there's the info~
also, teamspeak faggots:
megalolz.zapto.org
9987
/trox
there's the info~
also, teamspeak faggots:
megalolz.zapto.org
9987
/trox
Last edited by EntroX; October 24 2011 at 10:54:06 PM.
Originally Posted by Virtuozzo
Fault Line 3:
[youtube:3ni1bttw]DnMyhAdwjkw[/youtube:3ni1bttw]
Devs were moved from Mirror's Edge 2 to this according to EA, do not want for that reason alone.
DO IT FAGGOTStwitter.com/Battlefield: "MISSION: Recruit 1 Million "Likes" on our Facebook page to unlock the full trailer & producer's commentary early http://on.fb.me/gSmhVu"
Done
This game will deliver!
12 Minute fault line trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kw9z6RWk ... r_embedded
Looks like jets are confirmed now
Jets? In a console-friendly game?
Do not have any hopes. Still wanking at Project Reality for BF2.
well dont forget that Battlefield 2 also came out on consoles (admittedly with jets cut out)
DICE did say they were putting more work into the PC version though. Console MP is 24 players, PC goes up to 64
[youtube:m34laexo]Kw9z6RWkCng[/youtube:m34laexo]
All I can say is wow.
Wow indeed. Wow, as in "wow that looks just as boring as CoD", "wow I can't even open a fucking door on my own", "wow they have a glowing 'Follow' sign over the leader and they tell me exactly what to do every 30 seconds". As in "wow I can't believe anyone enjoys this kind of game".
Call of Duty can fuck off. It's Activision doing the only thing they know, poisoning the whole games business.
Look at this game, it looks incredible, and they're wasting it on a moronic game design. All those man hours to create an almost non-interactive experience. It's such a waste.
Wow indeed. Wow, as in "wow that looks just as boring as CoD", "wow I can't even open a fucking door on my own", "wow they have a glowing 'Follow' sign over the leader and they tell me exactly what to do every 30 seconds". As in "wow I can't believe anyone enjoys this kind of game".
Call of Duty can fuck off. It's Activision doing the only thing they know, poisoning the whole games business.
Look at this game, it looks incredible, and they're wasting it on a moronic game design. All those man hours to create an almost non-interactive experience. It's such a waste.
looks great tbh
[quote=Badboy K]Wow indeed. Wow, as in "wow that looks just as boring as CoD", "wow I can't even open a fucking door on my own", "wow they have a glowing 'Follow' sign over the leader and they tell me exactly what to do every 30 seconds". As in "wow I can't believe anyone enjoys this kind of game".
Call of Duty can fuck off. It's Activision doing the only thing they know, poisoning the whole games business.
Look at this game, it looks incredible, and they're wasting it on a moronic game design. All those man hours to create an almost non-interactive experience. It's such a waste.
looks great tbh[/quote:74heuky8]Crysis, too, looked great. Look how that turned out.
bittervet_hi5.jpg to equak
great?
average.great?
it looks alright, but how does it play i wonder ? its a pity with all these CoD4:MW clones, but then i suppose that's to be expected here, somebody manages to create a game that get's a very nice reception and then suddenly there's half a gazillion wannabes of varying quality.
i wish more games poached crysis's semi auto/attachment system though.
you dont appear to know what this word means vOvaverage.great?
no, it's just average.you dont appear to know what this word means vOvaverage.great?
the first crysis was more or less a tech demo sold as a game (and not a terrible game at that) and the second is just that, a average near future shooter with the nano suit as the gimmick, the story is "meh" the visuals are not really that much better than everything else. there's no ground breaking features to speak of...
so yea, good effort but still a average console castrated FPS like so many others.
I don't play Battlefields for single player, EA.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks