hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: [PvP] Nighthawk

  1. #21
    sharptoast's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 6, 2012
    Location
    Being bad, somewhere.
    Posts
    337
    Having looked at the Nighthawk, I have found it somewhat underwhelming, sadly, the gains are fairly small when compared to the Drake, and the cost significantly higher.


  2. #22
    prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,529
    ship is still woefully underpowered.
    it's BETTER now, but still pretty crap.

    the main reason is the lack of grid/cpu, but i think we have known that for a while
    Quote Originally Posted by Frug View Post
    Prom is right and you're dumb.

  3. #23
    W0lf Crendraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 26, 2012
    Posts
    963
    If it had 30 more cpu and one more midslot you woudlnt be able to get me out of it, more base speed would be nice as well! With isk the grid is okayish (but more woudnt hurt).

    Something like:

    [Nighthawk, active nighthawk]
    Damage Control II
    Ballistic Control System II
    Ballistic Control System II
    Ballistic Control System II
    Reactor Control Unit II

    Pith A-Type Large Shield Booster
    10MN Digital Booster Rockets
    Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor
    Medium Electrochemical Capacitor Booster I, Navy Cap Booster 800
    Adaptive Invulnerability Field II

    Imperial Navy Small EMP Smartbomb
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
    Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile

    Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer II
    Medium Warhead Calefaction Catalyst II


    Hobgoblin II x5

    With an additional web, - reactor control unit, extra nano and a normal mwd and more speed this thing would rock!

  4. #24
    prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    2,529
    it doesnt really need a web, especially if those high slot TPs go live.
    Quote Originally Posted by Frug View Post
    Prom is right and you're dumb.

  5. #25
    W0lf Crendraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 26, 2012
    Posts
    963
    It really does, its not to apply damage its to keep tackle away, once you are scrammed its looking bad for you (even if the friagte dies 20seconds afterwards), now with a 27km web kiting would be a lot easier in this otherwise the everpresent af will tank the dps long enough for the rest of the fleet to catch up and get scram as well!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •