hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 398 of 400 FirstFirst ... 298348388395396397398399400 LastLast
Results 7,941 to 7,960 of 7997

Thread: The Shitposting Thread

  1. #7941
    Malcanis's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Posts
    13,914
    Quote Originally Posted by Marlona Sky View Post
    And there still is problems with local. Just remove it already, CCP. Give it same local as wormhole space, sit back and watch the fireworks unfold. But this should have happened a decade ago to be honest.
    As you well know, it would need to be accompanied with other changes. At minimum, removing cynos from cloaked ships. And other cloak nerfs as well even no active scanning or probing while closely.
    Quote Originally Posted by Keieueue View Post
    I love Malcanis!

  2. #7942
    Meester's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25, 2011
    Posts
    1,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Malcanis View Post
    At minimum, removing cynos from cloaked ships. And other cloak nerfs as well even no active scanning or probing while closely.
    Whoa, lets not go insane here!

  3. #7943
    Malcanis's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Posts
    13,914
    I feel like I should say that EVE isn't dying btw

    it's pretty much the same as it's been for the last few years.
    Quote Originally Posted by Keieueue View Post
    I love Malcanis!

  4. #7944
    Dirk Magnum's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 18, 2011
    Posts
    2,787
    Removing local would be the buff of all buffs for suicide ganking. But what about the downsides?
    What would anyone propose change about D Scan if local was removed? Would it associate pilots with ships?
    What happens when the gaming press reports that Eve removed part of the social dynamic from their PvP MMO because their players are too risk averse and PvP is too hard to find when local is an intel tool?

  5. #7945
    Marlona Sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    7,389
    Quote Originally Posted by Malcanis View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Marlona Sky View Post
    And there still is problems with local. Just remove it already, CCP. Give it same local as wormhole space, sit back and watch the fireworks unfold. But this should have happened a decade ago to be honest.
    As you well know, it would need to be accompanied with other changes. At minimum, removing cynos from cloaked ships. And other cloak nerfs as well even no active scanning or probing while closely.
    For sure, make some logical changes, but get that free intel out of here. Could always make some interesting and dynamic changes to how the d scan works. CCP just needs to decide that they are removing local and then sit down with a smart team and decide how can they make such a decision become a fun and rewarding experience for the player base. And above all immediately dismiss the usual rabble of players who are only interested in keeping their space 100% safe. Tell them to fuck right off.

  6. #7946
    Meester's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25, 2011
    Posts
    1,105
    Not removing local but a step in the right direction anway, CCP are removing chat bubbles - Chat Bubbles To Be Disabled On 2018/04/05

  7. #7947
    Clovnea's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 6, 2011
    Location
    Molden Heath
    Posts
    230
    How did the chat bubbles work btw?

  8. #7948
    Malcanis's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Posts
    13,914
    It was almost instantly successful in persuading me to open up the Options menu and disable convos.
    Quote Originally Posted by Keieueue View Post
    I love Malcanis!

  9. #7949
    Keckers's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 31, 2012
    Posts
    15,744
    Quote Originally Posted by Malcanis View Post
    I feel like I should say that EVE isn't dying btw

    it's pretty much the same as it's been for the last few years.
    I haven't played for the past few years so it's as dead to me as it was before.
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Mason
    It is absurd that we are capable of witnessing a 40,000 year old system of gender oppression begin to dissolve before our eyes yet still see the abolition of a 200 year old economic system as an unrealistic utopia.

  10. #7950
    Banned
    Join Date
    October 23, 2017
    Posts
    787
    Quote Originally Posted by Malcanis View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Duckslayer View Post
    CCPS lack of giving enough of a fuck about botting, rmt and cheating was the thing that really made me become bitter about eve. Just cant give enough of a fuck about it any more. same old same old.
    Ultimately, the people who do that shit cheat themselves. As long as CCP keep enough of a lid on it that it doesn't become obtrusive to me, I just ignore it.
    Good for you. Ultimately the cheats dont just cheat themselves. They cheat those who dont cheat. It was blatant, rampant and obvious back in 2011 and i tried to ignore it. IOt started to negatively effect my playstyle. I saw the vast swathes of nulsec space entirely filled with bots and nothing but bots. Was about 10 whole regio ns which were bot farms in their entirety, back then. For years and years nothing was done. I even got that groon forum dump with them openly RMTing and noone was banned. Eventually that just makes a player go "nah" because clearly some CCP employees are doing mass rmt bot farms on the sly.

  11. #7951
    Bartholomeus Crane's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    7,339
    Quote Originally Posted by Duckslayer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Malcanis View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Duckslayer View Post
    CCPS lack of giving enough of a fuck about botting, rmt and cheating was the thing that really made me become bitter about eve. Just cant give enough of a fuck about it any more. same old same old.
    Ultimately, the people who do that shit cheat themselves. As long as CCP keep enough of a lid on it that it doesn't become obtrusive to me, I just ignore it.
    Good for you. Ultimately the cheats dont just cheat themselves. They cheat those who dont cheat. It was blatant, rampant and obvious back in 2011 and i tried to ignore it. IOt started to negatively effect my playstyle. I saw the vast swathes of nulsec space entirely filled with bots and nothing but bots. Was about 10 whole regio ns which were bot farms in their entirety, back then. For years and years nothing was done. I even got that groon forum dump with them openly RMTing and noone was banned. Eventually that just makes a player go "nah" because clearly some CCP employees are doing mass rmt bot farms on the sly.
    I've never seen any evidence that CCP employees were doing mass RMT bot farms on the sly, but CCP clearly condoned the practice within EVE as a whole.

    And, yes, that did (and does) affect everyone else. That's what you get if you build your game around a shared, open, economy.

    And, obviously, that's a problem when it comes to the viability of the game in the long run. Because it's effects pop up everywhere in the game. And players, young and old, can, indeed, only ignore those for only so long.

    What's the point of sticking to a game that you know is slanted against you through cheats and bots? When there are plenty of alternatives out there that do provide a level playing field ...

    I would rather have expected CCP to have done something about this by now. I'm not surprised they haven't though ...

    What happened to that guy they brought in to deal with all this? I remember ebullient blog and forum posts from this former maker of Christian websites ...
    Quote Originally Posted by Miep View Post
    ...i have no idea whats realy going on...

  12. #7952
    Meester's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25, 2011
    Posts
    1,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Malcanis View Post
    It was almost instantly successful in persuading me to open up the Options menu and disable convos.
    Well luckily for you CCP has now disabled convos by removing all chat channels in their efforts to remove chat bubbles [they are fixing right now btw].

  13. #7953

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Pizza delivery van
    Posts
    5,926
    Quote Originally Posted by Meester View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Malcanis View Post
    It was almost instantly successful in persuading me to open up the Options menu and disable convos.
    Well luckily for you CCP has now disabled convos by removing all chat channels in their efforts to remove chat bubbles [they are fixing right now btw].
    Now they only need to remove all interactions between players in space and in the market and then the toxic playerbase can't harm new players anymore!

  14. #7954
    Meester's Avatar
    Join Date
    October 25, 2011
    Posts
    1,105
    Quote Originally Posted by depili View Post

    Now they only need to remove all interactions between players in space and in the market and then the toxic playerbase can't harm new players anymore!
    Only about 10% [if that] of the playerbase is toxic, gigx and The Mittani etc do not wholly comprise 100%.

  15. #7955
    Malcanis's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Posts
    13,914
    Quote Originally Posted by Bartholomeus Crane View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Duckslayer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Malcanis View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Duckslayer View Post
    CCPS lack of giving enough of a fuck about botting, rmt and cheating was the thing that really made me become bitter about eve. Just cant give enough of a fuck about it any more. same old same old.
    Ultimately, the people who do that shit cheat themselves. As long as CCP keep enough of a lid on it that it doesn't become obtrusive to me, I just ignore it.
    Good for you. Ultimately the cheats dont just cheat themselves. They cheat those who dont cheat. It was blatant, rampant and obvious back in 2011 and i tried to ignore it. IOt started to negatively effect my playstyle. I saw the vast swathes of nulsec space entirely filled with bots and nothing but bots. Was about 10 whole regio ns which were bot farms in their entirety, back then. For years and years nothing was done. I even got that groon forum dump with them openly RMTing and noone was banned. Eventually that just makes a player go "nah" because clearly some CCP employees are doing mass rmt bot farms on the sly.
    I've never seen any evidence that CCP employees were doing mass RMT bot farms on the sly, but CCP clearly condoned the practice within EVE as a whole.

    And, yes, that did (and does) affect everyone else. That's what you get if you build your game around a shared, open, economy.

    And, obviously, that's a problem when it comes to the viability of the game in the long run. Because it's effects pop up everywhere in the game. And players, young and old, can, indeed, only ignore those for only so long.

    What's the point of sticking to a game that you know is slanted against you through cheats and bots? When there are plenty of alternatives out there that do provide a level playing field ...

    I would rather have expected CCP to have done something about this by now. I'm not surprised they haven't though ...

    What happened to that guy they brought in to deal with all this? I remember ebullient blog and forum posts from this former maker of Christian websites ...
    Tell us of these bot free MMOs
    Quote Originally Posted by Keieueue View Post
    I love Malcanis!

  16. #7956
    Super Everator Global Moderator Virtuozzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,046
    Quote Originally Posted by Meester View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by depili View Post

    Now they only need to remove all interactions between players in space and in the market and then the toxic playerbase can't harm new players anymore!
    Only about 10% [if that] of the playerbase is toxic, gigx and The Mittani etc do not wholly comprise 100%.
    Much, much less actually.
    J'ai violé votre vaisseau spatial. C'était amusant....!

    EVE once was about internet spaceships. Then those became serious business.
    Now all that is left is serious business, and spaceships are docked for two years till after the Dust of Incarna
    .

  17. #7957
    Super Everator Global Moderator Virtuozzo's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,046
    Quote Originally Posted by Bartholomeus Crane View Post

    I've never seen any evidence that CCP employees were doing mass RMT bot farms on the sly, but CCP clearly condoned the practice within EVE as a whole.

    And, yes, that did (and does) affect everyone else. That's what you get if you build your game around a shared, open, economy.

    And, obviously, that's a problem when it comes to the viability of the game in the long run. Because it's effects pop up everywhere in the game. And players, young and old, can, indeed, only ignore those for only so long.

    What's the point of sticking to a game that you know is slanted against you through cheats and bots? When there are plenty of alternatives out there that do provide a level playing field ...

    I would rather have expected CCP to have done something about this by now. I'm not surprised they haven't though ...

    What happened to that guy they brought in to deal with all this? I remember ebullient blog and forum posts from this former maker of Christian websites ...
    /me vaguely remembers a little old IA tale of a few good men who got a little caught running ice bots while teaming up with a player initiative at the time along the lines of kickback scheme with a ton of "save high sec" marketing based on suicide tactics :P

    That scheme still bumping miners today, but that said, it's been years since that glitch. Frankly, eve time did go down quite a bit at CCP.


    I'm not sure it's a case of condoning RMT / bots though. RMT is something which has always been a big thing for CCP, but attention for it did suffer heavily during the years of post-startup nepotism. Botting however, I don't think it's ever been a case of condoning, much more a matter of stupidity due to lack of attention - and lack of metrics based insight (or prioritising focus). Sure, practical result is a perception of condoning matters, but perception versus reality and all that.

    Either way, attention is mostly cyclic, but while it's gotten better due to improvements in tracking proper metrics and (part of eggnog's legacy) impact studies what strikes me the most is that it's a lot like a tech race in terms of CCP losing that race. Combined with lack of attention for what was once introduced as a way of shifting workload on players (reporting).

    There was a point where it became clear that a stupid amount of work would have to be done in order to improve general health of matters, but that did coincide with the upstairs people stuck in trauma and ipo's. So, this being Iceland, the man who was brought in to solve a number of things got another wall put in front of him and that was really that, being an outsider.


    Crux of it all is that yes, it is an open and shared interaction system, so yes everything always has a measurable effect. If you leave an experiment running you're bound to get interesting results at some point anyway, if you have something rotten in the kettle that means the soup will become sour. But it is not like CCP has any real capability to consistantly keep things in check. Let's be honest, at minimum because CCP's attention isn't primarily on EVE as a product, the way customers view it. So by default it is cyclic, and that means that shit goes sour by default and then once people taste it CCP adds sugar and cleans it up. In many ways it is perfectly understandable, but it's also an approach which doesn't really recognise the nature of the system itself. Behaviour is a contaminant. Which is why at minimum you need to run short cycles of cleanup, maintain consistant insight in tech evolution, and have PR stuff ready for when players start vomiting.

    The one thing CCP has improved on is that last bit. I suppose in terms of historic perspective that's an improvement.

    Here's the thing though, while it should be obvious that the soup can go sour and that yes it will go sour if the cook doesn't do his job once in a while, botting is primarily a perception problem exactly because it's a topic in that arena of behavioural contaminants / stimuli. Effective impact isn't linear, it's much more along the lines of ripples in game theory. Which is why CCP can get away with not having a consistant cleanup activity. But it is also why most players do not notice actual effects.

    That makes the primary red flag for CCP not the presence of bots, or the impact models of bots over time, but the presence of players presenting a perception problem of "omg bots everywhere".
    J'ai violé votre vaisseau spatial. C'était amusant....!

    EVE once was about internet spaceships. Then those became serious business.
    Now all that is left is serious business, and spaceships are docked for two years till after the Dust of Incarna
    .

  18. #7958
    Donor Verite Rendition's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    4,027
    Quote Originally Posted by Virtuozzo View Post
    what strikes me the most is that it's a lot like a tech race in terms of CCP losing that race.
    It's only going to get worse, as well. Even if CCP could block people hooking directly into the client, neural networking-backed computer vision is improving at a rapid enough pace that all the tech being used for self-driving cars can be applied to bots. They won't play the game exactly like a human, but they can be trained to come close; close enough that other than the hours played, it would be very difficult to tell them apart from a human carebear.
    Tranquility (EVE) Influence Map
    Life is absurd, but with a little effort we can make it completely ridiculous

  19. #7959
    Donor Verite Rendition's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    4,027
    See?! The bot uprising has already begun!
    Tranquility (EVE) Influence Map
    Life is absurd, but with a little effort we can make it completely ridiculous

  20. #7960
    Bartholomeus Crane's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    7,339
    Quote Originally Posted by Virtuozzo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bartholomeus Crane View Post

    I've never seen any evidence that CCP employees were doing mass RMT bot farms on the sly, but CCP clearly condoned the practice within EVE as a whole.

    And, yes, that did (and does) affect everyone else. That's what you get if you build your game around a shared, open, economy.

    And, obviously, that's a problem when it comes to the viability of the game in the long run. Because it's effects pop up everywhere in the game. And players, young and old, can, indeed, only ignore those for only so long.

    What's the point of sticking to a game that you know is slanted against you through cheats and bots? When there are plenty of alternatives out there that do provide a level playing field ...

    I would rather have expected CCP to have done something about this by now. I'm not surprised they haven't though ...

    What happened to that guy they brought in to deal with all this? I remember ebullient blog and forum posts from this former maker of Christian websites ...
    /me vaguely remembers a little old IA tale of a few good men who got a little caught running ice bots while teaming up with a player initiative at the time along the lines of kickback scheme with a ton of "save high sec" marketing based on suicide tactics :P

    That scheme still bumping miners today, but that said, it's been years since that glitch. Frankly, eve time did go down quite a bit at CCP.


    I'm not sure it's a case of condoning RMT / bots though. RMT is something which has always been a big thing for CCP, but attention for it did suffer heavily during the years of post-startup nepotism. Botting however, I don't think it's ever been a case of condoning, much more a matter of stupidity due to lack of attention - and lack of metrics based insight (or prioritising focus). Sure, practical result is a perception of condoning matters, but perception versus reality and all that.

    Either way, attention is mostly cyclic, but while it's gotten better due to improvements in tracking proper metrics and (part of eggnog's legacy) impact studies what strikes me the most is that it's a lot like a tech race in terms of CCP losing that race. Combined with lack of attention for what was once introduced as a way of shifting workload on players (reporting).

    There was a point where it became clear that a stupid amount of work would have to be done in order to improve general health of matters, but that did coincide with the upstairs people stuck in trauma and ipo's. So, this being Iceland, the man who was brought in to solve a number of things got another wall put in front of him and that was really that, being an outsider.


    Crux of it all is that yes, it is an open and shared interaction system, so yes everything always has a measurable effect. If you leave an experiment running you're bound to get interesting results at some point anyway, if you have something rotten in the kettle that means the soup will become sour. But it is not like CCP has any real capability to consistantly keep things in check. Let's be honest, at minimum because CCP's attention isn't primarily on EVE as a product, the way customers view it. So by default it is cyclic, and that means that shit goes sour by default and then once people taste it CCP adds sugar and cleans it up. In many ways it is perfectly understandable, but it's also an approach which doesn't really recognise the nature of the system itself. Behaviour is a contaminant. Which is why at minimum you need to run short cycles of cleanup, maintain consistant insight in tech evolution, and have PR stuff ready for when players start vomiting.

    The one thing CCP has improved on is that last bit. I suppose in terms of historic perspective that's an improvement.

    Here's the thing though, while it should be obvious that the soup can go sour and that yes it will go sour if the cook doesn't do his job once in a while, botting is primarily a perception problem exactly because it's a topic in that arena of behavioural contaminants / stimuli. Effective impact isn't linear, it's much more along the lines of ripples in game theory. Which is why CCP can get away with not having a consistant cleanup activity. But it is also why most players do not notice actual effects.

    That makes the primary red flag for CCP not the presence of bots, or the impact models of bots over time, but the presence of players presenting a perception problem of "omg bots everywhere".
    There is much in the above that is, obviously, true. Yes, CCP is more concerned with the RMT aspect of botting than the botting itself. They want the money themselves after all. It is also true that CCP doesn't do `constant attention to details`, and so any action on things like botting is going to be cyclical. Players make a stink about it, CCP does some windowdressing to appease perception, and then: no follow-up. Because botting, without, or with almost no RMT, still results in higher player numbers, and that's a metric that's important to CCP.

    Though mostly it's CCP's systemic incapability to 'stick with a theme', and it's endemic incompetence to actuate anything meaningful over the long term. CCP simply doesn't have any the capability to keep things in check, but this is not because 'EVE is EVE', and/or somehow intractable by its own nature. It is only impossible because CCP can't, or doesn't want to, do it.

    However, I get the feeling that all of these cyclical attempts to do something short term about botting are all in the (distant) past. When was the last cycle? Or rather, given how ineffective/uninterested CCP really is in dealing with this issue: when was the last time players made a stink about botting?

    Because the players are a factor in this as well, and to CCP's detriment: because if they make a stink, but, for all the PR efforts, they still don't see any real change in the game, they may not make a stink next time, but merely take their issue to third parties, and/or leave altogether. In which case CCP may have shut up the complainers, and thus had a successful PR stint from their perspective, while meanwhile losing the PR war everywhere else, while keeping new players at bay, and with players still leaving. You can only spin this so far.

    The whole effort is then shallow. As is CCP. As is EVE. Hollowed out by incompetence. How long can CCP reply on sour soup lovers, or those suffering from Stockholm Syndrome?
    Quote Originally Posted by Miep View Post
    ...i have no idea whats realy going on...

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •