What is the point of the Pershing? I hate it. It's too high to hide behind hillocks and things like the T20, it has just as little armour. It's not fast and it's gun is extremely meh, with what feels like a really long reload and pretty long aiming time/bad accuracy. It's decent when your team is good, but when your team sucks it has almost no ability to punch above it's weight. It's good at popping shots at stuff that's distracted or timid, but if you come across a higher or same tier tank that is aggressive and pushes at you, you can do exactly jack shit. And tankers often do that, no-one is intimidated by you in this tank and you get bullied by the bigger stuff all the time.
I don't get the point of it, it's fucking useless. Everything can damage you and you're not fast enough to dodge shots. Why do americans suck so much at making tanks?
11 Games in the Jpanther 3 wins 8 loses still averaging 500xp and I only have the short 88. Been getting a lot of 800xp loses. I just don't understand why people are so bad at this game, if I Jpanther with the short 88 is soloing their high tier guys and you are sitting there failing then you need to ask yourself why am I playing this game?
Ya, I like the new trailer.
I just wish the in-game sound was similar to the trailer. Make the engine sounds more beefier and more realistic, and gun sounds as well.
IIRC, there are only 2 engine sounds in the game, and 3 or so gun sounds. Would be awesome if you could tell the difference between a Maybach, Ford, Russian, and Renault engine. Maybe make it surround a tank, so even if you can't spot a tank near you, you can hear it's engines. The closer you get, the louder the engine is.
But I suppose that would make game too complicated?
Not sure how well you'd hear another tank from inside a tank with a padded helmet over your ears though. But I do agree that they should make the sound of one's own tank better.
In JagdPanther news, it's still one of my least productive tanks I think from an efficiency standpoint, but it's getting better MM results now. It also seems bouncier. Not super-confident about the JP2 though. Until you put the 12.8cm on it then it's basically a Patch 7.4 JagdPanther. Super soft target up against the top tiers. Am I wrong about this? Still have 20,000xp to go before I have to choose between that and the Ferdi at least.
jp2
dat gun
dat speed
armor is not literally paper panted grey to confuse people
Your posting is medium, its not rare and its not well done
- Krans 26/7/12
Victory!
Battle: Cliff 09 August 2012 09:54:11
Vehicle: AMX M4(1945)
Experience received: 4,368 (x2 for the first victory each day)
Credits received: 51,502
Battle Achievements: Bölter's Medal, Top Gun
Researched:
AMX 50 100 researched. Undistributed experience spent: 81,000. Free Experience spent: 0.
Woot woot.
WoT: Mike_Hammer
Tanks are like Pokemon, gotta collect 'em all.....
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
the T-43 has pretty much killed all interest in playing this game.
To buy Type 59 or not to buy Type 59? http://worldoftanks.com/news/1476-new-gift-shop-offers/
I've been meaning to pick up a premium so I don't have to bother with "I have no credits" anymore, and I've heard the Type basically prints creds. Is this true?
Also Type 62... not sure though, I'm not exactly a light driver so would probably be terrible with it.
T-62a is crap, really disappointing for me. Stay away from it if you have some other tier 10 med to play instead.
You can even read this for more views on it
http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.p...a-experiences/
WoT: Mike_Hammer
Tanks are like Pokemon, gotta collect 'em all.....
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
Type 62, not T-62a.
Type 62 is a tier 6 Chinese light tank: http://wiki.worldoftanks.com/Type_62
Type 59 is still ok. Far more grateful for solo playing than poor abysmally slow and sluggish T34. Imho. Dunno how it compares to Lowe fun and earnings. Didn't even know Type 62 was hitting the servers.
IS-8, KV-13, KV-1, KV-1s, T-150, T-50-2, Tetrarch, T-127, Type59, E-100, E-50, E-50M, PzKwIV, VK28, VK36, JagdTiger, JadgPanther, StuG III, Marder II, T-34, M103, T34, M24, T54, M7 Priest, T25/2, M18, M4, T49, M8A1, T82, Bat Chat, ELC AMX, Black Prince, Cruiser Mk. II
I got the T59 last time it was in the store, and it's been great. You can bounce tons of stuff off the front, damage and pen are fine, and speed is good. I'm still not very good at Type v Type though.
Anyone heard anything about the 62? Not sure what to think of it looking at the stats.
Domination.
Vote Lark for CSM
Yea in platoons I'm sure it can work, if you fag it up (eg snipe). But it's seriously a needlethrower and it cannot take a punch in any form what so ever. At least they toned down the fires a bit since last week, but the fucking tracks have half the hp compared to T-54 tracks and take twice as long to repair. Plus any 12t and up can penetrate the hull from ALL angles, there's no reverse peekabooing, no shoot mah tracks bitch maneuvers, because everything does damage every time pretty much. AND breaks stuff, be they tracks or ammo rack or whatever.
It feels like it's more vulnerable then batchat, without being able to rape stuff.
Oh. Neato.
Last edited by Qui Shon; August 9 2012 at 12:22:15 PM.
WoT: Mike_Hammer
Tanks are like Pokemon, gotta collect 'em all.....
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Arthur Schopenhauer
Bookmarks