hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 1154 of 1305 FirstFirst ... 1546541054110411441151115211531154115511561157116412041254 ... LastLast
Results 23,061 to 23,080 of 26088

Thread: (UK EURO WAFFLE) Limey Civil War

  1. #23061
    Keckers's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 31, 2012
    Posts
    14,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post
    Of course its going to cut job numbers in the long run! And why shouldn't it when there is lots of evidence that you dont need two people to do this job?
    Throwing people onto the scrap heap in austerity ravished Britain is exactly what we need more of!

    Who do you think will benefit from less labour costs? It won't be the customers, it won't be the poor bastard who is sacked and it wont be the current employees.
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Mason
    It is absurd that we are capable of witnessing a 40,000 year old system of gender oppression begin to dissolve before our eyes yet still see the abolition of a 200 year old economic system as an unrealistic utopia.

  2. #23062
    Smuggo
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Smuggo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post
    It always amazes me that so many people are (quite rightly) skeptical of the idea that corporations will be motivated by anything but bottom line (long or short term), but haplessly accept that unions are acting altruistically for the public good and not just with the aim of maintaining their own bargaining position and members' income.
    A Union exists to act in protecting the employment rights of its members, which does not purely mean getting them more money. I'll remind you that actually most of the major achievements by unions over the years have been non-monetary, such as the right to paid holiday, sick pay, maternity leave, flexible working and, of course, protecting the jobs of their members.
    Most of those changes were achieved by EU dictat, not the unions, but I accept the general point.

    I understand and agree what the point of Unions is. That's why I can see through the claims that this is about safety. It isnt, it's about job numbers.
    If the driver becomes responsible for safety checks he previously wasn't then it is inevitably about safety whether you think it is or not. And sure it also about job numbers, which is again why Southern's stupid payrise offer was rejected.

    Also who do you think lobbied the EU to make these kind of changes? It certainly wasn't the CBI or IoD.
    Last edited by Smuggo; July 14 2017 at 01:34:53 PM.

  3. #23063
    Keckers's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 31, 2012
    Posts
    14,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post

    I understand and agree what the point of Unions is. That's why I can see through the claims that this is about safety. It isnt, it's about job numbers.
    Why not both?
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Mason
    It is absurd that we are capable of witnessing a 40,000 year old system of gender oppression begin to dissolve before our eyes yet still see the abolition of a 200 year old economic system as an unrealistic utopia.

  4. #23064

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Chair
    Posts
    5,778
    Offering such a pay rise, which is in effect offering drivers a cut of the savings made from firing other staff, is just crass & really does suggest southern rail either miss the point or are so pig headedly determined to cut staff they'll undermine their own justifications to do it. Now if they were to acquiesce & then aslef said actually we're gonna strike for that 20% raise for everyone as well, there'd be grounds for union bashing.

  5. #23065
    Movember '12 Best Facial Hair Movember 2012Donor Lallante's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 13, 2011
    Posts
    17,465
    Quote Originally Posted by Keckers View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post

    I understand and agree what the point of Unions is. That's why I can see through the claims that this is about safety. It isnt, it's about job numbers.
    Why not both?
    Because if there was a positive safety case for cutting staff numbers unions like ASLEF would still oppose it (see: automated driverless trains). So it isnt about safety.

  6. #23066
    Smuggo
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Keckers View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post

    I understand and agree what the point of Unions is. That's why I can see through the claims that this is about safety. It isnt, it's about job numbers.
    Why not both?
    Because if there was a positive safety case for cutting staff numbers unions like ASLEF would still oppose it (see: automated driverless trains). So it isnt about safety.
    Why are automated trains a positive safety case?

  7. #23067
    Djan Seriy Anaplian's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    London (Silphe ingame)
    Posts
    2,825
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Caine View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Smuggo View Post

    Anyway good Brexit piece on the Graun today with particularly salient point quoted for those of you who still think we can stay in the EU.
    I think that's just Djan. And i don't think even he actually thinks that, just desperate hope more than anything.
    I think money talks and if it ever got seriously bad we might, but i don't think it will.

  8. #23068

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Chair
    Posts
    5,778
    Quote Originally Posted by Smuggo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Keckers View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post

    I understand and agree what the point of Unions is. That's why I can see through the claims that this is about safety. It isnt, it's about job numbers.
    Why not both?
    Because if there was a positive safety case for cutting staff numbers unions like ASLEF would still oppose it (see: automated driverless trains). So it isnt about safety.
    Why are automated trains a positive safety case?
    We're already at the stage where it's almost more of a danger to have someone behind the wheel/stick/monitor etc - with nothing to do because all the basic functions of travel are automated - rather than just automating everything. An ironic side effect of ever higher standards of safety is that we're about at the point where the part most prone to failure is the person in control. The recent Air Canada near disaster being an example. The runway was clear, but the pilot misjudged the landing in the dark & nearly slammed into the taxiway.

  9. #23069

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Chair
    Posts
    5,778
    Quote Originally Posted by Duckslayer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lancehot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Smuggo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Keckers View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post

    I understand and agree what the point of Unions is. That's why I can see through the claims that this is about safety. It isnt, it's about job numbers.
    Why not both?
    Because if there was a positive safety case for cutting staff numbers unions like ASLEF would still oppose it (see: automated driverless trains). So it isnt about safety.
    Why are automated trains a positive safety case?
    We're already at the stage where it's almost more of a danger to have someone behind the wheel/stick/monitor etc - with nothing to do because all the basic functions of travel are automated - rather than just automating everything. An ironic side effect of ever higher standards of safety is that we're about at the point where the part most prone to failure is the person in control. The recent Air Canada near disaster being an example. The runway was clear, but the pilot misjudged the landing in the dark & nearly slammed into the taxiway.
    Sounds like one hell of a train journey!
    Fair enough. Here's a more relevant example.

  10. #23070
    Movember '12 Best Facial Hair Movember 2012Donor Lallante's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 13, 2011
    Posts
    17,465
    *crickets*

  11. #23071

    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    2006
    Posts
    4,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post
    *crickets*
    For people who don't piss away their evenings at the office, this is driving/eating time.

    Unless you live 5 minutes from work

  12. #23072
    Smuggo
    Guest
    I don't see how crickets could drive a train.

  13. #23073
    Keckers's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 31, 2012
    Posts
    14,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post

    Because if there was a positive safety case for cutting staff numbers unions like ASLEF would still oppose it (see: automated driverless trains). So it isnt about safety.
    But there isn't so why is that relevant?
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Mason
    It is absurd that we are capable of witnessing a 40,000 year old system of gender oppression begin to dissolve before our eyes yet still see the abolition of a 200 year old economic system as an unrealistic utopia.

  14. #23074
    Malcanis's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Posts
    13,348
    Quote Originally Posted by Keckers View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post

    The union cares because it results in fewer union jobs in the long run. It's exactly the same line they used to object to automated drivers (used all around the world without problems). They will NEVER accept a change that reduces headcount, however sensible.
    No fucking shit, it's literally their job to represent the interests of their current members.

    Do you expect a letting agent to pressure a landlord into reducing rent below the market value?
    Self interest is only reasonable if you're rich
    Quote Originally Posted by Keieueue View Post
    I love Malcanis!

  15. #23075
    Keckers's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 31, 2012
    Posts
    14,246
    Quote Originally Posted by Malcanis View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Keckers View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lallante View Post

    The union cares because it results in fewer union jobs in the long run. It's exactly the same line they used to object to automated drivers (used all around the world without problems). They will NEVER accept a change that reduces headcount, however sensible.
    No fucking shit, it's literally their job to represent the interests of their current members.

    Do you expect a letting agent to pressure a landlord into reducing rent below the market value?
    Self interest is only reasonable if you're rich
    And the just world fallacy suggests that rich people are better anyway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Mason
    It is absurd that we are capable of witnessing a 40,000 year old system of gender oppression begin to dissolve before our eyes yet still see the abolition of a 200 year old economic system as an unrealistic utopia.

  16. #23076

  17. #23077
    Keckers's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 31, 2012
    Posts
    14,246
    Can't we just have all members of the cabinet shot so we can try again?
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Mason
    It is absurd that we are capable of witnessing a 40,000 year old system of gender oppression begin to dissolve before our eyes yet still see the abolition of a 200 year old economic system as an unrealistic utopia.

  18. #23078

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Chair
    Posts
    5,778
    I'm not sure how shooting the best the Tories have to offer will improve things.

  19. #23079
    Donor Shiodome's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    I am a white male.
    Posts
    4,831
    It might provide motivation for some self improvement in the survivors? we all need a little push now and then.

  20. #23080
    GeromeDoutrande's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Fakefrenchistan
    Posts
    1,769
    Have you considered switching to rule by magic 8-ball?

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •