hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 1 of 16 123411 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 317

Thread: Community aggression caused CCP staff to "buckle under pressure"

  1. #1
    Warpath's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    1,369

    Community aggression caused CCP staff to "buckle under pressure"

    Staff at Icelandic developer CCP have become adversely affected by the aggression of the collective EVE Online community, according to CEO Hilmar Veigar Pétursson, although he had nothing but praise for individual players.

    Speaking following revolt and frustration by players enraged by leaked documents and the latest Incarna update, Pétursson said anger at individual members of his team is misdirected, and affects the mindset of the entire business.

    "People at CCP who have been in the business of relating to EVE subscribers have developed a hard skin because the player base can be very quite aggressive," Pétursson told GamesIndustry.biz in an exclusive interview published today.

    "I have seen people buckle under the pressure of talking to them as a group. To clam up and not be as open as they were prior to that. And really that's the nature of the beast."

    http://www.gamesindustry.biz/article...under-pressure

  2. #2
    Warpath's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    1,369

  3. #3

    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Not in space
    Posts
    2,593
    CEO Hilmar Veigar Pétursson revealed that bullets and baseball bats had been sent to the company's HQ in Iceland - amongst other verbal and in-game economic mischief.
    WAT.
    Once upon a time, men called me Tsubutai

  4. #4
    Omak Topal's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    wh J[insertnumberhere]
    Posts
    54
    This is an excerpt from the full story. Log in or register for free to read the whole article.

  5. #5
    Xiang Jiao's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    7,261
    HTFU

  6. #6
    Lana Torrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 13, 2011
    Location
    Bonding around
    Posts
    15,125
    Quote Originally Posted by Tsubutai View Post
    CEO Hilmar Veigar Pétursson revealed that bullets and baseball bats had been sent to the company's HQ in Iceland - amongst other verbal and in-game economic mischief.
    WAT.
    And people think I'M extreme... I will rage on the forums about people sitting with my game time, but its just a fucking game..

    (Technically that should be 'did' and 'no longer care', but you know what I mean)
    Quote Originally Posted by lubica
    And her name was Limul Azgoden, a lowly peasant girl.

  7. #7
    Warpath's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    1,369
    Quote Originally Posted by Omak Topal View Post
    This is an excerpt from the full story. Log in or register for free to read the whole article.

    The interview is over a couple of pages, it costs nowt to register...

  8. #8
    Xiang Jiao's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    7,261
    Quote Originally Posted by Warpath View Post
    The interview is over a couple of pages, it costs nowt to register...
    OMG - There are MTs when I'm trying to lick up the tears from the fallout of MTs! We must go derper...

  9. #9
    Lana Torrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 13, 2011
    Location
    Bonding around
    Posts
    15,125
    Quote Originally Posted by Warpath View Post
    The interview is over a couple of pages, it costs nowt to register...
    AHAHAHahahahahahahahahah.. I love it.

    Fucking cry some more Hilmar.. No one can read it anyway..
    Quote Originally Posted by lubica
    And her name was Limul Azgoden, a lowly peasant girl.

  10. #10
    Warpath's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    1,369
    Could be going F2P in the longer term?

    Q: Do you see the business model changing entirely over time? From all subscriptions to all micro-transactions with a free-to-play model?

    Hilmar Veigar Pétursson: It could. I would guess that's not going to happen. A lot of it is just going to be a result of how it all plays out. What people tend to look at is what's being adopted and what's being used by companies. Often that's something entirely different from what you imagine at the beginning of the life of the product but we can't predict behaviour to come. We'll take a look at purchase transactions and what people are interested in buying. We've certainly had a lot of interesting feedback from the EVE players, obviously we listen to the feedback. This is really about taking these leaps and then iterating and refining. We're just starting that process now. It started with a bang.

  11. #11
    Space Panda's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 24, 2011
    Posts
    1,470
    someone poast the interview for the tribe

  12. #12
    Warpath's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    1,369
    E3 2011
    Home News Features Directory Resources Education Jobs

    Matt Martin
    Editor, GamesIndustry.biz

    07/07/2011 @ 07:54
    Related articles

    Community aggression caused CCP staff to "buckle under pressure"
    EVE producer defends microtransaction costs

    Article navigation

    Jump to page: 1 2
    CCP's Hilmar Veigar Pétursson

    Page 1 of 2. Next page →

    Two weeks ago EVE Online launched Incarna, an expansion that added human avatars to a game previously focused on spaceships. What should have been the celebrated release of another evolution in the continuing space saga, quickly turned to drama and uproar amongst the passionate EVE community alarmed by the high price vanity items on sale through micro transactions, and then the leak of internal memos. The memos appeared to present a blunt attitude of the CCP development team: EVE players were seen as the "golden goose", and they were going to be rinsed of money to help fund new projects at CCP.

    In retaliation, the EVE community revolted with in-game protests and abuse directed at the CCP developers - last week at the Game Horizon event, CEO Hilmar Veigar Pétursson revealed that bullets and baseball bats had been sent to the company's HQ in Iceland - amongst other verbal and in-game economic mischief.

    CCP called a crisis meeting with the Council of Stellar Management - player representatives who speak for the community and deal directly with upper management - to address the issues and anger, and a resolution of sorts was reached.

    Last week, a day before the meeting of the CSM and under embargo until after the event, GamesIndustry.biz sat down with Pétursson to discuss the extraordinary backlash, the effect it had on the talent at CCP, the shift to micro-transactions and the constant evolution of one of the most successful and fascinating online virtual worlds.

    Q: EVE has been subscription based for years, why add micro-transactions on top of that now?

    Hilmar Veigar Pétursson: I would say the main macro reasoning is that we as a company were setting out to make subscription games, we were making virtual worlds. And the most robust model at that time was subscriptions. But since then people have been doing really interesting things with free-to-play, micro-transactions, additional payments, premium services - there's a lot of stuff out there. What we have always believed is that to make it relevant for decades to come we have to innovate on all aspects of the game, and that includes business models just as much as game features. If you don't change then at some point EVE will just go into oblivion, it becomes deprived over time. That's not occurring now, so we're taking a step quite early in the process and we're a company that innovates, that's a core strength of ours, to take these leaps once in a while.

    Q: Do you see the business model changing entirely over time? From all subscriptions to all micro-transactions with a free-to-play model?

    Hilmar Veigar Pétursson: It could. I would guess that's not going to happen. A lot of it is just going to be a result of how it all plays out. What people tend to look at is what's being adopted and what's being used by companies. Often that's something entirely different from what you imagine at the beginning of the life of the product but we can't predict behaviour to come. We'll take a look at purchase transactions and what people are interested in buying. We've certainly had a lot of interesting feedback from the EVE players, obviously we listen to the feedback. This is really about taking these leaps and then iterating and refining. We're just starting that process now. It started with a bang.

    If you don't change then at some point EVE will just go into oblivion, it becomes deprived over time

    Q: What's the mood like amongst the developers - you've been working on Incarna for a long time and you release it to savage feedback from the most loyal of players?

    Hilmar Veigar Pétursson: What has affected the mood of people the most has been the leaks that have occurred. Misinterpretation of internal material taken as something that it is not. For example the Fearless newsletter that's out there is an internal tool for discussion and debate, where people take very polarised views and write in a debating fashion, conflicting their own views, just to debate points. That's been taken as literal memos on behalf of the company when it's something entirely different.

    We have always celebrated debate and open discussion at CCP and when it goes out in its pure form it's a lot of misunderstanding, and that's affected people a lot. All the theories about impending doom, because people are taking this out of context, that's definitely affected the staff.

    Q: How do you manage that internally so the same thing doesn't happen again, when you value that freedom of speech and open-minded discussion at CCP?

    Hilmar Veigar Pétursson: We are not going to stop it, this is part of the company DNA. But it was the first time in 13 years. We're not going to have that slay us too much. Obviously we have to have that discussion internally about how we are going to manage these things, and that they will be taken out of context. If you take internal debates out into the limelight you can’t really have a debate with a group of 400,000 people. You have to have some sense of structure to the discussion and that's why we created the Council of Stellar Management. That's an important platform to resolve some of the issues we're having now. Because as I said, we can't have a debate with all those people.

    We've built that platform out of the experience of trying to debate with 100s of 1000s of people because that's not very productive and nor are written words in blogs and forum posts
    Q: Can you understand how players were so upset, especially when EVE was referred to as the "golden goose" which can help fund other projects, considering the amount of time and effort and emotion that payers put into something like EVE?

    Hilmar Veigar Pétursson: I understand it. It's not something that we refer to EVE or the player base as internally. It was in the newsletter to make a point. And that's all it is, it's not emblematic of internal dialogue. Obviously people at CCP who have been in the business of relating to EVE subscribers have developed a hard skin because the player base can be very quite aggressive. I have seen people buckle under the pressure of talking to them as a group. To clam up and not be as open as they were prior to that. And really that's the nature of the beast.

    On the flip side I don't think I've ever, in the eight years I've been doing this, met an EVE player in person that wasn't fantastically enthusiastic about what we're doing. And it's been like a wonderful experience every single time. I've never met an EVE player who has been anything less than a stellar example of nice things, but when they come together they can be quite antagonistic. Which his fine, I'm in the job of having that thrown at me and that's perfectly fine. But when they are singling out individual employees of CCP that are doing their job, that's when it gets a little too much. There have been people that are being singled out by the player base as the root of all evil when in fact they are just debating a point. I would just recommend they turn their attention to the people who hold responsibility of answering to them, whether it's me or a senior producer.

    The sandbox and emergent gameplay in EVE is what makes the experience. Whatever we add to it is not meant to compromise that in anyway

    Q: You introduced micro-transactions for vanity items, but do you see that going further with the purchase of weapons, ships, better equipment that gives the player an advantage in-game?

    Hilmar Veigar Pétursson: Right now it's just not something we can comment on. We've made a commitment to discuss those things with the Council of Stellar Management so me speaking out of turn would not be honouring that. Really the platform to have that dialogue is with the CSM. It's a complicated matter to define what is vanity and what is not vanity. There is a lot of vanity in society that has an impact on wider matters.

    Q: When do you think you'll have enough data from the first sales to really pull it apart and analyse the stats to feed it back into the creation process?

    Hilmar Veigar Pétursson: I would say it's a process that is never fully done, it's an endless effort and it's going to change over time. Certainly now we have some data after the first week that we can have productive dialogue about. Out of that we will formulate the next step.

    Q: One of the most interesting reactions from players was that they would rather pay a higher subscription rate than pay for smaller items in-game. What was the reaction to that and have you ever considered increasing the subscription rate for EVE?

    Hilmar Veigar Pétursson: Yes, of course we have considered that, for sure.

    Q: Why didn't you increase the subs rate?

    Hilmar Veigar Pétursson: It's like I said in the beginning, it's the evolution of the business of EVE like we've evolved the gameplay of EVE. Raising the subscription price would have been doing more of the same, it's not adding a new dimension to EVE when we see what other games have innovated on. It's not bringing the learning from the wider market place into EVE. It's our belief that to make the business relevant we need to change. Although some EVE subscribers would like to pay a higher subscription fee not all of them would. There are people that pay the subs fee and don't want to pay for in-game goods and that's perfectly fine. There's nothing wrong with that. Some want to buy the good because they are already doing it. Some want to use Plex as a means to engage more. It's really about offering these different options in a balanced way but the core foundation of the game is still strong. We're a company that knows the sandbox and emergent gameplay in EVE is what makes the experience. Whatever we add to it is not meant to compromise that in anyway.

    Q: Do you expect subscriber numbers to go down as part of the Incarna backlash?

    Hilmar Veigar Pétursson: Well, every time we've made a big change to EVE we see new players come in and other players leave. We've done a lot of changes and we see people quit, we see people come back, we see new sign-ups. It's really the state of affairs. EVE is a thing that is going to continue to evolve, we're quite clear on that. The fact that we change it every six months should be an example of that commitment. These are not always changes that everyone likes, it's not always a system that everyone is entirely happy with, but we look at the general state of affairs and trust those. In collaboration with the players, through the CSM and other feedback channels, we just take this in and refine the experience based on that.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    June 27, 2011
    Posts
    297
    Quote Originally Posted by Tsubutai View Post
    WAT.
    "For dealing with misbehaving cluster"

    But yes, the fuck? Bullets?

  14. #14

    Join Date
    June 21, 2011
    Posts
    3
    Harden the fuck up!

  15. #15
    Xiang Jiao's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    7,261
    Quote Originally Posted by Hilmar
    We'll take a look at purchase metrics and see what makes us the most money. We've certainly had a lot of tedious feedback from the EVE players, obviously we will pretend to listen to the feedback and then ignore it. This is really about milking the player base for all they are worth with the NeX store and then iterating and refining when it's no longer working for us financially. We're just starting that process now. It started with a pathetic whimper.
    Did any one else read the same overtones within Hilly's corporate-speak?
    Last edited by Xiang Jiao; July 7 2011 at 07:39:34 AM. Reason: grammer Nazi!

  16. #16
    Warpath's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    1,369
    Q: You introduced micro-transactions for vanity items, but do you see that going further with the purchase of weapons, ships, better equipment that gives the player an advantage in-game?

    Hilmar Veigar Pétursson: Right now it's just not something we can comment on. We've made a commitment to discuss those things with the Council of Stellar Management so me speaking out of turn would not be honouring that. Really the platform to have that dialogue is with the CSM. It's a complicated matter to define what is vanity and what is not vanity. There is a lot of vanity in society that has an impact on wider matters.

    So they may introduce game breaking items in the future?

  17. #17
    noobcake's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 14, 2011
    Location
    is
    Posts
    2,917
    uhhhhh I really, sincerely am going to doubt the legitimacy of the "bullets and baseball bats" claim. If this was the WoW player base, I might be so inclined to believe something of this nature. But fuck, the Eve player base has got to have the highest IQ of any MMO I've ever played.

    This is a serious "pics/proof or gtfo" post. I think he's playing up how upset the player base was to make for a good story...


    Quote Originally Posted by Kate Yeats View Post
    It is called a difference of opinion and if you're going to get so shirty about it, you might want to cancel your connection to the internet.




  18. #18
    noobcake's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 14, 2011
    Location
    is
    Posts
    2,917
    Quote Originally Posted by Warpath View Post
    So they may introduce game breaking items in the future?

    speculate more please. It could seriously mean that there are ongoing discussions with regards to "gold ammo" MT between them and the CSM. No one said anything about them introducing game breaking MT.

    You people speculating on the future of MT in Eve are literally worse than the fucking 9/11 truth movement faggots.


    Quote Originally Posted by Kate Yeats View Post
    It is called a difference of opinion and if you're going to get so shirty about it, you might want to cancel your connection to the internet.




  19. #19
    Xiang Jiao's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    7,261
    Quote Originally Posted by Hilmar
    Really the platform to have that dialogue is with the CSM. It's a complicated matter to define what is vanity and what is not vanity. There is a lot of vanity in society that has an impact on wider matters.
    Holy hell, Hilmar! CCP is under assault by nefarious terrorist nerds! Quickly - grab the nearest councilman and use him as a human shield so that you may survive this onslaught! What a farce!

  20. #20
    Warpath's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    1,369
    Quote Originally Posted by noobcake View Post
    It could seriously mean that there are ongoing discussions with regards to "gold ammo" MT between them and the CSM.

    Was under the impression that "gold ammo" and other weapons and ships with improved stats had been ruled out?

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •