30 years later in years of SJW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wOnvl9YYGw
Printable View
30 years later in years of SJW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wOnvl9YYGw
Bought myself a blinged out bubba-gun for bird season. If the first round of clay-shooting was anything to go by I'd say they don't have much to fear.
Brand is Fausti, Italian gun manufacturer with a pretty good rep. This one ran me $1200 used from the local Cabelas.
https://i.imgur.com/4KevGN0.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/C0e6oOi.jpg
over under over under over under
nice gun!
pimp up my flintlock
https://www.svtperformance.com/attac...2-jpg.1605496/
Nice camo on the dog
She's a wirehair pointer
https://time.com/5725068/sandy-hook-...supreme-court/Quote:
Supreme Court Says Sandy Hook Families Can Sue the Remington Gun Maker
By that logic, can I sue Ford or Jeep when some redneck rearends me?
So what was the mechanical fault on Remington's side there?
marketing and selling semi-automatic rifles to Lanza ?
the suit targets both the store the weapons where bought, and the manufacturer.
Store is more than fine to target, where it should start and end tbh. Manufacturer is just stupid and seems like a knee jerk reaction to score some points without doing anything to really solve the problem. There will still be too many guns in private ownership and it will be still too easy to get one. Let's not even start with paranoia among citizens. In what sane country population arm themselves in fear of home invasion? But I guess some dumb lefties will jerk off with few million dollars being paid by some of the last companies that allow skilled blue collar workers to earn respectable pay.
If you really want to go for companies in meaningful and somewhat justifiable manner, ban them from being able to donate to NRA.
When they developed and sold faulty product, downplaying or even hiding side effects. Do you really not see a difference here? Hell, go at knife producers while they're at it.
it's not uncommon, as a seller, to have a obligation to ensure that the buyer has the ability to safely handle the product when it's of a hazardous nature, such as chemicals and some types of industrial machinery, chain liability is not a new thing in connection with that either.
Again, nothing against going for the sellers. It's the way to go in my opinion. If you sell guns to people that are not legally permitted to own one, you deserve to have your life ruined by chain of lawsuits. Still just a quarter-measure without meaningful change in gun ownerships laws. But noone has enough courage to even start doing that, so let's just allow people to sue gun producers while shouting about violent video games and it will work out in the end, right?