I can't see Russia being in a position to use nukes without also calling for full mobilisation. I'm pretty sure Putin lacks the political capital to actually declare war now, conscripts from the mud hut regions of Russia dying in droves has a different cultural impact to 'real russians' from Moscow and St Petersburg getting instagibbed by guided munitions
Look, the wages you withheld from the workmen who mowed your fields are crying out against you. The cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of Hosts. You have lived on earth in luxury and self-indulgence. You have fattened yourselves for slaughter.
I'm not sure provoking the russian equivalent of the Home Counties is an absolute blocker to mobilisation; he'll probably do it when there's literally nothing else, but yeah he's not going to try the nuclear option unless and until Ukraine starts looking like they'll serious inroads into "real" Russia. And unless I miss my guess, I think Ukraine just wants Russia out and to get on with their lives, with maybe a few Israeli style snatch squads for the 3 or 400 worst Russian war criminals.
Corbyn wants Ukraine to roll over and die, quality leadership material.
"I think we could all do with sitting back a bit and detaching ourselves from the situation to really think about how these issues reflect on our future and how we discuss them here and be a bit less aggressive or defensive because everyone has a complicated set of circumstances that has led the to place importance on particular issues and it doesn't meany any of them is less valid, we just need to look at the broader picture"
Smuggo - Brexit Thread
The man's an idiot but his point is diplomatic solutions should be sought as well not just giving weapons.
However any diplomatic solution will involve ceding territory at this stage and I can't see how it's unacceptable Palestine has had to cede territory and this is an outrage but it's fine for Ukraine to?
This has been their doctrine developed in WW2 and ever since: overwhelm with quantity fully well aware of and accepting these losses. This also plays a role in their weapons production. Accept inferior combat quality/strength (compared to western tanks), but make them easier, faster and cheaper to build and maintain under normal circumstances*).
*) The apparent corruption going on obviously hurts them badly in that aspect.
Inferior quality domestic stuff works fine when you have lend lease providing a backbone of actually operational combat vehicles and trucks for logistics.
Look, the wages you withheld from the workmen who mowed your fields are crying out against you. The cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of Hosts. You have lived on earth in luxury and self-indulgence. You have fattened yourselves for slaughter.
The t-34 would have been useless without American diesel and trucks to keep the supply lines operational. Without lend lease the USSR couldn't have maintained a 1:7 k/d against german armour.
Look, the wages you withheld from the workmen who mowed your fields are crying out against you. The cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of Hosts. You have lived on earth in luxury and self-indulgence. You have fattened yourselves for slaughter.
Bookmarks