Lowsec candidate for CSM8

[islador]

I'd vote for http://evewho.com/pilot/islador but I don't think he's running.

I just registered an account to say that I am flattered someone thinks I would make a good CSM candidate. Unfortunately I am not legally eligible to run for the CSM. That and Sadistica Alliance is currently taking up all my time in game. Perhaps at a later date, in the meantime, I work with Marc Scaurus and him and I maintain an open dialogue about the CSM. If you're looking to vote for a lowsec candidate, he's your man.


Legal Eligibility - Page 15

[Varcaus]

I'd vote for http://evewho.com/pilot/islador but I don't think he's running.

I just registered an account to say that I am flattered someone thinks I would make a good CSM candidate. Unfortunately I am not legally eligible to run for the CSM. That and Sadistica Alliance is currently taking up all my time in game. Perhaps at a later date, in the meantime, I work with Marc Scaurus and him and I maintain an open dialogue about the CSM. If you're looking to vote for a lowsec candidate, he's your man.


Legal Eligibility - Page 15

In ccp banned or under 21 hrmmm

[Sponk]

Probably a young'un.

[Varcaus]

Probably a young'un.

v0v most likely

[Smarnca]

Personally i would like to see candidates like Rixx Javix. I think he would be an ideal CSM candidate of lowsec.

NO

Unless you want a lyeing chat log fixing attention seeker

[Fuzzysteve]

Evening Folks,

I'm not a Lowsec Candidate, that's not my platform. But that's not to say that I don't have a few concerns about the state of balance between High, Low and Null.

http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/2013/03/21/lowsec-csm8-trail/

[Sponk]

NO

Unless you want a lyeing chat log fixing attention seeker

In other words, someone who would fit in?

[Smarnca]

Fon Revedhort seems cool

http://match.eve-csm.com/candidate.php?id=38

[Varcaus]

Isnt he a neo nazi?

[W0lf Crendraven]

Yes he is (which is weird since hes russian), also im pretty sure marc isnt running anymore nor playing eve for any time in the future.

[Fuzzysteve]

Bah. double up on the last during moderation

[W0lf Crendraven]

[QUOTE=Fuzzysteve;745086]While Lowsec isn't my primary focus, I am of the opinion it needs solid work done on it, to bring more people in, and give some of them a reason to stay. Others, should be dipping in and out, providing interesting targets for those who want that PvP.

Why would lowsec need more people, and how do you intend do get them away from where they currently hang out to move to desolated lowsec areas?

[Fuzzysteve]

[QUOTE=W0lf Crendraven;745389]

While Lowsec isn't my primary focus, I am of the opinion it needs solid work done on it, to bring more people in, and give some of them a reason to stay. Others, should be dipping in and out, providing interesting targets for those who want that PvP.

Why would lowsec need more people, and how do you intend do get them away from where they currently hang out to move to desolated lowsec areas?

Lowsec needs people to be the prey of the people who live there. I'm suggesting some mechanic that will draw people in for trips, ideally having to bounce through multiple systems in something more than a stealth bomber. They bounce in, spend some time getting something/doing something, and then leave. Which gives the kind and generous people who actually live there, a chance to share their hospitality.

How to draw them in involves adding resources to be harvested. Either with guns, mining lasers, or code breaker modules. Exploration, ideally something that weights by how frequented a system is, to draw people off any pipes. Some resource that's small, and valuable.

[Malcanis]

I've long supproted lo-sec being the place to be for sec repair. IMO lo-sec rats should be several times better than anywhere else for this. In fact I don't see why 0.0 rats should give sec at all; you can't lose sec in 0.0, so why should you gain it there?

[Sponk]

I would love to see this just for the tears.

[Mike deVoid]

I've long supproted lo-sec being the place to be for sec repair. IMO lo-sec rats should be several times better than anywhere else for this. In fact I don't see why 0.0 rats should give sec at all; you can't lose sec in 0.0, so why should you gain it there?

Old notions of risk/reward. I agree with you though.

[Fuzzysteve]

I've long supproted lo-sec being the place to be for sec repair. IMO lo-sec rats should be several times better than anywhere else for this. In fact I don't see why 0.0 rats should give sec at all; you can't lose sec in 0.0, so why should you gain it there?

Old notions of risk/reward. I agree with you though.

Works for me. And it helps break the perception that it's high, to low, to null. Each space should have its unique drawing points.

[Malcanis]

I would love to see this just for the tears.

W-space rats don't give sec increases, even the C-5 ones and they're basically rat dreads

Somehow the Wormholers survive.

[Cue1*]

I would love to see this just for the tears.

W-space rats don't give sec increases, even the C-5 ones and they're basically rat dreads

Somehow the Wormholers survive.

By ratting for sec in null through null holes.

the thing from the buzz buzz

[Shin_getter]

I've long supproted lo-sec being the place to be for sec repair.

Cool, will support