hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678
Results 141 to 156 of 156

Thread: Patch-Notes [Vanguard]

  1. #141
    Jester's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Elite, vicinity of Altair
    Posts
    1,988
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post
    i've always wondered why CCP never thought of creating decoration ships (like the apotheosis, victorineux yatch, leopard) and such, for aurum.
    Because then you're spinning ships out of thin air and collecting money for them without player involvement, which is bad.
    Ripard Teg (among others)... what's our new alliance called again?
    I was once Deemed Worthy To Wield The Banhammer, to good effect. Or at least, that's what most of EVE believes.

  2. #142

    Join Date
    July 13, 2011
    Posts
    968
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post
    i've always wondered why CCP never thought of creating decoration ships (like the apotheosis, victorineux yatch, leopard) and such, for aurum.
    Because then you're spinning ships out of thin air and collecting money for them without player involvement, which is bad.
    There was never involvement in creating those ships in the first place Jester, what the heck are you talking about?.

    I'm only considering trophy ships, that don't have any fitting, and cannot be insured. The only thing that can be obtained from them is ISK changing hands if you sell them on the market, but its the same with SKINs, and other AURUM-only items.

    So whats the difference?

  3. #143
    Jester's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Elite, vicinity of Altair
    Posts
    1,988
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post
    i've always wondered why CCP never thought of creating decoration ships (like the apotheosis, victorineux yatch, leopard) and such, for aurum.
    Because then you're spinning ships out of thin air and collecting money for them without player involvement, which is bad.
    There was never involvement in creating those ships in the first place Jester, what the heck are you talking about?.

    I'm only considering trophy ships, that don't have any fitting, and cannot be insured. The only thing that can be obtained from them is ISK changing hands if you sell them on the market, but its the same with SKINs, and other AURUM-only items.

    So whats the difference?
    The fact that you want players to pay real money for a ship with no player involvement in creating it. If CCP gives away ships and most everyone has an easy opportunity to get one, that's fine. If you want players to pay real money for a ship, no matter how seemingly benign the bonuses might be, you've taken the first small step down the slippery slope to a Lowe.
    Ripard Teg (among others)... what's our new alliance called again?
    I was once Deemed Worthy To Wield The Banhammer, to good effect. Or at least, that's what most of EVE believes.

  4. #144
    Straight Hustlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 14, 2011
    Posts
    10,578
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester View Post

    you've taken the first small step down the slippery slope to a Lowe.
    Ah yes I can see that fitting perfectly with CCP; I mean the bit about changing the lowe from being comparable, but somewhat less effective than its counterparts and nerfing it into the ground because enough horrible players complained about it.

  5. #145

    Join Date
    July 13, 2011
    Posts
    968
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post
    i've always wondered why CCP never thought of creating decoration ships (like the apotheosis, victorineux yatch, leopard) and such, for aurum.
    Because then you're spinning ships out of thin air and collecting money for them without player involvement, which is bad.
    There was never involvement in creating those ships in the first place Jester, what the heck are you talking about?.

    I'm only considering trophy ships, that don't have any fitting, and cannot be insured. The only thing that can be obtained from them is ISK changing hands if you sell them on the market, but its the same with SKINs, and other AURUM-only items.

    So whats the difference?
    The fact that you want players to pay real money for a ship with no player involvement in creating it. If CCP gives away ships and most everyone has an easy opportunity to get one, that's fine. If you want players to pay real money for a ship, no matter how seemingly benign the bonuses might be, you've taken the first small step down the slippery slope to a Lowe.
    I see now what you are saying, it CCP opens that door, its going to open a much more dangerous option down the road ahead.

    If CCP ever gives actual combat/industrial/mining ships for RL money, i'll quit eve for good.

  6. #146
    spitroast's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 8, 2015
    Location
    Angry Northern Bastard, UK
    Posts
    2,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post
    i've always wondered why CCP never thought of creating decoration ships (like the apotheosis, victorineux yatch, leopard) and such, for aurum.
    The Victo Yatch and Leopard aren't purely decorative as I use both rather frequently, the Leopard more than the Yacht atm (20AU warp speeeeeeeeeeeeeed) but they both are very useful ships and fill a small niche perfectly. The Apotheosis on the other hand is useless shite as is the CSM shuttle....

  7. #147
    Malcanis's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Posts
    16,345
    Quote Originally Posted by Jester View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post
    i've always wondered why CCP never thought of creating decoration ships (like the apotheosis, victorineux yatch, leopard) and such, for aurum.
    Because then you're spinning ships out of thin air and collecting money for them without player involvement, which is bad.
    "Requires 2500 AUR and base hull/list of minerals/Fedos"

  8. #148
    Super Moderator Global Moderator QuackBot's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 7, 2012
    Posts
    21,326
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post

    I see now what you are saying, it CCP opens that door, its going to open a much more dangerous option down the road ahead.

    If CCP ever gives actual combat/industrial/mining ships for RL money, i'll quit eve for good.
    I see you have read nietzsche's little known work "beyond boobs and butts".

  9. #149
    W0lf Crendraven's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 26, 2012
    Location
    The United
    Posts
    8,970
    Quote Originally Posted by QuackBot View Post
    I see you have read nietzsche's little known work "beyond boobs and butts".
    Imo the single best line he has ever writen
    Quote Originally Posted by QuackBot View Post
    I see you have read nietzsche's little known work "beyond boobs and butts".

  10. #150
    Malcanis's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Posts
    16,345
    Quote Originally Posted by W0lf Crendraven View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by QuackBot View Post
    I see you have read nietzsche's little known work "beyond boobs and butts".
    Imo the single best line he has ever writen
    Searching Amazon now tbh

  11. #151

    Join Date
    July 13, 2011
    Posts
    968
    Quote Originally Posted by QuackBot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post

    I see now what you are saying, it CCP opens that door, its going to open a much more dangerous option down the road ahead.

    If CCP ever gives actual combat/industrial/mining ships for RL money, i'll quit eve for good.
    I see you have read nietzsche's little known work "beyond boobs and butts".
    i see you have not realized there are only sandy vaginas in this forum.

  12. #152
    spitroast's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 8, 2015
    Location
    Angry Northern Bastard, UK
    Posts
    2,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by QuackBot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post

    I see now what you are saying, it CCP opens that door, its going to open a much more dangerous option down the road ahead.

    If CCP ever gives actual combat/industrial/mining ships for RL money, i'll quit eve for good.
    I see you have read nietzsche's little known work "beyond boobs and butts".
    i see you have not realized there are only sandy vaginas in this forum.

  13. #153

    Join Date
    December 15, 2012
    Posts
    387
    I will never be able to get that image out of my head

    cheers you cunt

  14. #154
    OrangeAfroMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 20, 2011
    Posts
    7,376
    Any notes for yesterday's patch?
    Actually an '06.

    EVE: OrangeAfroMan
    Dust514: Andrelommech
    WoT: NorthernNomad
    MWO: Loren Ward

    www.twitch.tv/oameve

  15. #155
    Chakrai's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    2,682
    Quote Originally Posted by spitroast View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by QuackBot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alain Colcer View Post

    I see now what you are saying, it CCP opens that door, its going to open a much more dangerous option down the road ahead.

    If CCP ever gives actual combat/industrial/mining ships for RL money, i'll quit eve for good.
    I see you have read nietzsche's little known work "beyond boobs and butts".
    i see you have not realized there are only sandy vaginas in this forum.
    What the fuck did that come from?
    She did what?

  16. #156
    Movember 2012 Stoffl's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    The original viennese waffle
    Posts
    22,728
    Do you REALLY wanna know ?

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •