Command ships need a cap warfare immunity before T3 frigs get one.
Command ships need a cap warfare immunity before T3 frigs get one.
New T3s should be just like existing ships but with immunity to ECM. :3
Let's start a party of our own
SS = safespot?
Make isk with PICountries do not exist where I am from. The discovery of the Higgs boson led to limitless power, the elimination of poverty and Kit-Kats for everyone. It is a communist chocolate hellhole and I'm here to stop it ever happening.
The Great Tracking Nerf v0.1
My fav ECM alternative
Claymore breaks 4k dps tanked with a dg booster, crystals and tengu, and that's with an MWD and a scram. The only thing that can stop it is neuts. I like my claymores, but making them neut immune would make them retardedly powerful. Hell even without the crystals and tengu it still tanks over 2k dps. And you want to make it immune to neuts as well? :V
Last edited by Shiroi Okami; October 20 2011 at 08:50:21 PM.
I see your points.
Maybe some kind of stacking penalty bonus to taking neuts?
Was going to post about how a blob is now "uber faction active tanking ships" EHP is worth in alpha or 1 dps more than whatever that could tank but then again it's a better definition than most.
Last edited by Pattern; October 20 2011 at 10:31:42 PM.
This would actually be a good idea. I've thought for a while that like other ewar, neuts (and ecm) should be stacking penalised, in general. That said tho whisp why do you focus on command ships? They generally have pretty good cap by default, compared to active tanking battleships or cruisers
Because field commands need a pvp role
(Astarte notably)
Just nerf neuts down to the same cap/s as nos.
Bookmarks