hate these ads?, log in or register to hide them
Page 24 of 127 FirstFirst ... 14212223242526273474124 ... LastLast
Results 461 to 480 of 2530

Thread: Wormhole Space (147 posts deleted and counting)

  1. #461

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Rooks & Kings
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by Pattern View Post
    The Reality is, based on RNKs posts both here and on kugs, it seems they've just recieved there first bit of solid intel.

    Well, here's what we do know:


    1) The wormhole coalition 'NATO' started moving capitals and Bhaalgorns and such into our wormhole.

    2) On the weekend of the 8th October, we happened across a large fleet of WH corps (some cool guys I like, and a few smacky aharm types) in high sec. Narwhals Ate my Duck, Aperture Harmonics, No Holes Barred, Transmission Lost, Talocan (sp?) and Adhocracy Inc. You can see for yourself here:



    3) This fleet then flew around high sec a bit, gathered more reinforcements and flew to the low sec system where our static wh was connected. We had not put the WH in critical. You'll recall when we destroyed Aperture Harmonic's system 'Polaris' that we even published the entrances of the static and invited them to enter freely to man their own defence. This was KEEN's idea and incredibly sporting - if it were up to me I probably wouldn't make it so easy for people

    4) Realising that a 100man WH blob was on the way, we batphoned some fine folk and assembled on the wh. As you can see here, we had a T2 ANCHORED BUBBLE that kept our carriers 40+ km from the wormhole, so clearly we couldn't collapse this in a hurry:



    You'll note we have only 20 in fleet at the time but we're still up for the fight (granted I would have tried to get a few more on though).

    Now, if you want, you can believe that we had cloaked carriers somehow ready to collapse the wormhole. However, why not then just collapse it and save ourselves the trouble of logging in? Surely too, the carrier would have to slowboat through the bubble and then cloak? And if we left it there all night, on its own, surely it would have been seen by a scout and killed by all those assets the coalition have logged off here?

    I think this puts to rest any questions of a cloaked carrier.

    5) After some thought, the AHARM coalition led fleet chooses not to jump, and instead goes home to high sec.

    6) The coalition fleet does not return, and if it formed up somewhere, we never found it on the weekend of the 15th.

    7) We have a week of fun doing random things in wh space against other people, including a nice fight with Nulli.

    8) On the weekend of the 15th an AHARM member gets fed up and sells us their CEO's dread, which was logged off in the system.

    9) On the weekend of the 15th, too, we see carrier wrecks on scan in deep safes and safespots, presumably from self-destructed capitals.

    10) On the evening of the 18th, despite seemingly asking half a dozen alliances and an entire coalition of the willing to help them beat a corp of about 20 real guys who knocked them off their wormhole perch, and then failing, an AHARM member starts smacking.

  2. #462

    Join Date
    April 11, 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,014
    this was the best uneasy silence we had in a while I think, I love you lord, and I love you blue :-)

  3. #463
    Ampoliros's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Aperture Harmonics
    Posts
    1,013
    Quote Originally Posted by Wrack View Post
    So, WH groups have grown too big to fit enough through a WH to fight the force they know is waiting on the other side. However, WH space in general still feels like a ghost town. Maybe when that happens they should split into smaller groups and occupy more wormholes?
    we've tried it in the past, it doesn't really work out that well. Some groups are invariably more active than the others and players gravitate towards locations where shit is getting done.

    Also, I don't think forces have gotten too big in w-space to fight; it's just getting to the point where home field advantage is pretty huge, and no one wants to fight without every advantage they can muster, despite how much they posture otherwise.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Maldoror View Post
    But to the point, you've cunningly tried to dodge my questions. Luckily being the fox that I am, I noticed. So let's try again:

    1) Do you deny that majors players of Wormhole Alliance/NATO/WC, including the sploitactular AHARM, presently have capitals logged off in the KEEN wh? Assets you could log in any time?

    2) Do you deny that some of these assets have been self-destructing in the last 48 hours in disappointment?

    3) Do you deny that we have Robert Hudson's (your ceo?) Revelation that was placed here for the NATO invasion?

    4) Do you deny that we chose not to take the furry dice, which now cavort through the universe looking for some final casino in the sky ?

    I feel the answers to these questions (they're not really questions) are somewhat self-evident, but i'm gonna go ahead and vehemently deny everything and furthermore accuse you of being a liar, a charlatan, and a braggart, as that appears to be the role i have to play in this clever story you seem to be making up

  4. #464

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Rooks & Kings
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by Ampoliros View Post
    I feel the answers to these questions (they're not really questions) are somewhat self-evident, but i'm gonna go ahead and vehemently deny everything and furthermore accuse you of being a liar, a charlatan, and a braggart, as that appears to be the role i have to play in this clever story you seem to be making up
    The first part of your sentence rather undermines its conclusion there. You're at the stable door and the horse has bolted. But at least you've said something, which is better than the damning silence that has suddenly descended over the previous storm of AHARM smack posters.

    However, since the questions were aimed at that 'Pattern' fellow, I have a better role for you entirely: deny everything including your AHARM membership (I had to look you up in-game anyway). After all, no one really knows what alliance you're in yet, you haven't filled out the location ticker on your profile, and you might pass as being from one of the cooler coalition partners. For that matter, on merit one of them should lead the coalition, not AHARM. There'd be more action and people would call you a gentleman and a scholar, no one would wheel you out for damage control and you could periodically produce a pocket watch to tell enquiring, buxom young lasses the time for pwnge.

  5. #465
    Leboe's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,951
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Maldoror View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ampoliros View Post
    I feel the answers to these questions (they're not really questions) are somewhat self-evident, but i'm gonna go ahead and vehemently deny everything and furthermore accuse you of being a liar, a charlatan, and a braggart, as that appears to be the role i have to play in this clever story you seem to be making up
    The first part of your sentence rather undermines its conclusion there. You're at the stable door and the horse has bolted. But at least you've said something, which is better than the damning silence that has suddenly descended over the previous storm of AHARM smack posters.

    However, since the questions were aimed at that 'Pattern' fellow, I have a better role for you entirely: deny everything including your AHARM membership (I had to look you up in-game anyway). After all, no one really knows what alliance you're in yet, you haven't filled out the location ticker on your profile, and you might pass as being from one of the cooler coalition partners. For that matter, on merit one of them should lead the coalition, not AHARM. There'd be more action and people would call you a gentleman and a scholar, no one would wheel you out for damage control and you could periodically produce a pocket watch to tell enquiring, buxom young lasses the time for pwnge.
    https://gate.eveonline.com/Profile/Pattern%20Clarc hth

  6. #466
    Smuggo's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    Behind you
    Posts
    25,820
    Quote Originally Posted by Wrack View Post
    So, WH groups have grown too big to fit enough through a WH to fight the force they know is waiting on the other side. However, WH space in general still feels like a ghost town. Maybe when that happens they should split into smaller groups and occupy more wormholes?
    Yeah this would be good to see. There are still a ton of C4/5/6s out there that are empty and an entity as large as Narwhals could easily occupy quite a few of them. If you pick the right holes then you can always chain collapse into another if you wish to meet up for anything.

  7. #467

    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Location
    [TSKRS]
    Posts
    3,209
    Anglo WH entities banding together to fight off invasion of large russkie blob: cool/impressive
    Anglo WH entities remaining banded together to invade/blob 20-30 single-TZ frenchies: not so cool/impressive, but eh, that's eve
    Anglo WH entities failing to accomplish anything against said frenchies, losing a bunch of ships in the process, and then whining about blueballs/ganks: lololololol

  8. #468

    Join Date
    May 11, 2011
    Posts
    29
    Grarr Dexx is a ass and pretty shallow.
    Last edited by Domania; October 20 2011 at 11:10:48 PM. Reason: Grarr Dexx is a ass and is pretty shallow.

  9. #469

    Join Date
    April 12, 2011
    Location
    Rooks & Kings
    Posts
    5
    yea, i know pattern clarc, killed him in either cva or ushra cant circa 2006 ish. my memory fails as to which.

  10. #470
    XenosisReaper
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Domania View Post
    Shit posting in a shit thread.

    I thought FHC was suppose to be better than the normal CAOD board. Yet stories from both parties are shit and over asserted.
    Nobody really cares about eve so v0v do what you want, Other Games is where it's at.

  11. #471

    Join Date
    July 26, 2011
    Location
    Rooks & Kings
    Posts
    6
    I can understand the frustration of Aperture, as we didn't gave them much kills this year. They only managed to kill us 3 ships : 2 covert ops and 1 devoter. They had to suicide an apocalypse to get that last kill.

    If AHARM like to suicide stuff on us, to grab some kills or trap us somewhere, this is definitly not our spirit. This is why we didn't offered them our fleet yesterday. They were our number (~20), fully prepared, with some capitals ready to trap us and escalate.

    They also didn't jumped in our system to get the "good fight" they were expecting, probably for the same reasons, I don't blame them.

    They even didn't jumped last week, with a 100+ man fleet (including capitals logged off in our system) and 3x our number.


    Yes, there were nothing to expect yesterday. It was a non-event. Not sure about about why they start smacking on Failheap.
    Guillotine Therapy - Rooks & Kings

  12. #472

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Rooks & Kings
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by Domania View Post
    Shit posting in a shit thread.

    I thought FHC was suppose to be better than the normal CAOD board. Yet stories from both parties are shit and over asserted.
    You're one of the better AHARM folks but you won't manage a sort of 'it's all nonsense anyway' Zen stance here. If you want to debate the facts as presented, let's talk. I have a lot more screenshots You've little to lose since the smack-first approach of your colleagues appears to have failed your organisation (again). You should also put your location as 'Aperture Harmonics' in your profile. AHARM members seem to be getting increasingly sketchy on that of late but it's important for following the ebb and flow of the thread (especially a place with so many entities as wormhole space).

  13. #473

    Join Date
    May 11, 2011
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Maldoror View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Domania View Post
    Shit posting in a shit thread.

    I thought FHC was suppose to be better than the normal CAOD board. Yet stories from both parties are shit and over asserted.
    You're one of the better AHARM folks but you won't manage a sort of 'it's all nonsense anyway' Zen stance here. If you want to debate the facts as presented, let's talk. I have a lot more screenshots You've little to lose since the smack-first approach of your colleagues appears to have failed your organisation (again). You should also put your location as 'Aperture Harmonics' in your profile. AHARM members seem to be getting increasingly sketchy on that of late but it's important for following the ebb and flow of the thread (especially a place with so many entities as wormhole space).
    Your maybe the worst offender of them all with the stories, someone posts their side and you go off on a tangent attempting to procrastinate facts on a hunch of baiting someone(Which works btw) into posting their side of the story so you can talk down about it instead of posting about your story and leaving it to that... This isn't Evenews24 you know, you can keep a honest battle report? What say you?

  14. #474
    Donor Pattern's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 9, 2011
    Posts
    5,853
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Maldoror View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ampoliros View Post
    I feel the answers to these questions (they're not really questions) are somewhat self-evident, but i'm gonna go ahead and vehemently deny everything and furthermore accuse you of being a liar, a charlatan, and a braggart, as that appears to be the role i have to play in this clever story you seem to be making up
    The first part of your sentence rather undermines its conclusion there. You're at the stable door and the horse has bolted. But at least you've said something, which is better than the damning silence that has suddenly descended over the previous storm of AHARM smack posters.

    However, since the questions were aimed at that 'Pattern' fellow, I have a better role for you entirely: deny everything including your AHARM membership (I had to look you up in-game anyway). After all, no one really knows what alliance you're in yet, you haven't filled out the location ticker on your profile, and you might pass as being from one of the cooler coalition partners. For that matter, on merit one of them should lead the coalition, not AHARM. There'd be more action and people would call you a gentleman and a scholar, no one would wheel you out for damage control and you could periodically produce a pocket watch to tell enquiring, buxom young lasses the time for pwnge.

  15. #475

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Rooks & Kings
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by Domania View Post
    Your maybe the worst offender of them all with the stories, someone posts their side and you go off on a tangent attempting to procrastinate facts on a hunch of baiting someone(Which works btw) into posting their side of the story so you can talk down about it instead of posting about your story and leaving it to that... This isn't Evenews24 you know, you can keep a honest battle report? What say you?
    Look around you - the Eve community says it for me. Not because I'm doing anything amazing but rather because they see your alliance's one line posts, insults and general fail-smack be rebuffed by a wall of sourced, detailed information. Which is easy to present since it is, after all, the truth. They see AHARM round up every entity possible and then buckle in resolve. Was it really wise of Pattern to come on here and smack about not fighting, after assembling all the English-speaking alliances of w-space to try and kill Guillotine Therapy's corp? And then fail at it anyway? You could have held a dignified silence and the matter might not have come to public attention.

    P.S. How's that Location ticker coming along? You should wear your colours in times of thick and thin.

  16. #476
    XenosisReaper
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Maldoror View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Domania View Post
    Your maybe the worst offender of them all with the stories, someone posts their side and you go off on a tangent attempting to procrastinate facts on a hunch of baiting someone(Which works btw) into posting their side of the story so you can talk down about it instead of posting about your story and leaving it to that... This isn't Evenews24 you know, you can keep a honest battle report? What say you?
    Look around you - the Eve community says it for me. Not because I'm doing anything amazing but rather because they see your alliance's one line posts, insults and general fail-smack be rebuffed by a wall of sourced, detailed information. Which is easy to present since it is, after all, the truth. They see AHARM round up every entity possible and then buckle in resolve. Was it really wise of Pattern to come on here and smack about not fighting, after assembling all the English-speaking alliances of w-space to try and kill Guillotine Therapy's corp? And then fail at it anyway? You could have held a dignified silence and the matter might not have come to public attention.

    P.S. How's that Location ticker coming along? You should wear your colours in times of thick and thin.
    As a member of the Eve Community I would like to stress that I think you are both equally shitposting faggots who should shut up and stop fucking whining over how many internet spaceship pixels you destroyed in glorious spaceship pixel combat even though the enemy had more spaceship pixels than you.

    Jesus fucking christ do either of you even read your own posts? It's like autism central in here.

  17. #477

    Join Date
    September 27, 2011
    Posts
    5
    wait, wait, wait.... Nato coalition formed up again, with 100 guys, and to fight a 20 men gang ? Seriously ?

    How many post we could have read from them, saying that they will disband their coalition after russian campaign because they don't want to blob into wh ?

  18. #478
    XenosisReaper
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by phlys View Post
    wait, wait, wait.... Nato coalition formed up again, with 100 guys, and to fight a 20 men gang ? Seriously ?

    How many post we could have read from them, saying that they will disband their coalition after russian campaign because they don't want to blob into wh ?
    5 post scrub joining in to smacktalk get out.

  19. #479

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    Rooks & Kings
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by phlys View Post
    wait, wait, wait.... Nato coalition formed up again, with 100 guys, and to fight a 20 men gang ? Seriously ?

    How many post we could have read from them, saying that they will disband their coalition after russian campaign because they don't want to blob into wh ?
    To be fair, quite a lot of Fairlight are around as well, so it's more than 20, more like 40. On the other hand of course, there were more than 100 in the fleet that we scouted from Kaaputenen as it went around and grew in size from there. Then of course there are (and to some degree, were) the assets that are already in place in the wormhole, logged off, mostly capitals, though we saw some support as well. In the end though it's less about blobbing and not blobbing and more about fighting or not fighting.

  20. #480

    Join Date
    April 10, 2011
    Location
    in a wormhole...
    Posts
    553
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Maldoror View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by phlys View Post
    wait, wait, wait.... Nato coalition formed up again, with 100 guys, and to fight a 20 men gang ? Seriously ?

    How many post we could have read from them, saying that they will disband their coalition after russian campaign because they don't want to blob into wh ?
    To be fair, quite a lot of Fairlight are around as well, so it's more than 20, more like 40. On the other hand of course, there were more than 100 in the fleet that we scouted from Kaaputenen as it went around and grew in size from there. Then of course there are (and to some degree, were) the assets that are already in place in the wormhole, logged off, mostly capitals, though we saw some support as well. In the end though it's less about blobbing and not blobbing and more about fighting or not fighting.
    Come on, Mr. Lord Maldoror, if you are going to quote numbers, you could at least quote proper ones. You guys have 40+ folks in T3s in there, plus plenty of folks in all those logged off triage carriers/dreads. I think a fairer number would be closer to 60.

    I think we had around 70 in the fleet the other weekend. The problem is, our route into your wormhole was only a nullsec that was deep in dronelands, and we had to go through another C1 to get there, so would have only been able to push 25-30 cruisers through, which we judged as not enough to fight you. We did have a perfectly good highsec route scanned out earlier, but you closed that one, despite your claims to want fights.

    From out POV, we thought R&K would welcome a fight in their home wormhole where they still had capital numerical superiority even if they were outnumbered in subcaps. Clearly that wasn't true, and now we get all the smack instead of the goodfight we could have had. Now to answer your trolling questions:
    But to the point, you've cunningly tried to dodge my questions. Luckily being the fox that I am, I noticed. So let's try again:

    1) Do you deny that majors players of Wormhole Alliance/NATO/WC, including the sploitactular AHARM, presently have capitals logged off in the KEEN wh? Assets you could log in any time?

    2) Do you deny that some of these assets have been self-destructing in the last 48 hours in disappointment?

    3) Do you deny that we have Robert Hudson's (your ceo?) Revelation that was placed here for the NATO invasion?

    4) Do you deny that we chose not to take the furry dice, which now cavort through the universe looking for some final casino in the sky ?
    1) Nope, I will not deny this. How many months did you guys have capitals logged out in our system? Are you going to claim you don't still have scanners in our system?
    2) I have no idea. No AHARM assets have SD'd
    3) I have no idea on this one as well. We had a member who made some inappropriate comments in corp who we removed from corp who was sitting in that dread, he might have been mad and sold it to you guys. Congrats on the purchase though! I'm sure it must be exciting to own a dread that our CEO used to sit in, though I would think the smell would have deterred you from buying it.
    4) I am not on enough drugs to answer this question.

    Since I was kind enough to answer your questions, how about you start telling the truth about closing holes?

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •