hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 61

Thread: [Devblog] Alliance Tournament X random draw results

  1. #41
    rojomojo915's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,208
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Intigo View Post
    shrug I would just have let both blue and red fly under the same team, seems fine to me even if it would technically be "wrong" since they aren't in the same alliance
    Cause no one would complain and throw bitchfits about what appears to be special treatment in the CCP sanctioned tournament, amirite?
    People would complain and throw bitchfits no matter how it turned out. Should just let them field both red and blue players on the same team.

  2. #42

    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by rojomojo915 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Intigo View Post
    shrug I would just have let both blue and red fly under the same team, seems fine to me even if it would technically be "wrong" since they aren't in the same alliance
    Cause no one would complain and throw bitchfits about what appears to be special treatment in the CCP sanctioned tournament, amirite?
    People would complain and throw bitchfits no matter how it turned out. Should just let them field both red and blue players on the same team.
    And why, pray tell, should CCP do that, creating special exceptions ("Hey, they got a special exception! I want my buddy to be able to participate too, even though he's not in my alliance!") instead of making everyone follow the same rules?

  3. #43

    Join Date
    April 16, 2011
    Posts
    1,991
    Quote Originally Posted by rojomojo915 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Intigo View Post
    shrug I would just have let both blue and red fly under the same team, seems fine to me even if it would technically be "wrong" since they aren't in the same alliance
    Cause no one would complain and throw bitchfits about what appears to be special treatment in the CCP sanctioned tournament, amirite?
    People would complain and throw bitchfits no matter how it turned out. Should just let them field both red and blue players on the same team.
    yep! that way they would only get one team in and nobody should give a fuck

    but "blabla not same alliance" people will cry about rule-breaking, zzz

  4. #44
    rojomojo915's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    1,208
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rojomojo915 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Intigo View Post
    shrug I would just have let both blue and red fly under the same team, seems fine to me even if it would technically be "wrong" since they aren't in the same alliance
    Cause no one would complain and throw bitchfits about what appears to be special treatment in the CCP sanctioned tournament, amirite?
    People would complain and throw bitchfits no matter how it turned out. Should just let them field both red and blue players on the same team.
    And why, pray tell, should CCP do that, creating special exceptions ("Hey, they got a special exception! I want my buddy to be able to participate too, even though he's not in my alliance!") instead of making everyone follow the same rules?
    Then let both red and blue enter as seperate entries, they are clearly not an A and B team situation.

    Edit: Also because CCP changing their decision is affecting how many pilots can compete. If they had changed their decision last week, all would of fine because at least then all of the pilots could of joined the same alliance.

  5. #45

    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    249
    Quote Originally Posted by rojomojo915 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by rojomojo915 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KalRyan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Intigo View Post
    shrug I would just have let both blue and red fly under the same team, seems fine to me even if it would technically be "wrong" since they aren't in the same alliance
    Cause no one would complain and throw bitchfits about what appears to be special treatment in the CCP sanctioned tournament, amirite?
    People would complain and throw bitchfits no matter how it turned out. Should just let them field both red and blue players on the same team.
    And why, pray tell, should CCP do that, creating special exceptions ("Hey, they got a special exception! I want my buddy to be able to participate too, even though he's not in my alliance!") instead of making everyone follow the same rules?
    Then let both red and blue enter as seperate entries, they are clearly not an A and B team situation.
    Clearly not? When they both have the same CEO?

    Hmmm.

    Sorry, I just don't have any sympathy for CCP not bending their rules for them. As I said, this is the price you pay for being a unique snowflake :P

  6. #46

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    7,016
    Quote Originally Posted by rojomojo915 View Post
    Then let both red and blue enter as seperate entries, they are clearly not an A and B team situation.
    Eh? They are the most official A & B situation possible. Players would swap alliances or fleets all day long to work together on TQ anyway. They are as 1 alliance except they use the game mechanics to easily flag who's in the current 'opposing' fleets for balanced pew. Or that's the stated goal anyway.

    Also, thread delivers, etc.

  7. #47

    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    RvB
    Posts
    1,747
    https://forums.eveonline.com/default...81#post1347681
    Quote Originally Posted by CCP Sreegs
    The matches may consist of red or blue pilots and we're working out the details.
    Let's start a party of our own

  8. #48

    Join Date
    April 16, 2011
    Posts
    1,991
    all good then~

  9. #49
    Varcaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 15, 2011
    Posts
    10,031
    All is well in RvB land.

  10. #50
    Neoo Gabriel's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 27, 2011
    Posts
    108
    I was disappointed that my alliance that was made specifically to compete in ATX was not selected on the draw, and I am miffed precisely because many of the rich and large alliances didn't get selected in the draw, and I worry that the bidding for the remaining 32 slots will quickly outpace the small pool that we would be willing to spend. So last year the slots went for about 20Bil each, and I am not sure but maybe this is something we might be able to pay, but if the prices spiral out control to more than that then we will be left out.

    Maybe next year they should ban all large alliances that consequentially are filthy rich from the random draw, so as to give smaller alliances a chance of participating, and have these large entities then bid their dozens of billions of isk to participate with their teams. PL or Goons or Solar for example have trillions of isk to burn in such things (and im sure private alliances of big players as well), but most of the smaller alliances cannot hope to have the funds to do such a thing.

    Also, the devs said that there were only a total of 77 applicant alliances, so maybe the remaining 77-32=45 won't make it such a heated bidding war for the remaining 32 slots, even if 13 of the alliances won't make it (and unfortunately, the poorer ones, which may not mean the worst pilots).

    Which brings me to my point:

    If any large alliances here would like to use my corp and the alliance we created to force other alliances from participating by donating money we would appreciate it. If by any chance we manged to get prizes (which is a long shot), we could work out a deal of what percentage of the prizes the sponsor/s would get, which as of now i would think would be proportional to the % of isk that was donated for the auction price slot. Ie, If you donate 15bil and we spend a total of 30Bil for the slot, you would be entitled to 50% of the isk value of the payout (in bpcs or isk).

    This is the link to our KB and to BC for our corp so you can peruse our stats:

    http://pzza.eve-kill.net/
    http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboar...sive+Diplomacy

  11. #51
    Leboe's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,531
    they're stressing the auctions way too much, its a bullshit moneygrab.

  12. #52

    Join Date
    April 16, 2011
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    126
    Came to thread, saw heretic nation
    Watched vid, expected a joke about heretics probably not participating due to no orcas asslowed in tourney.
    Left mad, nation has been alive since 06ish, that bastard...hell, our tourney team in bane alliance made it pretty high up 2 years running. Fu ccp, fu.
    Also
    Fu inventory

  13. #53

    Join Date
    April 16, 2011
    Posts
    1,991
    Quote Originally Posted by Leboe View Post
    they're stressing the auctions way too much, its a bullshit moneygrab.
    wtf???

    The auctions are AFTER the random draw, this is because people specifically asked for it to be that way and this obviously LOWERS the overall price of the slots. There are 32 auction slots, this decreases the price of them by loads.

    Sure it's retarded that they allow people not in the draw to jump into the auction, but I doubt anyone actually will. How is this a moneygrab?

  14. #54
    Donor
    Join Date
    April 11, 2011
    Location
    Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    1,851
    Quote Originally Posted by Neoo Gabriel View Post
    I was disappointed that my alliance that was made specifically to compete in ATX was not selected on the draw, and I am miffed precisely because many of the rich and large alliances didn't get selected in the draw, and I worry that the bidding for the remaining 32 slots will quickly outpace the small pool that we would be willing to spend. So last year the slots went for about 20Bil each, and I am not sure but maybe this is something we might be able to pay, but if the prices spiral out control to more than that then we will be left out.

    Maybe next year they should ban all large alliances that consequentially are filthy rich from the random draw, so as to give smaller alliances a chance of participating, and have these large entities then bid their dozens of billions of isk to participate with their teams. PL or Goons or Solar for example have trillions of isk to burn in such things (and im sure private alliances of big players as well), but most of the smaller alliances cannot hope to have the funds to do such a thing.

    Also, the devs said that there were only a total of 77 applicant alliances, so maybe the remaining 77-32=45 won't make it such a heated bidding war for the remaining 32 slots, even if 13 of the alliances won't make it (and unfortunately, the poorer ones, which may not mean the worst pilots).

    Which brings me to my point:

    If any large alliances here would like to use my corp and the alliance we created to force other alliances from participating by donating money we would appreciate it. If by any chance we manged to get prizes (which is a long shot), we could work out a deal of what percentage of the prizes the sponsor/s would get, which as of now i would think would be proportional to the % of isk that was donated for the auction price slot. Ie, If you donate 15bil and we spend a total of 30Bil for the slot, you would be entitled to 50% of the isk value of the payout (in bpcs or isk).

    This is the link to our KB and to BC for our corp so you can peruse our stats:

    http://pzza.eve-kill.net/
    http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboar...sive+Diplomacy
    No disrespect but you're not the only people in this position, I imagine there are many corps and alliances with exactly this viewpoint.

    Unfortunately (for you) that's the nature of the beast when it comes to a system with a finite number of winners. Under the circumstances a "half chosen at random, half chosen by auction" is probably as fair as you can make it whilst still keeping it an attractive event. Yes, the likes of PL, Hydra, etc can buy themselves in via the auction, as it should be, because people want to see them and their wealth is a sign that they are successful in the game.

    Having all of the teams completely chosen at random might be an interesting take on things but I suspect it would simply lead to comments about how "X would've won if they hadn't been screwed over by the RNG". This way X can buy themselves in, and if they're halfway notable they can probably afford to.

    Sorry you weren't lucky enough to be chosen at random, but them's the breaks. You are not special in that context.

  15. #55

    Join Date
    September 16, 2011
    Location
    Origin.
    Posts
    629
    Quote Originally Posted by Intigo View Post
    How is this a moneygrab?
    Clearly, forcing teams to spend money is an example of CCP's greed and not at all an attempt to narrow the field to the most prepared teams.

  16. #56

    Join Date
    April 16, 2011
    Posts
    1,991
    Quote Originally Posted by Mfume View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Intigo View Post
    How is this a moneygrab?
    Clearly, forcing teams to spend money is an example of CCP's greed and not at all an attempt to narrow the field to the most prepared teams.
    I mean sure, CCP is getting money from the PLEX etc. but the auction itself is VERY fair and MUCH improved over the last time

    and I know you're kidding, I just had to clarify and used your reply

  17. #57
    Jack Coutu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 9, 2011
    Location
    marketjacker
    Posts
    337
    Quote Originally Posted by Durzel View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Neoo Gabriel View Post
    I was disappointed that my alliance that was made specifically to compete in ATX was not selected on the draw, and I am miffed precisely because many of the rich and large alliances didn't get selected in the draw, and I worry that the bidding for the remaining 32 slots will quickly outpace the small pool that we would be willing to spend. So last year the slots went for about 20Bil each, and I am not sure but maybe this is something we might be able to pay, but if the prices spiral out control to more than that then we will be left out.

    Maybe next year they should ban all large alliances that consequentially are filthy rich from the random draw, so as to give smaller alliances a chance of participating, and have these large entities then bid their dozens of billions of isk to participate with their teams. PL or Goons or Solar for example have trillions of isk to burn in such things (and im sure private alliances of big players as well), but most of the smaller alliances cannot hope to have the funds to do such a thing.

    Also, the devs said that there were only a total of 77 applicant alliances, so maybe the remaining 77-32=45 won't make it such a heated bidding war for the remaining 32 slots, even if 13 of the alliances won't make it (and unfortunately, the poorer ones, which may not mean the worst pilots).

    Which brings me to my point:

    If any large alliances here would like to use my corp and the alliance we created to force other alliances from participating by donating money we would appreciate it. If by any chance we manged to get prizes (which is a long shot), we could work out a deal of what percentage of the prizes the sponsor/s would get, which as of now i would think would be proportional to the % of isk that was donated for the auction price slot. Ie, If you donate 15bil and we spend a total of 30Bil for the slot, you would be entitled to 50% of the isk value of the payout (in bpcs or isk).

    This is the link to our KB and to BC for our corp so you can peruse our stats:

    http://pzza.eve-kill.net/
    http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboar...sive+Diplomacy
    No disrespect but you're not the only people in this position, I imagine there are many corps and alliances with exactly this viewpoint.

    Unfortunately (for you) that's the nature of the beast when it comes to a system with a finite number of winners. Under the circumstances a "half chosen at random, half chosen by auction" is probably as fair as you can make it whilst still keeping it an attractive event. Yes, the likes of PL, Hydra, etc can buy themselves in via the auction, as it should be, because people want to see them and their wealth is a sign that they are successful in the game.

    Having all of the teams completely chosen at random might be an interesting take on things but I suspect it would simply lead to comments about how "X would've won if they hadn't been screwed over by the RNG". This way X can buy themselves in, and if they're halfway notable they can probably afford to.

    Sorry you weren't lucky enough to be chosen at random, but them's the breaks. You are not special in that context.

    don't mind him he's insane.

  18. #58

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    590
    Quote Originally Posted by Durzel View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Neoo Gabriel View Post
    I was disappointed that my alliance that was made specifically to compete in ATX was not selected on the draw, and I am miffed precisely because many of the rich and large alliances didn't get selected in the draw, and I worry that the bidding for the remaining 32 slots will quickly outpace the small pool that we would be willing to spend. So last year the slots went for about 20Bil each, and I am not sure but maybe this is something we might be able to pay, but if the prices spiral out control to more than that then we will be left out.

    Maybe next year they should ban all large alliances that consequentially are filthy rich from the random draw, so as to give smaller alliances a chance of participating, and have these large entities then bid their dozens of billions of isk to participate with their teams. PL or Goons or Solar for example have trillions of isk to burn in such things (and im sure private alliances of big players as well), but most of the smaller alliances cannot hope to have the funds to do such a thing.

    Also, the devs said that there were only a total of 77 applicant alliances, so maybe the remaining 77-32=45 won't make it such a heated bidding war for the remaining 32 slots, even if 13 of the alliances won't make it (and unfortunately, the poorer ones, which may not mean the worst pilots).

    Which brings me to my point:

    If any large alliances here would like to use my corp and the alliance we created to force other alliances from participating by donating money we would appreciate it. If by any chance we manged to get prizes (which is a long shot), we could work out a deal of what percentage of the prizes the sponsor/s would get, which as of now i would think would be proportional to the % of isk that was donated for the auction price slot. Ie, If you donate 15bil and we spend a total of 30Bil for the slot, you would be entitled to 50% of the isk value of the payout (in bpcs or isk).

    This is the link to our KB and to BC for our corp so you can peruse our stats:

    http://pzza.eve-kill.net/
    http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboar...sive+Diplomacy
    No disrespect but you're not the only people in this position, I imagine there are many corps and alliances with exactly this viewpoint.

    Unfortunately (for you) that's the nature of the beast when it comes to a system with a finite number of winners. Under the circumstances a "half chosen at random, half chosen by auction" is probably as fair as you can make it whilst still keeping it an attractive event. Yes, the likes of PL, Hydra, etc can buy themselves in via the auction, as it should be, because people want to see them and their wealth is a sign that they are successful in the game.

    Having all of the teams completely chosen at random might be an interesting take on things but I suspect it would simply lead to comments about how "X would've won if they hadn't been screwed over by the RNG". This way X can buy themselves in, and if they're halfway notable they can probably afford to.

    Sorry you weren't lucky enough to be chosen at random, but them's the breaks. You are not special in that context.
    I wouldn't worry. Yes, last year, the Auction slots went for ~16bil, but, there were 4 of them. A better comparison is the year before, when there were 16 slots, and the slots went for mostly base price, and afaik, no slots went over +1b over base price.

    This year, there were 77 applying teams, and 64 will get in, so there wont be MUCH competition, and almost everyone will get in *anyway*. Counting normal fuckups people make (like missing to show up to the auction in time, etc), I am 90% sure most everyone who wants to get in, will get in, and the prices will be 5-7bil.
    ________________________
    --- Omega Wing -- Rivqua ---

  19. #59

    Join Date
    April 16, 2011
    Posts
    1,991
    Rivqua is right, but the silly Alliance his corp is in is already in :3

  20. #60
    ry ry's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    2,209
    Quote Originally Posted by Armag3ddon View Post
    All these fucking no name and bad aliances.
    good. watching the same elite pvp alliances all the time is pretty boring, and the big guns can buy in anyway.

    i4b they're all elite pvp alt alliances.
    Last edited by ry ry; May 24 2012 at 12:41:13 PM.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •