Originally Posted by Intigo
lol
also those fits seriously need a web.
the 100mn ab is totally worthless without a web to counter web a bc back. otherwise they can just mwd at a similar speed to you to keep you tackled for longer
lol
also those fits seriously need a web.
the 100mn ab is totally worthless without a web to counter web a bc back. otherwise they can just mwd at a similar speed to you to keep you tackled for longer
[Tengu, Proteus Wannabe]
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Damage Control II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Federation Navy 10MN MicroWarpdrive
Caldari Navy Large Shield Extender
Photon Scattering Field II
True Sansha Warp Scrambler
Federation Navy Stasis Webifier
Invulnerability Field II
Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M
Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M
Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M
Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M
Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M
Heavy Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge M
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Medium Core Defence Field Extender I
Tengu Defensive - Supplemental Screening
Tengu Electronics - Dissolution Sequencer
Tengu Engineering - Power Core Multiplier
Tengu Offensive - Magnetic Infusion Basin
Tengu Propulsion - Intercalated Nanofibers
Fits all level V
601 DPS
94kehp (70/88/82/70 resist profile) [18k total shield HP]
1287m/s (1821 OH'd)
4.5 + 6.3km Range (11 + 7.8km with null, drops to 479 DPS)
I don't get it. Did you wake up one day and think "ferox is too cheap, needs pimping" ?
Yes.
The active tanked laser version (of the ferox) didn't work too well either.
I was EFTing a neutron Tengu yesterday. =D Ended up with a nearly identical fit.
Would fly it if I had an extra billion lying around burning a hole in my pocket.
The 'Because of Falcon' fit is lacking a web as i sacrificed a mid for the sensor strength subsystem. I was given so much shit for not taking into account falcons last time. So i did 2 fits.
2nd fit has a web look closer, i love the web fit for Low-Sec. Enabled me to runaway from a Proteus.
Dropping the interdiction would be practical if there weren't so many blobs of cunt wipes roaming about looking for easy kills, not being capable of anything else.
Hi guys,
i tried to modify the endless's fit, to have little more tank and resistances. Only way was to swap dissolution sequencer to emergent locus sub, that's pretty useless for bonuses, but give an extra mid. So now i have same fit with +1 med (for tanking) -1 low (no DCU) same DPS. Only difference is resistance to ECM dropped to 20 (35 was in endless's fit) and targeting range dropped from 117km to 81km.
Question is if this "more tanked" version justify the loss of DCU, targeting range and defence against ECM..
Here the mod:
[Tengu, 100mn AB mod endless]
Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System
Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System
Caldari Navy Ballistic Control System
Chelm's Modified Reactor Control Unit
Imperial Navy Medium Capacitor Booster, Navy Cap Booster 400
Gist X-Type Large Shield Booster
Core X-Type 100MN Afterburner
Republic Fleet Warp Disruptor
Federation Navy Stasis Webifier
Dread Guristas Photon Scattering Field
Caldari Navy Invulnerability Field
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Scourge Heavy Missile
Medium Ancillary Current Router II
Medium Warhead Flare Catalyst II
Medium Warhead Rigor Catalyst II
Tengu Defensive - Amplification Node
Tengu Electronics - Emergent Locus Analyzer
Tengu Engineering - Capacitor Regeneration Matrix
Tengu Offensive - Accelerated Ejection Bay
Tengu Propulsion - Fuel Catalyst
I would say no. its designed for fighting blobs/small gangs and they will have ECM. without being able to counter web etc and take out tacklers it will end up much worse I think
my pvp course is on hold atm until after AT unless you make me an offer I cant resist. sorry
What Podcat says. Also the higher sensor strength will save you a few more times from raging at "dishonour drones"
And since you'd be flying the AB-gu for fun and enjoyment cutting down the time you spend looking at 20second timer bars counts a lot in my opinion
God wills it!
What about using a CN Invuln instead of an EM-hardener and dropping the flare for an EM rig?
Noone bothers with hams anymore? :c
A covertops/nullified HAM tengu can get a decent 450 dps.
how about simply not spending any money on a tengu thats just gunna get perma-jammed and die?
So I've been looking at getting a 100mn AB Tengu, and I've got two questions for those who have flown them before. For reference, I'll be running it with a T3 command booster w/ a mix of skirmish and siege links, and skirmish mindlink.
1) If you had to chose, would a Nano or rigor II rig be better? The Nano adds like, 250-350m/s (depending on implants), and cuts align time by ~3.3 seconds. The Rigor II makes the furies hit cruisers and frigates a lot harder, and moar applied dps is always good.
2) For implant sets, snakes or crystals? The Tengu would essentially be the *only* active boosting shield ship I'd fly (at least for a long time), and therefore would be of limited use to me. Snakes would be much more applicable, but the tank starts to look thin then.. Of course, it would also run like a bat out of hell (esp. with the nano), and that is its own form of survivability.
Was looking at the viability of ham fits, talked to a veteran tengu pilot, who dismissed the idea offhand and wouldn't even look at my potential fitting. No explanation either other than "HMLs rox and you dun need anything else!".
So I ask you, the setups forum of FHC: can this be made to work?
[Tengu, HAM]
Damage Control II
Ballistic Control System II
Ballistic Control System II
Ballistic Control System II
Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon I Microwarpdrive
Invulnerability Field II
Invulnerability Field II
Photon Scattering Field II
Domination Warp Disruptor
Federation Navy Stasis Webifier
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Terror Assault Missile
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Terror Assault Missile
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Terror Assault Missile
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Terror Assault Missile
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Terror Assault Missile
Heavy Assault Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Terror Assault Missile
Medium Bay Loading Accelerator I
Medium Ancillary Current Router I
Medium Hydraulic Bay Thrusters I
Tengu Defensive - Supplemental Screening
Tengu Electronics - Dissolution Sequencer
Tengu Engineering - Augmented Capacitor Reservoir
Tengu Offensive - Accelerated Ejection Bay
Tengu Propulsion - Gravitational Capacitor
Calculated with standard gang bonuses but without links.
59,751 ehp. 810/952 dps@~35km with 5% hardwires. 1060 heated dps @~31km w/rage. Dps figures with 5% hardwires. Requires PG hardwire.
Last edited by Rania Serlia; August 10 2011 at 05:36:28 PM.
I consider myself to be a sovereign space holding entity, however the simple fact is that my sphere of influence rarely if ever extends beyond the optimal+falloff*2 of my ship's turrets.
If you change the engineering sup to cap regen matrix you get 36% stable with web off, it drops one launcher and the need for an ACR but you can fit a LSE and have +1 low slot
Spoiler:
IS-4, T110E5, T-54, E-50, IS-8, M103, T34, Type 59, M26 Pershing, AMX 13 90, KV-3, SU-122-44, AMX AC Mle. 1946, SU-101, T20, T71, T25/2, KV-1S, T21, Jgdpzr IV, Sherman E8, GW Panther, AMX 12t, M18, Stug III, T-50-2, T-34, PzIV, ELC AMX, Crusader, Covenanter, SU-26, T1, RenaultFT.
Tech 1 bay loading accels gah
Contract stuff to Seraphina Amaranth.
"You give me the awful impression - I hate to have to say - of someone who hasn't read any of the arguments against your position. Ever."
Bump to T2 rigs where you want, obviously.
Except that a T2 loading accel won't fit with that rig combination due to it taking 300 calibration. You could drop the hydraulic bay thrusters to another flare and fit it but you'd lose a little range.
Honestly though IMO that rig combination in T1 gives a good mix of range and damage for hams.
Notr sure I want to sacrifice a launcher for a little more buffer though. The point of the supar theoryfit was that you can get 1k dps npnp from a tengu with 5% hardwires and a T2 fit. I'm not sure I'd ever fly it over a loki(though similar ehp buffer with no LSE is silly), but the idea of doing 1k dps from a cruiser @30km is pretty attractive.
I consider myself to be a sovereign space holding entity, however the simple fact is that my sphere of influence rarely if ever extends beyond the optimal+falloff*2 of my ship's turrets.
BLA stacking nerfed through three BCS? Not really worth it imo. Just go for more range.
Contract stuff to Seraphina Amaranth.
"You give me the awful impression - I hate to have to say - of someone who hasn't read any of the arguments against your position. Ever."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks