforcement of this law actually worked, it would shut down quite a bit of eve. :OH GOD MY METAGAMING:
Everyone would see who I really was every time I posted or logged in. You'd have to be full-retard in order to have any spies in your alliance as you'd know their names.
Other than that, tbh decent idea. Lots of good points, but part of me looks at it and screams "SOPA BEACHHEAD SOPA BEACHHEAD WARNING WARNING"
It may have some good points but if you give them any ground on this then more and more will get tacked on. Leave the internet wild and free and learn to deal with the virtual hate that doesn't actually affect you.
(or kill yourself)
It is indeed pretty chill (see what I did there). Except for the student riots in Quebec right now.
WoT: Redglare[VPG]
pfff, it may look like post-apocalyptic scenes in the news but I live right in the middle of it and apart from the occasional protest that I happen to walk by (they've been protesting during the night for the last month) I couldn't tell it's any different from normal.It is indeed pretty chill (see what I did there). Except for the student riots in Quebec right now.
I find the claim of "most" and "RINO" to be a logically exclusive claim. To dismiss republicans as not republicans just to make it a convenient argument to alleviate responsibility of party sponsorship of what will be an unpopular law. Barring a wholesale dismissal of the bill by fellow republicans claims that these people are outliers is questionable at best to fraudulent at worst. We shall see.I'm just stating a fact. Most of them are called Republicans In Name Only (RINOs). You can "Really?" it but, it doesn't make it not true.No True Scotsman fallacy? Really?But then, not all Republicans are created equally. There are Republicans and there NYS Republicans... (they're called RINOs).What in the world gives you the idea that they won't vote for this because they're Republicans? It was a Republican that introduced the bill!
you put the right on the left.Here's a political spectrum for youI'm just stating a fact. Most of them are called Republicans In Name Only (RINOs). You can "Really?" it but, it doesn't make it not true.No True Scotsman fallacy? Really?But then, not all Republicans are created equally. There are Republicans and there NYS Republicans... (they're called RINOs).What in the world gives you the idea that they won't vote for this because they're Republicans? It was a Republican that introduced the bill!
My point, well I don't have one. I just wanted to make a graph (badly)Code:Right [ |--| |--------| |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| ]Left ^ ^ ^ True God | | Fearing Gun | | Loving | | Republicans | | | 'RINOS' | Socialist rights stealing baby killing mexicans, muslims, and commies who hate America
and as an on topic aside - the older i get, the less of a shit i give about my about my supposed online privacy. My general level of openess is roughly equivilent to chatting to a random stranger in the pub.
i actually quite like the idea of everybody having to reveal who they are online - the era of the 14 year old autistic wikipedia editor claiming to be a irl rocket scientist would be no great loss. Presumably the challenge would be stopping violent sexual predators raping the shit out of the 14 year old autistic former-wikipedia editor, but that's not really my problem.
But like mates then i have to go around telling everyone im 16 and my internet bs backbone would be no more.
1/10
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks