Most democratic voters, and democrats in general, are not promoting the things that are happening, and yet you conclude that because they're happening, that Obama and the democratic party promotes them.
You're bitching about the debt and ignoring the fact that their attempts to end the bush tax cuts were blocked. What they want is to keep social infrastructure strong. That's one of their primary goals (if not THE primary goal). Don't be fucking retarded and talk like their goal is to grow the debt. Don't say "they won't even try" when they have been wrestling with the republicans to raise taxes for god knows how long now.
Shit like eliminating the EPA and going back to the gold standard ARE your darling's stated goals. Raising the debt is not the fucking goal of anyone. I think republicans are brain damaged retards but I don't think their goal is to fuck up their own economy. The comparison to shit like the gold standard and eliminating government agencies is raising taxes. You dig? You're comparing his proposed solution to the problem, when you should be comparing his proposed solution to their proposed solution.
Now you're going to interpret my position as an extreme supporter of the dems which I am not. I don't think they've done enough and I don't think Obama works hard enough on certain key issues, but I'm mature enough to realize that he'd get even less done if he tried to fight openly against everyone. It's a valid opinion to say he's part of the problem because he perpetuates the system and works within it in cooperation with established organizations and by appeasing the people he has to work with by, for example, agreeing to keep Guantanamo as-is and drone striking random people.
But, see, that's the issue stated in a mature, non-extremist-douchebag way. The immature extremist-douchebag way is to tell everyone they're too stupid to see the truth and that the only arguments against ron paul is their fear of his awesomeness.