hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 39 of 39

Thread: [TMA] Soloing in interceptors.

  1. #21

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    7,029
    Crusader = armour tanked Slicer? Where the Slicer is shield/hero tanked.

  2. #22
    prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,538
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophichius View Post
    the taranis is a bit of an anomaly because it can take on larger ships
    ding ding ding
    but lets leave combat inty for another thread, shall we?

    Quote Originally Posted by Daneel Trevize View Post
    Crusader = armour tanked Slicer? Where the Slicer is shield/hero tanked.
    Yea, usually.
    The Slicer operates very similarly to how the old fotm Crusaders used to. The difference is the tracking.
    The Slicer can do a mean tank brawler (super-punisher), but the lack of tracking bonus makes its less than desirable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Frug View Post
    Prom is right and you're dumb.

  3. #23
    I am the 99.99998% Tyrus Tenebros's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    4,701
    Taranis still does take on other inties really well fwiw
    I tried to be cool and all I got was a lousy warning about my sig being too big.

  4. #24
    Anzoxe's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 17, 2011
    Posts
    323
    How would you go about fighting a bc or cruiser anyway?

    Also is it every worth it to engage a thrasher or should I just avoid them.

  5. #25
    Movember 2011Donor Cue1*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Killing that damn fairy
    Posts
    2,998
    Quote Originally Posted by Anzoxe View Post
    How would you go about fighting a bc or cruiser anyway?

    Also is it every worth it to engage a thrasher or should I just avoid them.
    Cruiser, get under it's guns or kite it. BC, hope and pray it doesn't have a neut(since Ti2 ones usually do).

  6. #26
    Raz's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Posts
    686
    Quote Originally Posted by Anzoxe View Post
    Also is it every worth it to engage a thrasher or should I just avoid them.
    You can kill an arty Thrasher if you can get on top of it immediately, preferably with it warping in to you, and then stay under its guns. AC Thrashers are extremely mean now with the recent buff, but you can probably kill one if you know it to be extremely new and/or terrible. But it's risky.
    Quote Originally Posted by joe space View Post
    burning straight up when surrounded by bad guys... when you explode you will be a rising beautiful testament to el33t pvp escaping into the ether above those beneath you and they will immediately realize, upon viewing your bold presence above them, their inferiority and they will feel bad for what they done.
    EVE: Raz Lictor
    WoT: ArmoredPie

  7. #27
    Gix Tyrionn's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 15, 2011
    Posts
    427
    Quote Originally Posted by Suleiman Shouaa View Post

    Something like this:

    [Crusader, The Man]
    Heat Sink II
    F85 Peripheral Damage System I
    Small Armor Repairer II
    Adaptive Nano Plating II

    Catalyzed Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters
    Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I

    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency S
    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency S
    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency S
    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency S

    Small Energy Burst Aerator I
    Small Energy Collision Accelerator I

    More tank than the standard dual prop Taranis (buffer is the same, but the rep helps alot in interceptor vs interceptor fights and I guess between fights). Scorch means you can't get kited at the edge of scrambler range unlike a Ranis. If you're fighting a Ranis, make sure the fight doesn't start at 0! If you overheat the MWD you can delay the time until he gets ontop of you by a few seconds which can be the difference between living in structure and dying.

    Obviously, the DPS is lower (by about ~100) but it's an interesting toss-up between damage projection & actual raw damage out. Of course, the DP Taranis is much better for dealing with bigger ships generally (AB helps a ton and damage projection doesn't matter).
    Why not AB fit?
    Makes kiting at scram/scorch range, and fitting a hell of a lot easier. You can maximize the rep w/ orbit if you know you'll have time to fight. Near 200dps/150 scorch. OH'ing at 2k with a 32 sig can get you out of alot of bad situations. Particularly the ones you'll be in (inside a scram range with a frigate) rather than the avoidable ones an mwd helps with (warping into bubble hell death).

    [Crusader, Brawler]
    Heat Sink II
    Adaptive Nano Plating II
    Small Armor Repairer II
    Damage Control II

    J5b Phased Prototype Warp Scrambler I
    1MN Afterburner II

    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Scorch S
    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Scorch S
    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Scorch S
    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Scorch S

    Small Energy Collision Accelerator I
    Small Energy Burst Aerator I

  8. #28
    prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,538
    Because AB fits aren't exactly useful for 00.
    Vagas/Cynabals/Link canes are faster than you for christs sake, as well as the other interceptors.

    You're basically making the Crusader even worse.
    Quote Originally Posted by Frug View Post
    Prom is right and you're dumb.

  9. #29

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    .-D-.
    Posts
    262
    Quote Originally Posted by Gix Tyrionn View Post
    Why not AB fit?
    Because you wont get fights you can win in 0.0 with an AB fit.
    Ship that cant actually ~move~ around the grid is p much useless. The only people who will want to engage you solo will be those sure of victory. Also you'll die to camps.

    AB fits are for "1vs1 amamake first belt pls"
    Last edited by n0th; January 14 2012 at 05:36:19 PM.

  10. #30
    Suleiman Shouaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    [TSKRS]
    Posts
    557
    Quote Originally Posted by Gix Tyrionn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Suleiman Shouaa View Post

    Something like this:

    [Crusader, The Man]
    Heat Sink II
    F85 Peripheral Damage System I
    Small Armor Repairer II
    Adaptive Nano Plating II

    Catalyzed Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters
    Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I

    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency S
    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency S
    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency S
    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Imperial Navy Multifrequency S

    Small Energy Burst Aerator I
    Small Energy Collision Accelerator I

    More tank than the standard dual prop Taranis (buffer is the same, but the rep helps alot in interceptor vs interceptor fights and I guess between fights). Scorch means you can't get kited at the edge of scrambler range unlike a Ranis. If you're fighting a Ranis, make sure the fight doesn't start at 0! If you overheat the MWD you can delay the time until he gets ontop of you by a few seconds which can be the difference between living in structure and dying.

    Obviously, the DPS is lower (by about ~100) but it's an interesting toss-up between damage projection & actual raw damage out. Of course, the DP Taranis is much better for dealing with bigger ships generally (AB helps a ton and damage projection doesn't matter).
    Why not AB fit?
    Makes kiting at scram/scorch range, and fitting a hell of a lot easier. You can maximize the rep w/ orbit if you know you'll have time to fight. Near 200dps/150 scorch. OH'ing at 2k with a 32 sig can get you out of alot of bad situations. Particularly the ones you'll be in (inside a scram range with a frigate) rather than the avoidable ones an mwd helps with (warping into bubble hell death).

    [Crusader, Brawler]
    Heat Sink II
    Adaptive Nano Plating II
    Small Armor Repairer II
    Damage Control II

    J5b Phased Prototype Warp Scrambler I
    1MN Afterburner II

    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Scorch S
    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Scorch S
    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Scorch S
    Gatling Pulse Laser II, Scorch S

    Small Energy Collision Accelerator I
    Small Energy Burst Aerator I
    That's the fit I use and I'm fairly sure I gave it to you ingame. However, since the discussion was obviously slanted at 0.0, an MWD is more appropriate.

  11. #31
    Ophichius's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 15, 2011
    Location
    Hedonistic Imperative
    Posts
    2,076
    Okay, so, side question to interceptors and faction frigates. Since I want to be able to go after bigger stuff, the taranis seems to be a really solid choice. However, I compared similar Taranis and FNC dualprop + nos fits, and the numbers are so close that I can't really tell which ship has the edge.

    [Federation Navy Comet, FNC - Dualprop]
    Corpii C-Type Small Armor Repairer
    Micro Auxiliary Power Core II
    Damage Control II
    Magnetic Field Stabilizer II

    Catalyzed Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters
    1MN Afterburner II
    Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I

    Light Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S
    Small Diminishing Power System Drain I
    Light Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S

    Small Hybrid Burst Aerator I
    Small Hybrid Ambit Extension I
    Small Low Friction Nozzle Joints I


    Warrior II x3
    Hobgoblin II x3

    265 DPS with CNAM, 3458/1276 MWD/AB velocity, 2.6s align. 4.2k EHP

    [Taranis, Taranis - Dualprop]
    Corpii C-Type Small Armor Repairer
    Micro Auxiliary Power Core II
    Damage Control II

    Catalyzed Cold-Gas Arcjet Thrusters
    1MN Afterburner II
    Warp Scrambler II

    Light Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S
    Light Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S
    Light Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S
    Small Diminishing Power System Drain I

    Small Hybrid Burst Aerator I
    Small Ancillary Current Router II


    Hobgoblin II x2


    231 DPS with CNAM, 3650/1369 MWD/AB velocity, 3.1s align, 3.8k EHP

    Is the faster AB speed and lower MWD sig bloom on the Taranis worth the lower EHP, lower DPS, and worse align time?

    -O
    I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those Thukkers, that way I wouldn't have to have any goddamn stupid useless conversations with anybody.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nu11u5
    I'm going to stick to a size where the characters' eye orbs are not the size of my skull. That's kind of disturbing.

  12. #32
    Movember 2012 Warmenhoven's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 29, 2011
    Location
    All over the shop
    Posts
    642
    Check the tracking on the two, iirc the FNC doesn't get a tracking bonus?

  13. #33
    prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,538
    Yes, FNC gets tracking.
    Quote Originally Posted by Frug View Post
    Prom is right and you're dumb.

  14. #34
    I am the 99.99998% Tyrus Tenebros's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    4,701
    The MWD bloom can be a pretty big deal, but really if you want to fight above your weightclass i think an AF (or daredevil even) is a better choice. Most AFs can almost certainly kill a rapier, where for the 'ranis it's a bit of a tossup based on whether he fit ACs, how fast you kill his drones, and how he's tanked.
    I tried to be cool and all I got was a lousy warning about my sig being too big.

  15. #35
    prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,538
    Taranis will always kill a Rapier if you're starting from tackle range. It doesn't even need to be a dual-prop setup.
    The only thing you need to worry about is ECM drones.

    AFs are a bad choice, as there's really only 2 of them that can reliably do it in a fair bit of time (Ishkur/Jag), but the ships are fat and slow so you're probably die more often than a Taranis or Comet would.
    If the boost patch goes live however.... Different story. Recon pilots (for teh most part) are gonna be slow on the pick-up that AFs have become worth flying.
    Quote Originally Posted by Frug View Post
    Prom is right and you're dumb.

  16. #36
    Rampro.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    November 12, 2011
    Posts
    27
    I had some fun in the ranis in syndicate recently (fixing my sec) , I fit for highest Dps I could get with an MSE and scram. Anything I thought i could kill before it killed me I had a shot at .
    I used null because when MWDing to target and vice versa range seemed to pull +2k for 1/2 the fight , it just seemed to give better results (bar the drake which I used viod on.)

    http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12062472

    http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12066366

    http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12066574

    this was the fit I used but u prob could fit nuetrons with a t2 power core im not sure the ship was fit pre patch.

    http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12066578

    im not saying thats a good fit either just good fun

    and anything with a web is gonna ruin this fits day.
    Last edited by Rampro.; January 24 2012 at 01:08:17 PM.

  17. #37

    Join Date
    April 20, 2012
    Posts
    3
    So is it Taranis or nothing for inties? The Ranis and the faction frigs are the only ships really mentioned here. How about the Claw, is that any good?

  18. #38
    Mr Marram's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    2,710
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Jord View Post
    So is it Taranis or nothing for inties? The Ranis and the faction frigs are the only ships really mentioned here. How about the Claw, is that any good?
    Tackle ones will still be viable for fleet work due to the speed and tackle range but for combat its pretty much only the ranis. Other do work like the malediction as a baby vengence and the sader as a baby retribution but the AFs do it a lot better for the same size hull.


    IS-4, T110E5, T-54, E-50, IS-8, M103, T34, Type 59, M26 Pershing, AMX 13 90, KV-3, SU-122-44, AMX AC Mle. 1946, SU-101, T20, T71, T25/2, KV-1S, T21, Jgdpzr IV, Sherman E8, GW Panther, AMX 12t, M18, Stug III, T-50-2, T-34, PzIV, ELC AMX, Crusader, Covenanter, SU-26, T1, RenaultFT.

  19. #39
    Lady Spank's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Location
    Placid
    Posts
    1,884
    Claw lacks web which makes it less desirable for solo.

    Sent from my electric telephone

    [–]bam_strokerCaldari 6 points 18 hours ago
    Your command of deliberate, convincingly bad English is amazing.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •