
Originally Posted by
F18
Lancehot, did you actually watch the movie?
Everyone seems to be going on about how deep & clever & full of hidden meanings it is. But, as far as I saw it, there were only two "interesting" philosophical aspects to what allegedly is a "thinking" film: Ancient astronauts theory & the moral/ethical questions surrounding advanced android intelligence.
no need for hyperbole.i dont think any of the meaning are particularly deep or hidden. movie is called Prometheus for chrissake.
No effort is put into debating or developing an explanation for us being the genetically identical offspring of the Engineers.
opening scene?
As for the why they created us, that frankly seemed barely to get elaborated on except in the disappointed drunk ramblings of the guy who David infects
why does it have to be elaborated. movie made its point on leaving things ambiguous.
then in a wonderful bit of plot exposition from the captain who randomly seems to have figured out exactly what the moon was & what the aliens had planned.
doesn't seem to be much of a stretch upon seeing bunch of black goo containers (and witnessing what it does) to figure out it some sort of payload with nefarious purpose. also he doesn't know what they have planned its Shaw wh tells him ship is headed for Earth (starmap)
Doesn't explain why the aliens seemed to want us to go to their military installation for 30+ thousand years before they decided they wanted to unleash the ooze on us. But whatever.
just cause something is left ambiguous != plot hole. deal with it. also you assume they wanted us to go there. it might as well been a warning to stay the fuck way. hence Shaw's line "we were so wrong" as to the purpose of the mission. as well as David quoting Lawrence of Arabia when they arrive at the planet "There is nothing in the desert and no man needs nothing". plus Weyland "we have nothing to learn from them" right before dieing.
T He infects the guy initially it seems because he some greater plan ("all things from small beginnings" I believe were his words) But what that plan is never seems to materialize because his interest (& that of the film in general) in the alien ooze offspring seems to evaporate the moment Weyland wakes up.
he doesn't have a "plan". same as android Ash in Alien he wants to run tests and experiment and human life is of secondary concern. Not to mention scene where Vickers confronts David and asks what did Weyland tell you. Where David responds "He said try harder". and indeed he does. all to the purpose of what Weyland wants, which is meeting live engineer i guess. thats why david wakes him up,- hes found a live one.
Then its all "children want to kill their parents" because robots always want to kill their creators. Yes there's the whole humans have souls despite being made (in a rather convoluted way) by the engineers but androids don't because they're made by humans thing. But again little energy seemed to be exerted in exploring that apparent paradox beyond a few short & boring bits of dialogue.
i agree theres a bit too many themes and ideas running through, as a result end product seem a bit jumbled. (killing your parents line might be a clue as to what David said to the engineer, thus making him hostile)
Bookmarks