God Hates THE WORLD (Natural Disaster Thread)

[evil edna]

Theres only one natural predator for the dutch and its the fucking ocean

[Nordstern]

Clearly the answer is reintroducing more apex predators to dutch parks

Bruv...u jokin?

We re-introduced the wolf in NL (came from Poland via Germany as intended). Its amazaballs how its failing. The fuckers are ment to be puppies but low and behold they predate on sheep. So much that they are just rando killing sheep and not eating them. Our answer? Wolf fences. Wolf says fuck that and has no issues going 20 miles to get around that fence.

New shock.... in areas with high sheep kills a wolf has been found shot to death and another few were killed by cars. Fuckers are seen in villages now scaring the shit out of people, give it time for them to attack some chiuauas.
NL is one big park and we should accept it. Why the fuck get a apex predator back after 200 years extinction in the most densly populated country of EU?

Everything you described is precisely why more predators should be introduced. You live in their habitat, not the other way around.

[Maximillian]

The apex predator of the Dutch is the German.

[Nordstern]

The apex predator of the Dutch is the German.

too spicy

[Lief Siddhe]

Holland is no "habitat" for an apex predator. It's an almost 100% artificial landscape, full to the brim with people, roads and houses and practically 0 square kilometers of any kind of "wilderness".

You might as well introduce grizzlies to New York, see how that works out.

[depili]

Holland is no "habitat" for an apex predator. It's an almost 100% artificial landscape, full to the brim with people, roads and houses and practically 0 square kilometers of any kind of "wilderness".

You might as well introduce grizzlies to New York, see how that works out.

Now that would be an improvement!

[Sacul]

Holland is no "habitat" for an apex predator. It's an almost 100% artificial landscape, full to the brim with people, roads and houses and practically 0 square kilometers of any kind of "wilderness".

You might as well introduce grizzlies to New York, see how that works out.

Indeed.

Its a good thing we rake our landscape and park-forests, not many fires out in the 'wild' here.

[Jack Coutu]

The grizzlies can battle the rats for trash food.

[Lowa [NSN]]

You might as well introduce grizzlies to New York, see how that works out.

I mean...I would watch that show.

[VARRAKK]

https://www.sundaypost.com/fp/humani...s-and-animals/

The landmark research blames chemical pollution from plastics, farm fertilisers and pharmaceuticals in the water.
Previously, it was thought the amount of plankton had halved since the 1940s, but the evidence gathered by the Scots suggest 90% has now vanished.

[Dee Jiensai]

I'm almost ready to bet that we will within the next 10 years:

- bring the planet over the edge of where it could have been saved
- develop Fusion power
- Find the secret to imortality

At least then i can be sure that god exists and really is an absolute asshole.

[Nordstern]

https://www.sundaypost.com/fp/humani...s-and-animals/

The landmark research blames chemical pollution from plastics, farm fertilisers and pharmaceuticals in the water.
Previously, it was thought the amount of plankton had halved since the 1940s, but the evidence gathered by the Scots suggest 90% has now vanished.

This study was not peer-reviewed and had numerous issues with its methodology. The organization that performed it has no previous studies, is extremely vague on who runs it and how they are funded, and is not listed on Charity Navigator.

[walrus]

https://www.sundaypost.com/fp/humani...s-and-animals/

The landmark research blames chemical pollution from plastics, farm fertilisers and pharmaceuticals in the water.
Previously, it was thought the amount of plankton had halved since the 1940s, but the evidence gathered by the Scots suggest 90% has now vanished.

This study was not peer-reviewed and had numerous issues with its methodology. The organization that performed it has no previous studies, is extremely vague on who runs it and how they are funded, and is not listed on Charity Navigator.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2022...y-of-plankton/

"For the past few days, it has been hard to look at social media without coming across a scary-looking report from the Scottish newspaper The Sunday Post. "Scots team’s research finds Atlantic plankton all but wiped out in catastrophic loss of life," reads the breathless headline. The article claims that a survey of plankton in the ocean found that "evidence... suggest 90% has now vanished." The article then goes on to predict the imminent collapse of our biosphere.

There's just one problem: The article is utter rubbish."

[Hel OWeen]

Well, how should I put this?

I consider my conversation skills above average, i.e. I typically don't lack words to express myself or comment on a topic. But when a bitter, over-the-top satire all of a sudden becomes reality ... ?!?

https://twitter.com/benphillips76/st...68004233314306

[Sacul]

https://www.sundaypost.com/fp/humani...s-and-animals/

The landmark research blames chemical pollution from plastics, farm fertilisers and pharmaceuticals in the water.
Previously, it was thought the amount of plankton had halved since the 1940s, but the evidence gathered by the Scots suggest 90% has now vanished.

This study was not peer-reviewed and had numerous issues with its methodology. The organization that performed it has no previous studies, is extremely vague on who runs it and how they are funded, and is not listed on Charity Navigator.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2022...y-of-plankton/

"For the past few days, it has been hard to look at social media without coming across a scary-looking report from the Scottish newspaper The Sunday Post. "Scots team’s research finds Atlantic plankton all but wiped out in catastrophic loss of life," reads the breathless headline. The article claims that a survey of plankton in the ocean found that "evidence... suggest 90% has now vanished." The article then goes on to predict the imminent collapse of our biosphere.

There's just one problem: The article is utter rubbish."

oef...good
I had some doubts reading that but took it 80% at face value