In a war of attrition, which we seemed to have entered a couple of weeks ago, Russia will keep the upper hand in the long run. Which doesn't mean they
win this war, but rather it morphing into a North/South Korean like stalemate, with the ongoing or occasional local fighting happening*).
Even assuming RU can't upkeep the artillery firing of now due to ammunition supply issues, all they need to do is dig in, defend and keep hold of what they've got now. UA won't be able to gain larger territory parts back, because it'll lack the manpower to go on the offensive.
RU still has and most likely will keep the air superiority, so e.g. massive
armored UA attacks might not be feasible. Though in the long run UA will have the artillery (range) advantage (
= assuming most support promises by western countries will be fulfilled eventually), arti doesn't win back territory. You still need boots on the ground for that.
*) One thing to keep in mind, of which at least I wasn't aware of: there has been
constant ongoing fighting happening in the east of UA since 2014.
I recently learned (German vid) that the definition/distinction of actual
war, in comparison to an
armed conflict, is 1,000 deadly causalities/yr.. In that regard, UA is at war since 2014.
Bookmarks