Bitcoin

[Keckers]

[Nordstern]

At last, a way for Millennials to be productive.

A single human body at rest radiates 100 watts of excess heat. We created a body-suit that uses thermoelectric generators to harvest the temperature differential between the human body and ambient and converts it into usable electricity. The electricity generated is then fed to a computer that produces cryptocurrency.

http://speculative.capital/

Watch it. If you keep insulting Millennials like this, they'll kill Social Security next.

[Don Rumata]

At last, a way for Millennials to be productive.

A single human body at rest radiates 100 watts of excess heat. We created a body-suit that uses thermoelectric generators to harvest the temperature differential between the human body and ambient and converts it into usable electricity. The electricity generated is then fed to a computer that produces cryptocurrency.

http://speculative.capital/

Watch it. If you keep insulting Millennials like this, they'll kill Social Security next.

We'll just rename it as Socialist Security. Millennials LOVE Socialism.

[Nordstern]

At last, a way for Millennials to be productive.

A single human body at rest radiates 100 watts of excess heat. We created a body-suit that uses thermoelectric generators to harvest the temperature differential between the human body and ambient and converts it into usable electricity. The electricity generated is then fed to a computer that produces cryptocurrency.

http://speculative.capital/

Watch it. If you keep insulting Millennials like this, they'll kill Social Security next.

We'll just rename it as Socialist Security. Millennials LOVE Socialism.

That's it, you're going to the state-run nursing home, Don.

[Sparq]

Good lord, Kodak's stock is up 120 per cent. How? New film? Oh. It launched a crypto-coin...

[FatFreddy]

Overhearing waiters talking about how they are "investing in cryptocurrencies" via "invest companies" which are totally not a recruitment/finance scam.

Sometimes in life, you just listen and keep quiet.

[Keckers]

Investors are usually idiots. The guiding hand of the free market has Parkinson's.

[Maximillian]

If it achieves nothing else crypto currencies will drive us into becoming a level 1 civilization on the Kardashev Scale just to power all the blockchains.

[Larkonis Trassler]

>Not posting the superior version...

[Hel OWeen]

Good lord, Kodak's stock is up 120 per cent. How? New film? Oh. It launched a crypto-coin...

Wasn't Kodak basically a penny stock for the time being? So "up 120%" wouldn't mean that much.

[Sparq]

Good lord, Kodak's stock is up 120 per cent. How? New film? Oh. It launched a crypto-coin...

Wasn't Kodak basically a penny stock for the time being? So "up 120%" wouldn't mean that much.

Hovering above $3 for 'ages' (November last year), jumped to $6.80 yesterday, $10.70 today.

Related,

[Isyel]

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/biz/...67_242293.html

Bitcoin collapses in South Korea as regulator threatens to ban trading

Also comes with this choice quote of a minister who seems to have woken up in a particularly retarded mood.

"Virtual currency is not based on an exchange of something with a certain value

[Lief Siddhe]

Saw this on Vice today

The Chinese government will end bitcoin mining operations in the coming months, Bloomberg reported over the weekend, a move that could have a massive impact on the price of the world’s biggest digital currency.

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/...rce=vicenewsfb

[Nicholai Pestot]

It's not going to change the supply of bitcoin by any significant amount. That's not how mining works.

New bitcoins are produced at a relatively consistent speed, with miners competing to "win" the currency that's produced with each new block. Less miners just means the remaining miners have a better chance to win each block, it doesn't mean more Bitcoin is going to be generated.

Good old clueless media.

[Aea]

It's not going to change the supply of bitcoin by any significant amount. That's not how mining works.

New bitcoins are produced at a relatively consistent speed, with miners competing to "win" the currency that's produced with each new block. Less miners just means the remaining miners have a better chance to win each block, it doesn't mean more Bitcoin is going to be generated.

Good old clueless media.

I see you’ve created a straw man and then quite handily destroyed it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Lowa [NSN]]

Good lord, Kodak's stock is up 120 per cent. How? New film? Oh. It launched a crypto-coin...

Wasn't Kodak basically a penny stock for the time being? So "up 120%" wouldn't mean that much.

Hovering above $3 for 'ages' (November last year), jumped to $6.80 yesterday, $10.70 today.

Related,

Wow... I dont even... That said, this isnt really the good ol' Kodak is it? Its the shell of the former company using the brand for credibility right? Right...? Pls?



e: why does this show like I'm inside sparqs quote? Stupid intertwatter.

[Nicholai Pestot]

It's not going to change the supply of bitcoin by any significant amount. That's not how mining works.

New bitcoins are produced at a relatively consistent speed, with miners competing to "win" the currency that's produced with each new block. Less miners just means the remaining miners have a better chance to win each block, it doesn't mean more Bitcoin is going to be generated.

Good old clueless media.

I see you’ve created a straw man and then quite handily destroyed it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I see you didn't read the note at the bottom of their article.

They got it all wrong before and have now re-written it. The first version of their article wittered on about changes in the volume of bitcoin being produced.

Edit: I'm probably not the only one who sent them a message about it

[dzajic]

Transaction fees would skyrocket if China goes offline. They are already too high and bitcoin has lost all meaning other than a speculative device.

[Aea]

It's not going to change the supply of bitcoin by any significant amount. That's not how mining works.

New bitcoins are produced at a relatively consistent speed, with miners competing to "win" the currency that's produced with each new block. Less miners just means the remaining miners have a better chance to win each block, it doesn't mean more Bitcoin is going to be generated.

Good old clueless media.

I see you’ve created a straw man and then quite handily destroyed it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I see you didn't read the note at the bottom of their article.

They got it all wrong before and have now re-written it. The first version of their article wittered on about changes in the volume of bitcoin being produced.

Edit: I'm probably not the only one who sent them a message about it

Didn’t see it in phone when I read. My apologies.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[erichkknaar]

Meanwhile, in Hollandistan.

https://gizmodo.com/men-try-to-redef...ain-1821964907

Dutch blockchain company LegalThings announced in a press release on Wednesday that it is developing an app, LegalFling, which in theory could allow about-to-bone partners to log what they are and are not okay with before they bone. The company notes that you can mark your do’s and don’ts “with the swipe of a finger.”

Consent. Now on the blockchain.