Insurance companies are not exactly a not for profit. Or did you not know that?Originally Posted by elmicker
It genuinely intrigues me that one individual could come up with everything that you do.
Insurance companies are not exactly a not for profit. Or did you not know that?It genuinely intrigues me that one individual could come up with everything that you do.
And even if they were, they'd still have to pay their staff.
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
Is there any limit on what a non-profit can choose to pay its staff?
Yes, it's generally known as the "Fuck this shit" wage.
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
I mean top, not bottom. Wondering if I should start up a non-profit and pay myself an obscene salary.
This happens a lot, except for now you're still paying income taxes personally so...I mean top, not bottom. Wondering if I should start up a non-profit and pay myself an obscene salary.
How are you getting the money into the nonprofit? I don't think there's a legal cap, but good luck justifying your 800% admin cost ratio to your donors.I mean top, not bottom. Wondering if I should start up a non-profit and pay myself an obscene salary.
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
Why would I justify it?
Because they don't often give you money if you don't?Why would I justify it?
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
Just hire a man with shiny white teeth and a good toupe, slap him on TV inbetween jesus commercials and laugh scornfully at anyone bitching about transparency.Because they don't often give you money if you don't?Why would I justify it?
I know quite a few people in the UK that works for nonprofit charity and their wages are actually way over the average and that's pretty normal. I don't know about the tops thats just regular employees.Just hire a man with shiny white teeth and a good toupe, slap him on TV inbetween jesus commercials and laugh scornfully at anyone bitching about transparency.Because they don't often give you money if you don't?Why would I justify it?
Not that I think that's a bad thing, charities should be the last sort of business to screw it's own employees.
And here I'd have thought "Charities should be the last sort of groups to waste money" would be more to the point.
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
FYP to show what you just said.
Freupublican slip hu?
Last edited by Nicholai Pestot; February 21 2012 at 07:52:07 AM.
FYP to show what you just said.
Freupublican slip hu?
It makes me think of the phrase Charity begins at home. If a charitable organisation is shown to be taking advantage of its own employees how the hell is it going to convince anyone that it in fact charitable.
All things considered the ones I know that work in those organisations like teachers do put a lot of their own "free" time into their jobs. As their jobs mainly centred around arranging events and suchlike it wasn't your typical 9/5 job in any case.
If this thread became about how to scam lots of money fast I would have to say you are much better going for tele-evangelist then charity. Charities in most countries are strictly controlled. Tele evangelists on the other hand can do whatever the hell they like with the money =)
FYP to show what you just said.
Freupublican slip hu?
It makes me think of the phrase Charity begins at home. If a charitable organisation is shown to be taking advantage of its own employees how the hell is it going to convince anyone that it in fact charitable.
All things considered the ones I know that work in those organisations like teachers do put a lot of their own "free" time into their jobs. As their jobs mainly centred around arranging events and suchlike it wasn't your typical 9/5 job in any case.
If this thread became about how to scam lots of money fast I would have to say you are much better going for tele-evangelist then charity. Charities in most countries are strictly controlled. Tele evangelists on the other hand can do whatever the hell they like with the money =)
It depends on what you mean by "good wages", I guess. I'm not advocating screwing your employees as hard as you can, because if you do that then all the good ones will leave. Morale, employee quality, and all that other stuff does matter and is important. But paying "way over the average" for the sake of it(assuming that "average" refers to people of similar qualifications) is stupid - half the time it's a sanctioned form of siphoning off the top, and the other half it's just fuzzy-headed thinking. Pay people what you need to pay them to get good people, but don't go above that, because it tends to wreck your organization's finances and can even lead to some pretty perverse outcomes(people staying in jobs they hate because they can't do half as well elsewhere, for example).
"Make no mistake, Communism lost a big argument - one we know today as the 20th century."
I believe the usual method is to complain about religious persecution and hint that it's a gay/jewish/atheist/lizardman conspiracyJust hire a man with shiny white teeth and a good toupe, slap him on TV inbetween jesus commercials and laugh scornfully at anyone bitching about transparency.Because they don't often give you money if you don't?Why would I justify it?
fuck that, build a mega church, make real tax free money.Just hire a man with shiny white teeth and a good toupe, slap him on TV inbetween jesus commercials and laugh scornfully at anyone bitching about transparency.Because they don't often give you money if you don't?Why would I justify it?
free ralara
No longer Deleting all your posts erryday due to butthurt
usually pink or pinkest flamingo in other games
FREE NYAN CAT
JUSTICE FOR AMANTU
http://eve.enviroweb.org/
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks