hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 454 of 524 FirstFirst ... 354404444451452453454455456457464504 ... LastLast
Results 9,061 to 9,080 of 10473

Thread: St Louis - Muskets Thread (USA civil unrest)

  1. #9061
    evil edna's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    5,197
    Alistair thinks prison doesnt sound too bad because his weight prevents him from leaving his house

  2. #9062
    Alistair's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Missing My Sadie Cat
    Posts
    11,766
    Quote Originally Posted by evil edna View Post
    Alistair thinks prison doesnt sound too bad because his weight prevents him from leaving his house
    The internet: making weak little nerds awful brave since 1990.


    "Nothing left to do, but smile, smile, smile......" Robert Hunter, "He's Gone"
    "...we looked very closely at the matter and concluded that unfortunately arseholes also get to benefit from democratic freedoms." Andreas Geisel, Interior Affairs Senator, Germany


  3. #9063
    Keckers's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 31, 2012
    Posts
    13,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    The "I believe in the principle" people are the same folks who think we should spare Roof's life, give him free taxpayer-funded college, healthcare, a nice cell with a comfy bed, TV, and access to pretty farm to walk around, maybe some conjugal visits if some nutbar falls in love with him via mail, and of course therapy, and maybe they'll just release him back into society in a few years once he's vaguely been "reformed".
    Yes, that is exactly what I said you stupid fat cunt.
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Mason
    It is absurd that we are capable of witnessing a 40,000 year old system of gender oppression begin to dissolve before our eyes yet still see the abolition of a 200 year old economic system as an unrealistic utopia.

  4. #9064
    Keckers's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 31, 2012
    Posts
    13,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by evil edna View Post
    Alistair thinks prison doesnt sound too bad because his weight prevents him from leaving his house
    The internet: making weak little nerds awful brave since 1990.
    Being able to stand up when you weigh 400lbs doesn't make you strong. It makes you capable of basic mobility.
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Mason
    It is absurd that we are capable of witnessing a 40,000 year old system of gender oppression begin to dissolve before our eyes yet still see the abolition of a 200 year old economic system as an unrealistic utopia.

  5. #9065
    evil edna's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    5,197
    to be fair i couldnt deadlift 400lb

  6. #9066
    Keckers's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 31, 2012
    Posts
    13,809
    Quote Originally Posted by evil edna View Post
    to be fair i couldnt deadlift 400lb
    Can you climb several flights of stairs without risking a cardiac event though?
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Mason
    It is absurd that we are capable of witnessing a 40,000 year old system of gender oppression begin to dissolve before our eyes yet still see the abolition of a 200 year old economic system as an unrealistic utopia.

  7. #9067
    evil edna's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    5,197
    yes but i hate myself and my thin privilege every time

  8. #9068
    mewninn's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    1,380
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post


    The "I believe in the principle" people are the same folks who think we should spare Roof's life, give him free taxpayer-funded college, healthcare, a nice cell with a comfy bed, TV, and access to pretty farm to walk around, maybe some conjugal visits if some nutbar falls in love with him via mail, and of course therapy, and maybe they'll just release him back into society in a few years once he's vaguely been "reformed".
    Except that wouldn't have been the case.

    The severity of crimes and a Federal life sentence would have meant a fulfilling existence in a tiny concrete box at ADX Florence.

    If you ask me, I'd rather be put down.

  9. #9069

    Join Date
    April 13, 2011
    Posts
    3,754
    Today we learn the best punishment system is based on satisfying feelings of revenge...

  10. #9070
    mewninn's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    1,380
    I was only disputing his idea that a life sentence would mean going easy on Dylann Roof.
    Last edited by mewninn; January 11 2017 at 05:39:09 PM.

  11. #9071
    thebomby's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    6,457
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by UsernameisValidandNotinUs View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Keckers View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Keckers View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by UsernameisValidandNotinUs View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/us/dyl...ial/index.html

    Dylann Roof (Charleston Church Shooter/Racist) sentenced to death.

    And Justice will be done.

    In before the usual "but, but the Death Penalty is wrong and cruel and we shouldn't have it!!!" responses.
    inb4ing doesn't make the death penalty right you baddie
    You go right ahead and argue for sparing Dylann Roof's life. Best of luck.
    If even a single person is wrongly put to death by the state (protip, there have been potentially hundreds) then the death sentence should be removed.

    There's no point looking at a single case. The big picture is more important.
    I'll be sure to add you to the "Save Dylann Roof's life" side of the ledger.
    I care more about the principle than the single case.

    Mainly because I'm not a short sighted conservative who can only form opinion based on emotion and populist rhetoric.
    See Alistair, this is what happens when you go completely full conservative, I have to agree with Keckers.
    Agree all you like my friend, I'm going to enjoy hearing (sadly, in about 10 years the way our system works) that Roof is dead, and I hope the little fuck suffers frankly.

    The "if you fuck it up once, we have to shelve the whole thing" concept is as dumb as "no matter how many fuck'ups we find we still must kill em' all" side of the argument.

    There is no doubt or question Roof, a horrible racist pig, is guilty of this crime, and I'm glad he's going to burn in hell for what he did to those poor people in that church.

    The "I believe in the principle" people are the same folks who think we should spare Roof's life, give him free taxpayer-funded college, healthcare, a nice cell with a comfy bed, TV, and access to pretty farm to walk around, maybe some conjugal visits if some nutbar falls in love with him via mail, and of course therapy, and maybe they'll just release him back into society in a few years once he's vaguely been "reformed".

    So yeah, guess I'm close to full conservative here, and glad to do it. The hatred of the victims that is personified in the "nope, lets rehabilitate him" side disgusts me.
    You do realise there are more shades of grey (lol) than black and white? While I personally think that yes, the fucker should be killed, the argument that innocents are being killed is an important one, especially considering some of the people who have been released after having spent half their lives in jail for crimes they didn't commit are ruined for life. There is also space to think that someone like Roof would not get any decent treatment in jail, and would have to be kept in solitary to prevent him getting access to other nazi motherfuckers.
    Будь смиренным, будь кротким, не заботься о тленном
    Власти, данной Богом, сынок, будь навеки верным...
    Я люблю Росcию, я - патриот

  12. #9072

    Join Date
    July 14, 2013
    Posts
    1,334
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    Agree all you like my friend, I'm going to enjoy hearing (sadly, in about 10 years the way our system works) that Roof is dead, and I hope the little fuck suffers frankly.

    The "if you fuck it up once, we have to shelve the whole thing" concept is as dumb as "no matter how many fuck'ups we find we still must kill em' all" side of the argument.

    There is no doubt or question Roof, a horrible racist pig, is guilty of this crime, and I'm glad he's going to burn in hell for what he did to those poor people in that church.

    The "I believe in the principle" people are the same folks who think we should spare Roof's life, give him free taxpayer-funded college, healthcare, a nice cell with a comfy bed, TV, and access to pretty farm to walk around, maybe some conjugal visits if some nutbar falls in love with him via mail, and of course therapy, and maybe they'll just release him back into society in a few years once he's vaguely been "reformed".

    So yeah, guess I'm close to full conservative here, and glad to do it. The hatred of the victims that is personified in the "nope, lets rehabilitate him" side disgusts me.
    So you want to be able to execute the worst of the worst. Timothy McVeigh used to be the poster child, now it's Dylan Roof.

    And you think it's worth the risk that by having the death penalty available, the State might kill an innocent person (it's happened before, it'll happen again).

    And you think you're in a position to mock people who disagree, and do not feel that the risk of killing innocent people is worth slating the bloodlust of those who would rather see Roof killed than simply locked in a cell for the next 80 years.
    Totally not Victoria Stecker forgetting his password and not having access to his work email.

  13. #9073
    Alistair's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Missing My Sadie Cat
    Posts
    11,766
    Quote Originally Posted by thebomby View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by UsernameisValidandNotinUs View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Keckers View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Keckers View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by UsernameisValidandNotinUs View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/us/dyl...ial/index.html

    Dylann Roof (Charleston Church Shooter/Racist) sentenced to death.

    And Justice will be done.

    In before the usual "but, but the Death Penalty is wrong and cruel and we shouldn't have it!!!" responses.
    inb4ing doesn't make the death penalty right you baddie
    You go right ahead and argue for sparing Dylann Roof's life. Best of luck.
    If even a single person is wrongly put to death by the state (protip, there have been potentially hundreds) then the death sentence should be removed.

    There's no point looking at a single case. The big picture is more important.
    I'll be sure to add you to the "Save Dylann Roof's life" side of the ledger.
    I care more about the principle than the single case.

    Mainly because I'm not a short sighted conservative who can only form opinion based on emotion and populist rhetoric.
    See Alistair, this is what happens when you go completely full conservative, I have to agree with Keckers.
    Agree all you like my friend, I'm going to enjoy hearing (sadly, in about 10 years the way our system works) that Roof is dead, and I hope the little fuck suffers frankly.

    The "if you fuck it up once, we have to shelve the whole thing" concept is as dumb as "no matter how many fuck'ups we find we still must kill em' all" side of the argument.

    There is no doubt or question Roof, a horrible racist pig, is guilty of this crime, and I'm glad he's going to burn in hell for what he did to those poor people in that church.

    The "I believe in the principle" people are the same folks who think we should spare Roof's life, give him free taxpayer-funded college, healthcare, a nice cell with a comfy bed, TV, and access to pretty farm to walk around, maybe some conjugal visits if some nutbar falls in love with him via mail, and of course therapy, and maybe they'll just release him back into society in a few years once he's vaguely been "reformed".

    So yeah, guess I'm close to full conservative here, and glad to do it. The hatred of the victims that is personified in the "nope, lets rehabilitate him" side disgusts me.
    You do realise there are more shades of grey (lol) than black and white? While I personally think that yes, the fucker should be killed, the argument that innocents are being killed is an important one, especially considering some of the people who have been released after having spent half their lives in jail for crimes they didn't commit are ruined for life. There is also space to think that someone like Roof would not get any decent treatment in jail, and would have to be kept in solitary to prevent him getting access to other nazi motherfuckers.
    Shades of Grey such as "Roof is 100% guilty and deserves to die, and having that view does not mean I want or support innocent people being killed by the State".

    You don't say...


    "Nothing left to do, but smile, smile, smile......" Robert Hunter, "He's Gone"
    "...we looked very closely at the matter and concluded that unfortunately arseholes also get to benefit from democratic freedoms." Andreas Geisel, Interior Affairs Senator, Germany


  14. #9074
    Alistair's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Missing My Sadie Cat
    Posts
    11,766
    By the way, in the "wrongful death sentences" concern, I think this is relevant:

    Quote Originally Posted by CNN
    http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/12/us/dylann-roof-death-penalty-explainer/index.html

    How often does the federal government execute convicts?

    Very rarely -- especially compared with some of the 31 states that enforce capital punishment.

    In fact, the federal government hasn't executed anyone in 14 years.

    The federal death penalty was reinstated in 1988 after a 16-year moratorium. Since then, only three federal inmates have been executed -- all in Terre Haute, Indiana.

    -- Timothy McVeigh, for the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing that killed 168 people. He was executed on June 11, 2001.

    -- Juan Raul Garza, who was convicted of killing three people and running a marijuana drug ring in Texas. He was executed on June 19, 2001.

    -- Louis Jones, for the kidnapping and murder of 19-year-old Army Pvt. Tracie McBride. He was executed on March 18, 2003.
    Were any of these people wrongfully convicted/innocent?

    This isn't Texas, where perhaps an argument can be made for stricter application of the death penalty and how it's applied and to whom.

    The Feds generally don't kill you unless it's a seriously open and shut case.

    You don't get a much more open and shut case than Roof.

    So why, I'd ask, is it wrong to support the law and the death penalty for Roof on a singlar basis? I'm not cheering every death penalty case ever, I'm cheering THIS one.


    "Nothing left to do, but smile, smile, smile......" Robert Hunter, "He's Gone"
    "...we looked very closely at the matter and concluded that unfortunately arseholes also get to benefit from democratic freedoms." Andreas Geisel, Interior Affairs Senator, Germany


  15. #9075

    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    2006
    Posts
    4,338
    I'm still amazed that people consider death to be a lesser punishment than spending the next 80 years in an American jail.

    Death is just as much an end to suffering as it is an end to joy and you can guarantee that Roofs time in jail would be far more unpleasant than oblivion.

    If you are targeting just one person individually as a unique case then the last real justification for a death sentence (general deterrence) vanishes.
    Last edited by Nicholai Pestot; January 12 2017 at 03:52:33 PM.

  16. #9076

    Join Date
    July 14, 2013
    Posts
    1,334
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post

    So why, I'd ask, is it wrong to support the law and the death penalty for Roof on a singlar basis? I'm not cheering every death penalty case ever, I'm cheering THIS one.
    Sure, you can support Roof's execution.

    It's a question of whether we can have that without the nasty side-effects.

    As long as the death penalty is legal, we're going to have things like Texas, which will happily put people on death row via prosecutorial malfeasance.

    And the case in North Carolina (I think) where a dude was convicted of killing a cop entirely on witness testimony, and something like seven out of nine witnesses later recanted and said they'd been pressured heavily by the police. But the State's final decision was, "Well, he messed up some of the paperwork for his appeal, so we're not required to give him another chance and we're gonna kill him anyway." Sure, there's still a chance that that guy is guilty, but it's no longer the air-tight slam dunk that a case like Roof or McVeigh is.

    And this will continue to happen as long as the death penalty is legal.

    You may not be 'cheering' for those, but you have to at least accept them in order to cheer for this 'singular' case.

    And I don't think the cost is worth it.


      Spoiler:
    I guess if we took the power of execution away from the states, that would end most of these problems, but good luck getting that to fly.
    Totally not Victoria Stecker forgetting his password and not having access to his work email.

  17. #9077
    Frug's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    12,915
    Quote Originally Posted by thebomby View Post
    You do realise there are more shades of grey (lol) than black and white? While I personally think that yes, the fucker should be killed, the argument that innocents are being killed is an important one, especially considering some of the people who have been released after having spent half their lives in jail for crimes they didn't commit are ruined for life. There is also space to think that someone like Roof would not get any decent treatment in jail, and would have to be kept in solitary to prevent him getting access to other nazi motherfuckers.
    Your arguments are too confusing. Lets just kill people we don't like. It's working for America.

    There's this really weird mixture of 'muh freedoms' and the death penalty going on down there. I don't see how you can be so obsessed with freedom and simultaneously support giving the state the right to kill citizens.
    Maybe they're delusional and think that because such a harsh penalty does exist it must mean that it's because they've been given tons of freedoms.
    Last edited by Frug; January 12 2017 at 04:50:28 PM.

    Quote Originally Posted by Loire
    I'm too stupid to say anything that deserves being in your magnificent signature.

  18. #9078
    mewninn's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Posts
    1,380
    Quote Originally Posted by Steckersaurus View Post

    And the case in North Carolina (I think) where a dude was convicted of killing a cop entirely on witness testimony, and something like seven out of nine witnesses later recanted and said they'd been pressured heavily by the police.
    Generally, being a witness in the States is such a shitshow that I'm surprised anyone willingly steps forward

  19. #9079
    Alistair's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Missing My Sadie Cat
    Posts
    11,766
    Quote Originally Posted by Frug View Post
    Your arguments are too confusing. Lets just kill people we don't like. It's working for America.


    "Nothing left to do, but smile, smile, smile......" Robert Hunter, "He's Gone"
    "...we looked very closely at the matter and concluded that unfortunately arseholes also get to benefit from democratic freedoms." Andreas Geisel, Interior Affairs Senator, Germany


  20. #9080

    Join Date
    November 5, 2011
    Posts
    8,780
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by evil edna View Post
    Alistair thinks prison doesnt sound too bad because his weight prevents him from leaving his house
    The internet: making weak little nerds awful brave since 1990.
    talking about your own posting history of complete idiocy nobody can avoid i assume?

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •