PDA

View Full Version : Real Life Politics aka THE GAME



Pages : 1 [2]

Dorvil Barranis
May 6 2011, 04:33:40 PM
Those Africans selling all their tea leaves to the World Bank, could have been saving up for weapons/trade deals with neighbouring victims. If they simply organized a year to stop/shift production they could cause some serious attention to their plight, and that is when their overlords would have to be dancing around the attention of a news-hungry media.
If that doesn't work, they can simply burn their fields. If they can't live with on their labour, then no one should. Pretty simple. Same for gold/oil/textiles/food slaves all over the world.


Yes, African subsistance farmers should buy more guns, demand attention, and burn down their fields if that doesn't work. This is a great plan, I hope that it catches on.

Mavolio
May 6 2011, 04:57:01 PM
[youtube:esj5hyd2]kIKM4UYNs6Q[/youtube:esj5hyd2]

Omg, this guy just opened my eyes to all the lies!! I can see now how Lusulpher was trying to open all our eyes to all the lies!!!!

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Bq8xFjbqhts/TO24xYF72MI/AAAAAAAAAA4/OVgOcbjRJAE/s400/2009-01-28-Conspiracy-Theories.jpg

Tarminic
May 6 2011, 05:30:08 PM
this explains a lot of posts in this thread (http://www.miller-mccune.com/culture-society/belief-in-conspiracies-linked-to-machiavellian-mindset-30295/)
Oh my fucking god, the comments on that article...
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Fachiri
May 6 2011, 05:36:01 PM
It's like an army of Lulsulphers. http://www.half-lifecreations.com/forums/Smileys/default/emot-suicide.gif

Dorvil Barranis
May 6 2011, 07:12:54 PM
this explains a lot of posts in this thread (http://www.miller-mccune.com/culture-society/belief-in-conspiracies-linked-to-machiavellian-mindset-30295/)
Oh my fucking god, the comments on that article...
:lol: :lol: :lol:


Conspiracy theories are like scientific theories, some are real, some are fake, some are BLATANTLY fake, and some are real but need serious work.

Yes, to some extent, I believe this article, but I also do believe there are malevolent people in the world who want power, money, and control, even though I don't. If I wrote a book, it'd be called "everything I learned about politics, I learned from posting at internet forums". Some people are just BAD, in fact, I'd say most people are BAD. Especially when they're in a position that they don't have to worry about bad coming back on them.

Authority gives people a sense of sadistic self entitlement to make everybody their bitch. The same way a moderator bans people like it's fucking heroin, I'm sure big business and government officials just roll in the mud of corruption, lies, and war crimes, because they love it, because they can. Would I do that if I had that kind of power? Yes and no. No, I wouldn't want to control people as a whole, I wouldn't be so disgusting as to kick people down, secure my position, and propagate a message that is a perversion of anything I may have once stood for... But I WOULD use my power to be incredibly petty. Like get back at an ex girlfriend, or ruin an old school bully of mine's life. But then, I'd do that anyway. All a matter of opportunity. But clearly some people are not fit to have power at all, and unfortunately there is a lot of evil in the world whether or not some of it is "made up". So we should always be suspicious, we should always distrust what we are told, and we should never be nice until people give us a damn good reason to be. Because most people just don't give a shit about you, and would sell you down the river for a buck. So knowing that, it is not difficult at all to believe the more cunning, more higher class people are a different class of scumbag entirely. Meeting up at secret lodge reasons and pumping our kids with mercury to sterilize the population or whatever.

Trust me, I don't trust the conspiracy theorists much either. In fact, I trust them less. Obama never banned me from a forum, Alex Jones and David Icke have. Their forums are full of crazies, even some criminal sociopaths who say horrible things like legalize pedophilia. And meanwhile I get banned, for saying basically what I'm saying to you right now. I will never fucking forgive them for that slight. I would shoot their kids infront of them if I knew I could get away with it. Do I believe The Illuminati is some other wordly cult that worships The Devil or aliens? No... I think the world is made up of street gangs, psychopaths, and mafia guys. Cause that's pretty much how I act honestly. But to be fair you have too, where did being nice get me? Nowhere. If I put on a shit grin and sucked mod dick, would that prevent me from being censored everywhere I go? Is that what it fucking takes to have a voice? I refuse to put these rapist's jizz on my face, and I refuse to just be backed into a corner to not have anywhere to speak. But that's a rant for another time. My point is here, that yes, I do somewhat believe in conspiracy theories, and I wouldn't have a problem admitting too I could see myself doing half of them. But the other half I couldn't. Like the mass sterilizing of the population, or the dumbing down of the average person. I would find that horrific beyond comprehension. But I know there are many people despicable enough to do it anyway. Why is it all these blogs try to convince people that if you KNOW there are people worse then you, that you must be unstable? They apparently want you to be a self loathing, asperger's syndrone deluded freak, who lives in a vacuum and enclosed space, where you cannot fathom anyone or anything. Just more control for them, there really is not limit to human stupidity or evil, and much smarter and better men then me have said that. We live in a really bleak world, whether or not half the shit the conspiracy theorists say is true. Some people turn to God to cope, others just pretend it's not all that bad, me? I choose to be informed. Surround myself with different news articles and opinion pieces as to all the doom and gloom. Partially because I want to feel prepared, I want to be able to say "I told you so" and rub it in people's faces, but I think most of all, I really do want to see the world burn. And by "burn", I mean actually civilization collapse, not we all become pathetic enslaved zombies in some drugged up sex crazed Huxley haze, or fearmongering, police state Orwellian nightmare... Lord of The Flies is my preferred end. I am optimistic however, that we can achieve something like Starship Troopers if we work at it.

Man, now I never want to be a forum mod, nutters like the one above will want to shoot your kid for banning them.

Fara
May 6 2011, 08:29:24 PM
this explains a lot of posts in this thread (http://www.miller-mccune.com/culture-society/belief-in-conspiracies-linked-to-machiavellian-mindset-30295/)
Oh my fucking god, the comments on that article...
:lol: :lol: :lol:

pure comedy gold :psyduck:

Lusulpher
May 7 2011, 02:45:37 AM
this explains a lot of posts in this thread (http://www.miller-mccune.com/culture-society/belief-in-conspiracies-linked-to-machiavellian-mindset-30295/)
Oh my fucking god, the comments on that article...
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Yeah, they are right to be mad, but the tone they chose indicates they lack emotional inhibitors...pity, one of them linked the correct counter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_phenomenon

But now it will be drowned out by sheeple who don't want to realize that the leaders of history all displayed meta-cognitive understanding of politics and social norms.


Aka, even Abraham Lincoln chose how he appeared before the Public and his rivals[the wise old man/bumpkin presentation]. It's why he refused to let Blacks fight in the Civil War, he was already planning the Reconstruction era of the South, but without Southern bitterness.
He also invented the emoticon because he realized text does not communicate emotion sufficiently...my biggest gripe with the internet, beaten by 100+ years. :nostradamus:
And FDR was President 3 times and no one knew he was a cripple[or he parked the Pacific Fleet in range of Japanese retaliation for embargoes].

Those are the nice guys, and they kept big secrets. That article says, the bad guys keep bigger secrets and the sociopaths are honest enough to tell you that if they were in power, they would abuse you like the aimless sheep you are.[sociopaths can pretend to care, not to be confused with caring!]

AND even more profound, the metrics say that sociopaths are the ideal type for the Financial/Political sectors...The Executive boardroom is filled with people that would kill their mothers for a percentage gain. And that's exactly what Capitalism incentivizes, it's social evolution using finance.
So don't complain when they close your factory and move it to China/Mexico. Or when they seize your pension for another tax cut. You have always been warned by History's land grabs and backroom coups.

Btw, have you read Machiavelli's The Prince, it's pretty much Art of War for controlling populations. The goal has always been a feudal system. -_-

Bloodlines of the elites[not necessarily intellegentzia] maintained on the backs of the intellectually-reduced serfs/robots. Take a closer look at the recreation of it in the 1950s 'American Utopian Age' aka "The Good Ole Days with the Good Ole Boys". :obama:

spasm
May 7 2011, 02:49:51 AM
Confirming that not a single person knew FDR was crippled and the pacific fleet was put on Hawaii solely to be bombed by Japs.

Lusulpher
May 7 2011, 02:55:31 AM
[quote=Sponk]this explains a lot of posts in this thread (http://www.miller-mccune.com/culture-society/belief-in-conspiracies-linked-to-machiavellian-mindset-30295/)
Oh my fucking god, the comments on that article...
:lol: :lol: :lol:


Conspiracy theories are like scientific theories, some are real, some are fake, some are BLATANTLY fake, and some are real but need serious work.

Yes, to some extent, I believe this article, but I also do believe there are malevolent people in the world who want power, money, and control, even though I don't. If I wrote a book, it'd be called "everything I learned about politics, I learned from posting at internet forums". Some people are just BAD, in fact, I'd say most people are BAD. Especially when they're in a position that they don't have to worry about bad coming back on them.

Authority gives people a sense of sadistic self entitlement to make everybody their bitch. The same way a moderator bans people like it's fucking heroin, I'm sure big business and government officials just roll in the mud of corruption, lies, and war crimes, because they love it, because they can. Would I do that if I had that kind of power? Yes and no. No, I wouldn't want to control people as a whole, I wouldn't be so disgusting as to kick people down, secure my position, and propagate a message that is a perversion of anything I may have once stood for... But I WOULD use my power to be incredibly petty. Like get back at an ex girlfriend, or ruin an old school bully of mine's life. But then, I'd do that anyway. All a matter of opportunity. But clearly some people are not fit to have power at all, and unfortunately there is a lot of evil in the world whether or not some of it is "made up". So we should always be suspicious, we should always distrust what we are told, and we should never be nice until people give us a damn good reason to be. Because most people just don't give a shit about you, and would sell you down the river for a buck. So knowing that, it is not difficult at all to believe the more cunning, more higher class people are a different class of scumbag entirely. Meeting up at secret lodge resorts and pumping our kids with mercury to sterilize the population or whatever.

Trust me, I don't trust the conspiracy theorists much either. In fact, I trust them less. Obama never banned me from a forum, Alex Jones and David Icke have. Their forums are full of crazies, even some criminal sociopaths who say horrible things like legalize pedophilia. And meanwhile I get banned, for saying basically what I'm saying to you right now. I will never fucking forgive them for that slight. I would shoot their kids infront of them if I knew I could get away with it. Do I believe The Illuminati is some other wordly cult that worships The Devil or aliens? No... I think the world is made up of street gangs, psychopaths, and mafia guys. Cause that's pretty much how I act honestly. But to be fair you have too, where did being nice get me? Nowhere. If I put on a shit grin and sucked mod dick, would that prevent me from being censored everywhere I go? Is that what it fucking takes to have a voice? I refuse to put these rapist's jizz on my face, and I refuse to just be backed into a corner to not have anywhere to speak. But that's a rant for another time. My point is here, that yes, I do somewhat believe in conspiracy theories, and I wouldn't have a problem admitting too I could see myself doing half of them. But the other half I couldn't. Like the mass sterilizing of the population, or the dumbing down of the average person. I would find that horrific beyond comprehension. But I know there are many people despicable enough to do it anyway. Why is it all these blogs try to convince people that if you KNOW there are people worse then you, that you must be unstable? They apparently want you to be a self loathing, asperger's syndrone deluded freak, who lives in a vacuum and enclosed space, where you cannot fathom anyone or anything. Just more control for them, there really is not limit to human stupidity or evil, and much smarter and better men then me have said that. We live in a really bleak world, whether or not half the shit the conspiracy theorists say is true. Some people turn to God to cope, others just pretend it's not all that bad, me? I choose to be informed. Surround myself with different news articles and opinion pieces as to all the doom and gloom. Partially because I want to feel prepared, I want to be able to say "I told you so" and rub it in people's faces, but I think most of all, I really do want to see the world burn. And by "burn", I mean actually civilization collapse, not we all become pathetic enslaved zombies in some drugged up sex crazed Huxley haze, or fearmongering, police state Orwellian nightmare... Lord of The Flies is my preferred end. I am optimistic however, that we can achieve something like Starship Troopers if we work at it.

Man, now I never want to be a forum mod, nutters like the one above will want to shoot your kid for banning them.[/quote:2u68nn7l]

So you feel more comfortable that he not say what he would do? And then surprises you? That says a lot about you. :psyduck:

Also, his rage comes from the same place that revolutions come from[I am able to project that like any rational brain in a monkey suit]. Banning someone from speaking their opinion is the worst crime in history. It's intellectual murder. It's why empires fight for control of history books and the dominant languages well after their battles are concluded. It's what leads to the next war.
Attempting to kill a man's honest ideas is akin to murdering his children...in front of him.

And greater minds have stated this, and have died to say it.
Censorship, is one of those "give me liberty or give me death" issues.
Google what sociopath said that.
RL is srs bsns. :obama:

Mavolio
May 7 2011, 03:08:11 AM
End of days on 21st dec 2012 so non of this other stuff matters any way. So make sure you max out your CC before then with long life food and gunz. In case you aren't sure how much of each to get you need 1 gun with full ammo for each days worth of food you get.

[youtube:3nua7bk7]2M-YYIDeEvs[/youtube:3nua7bk7]

Lusulpher
May 7 2011, 09:21:14 AM
End of days on 21st Dec 2012 so none of this other stuff matters any way. So make sure you max out your CC before then with long life food and gunz. In case you aren't sure how much of each to get you need 1 gun with full ammo for each days worth of food you get.
[youtube]2M-YYIDeEvs[youtube]

First off, the Mayan prophecy says end of an era and beginning of a new one. NOBODY knows what that means, extinction/NWO, all bad stuff is assumed. Could be Obama winning re-election and leading America back to it's "old glory" days on the global stage. That would end our BabyBoomer era, and save the goddamn planet!

Secondly, there are 3 other near-concurrent prophecies, Hopi/Nostradamus/Revelation all relate Humanity's doom* and they ALL mention a feat of technology/engineering that gets us all smug, right before the whammo.
Even if they are wrong, the message is clear. WE ARE FUCKUPS.
Examples that can be found: Manifest Destiny/American Railroad and ecological destruction/Gulf spill/9-11/Kennedy assassinations and the start of military-industrial complex/Financial Anti-Christ/global surveillance networks and The Patriot Act]

Honestly, most of the prophecies has as much info as a poorly received breaking news tagline...which is probably how "psychics" see the future. That doesn't help us clean up for disasters[Katrina all status quo yet???], what we need for that is a mass-educated Public. Or the herd will panic and squander all resources[leading to the real disaster, Mad Maxian Chaos].

So you keep being cute with Jesse James. I can think of worse things than Humanity ending 2012...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/42912168#42912168
Another move. :facepalm:

Funfact: In Chess, you do not have to call "Check". It is a kind opponent who is permitted to say "Check". You can win The Game more easily by being unkind. :obama:

lubica
May 7 2011, 10:39:32 AM
is it just me, having just woken up and still sipping coffee, or did that actually make sense?

Fara
May 7 2011, 10:56:52 AM
is it just me, having just woken up and still sipping coffee, or did that actually make sense?

no.. can't be...

Quarantine
May 7 2011, 11:46:59 AM
End of days on 21st Dec 2012 so none of this other stuff matters any way. So make sure you max out your CC before then with long life food and gunz. In case you aren't sure how much of each to get you need 1 gun with full ammo for each days worth of food you get.
[youtube]2M-YYIDeEvs[youtube]

First off, the Mayan prophecy says end of an era and beginning of a new one. NOBODY knows what that means, extinction/NWO, all bad stuff is assumed. Could be Obama winning re-election and leading America back to it's "old glory" days on the global stage. That would end our BabyBoomer era, and save the goddamn planet!

There is no Mayan prophecy, at least not known to us. At the end of 2012 a Mayan calendar cycle ends and a new one starts, that is really all there is to this. It's more akin to us having a year zero (which isn't a real year) and a calendar cycle before it and one after it, only in the case of the Mayans the year isn't arbitrary but determined by their method of calculating the whole thing.

It's not even the start of a new era, and more importantly, it's not even happening 2012. This date is derived by the correlation between the Christian and the Maya calendar done by the Spanish in the 16th and 17th century, so it's based on literary evidence. However the correlation between the astronomical phenomena described in the existing Mayan calendar in Dresden and the mathematical calculation of when they should have actually happened, gives an entirely different correlation. In other words, apocalypse has been rescheduled by 200 years.

As for eschatology, the root of this is ecological disaster, because this is what threatened human life the most in pre-industrial times. It's not technology causing this, because there really was no way for humans to control or alter nature in such a way for this to have played a role. The distrust of technological progress is a relatively new addition to these myths (as in the last couple of hundred centuries), but not one of the basic premises of apocalyptic expectations. This is a bit difficult to grasp for us today, but for the better part of human history, the change in technology happened so slow that it was barely perceivable. The very expectation of constant technological progress is relatively new, as is the fear that came with this. Obviously it's a bit different for the natives of the European colonies, who came into contact with an advanced civilization - that's where Hopi prophecies come in.

A bit older still is the connection of morale decay and the loss of moral values / old ways of live to the impeding Apocalypse, I'm not sure about the Jewish but this was making a heavy impression on the early Christians and Manicheans and remains popular until today.

Tellenta
May 7 2011, 11:48:11 AM
Secondly, there are 3 other near-concurrent prophecies, Hopi/Nostradamus/Revelation all relate Humanity's doom* and they ALL mention a feat of technology/engineering that gets us all smug, right before the whammo.


Perpetual motion machine power plants that cause a black hole that swallows the universe. Calling it now.

spasm
May 7 2011, 01:58:23 PM
Secondly, there are 3 other near-concurrent prophecies, Hopi/Nostradamus/Revelation all relate Humanity's doom* and they ALL mention a feat of technology/engineering that gets us all smug, right before the whammo.


Perpetual motion machine power plants that cause a black hole that swallows the universe. Calling it now.


LHC tbh.

SebN
May 7 2011, 02:30:37 PM
Havent read the rest of the thread cba, but i noticed a little debate about the Mayan end of the world theories.
Thought i would drop this in for good measure.

[youtube:31979m2o]3zBqRLK_ESs[/youtube:31979m2o]



SebN

Mavolio
May 7 2011, 04:37:09 PM
omfg, calendar based of fingers and toes. Obv in 2012 a very contagious form of leprosy will spread around the world and every one will lose their fingers and toes meaning we cant use our adv tech leading to.....

END OF DAYS!!!

TimMc
May 7 2011, 04:54:37 PM
Why is this thread still alive?

Tarminic
May 7 2011, 05:27:26 PM
That last post was unusually coherent, new meds perhaps? ;)


Secondly, there are 3 other near-concurrent prophecies, Hopi/Nostradamus/Revelation all relate Humanity's doom* and they ALL mention a feat of technology/engineering that gets us all smug, right before the whammo.
Even if they are wrong, the message is clear. WE ARE FUCKUPS.
Examples that can be found: Manifest Destiny/American Railroad and ecological destruction/Gulf spill/9-11/Kennedy assassinations and the start of military-industrial complex/Financial Anti-Christ/global surveillance networks and The Patriot Act

What makes you say that exactly? Some prophecies say some shit about the end of the world, as many prophecies been saying shit like that constantly (Examples: 1874, 1987, 2000, 2005, the next one coming up on May 21st, the 2012 one, etc). I'd be surprised if a single generation has gone by in a Christian society where there wasn't some prophecy predicting the end of the world.

Why Christian you ask? Because the rapture is the ultimate fuck you to an uninteresting, shitty life. Where all the "good people", of which every Christian surely believes they are a part, will literally rise into an existence of eternal happiness and leaving all of their shitty friends, ex boyfriends/girlfriends, unfair bosses, and corrupt politicians they don't like to suffer a world of torment because they deserve it. People love that idea.

And yet for all the indications about the end of the world being brought about due to our accelerating destruction of the environment there are tons of contra-indications as well. Medical advances and lack of global conflicts since the end of WW2 mean that less people die of violence, famine, and disease now than at any point in mankind's history and that trend has no sign of decreasing.

Given that there are dozens to hundreds of ways to interpret all of the prophecies you mentioned, that is an incredibly huge margin of error. There's one right interpretation out of ten, raised to the third power. So if the prophecies are even true you have a 0.1% chance of getting all three right.

Phrixus Zephyr
May 8 2011, 02:05:13 AM
Verbal diarrhea
What the fuck are you talking about?

Tellenta
May 8 2011, 03:12:20 AM
Why is this thread still alive?

I think it's a less effective pony thread trying to keep the crazy in one place. Not effective at all in this regard.

Nicholai Pestot
May 8 2011, 09:20:04 AM
That last post was unusually coherent, new meds perhaps? ;)


Secondly, there are 3 other near-concurrent prophecies, Hopi/Nostradamus/Revelation all relate Humanity's doom* and they ALL mention a feat of technology/engineering that gets us all smug, right before the whammo.
Even if they are wrong, the message is clear. WE ARE FUCKUPS.
Examples that can be found: Manifest Destiny/American Railroad and ecological destruction/Gulf spill/9-11/Kennedy assassinations and the start of military-industrial complex/Financial Anti-Christ/global surveillance networks and The Patriot Act

What makes you say that exactly? Some prophecies say some shit about the end of the world, as many prophecies been saying shit like that constantly (Examples: 1874, 1987, 2000, 2005, the next one coming up on May 21st, the 2012 one, etc). I'd be surprised if a single generation has gone by in a Christian society where there wasn't some prophecy predicting the end of the world.

Why Christian you ask? Because the rapture is the ultimate fuck you to an uninteresting, shitty life. Where all the "good people", of which every Christian surely believes they are a part, will literally rise into an existence of eternal happiness and leaving all of their shitty friends, ex boyfriends/girlfriends, unfair bosses, and corrupt politicians they don't like to suffer a world of torment because they deserve it. People love that idea.

And yet for all the indications about the end of the world being brought about due to our accelerating destruction of the environment there are tons of contra-indications as well. Medical advances and lack of global conflicts since the end of WW2 mean that less people die of violence, famine, and disease now than at any point in mankind's history and that trend has no sign of decreasing.

Given that there are dozens to hundreds of ways to interpret all of the prophecies you mentioned, that is an incredibly huge margin of error. There's one right interpretation out of ten, raised to the third power. So if the prophecies are even true you have a 0.1% chance of getting all three right.

You could have replaced your entire post with :lolpsychics:

Mavolio
May 8 2011, 06:38:52 PM
I like how Nasa had to make that short blog about why the world wasn't going to end in 2012 just to reassure all the nutters who believe in this conspiracy/doomsday rubbish

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012.html

walrus
May 8 2011, 07:29:10 PM
I like how Nasa had to make that short blog about why the world wasn't going to end in 2012 just to reassure all the nutters who believe in this conspiracy/doomsday rubbish

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012.html
still you get articles like this:
http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-t ... 5991009247 (http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-tech/tatooines-twin-suns-coming-to-a-planet-near-you-just-as-soon-as-betelgeuse-explodes/story-fn5fsgyc-1225991009247)

Don Pellegrino
May 8 2011, 08:21:42 PM
I like how Nasa had to make that short blog about why the world wasn't going to end in 2012 just to reassure all the nutters who believe in this conspiracy/doomsday rubbish

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012.html
still you get articles like this:
http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-t ... 5991009247 (http://www.news.com.au/technology/sci-tech/tatooines-twin-suns-coming-to-a-planet-near-you-just-as-soon-as-betelgeuse-explodes/story-fn5fsgyc-1225991009247)
BUT THATS WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO BELIEVE

Lusulpher
May 8 2011, 09:51:33 PM
Havent read the rest of the thread cba, but i noticed a little debate about the Mayan end of the world theories.
Thought i would drop this in for good measure.

[youtube]3zBqRLK_ESs[youtube]
SebN

Just being snarky, thumb is not finger.
And Evolutionary theories tie the shape of a creature to it's environment all the time. A bird's beak is curved due to the trees around it, and those are determined by the length of a growing season, no matter how many different seeds wash ashore. And growing season is determined by planetary angle...
So if something changes in deep space, it affects even the smallest creature in any ecosystem.
:Reaganomics: :razor:
We only rule this planet because Evolution/God/gods gave us understanding of the thumb and recon advantage of standing. Civilization is biologically fragile.

NASA also mentioned the Mayan calender correlating to solar plane of our galaxy and a shift, and then they have to theorize how that affects polar shifting/weather/ion fields in the atmosphere/EVERYTHING else. Even if nothing happens, what kind of scientists would ignore a celestial event like that?
And then not notify the Public that they don't know what it actually means, well in advance, so that productive minds could set up some rational experiments.

If they just leave it on the Internet, conspiracy theories will develop, as in this case[Confusion good, Chaos BETTER]. Or the Y2K case[which actually might have been a MASSIVE COLLAPSE had someone not noticed BY ACCIDENT :psyduck: ]

Also the Egyptian mathematicians got it right using number 8 as the root of their math. It's the basis for computing language again and will lead to AI[and our DOOOOOOMMMMM!!!!]. No one even has a solid theory on how they crafted their precision tools, unreal... :obama:


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42937748/ns/technology_and_science-science/
Each time this happens, the 'brain trust' of the Department of Defense has a new layer of components they can experiment with on their projects. Or even a new production method or more stable synthetic. WE, the taxpayer are then sold the fruits of our labour on the "open market" years later. AND not at a discount.
That's a conspiracy. They separate us from our money on the subsidy end AND on the "free market" end. And anyone who questions that is considered a "non-patriotic, conspiracy theorist".
It keeps me up at night.

*Bush's TARP program lent out tax dollars at zero taxe by the billions, the banks then loaned the government back at above 3% interest...Still having those banks foreclose on hard working-middle class citizens. That's The Game we are playing.

Tarminic
May 8 2011, 10:07:11 PM
And Evolutionary theories tie the shape of a creature to it's environment all the time. A bird's beak is curved due to the trees around it, and those are determined by the length of a growing season, no matter how many different seeds wash ashore. And growing season is determined by planetary angle...
So if something changes in deep space, it affects even the smallest creature in any ecosystem.
Only if that change in deep space is enough to affect the planet's rotational axis in any meaningful way. Do some math on the gravitational force that the other planets, combined, exert on our axis of rotation. You'll find that jumping up and down is more likely to "affect even the smallest creature in any ecosystem."

No seriously, do the math.


NASA also mentioned the Mayan calender correlating to solar plane of our galaxy and a shift, and then they have to theorize how that affects polar shifting/weather/ion fields in the atmosphere/EVERYTHING else. Even if nothing happens, what kind of scientists would ignore a celestial event like that?
[CITATION NEEDED]


Also the Egyptian mathematicians got it right using number 8 as the root of their math. It's the basis for computing language again and will lead to AI[and our DOOOOOOMMMMM!!!!]. No one even has a solid theory on how they crafted their precision tools, unreal... :obama:
Base 2, not base 8, is the system of binary math. Hex is base 16, which is 2^4th.

Also there are several solid theories about how the Egyptians build the pyramids, so you have either done no research (or research based on blog posts based on other blog posts written by people who were paranoid schizophrenics) or intentionally lying.

Don Pellegrino
May 8 2011, 10:21:15 PM
Oh wow, Lusulpher, that last post :facepalm:

Lusulpher
May 8 2011, 10:52:31 PM
[quote=Lusulpher]
And Evolutionary theories tie the shape of a creature to it's environment all the time. A bird's beak is curved due to the trees around it, and those are determined by the length of a growing season, no matter how many different seeds wash ashore. And growing season is determined by planetary angle...
So if something changes in deep space, it affects even the smallest creature in any ecosystem.
Only if that change in deep space is enough to affect the planet's rotational axis in any meaningful way. Do some math on the gravitational force that the other planets, combined, exert on our axis of rotation. You'll find that jumping up and down is more likely to "affect even the smallest creature in any ecosystem."

No seriously, do the math.

Me: The math on that is over long spans of time and tiny changes...According to Darwin/staticians. So, ANY shift + 1% change in atmosphere due to some new position. And we could still be looking at what starves the planet to death. Mars is theorized to be a wasteland simply because it's atmosphere can't hold liquid water on the surface[that doesn't stop life from being completely underground/under-ocean however].

EVEN if a shift occurs, we might have enough time to adapt/leave. it's only the lack of information that makes it appear as some zero-sum outcome.


NASA also mentioned the Mayan calender correlating to solar plane of our galaxy and a shift, and then they have to theorize how that affects polar shifting/weather/ion fields in the atmosphere/EVERYTHING else. Even if nothing happens, what kind of scientists would ignore a celestial event like that?
[CITATION NEEDED]
Me: http://alignment2012.com/whatisga.htm
Nothing obvious happens when you get a solar alignment like that. Galactic alignment could be a matter of scales different or the same kind of whimper.


Also the Egyptian mathematicians got it right using number 8 as the root of their math. It's the basis for computing language again and will lead to AI[and our DOOOOOOMMMMM!!!!]. No one even has a solid theory on how they crafted their precision tools, unreal... :obama:
Base 2, not base 8, is the system of binary math. Hex is base 16, which is 2^4th.
Me: Whoops probably thinking of some other ancient Algebra, but Binary is still the shit.[DOOOOOMMMMM!!]

Also there are several solid theories about how the Egyptians build the pyramids, so you have either done no research (or research based on blog posts based on other blog posts written by people who were paranoid schizophrenics) or intentionally lying.[/quote:vz05b48l]
Last thing on History Channel[FUCK YOU COMCAST, YOU PRICKS] was a special on an archaeologist who studies tools. His entire career was figuring how ancient people made the tools for measuring/pacing/forging. The artifacts he has picked up from the Nile have production requirements that supercede what the History books allow for that region AND they are made out of inferior materials that require future requirement.
Microscopically-metered ridges along edges was a particularly intriguing image. Implies they had mechanization control comparable to current techniques.[finding more of this in ancient China/Greece too]

To state we know how the pyramids were built and have no data on the myriad range of tools or techniques is pretty much to say, 'We can imagine how they did it but we don't want to do it the same as they did.' Which is terrible, because we need some of their weight-lifting techniques, modernized, for lifting bigass cubes of raw material ANY DISTANCE!

Historians were informed by Herodotus that the pyramids were giant, well-heads into the underground Sea of the Sahara, and modern satellite imagery implies he wasn't 'spouting' off. :razor: Still doesn't change the narrative that they were over-glorified,slave-labour, constructed tombs by the original Arabian Stonemason society...
When researchers know that slavery does not allow such perfection, Socialism via labour tax was the method of payment for the water, and it was the peak of African[and possibly Human] intellectual achievement outside of Timbuktu.
But the destruction/outsourcing of African history from 'Manifest Destiny: sub-Sahara' is a whole new tier of conspiracy.

Let's get back to America, 21st century.


Offtopic[?]:
Can I request a :GIR: emote?
[youtube:vz05b48l]FMW0pbF0nHo[/youtube:vz05b48l]

Tarminic
May 8 2011, 10:55:40 PM
The citation I was looking for was from NASA, you know, the group you were making claims about? If I just had to support my points with random sites on the internet I argue literally anything I want without limit. :roll:

Fachiri
May 8 2011, 10:56:52 PM
Historians were informed by Herodotus that the pyramids were giant, well-heads into the underground Sea of the Sahara, and modern satellite imagery implies he wasn't 'spouting' off.

I think this beats the whole "pyramids as landing pads for alien ships" thing by a wide fucking margin.

Lusulpher
May 8 2011, 11:11:34 PM
Historians were informed by Herodotus that the pyramids were giant, well-heads into the underground Sea of the Sahara, and modern satellite imagery implies he wasn't 'spouting' off.

I think this beats the whole "pyramids as landing pads for alien ships" thing by a wide fucking margin.
Does not exclude.
The Egyptians have some downright freaky hieroglyphs about religious/political events.
Examples include: NASA shuttle/Apache helicopter/spacemen hieroglyphs.
And there is a theory that Ra's symbol is just a UFO lighting display[Sun/halo symbols mean God/big event or alien in several cultures]. And then there is the pyramids being obsessively aligned with sun worship[which might just have been a superior UFO encounter].

There are several of these historical light fighting in the sky encountered all the way up to Columbus, 3 days away from America's shores![the Catholic Church interrogated/inquisitioned him for saying it looked like a green, Jewish 'menorah'] Then you have two daylight in medieval Germany, some before that in India[there is a city ruin with an unusual mass-die off], the Hebrew Bible reads like meta-Scifi[their god concept IS AN ALIEN WHO SPAWNS OTHER ALIENS]and everything that ever happened in the Japanese seas. :obama:

Scientists don't argue IF intelligent life exists, they debate when.
And the landing pad region would be that runway in the Turkish area. But good luck with that. Turks won't let them end the Noah's Ark issue on the side of a mountain.
Chaos better... :obama:

walrus
May 8 2011, 11:13:28 PM
oh christ.jpg

spasm
May 8 2011, 11:18:25 PM
Where's the stargate buried lusulpher?

Spaztick
May 8 2011, 11:19:57 PM
oh christ.jpg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_iOXc7WQoMho/TKuvVawvGGI/AAAAAAAAAPQ/_lycSbK4voY/s1600/howie+yelling+oh+christ.jpg

Fachiri
May 8 2011, 11:24:05 PM
Where's the stargate buried lusulpher?

Lulsulpher is an even crazier Daniel Jackson, c/d?

Lusulpher
May 8 2011, 11:27:39 PM
The citation I was looking for was from NASA, you know, the group you were making claims about? If I just had to support my points with random sites on the internet I argue literally anything I want without limit. :roll:

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/2012-guest.html

Some guy in that article even wrote an article about it in 1975...are you implying that I would believe NASA would not have had that theory about space and math, pass their desk and then not begun experiments to see if it feasibly could hurt our situation in anyway?

I'm[and everyone else] implying that they have been such sneaky fucks about simple things that if it was bad, they would only inform their stakeholders on how to prepare with bunkers/modern tech on sustainibilty. And leave everyone else to die. Eugenics did not die with Hitler, and it did not begin with him.

If it was meh news, they obviously would not let this spiral out of control...surely, surely not to expand marketshare from survival gear sales. Or expanding their budgets/influence from a purely scientific goal...surely.

Transparency is absolutely nil. And the Public has to change that about America. Land of the Free, home of the Brave, my ass.
There are no unbiased, civilian-based committees with any power to get out-of-date information from the military/scientific sectors. Not any without cowardice in the face of being called "unpatriotic". :obama:

For instance, look at the Osama stealth helicopter and the instant DNA test.
The Public CANNOT ask about the chopper. National security is valid.
The DNA test...that has civilian applications. Our Judicial system is held up by forensics backlogs. :psyduck:

And the context of Osama being Bush Sr. CIA, in Cheney's Pakistan, and him needing to be dead, it's just susicious that it appears here, AFTER we confirmed Saddam had body doubles in hiding. Patriots ask questions so that our name doesn't get attached to conspiracies that could have been avoided. :obama:

Lusulpher
May 8 2011, 11:43:00 PM
Where's the stargate buried lusulpher?

Lusulpher is an even crazier Daniel Jackson, c/d?

Stargate was based on racist, historical theories that assume 'ancient Blacks'[old, sand niggers], COULD NOT POSSIBLY create the tools to precisely extract the material for pyramids. These same "intellectuals" subverted data for racism when confronted with African Genesis in Ethiopia and Human Migrations from there.
Now we have global mitochondrial DNA[rNA?], and several African caves showing the progression of language, before agriculture.[the creepy thing is Hebrew Bible arbitrarily describes many ancient facts/traditions about 'Nubia', Ethiopia, as if Genesis was written in that culture :shock: ]

It's why Napoleon destroyed the faces off the monuments. He was raised under that mentality. Old, sand niggers, COULD NOT BE BETTER THAN EUROPEAN CULTURE IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM.

In modern times, we have the Rosetta Stone[the multilingual artifact], proving that Egypt was an international, intellectual superpower the scope of which Europe could only invade and hope to pick up the scraps.

[i]Aliens/fluke must have done it. :obama:

I like how you confirm his statements without adding anything that adds to any topic[I wanted to say, you are an attention whore, that can only brofist anally with other attention whores in an attempt to derail a thread. But you are actually providing meta-cognitive content, so I wont...whoops :oops: ]

Fachiri
May 8 2011, 11:45:17 PM
I like how you confirm his statements without adding anything that adds to any topic[I wanted to say, you are an attention whore, that can only brofist anally with other attention whores in a an attempt to derail a thread. But you are actually providing meta-cognitive content, so I wont...whoops :oops: ]

:monocledowns:

spasm
May 8 2011, 11:47:07 PM
Stargate was probably the most racist show I've ever seen. It single-handedly set race relations back several decades.




I also like how you not only think napoleon shot the sphinx, but you also know why.

Lusulpher
May 8 2011, 11:51:39 PM
Stargate was probably the most racist show I've ever seen. It single-handedly set race relations back several decades.

I also like you not only think napoleon shot the sphinx, but you also know why.

He was one of several explorers who systematically removed the gold[redefining as poverty] and disfigured the artifacts[redefining as ignorant or above old, sand nigger abilities] across the continent. Precision is intent.
Most people are shocked to find out that Africa was almost a Social utopia continent-wide. THey even had an honour-code for labour. Indentured servitude was a replacement for money, allowing almost any class to be able to afford tutelage under someone who could read/write[scribes].

Then the libraries that were destroyed/and the grain silos in sub-Saharan kingdoms that were labeled 'phallic, fertility monuments' EVEN while filled with grain against droughts. :psyduck:
And that is in the last 500 years!
Before that African technologies reached China and to the northern Vikings.
I can confirm that conspiracy worked quite successfully.

I call it Inferiority Complex: Europe. Now we have one where nations compete against each other by waving thier currencydicks around and enslaving entire emerging economies and calling them 'Third Worlds'.


Also, Stargate Atlantis is worse. :?

Tellenta
May 9 2011, 12:03:28 AM
So removing gold is removing poverty. I'm down, you mind giving me your bank account numbers I have some debt I want to relieve you of.

Mavolio
May 9 2011, 12:20:22 AM
There was going to be more ethnic minorities in Stargate but they kept getting stopped by police on the way to the auditions and missing them.

[youtube:ng3x0tzq]emWGUQceHos[/youtube:ng3x0tzq]

This was the best SG ep. And shockingly was the least racist of all of them!!

Lusulpher
May 9 2011, 12:37:51 AM
There was going to be more ethnic minorities in Stargate but they kept getting stopped by police on the way to the auditions and missing them.

[youtube]emWGUQceHos[youtube]
This was the best SG ep. And shockingly was the least racist of all of them!!

Racism...still not a crucial factor in Class Warfare. Black guy gets rich and leaves the American ghetto system. Good on him, hope he sends his kids to Yale AND Harvard Law. Hope he gets affirmative action up the whazzo.[reparations still better, will accept stock options].
Black Man golfs with White country clubbers and figures out a scheme to gentrify[change land value using demographics, for a land/power grab] the ghettos he just left, leaving the Blacks there in a more-crime riddled situation. Fuck him and his family, and his golfing buddies!
That guy is a traitor, no matter what colour he is. He's an American fucking over other Americans.

Stupid pollacks. Asians look alike to me. And I don't look too kindly on the Welsh either, them and their humble super-micro-kingdom[SO TINY]. Fuck you Luxembourgians, and fuck-a you whale and dorrafin! :obama:

Teal'C...Black panther scowl drawn onto his face, really... :facepalm:

Kransthow
May 9 2011, 12:50:07 AM
There was going to be more ethnic minorities in Stargate but they kept getting stopped by police on the way to the auditions and missing them.

[youtube]emWGUQceHos[youtube]
This was the best SG ep. And shockingly was the least racist of all of them!!

Racism...still not a crucial factor in Class Warfare. Black guy gets rich and leaves the American ghetto system. Good on him, hope he sends his kids to Yale AND Harvard Law. Hope he gets affirmative action up the whazzo.[reparations still better, will accept stock options].
Black Man golfs with White country clubbers and figures out a scheme to gentrify[change land value using demographics, for a land/power grab] the ghettos he just left, leaving the Blacks there in a more-crime riddled situation. Fuck him and his family, and his golfing buddies!
That guy is a traitor, no matter what colour he is. He's an American fucking over other Americans.

Stupid pollacks. Asians look alike to me. And I don't look too kindly on the Welsh either, them and their humble super-micro-kingdom[SO TINY]. Fuck you Luxembourgians, and fuck-a you whale and dorrafin! :obama:

Teal'C...Black panther scowl drawn onto his face, really... :facepalm:
http://i.imgur.com/sA57v.jpg
I think most of your posts have some underlying point but I think you forgot to add one to that post.

fig
May 9 2011, 12:55:21 AM
What the fuck is th-

spasm
May 9 2011, 01:03:55 AM
Everything in the world is connected to racism and Lusulpher's need to get reparations. It's amazing.

Reed Tiburon
May 9 2011, 03:58:46 AM
holy shitballs wow

teds
May 9 2011, 04:09:51 AM
you're probably my favourite mental

Tyrus Tenebros
May 9 2011, 04:34:35 AM
Funfact: In Chess, you do not have to call "Check". It is a kind opponent who is permitted to say "Check". You can win The Game more easily by being unkind. :obama:I really didn't read any of this thread, however, I can only assume that you're attempting to point out that people are manipulating us in to a bad situation without letting us know, presumably leading "us" to "lose the game".

Unfortunately for you your analogy is a massive failure because if you're in check it is actually illegal to leave your king in a state of check at the end of your next move. As in, if you fail to notice and move another piece, your opponent cannot simply take your king, the move is rescinded and you have to choose another move.[1]

[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_chess#Check

HTH

Lusulpher
May 11 2011, 04:51:25 AM
Funfact: In Chess, you do not have to call "Check". It is a kind opponent who is permitted to say "Check". You can win The Game more easily by being unkind. :obama:I really didn't read any of this thread, however, I can only assume that you're attempting to point out that people are manipulating us in to a bad situation without letting us know, presumably leading "us" to "lose the game".

Unfortunately for you your analogy is a massive failure because if you're in check it is actually illegal to leave your king in a state of check at the end of your next move. As in, if you fail to notice and move another piece, your opponent cannot simply take your king, the move is rescinded and you have to choose another move.[1]

[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_chess#Check

HTH


"Check

When a player makes a move that threatens the opposing king with capture (not necessarily by the piece that was moved), the king is said to be in check. The definition of check is that one or more opposing pieces could theoretically capture the king on the next move (although the king is never actually captured). If a player's king is in check then the player must make a move that eliminates the threat(s) of capture; a player may never leave their king in check at the end of their move. The possible ways to remove the threat of capture are:

-Move the king to a square where it is not threatened.
-Capture the threatening piece (possibly with the king), if doing so would not leave the king in check.
-Place a piece between the king and the opponent's threatening piece. This is impossible if the threatening piece is a knight or pawn, or if a checking queen, rook or bishop is adjacent to the checked king.

In informal games, it is customary to announce check when making a move that puts the opponent's king in check. However, in formal competitions check is rarely announced (Just & Burg 2003:28)."



From your link...all's fair in Love and Chess? :obama:
Also, sovereigns are never captured, The Game simply ends. :obama: :obama:
These people like fair, authorized rules for their elite class to play. Socialism for them, Feudalism for us. Analogy stands. :obama: :obama: :obama:


Also, sorry for using this emote on you, noticed some trolls spouting off in random threads.
And MSNBC is unraveling some grimy moves made by Ralph Reed as he tries to be come a "Republican King-maker", AGAIN. After he was revealed to be fooling Christians into supporting Slavery in the Mauritanian isles.
I mad. But not at you, you have testicular fortitude, unlike some losers on this planet.

Raine Woot
May 11 2011, 04:57:13 AM
He's saying that it doesn't matter if you say it or not, they'll know one way or the other in the same.... oh why am i even bothering?

Fachiri
May 11 2011, 05:00:39 AM
He's saying that it doesn't matter if you say it or not, they'll know one way or the other in the same.... oh why am i even bothering?

Masochism.

Lusulpher
May 11 2011, 05:02:24 AM
He's saying that it doesn't matter if you say it or not, they'll know one way or the other in the same.... oh why am i even bothering?

They rescind the move in competition? And if I was being technical, I would point out 'the end of your next move', as the end of The Game, as it would be over...
If I say it, they have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options. I can still win, I'd just be doing it easier by not saying it.

Don't come in pretending to defend someone when even you have no idea what he meant by that.

Quarantine
May 11 2011, 07:04:15 AM
Just 2 quick points: Egyptians used decimals, same as everybody else due to humans liking very much to count with their fingers. Babylonians used a base 60 numbering system and most likely several other cultures inherited it from them, I don't recall any use of base 8 or 16 in ancient numbering.

Building pyramids is very well possible, the reason we don't reenact it is because we don't have unlimited man power, time and money to haul around stones in the desert.

Tellenta
May 11 2011, 07:06:54 AM
He's saying that it doesn't matter if you say it or not, they'll know one way or the other in the same.... oh why am i even bothering?

They rescind the move in competition? And if I was being technical, I would point out 'the end of your next move', as the end of The Game, as it would be over...
If I say it, they have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options. I can still win, I'd just be doing it easier by not saying it.

Don't come in pretending to defend someone when even you have no idea what he meant by that.

Oh I see what your problem is, you don't know what words mean. I'll steal some techniques from your own book to see if you get the point.


When a player makes a move that threatens the opposing king with capture (not necessarily by the piece that was moved), the king is said to be in check. The definition of check is that one or more opposing pieces could theoretically capture the king on the next move (ALTHOUGH THE KING IS NEVER ACTUALLY CAPTURED). If a player's king is in check then the player MUST make a move that eliminates the threat(s) of capture; a player may never leave their king in check at the end of their move. The possible ways to remove the threat of capture are:

-Move the king to a square where it is not threatened.
-Capture the threatening piece (possibly with the king), if doing so would not leave the king in check.
-Place a piece between the king and the opponent's threatening piece. This is impossible if the threatening piece is a knight or pawn, or if a checking queen, rook or bishop is adjacent to the checked king.

In chess you can't even make a move to let the opponent take your king in a check mate situation, the game is over on your turn due to the fact that you have no available moves.

spasm
May 11 2011, 01:39:44 PM
Lusulpher has ruined the obama emoticon.

Tellenta
May 11 2011, 01:54:29 PM
Lusulpher has ruined the obama emoticon.

He also ruined cognitive thought and using sources. It is however slightly entertaining to see him get all smug that he used a source when his post was the equivalent of the following.

Kellogs, Post foods, and Kraft use raisins in all their products. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raisin_Bran Why are you people so stupid to not believe this?

James Snowscoran
May 11 2011, 02:45:46 PM
If I say it, they have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options.
And if you don't say it, they still have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options...

(I felt like posting in this thread)

Tellenta
May 11 2011, 03:34:41 PM
If I say it, they have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options.
And if you don't say it, they still have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options...

(I felt like posting in this thread)

So did I :brofist:

Tarminic
May 11 2011, 04:38:33 PM
If I say it, they have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options.
And if you don't say it, they still have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options...

(I felt like posting in this thread)

So did I :brofist:
Of course you would brofist, because it's what people have been brought up to do and well we are definitely people and in this case there are many ways that brofists are necessary.

Lets not forget the historical implications that brofists have had in the past. You think that there was no such thing as such in the ancient Babylon? The Game says otherwise. Of course most people have no idea what this means, but it doesnt matter as the ones who matter always will. :obama:

Its no coincidence that the brofist is used when and where it is, history will be your teacher if not now then when the past is once again the future, though by this time the lesson itself will be much harsher and the cost of your F will be more than a few scolds from your rents.
:obama: :obama: :obama:

Not that the grades will ever matter no matter what those "teachers" say - Cheyney and his ilk will tell you that they're paid too much - which is a joke considering what they truly represent, isn't it? Lets not forget how inconsequential all of this is in the end.
http://www.timecube.com/

When the class warfare arrives, it will be walking hand in hand with fascism and unfortunately both will be carrying the american flag like a fresh apple pie, but in this pie is the koolaid and the wonderful children will each have a slice. :obama: :obama: But some already know this and those few may realize whats happening enough to spread the word. But I guess we'll see about that. :obama: :obama: :obama:

Tellenta
May 11 2011, 04:53:04 PM
If I say it, they have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options.
And if you don't say it, they still have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options...

(I felt like posting in this thread)

So did I :brofist:
http://www.timecube.com/

Tarminic thank you for this link it has opened my eyes to the evils of the oneism eduopressers that have been foisted on me my whole life. I will leave this thread with these words of wisdom from a great man.


THERE IS NO DAMN GOD -
ONEism IS A DEATH TRAP
for Mom and Dad Opposites.
You're Educated ONE Nitwits,
I possess Math & Science Proof.

James Snowscoran
May 11 2011, 08:56:46 PM
I, too, long ago rejected oppressive oneism and embraced the TRUTH OF CUBE


CATASTROPIC WARNING -
Obama must resign to save his people from his catastrophe. SUN power will not allow any
Black Skin power to rule over its Light Domain.
Hell cometh to the dumb, ignorant, educated
stupid "Worshippers of ONE", for Creation
is of OPPOSITES. Born Cubed I defy God of
ONE, for I have a Yes and No mentality
necessary for cubed intelligence

:obama:

Tarminic
May 11 2011, 09:01:42 PM
Oh holy shit it still gets updated? :psyduck:


WARNING TO EDUCATED STUPID, Black Skin equates imprisonment, white race had nothing to do making negros black. Even a worst imprisonment exists when the whites are under Dark rule, who seek revenge for false slavory. Hell, I am as much an economic slave as any black.Not one black in America wears a shackle that prevents them from returning to their African culture. White people are not obligated to nurture the black race - when actually dark and light should exist on opposite corners of Earth as depicted by midday and midnight. The white race is actually stupid to give welfare and integrate with the Black Race, who in time will slaughter them. The white race has done more to support the Black Race around the World than even the Black Race itself. In America, Blacks have welfare, in Africa they have AIDS. Play the colors dealt, some have to the cops and the others the robbers, next life it will be reversed. Hell could be the living in Black skin, but for whites living under Black rule could be a harsher hell.

I know for a fact that 4 simultaneous 24 hour Days exist within a single rotation
of Earth. Midday is a light race Day. Sundown is an Asian race Day. Midnight
is a Black Race Day and Sunup is an Indian Race Day. Erroneous 1 Day 1 God crap has corrupted human Cubic intelligence. Genesis 1:5 "first Day"is an evil Lie - contradicting the whole damn bible sh-it. Bible and stupid academic ONEness ignores and obstructs Cubic Creation Intelligence. Black people should create a "White Race Appreciation Day"for all they have sacrificed to help the Black. Compare the American Black economics to the African Black environment where
Whites can't own land or vote.

Warning to Obama, I believe that your black/white equality posture will lead your people to a racial war - destroying both races and America. Another warning you have no inkling about and never taught. The Sun has ruled over the Light on Earth for eons and might just fight back with another "Big Bang Catastrope"if Dark rules over the light from the highest office on Earth. You are giving hope to your people that is impossible for them to achieve and maintain. If you incite your people to revolt and the signs are already there, whites around the World will slaughter their blacks, and the rest will be returned to African Hell. After you fight the whites, the Blacks will have the masses of China upon them. Resign now Obama, avoid the carnage you encourage. Note the Bald Eagle with its white head brain with its powerful Black body No Dark shall rule over the light on Earth. Resign now before you incite hell on Earth for both Dark and Light races. Don't forget your dark rule over light on Earth will most likely incite the Sun to fight back.
Hey Lusulpher, you said that reading absolutely everything on the internet is important, what does this mean exactly?

Fachiri
May 11 2011, 09:02:24 PM
What's sad is that the contents no that site make more sense than Lulsulpher's posts. :lol:


Oh holy shit it still gets updated? :psyduck:

Yeah. It's awesome.

Mavolio
May 11 2011, 09:10:40 PM
[youtube:knnhn7hx]CDDPJPfFWl8[/youtube:knnhn7hx]

Chess is p.racist as well, white pieces always go 1st like they are better or some thing......

Lusulpher
May 12 2011, 09:09:22 AM
[youtube]CDDPJPfFWl8[youtube]

Chess is p.racist as well, white pieces always go 1st like they are better or some thing......
That is supposed to be the novice going before the elder. An equalizing advantage.
Chess is just a metaphor for Feudalistic social hierarchies anyway. You don't want to depress the new generation of players by simply starting The Game with all their officer pieces off the board[like Real Life :( ].
This game precedes Europe however, but does not precede Feudalism.[serfs bonded to Lords by honour/poverty]

That animation actually reminded me of how they walked all those soldiers into Maxim machine gun strafing in WWI.0...They called it 'The Devil's Paintbrush'.
Boys, horses, red mud, and the miserable screams of the dying holding their guts in. Rats, flies, officers, all the scum of the Earth pushing more innocent flesh into of the machinery of Death.

Hitler was an artist. And he got his "art" in that war. He was a message runner. He had to dodge The Gears, daily. And then they sent some Jewish bankers to Versailles to surrender the German board...poor Hitler. A noble Pawn becomes a misguided King. :obama:

Anyone realize that Hitler also possessed 'The Devil's Luck'[11 failed assassinations including 1 that killed 4 people at his same conference table, and HE/IT walked away!]. A plane dropped a mustard gas bomb onto his throat, tore him open and permanently gave him his 'hissing voice'[according to spy reports it was 'hypnotic to hear him at rallies']...but he lived?! And went on to massacre millions of Jews, Jews who go on to ethnically sweep the Holy Land using genocide...genocide that triggers extremist Islamic factions to rise...Evil, begetting evil, begetting evil, begetting evil... :roll:





Now excuse me while I dry-ream some already sore cornholes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_chess#Check
Under illegal moves section:
Conduct

High standards of etiquette and ethics are expected. Players should shake hands before and after the game. Generally a player should not speak during the game, except to offer a draw, resign, or to call attention to an irregularity. An announcement of "check" is made in amateur games but should not be used in officially sanctioned [The ]Games. A player may not distract or annoy another player by any means, including repeatedly offering a draw (Schiller 2003:30–31,49–52).


You Sodomites want to get technical about a fucking analogy that is still represented by the entire weight of Political History?
Or do you like having a SECOND source back up my assertion? This Game is old. HTFU.



@ Tellenta I can see you think yourself clever...
Yeah raisins are in your bran, now explain why they have to replace the sugar with the biological equivalent of clothing starch?
Why would they soak your motherfucking bran and oats in high fructose syrup[corn STARCH]and then give it to kids at school?
Why would they cancel exercise classes and then complain American children have early puberty/severe obesity?
Why would they give amphetamines to children instead of Recess, that actually CURES ADHD?
Why would they only increase the price of organic food when there is enough supply and growing new markets?
Why would they purposefully eliminate the basic standard of fitness required to join the military?
And why would they douse those children in treatments that doctors all cash out on Medicare, TO THE DETRIMENT OF AMERICA'S BUDGET?
Do you want links to the fact that they are poisoning lower class citizens of America AND making money doing it?
Or would you like to shut the fuck up and at least let me believe you don't all deserve your slow deaths...probably too much to ask. :obama:

Rest of you, put on your helmets and go back to chewing your fucking milk![which is laced with bovine steroids, causing elevated risk of Human breast cancer. You deserve it you cunts.]

Calks
May 12 2011, 10:00:11 AM
And what precautions do you take with your diet to avoid these 'additives' Lusulpher?

James Snowscoran
May 12 2011, 10:11:07 AM
Probably safer to just stop eating

Lusulpher
May 12 2011, 12:01:33 PM
And what precautions do you take with your diet to avoid these 'additives' Lusulpher?

tl:dr; You are what you eat. Try not being shit.

Lots of water[filtered, tap is all flouride, a metal/salt compound...that's not water, brush your fucking teeth and tongue, you swine]. And don't blame Socialism, they would have stopped that by now if they were allowed to. http://stagevu.com/video/rtusfnlsgbxw You will not like where they are taking water demand[not supply, that is of no concern]

High fructose is easy, read your ingredients. If you see anything ending in "-ose", or SEVERAL on the listing AND them being first, that company is trying to fuck you and your family.

Carbonated beverage is to be treated like alcohol. It's addictive and dangerous, and absolutely has no benefit. AT ALL. Moderation is fine. But several a day, you are asking for weak bones/arteries/obesity/impotency.

Wash vegetables thoroughly. Those fertilizers are to be treated like legal DDT. They build up, they know that. But the money is ungodly.

The more expensive the fish the more contaminated it usually is[National Geographic had an expose on that]. Shellfish are the scavengers of the ocean, might as well eat depleted uranium rods. Local streams are not to be trusted either, companies dump soap and chem byproduct in the cozy places so fewer people ask questions. Including nuclear plant runoff in national park areas.

You don't want to be eating genetically engineered crop atm[EVEN though the FDA is now a tool of corrupt medical/food companies and is forcing us]. Monsanto is experimenting with Terminator seed AND using proteins that can cross species...best case, nicer wheat. Worst case, pollen cases Human sterility. Monsanto also did Agent Orange, DDT, bovine growth hormone contamination, etc. etc. They are Satanic.
I swapped to Soymilk. Very vanilla. It's decent-refreshing.

Don't knock kosher dieting. You lack the amino acids to break down all the fats from 2 types of protein in one meal. Like beef + cheese sandwich= heart disease, as the fats are going straight to the arteries. But beef + egg sandwich = both completely digested. You can exhaust how much of one kind of meat you can safely digest in one sitting. Thanks Bible/medical journal.[kosher is supposed to be symbolic of our dominion over beasts and our superior mercy, by not 'bathing the flesh of the lamb in the milk of the mother' :twisted: ]

Consume more fiber than protein. Thick, heavy wheat bread with grains, reduce the damage that shit is doing to your colon[yeah starch causes colon polyps, which can become colon cancer, colon is a flexible tube, not to be ironed!]. Cellulose is a digestive sponge/masseuse. Not to mention filling me up before I gorge on fats/sugars, and play videogames all fucking day. :obama:

And instead of exercise, think about exercise. Burns almost the same calories



[b]Or you could vote all these shillsters out of government/business and not have to do any of this... They get subsidies from their buddies to do this to us.
I know, I know, Madness!/Anarchy...:obama:

Just saying if they can't feed the world and do it the right way[and they do get paid NOT TO REDUCE FOOD COSTS], that opens up a lot more jobs and applications of tech[green tech and hydroponics]. Instead of just faking continuous success until even that can't meet the artificial demand from an engineered, consumerist populace.

Wolves pretending to be shepherds, leading sheep to a field of razorgrass, for death by a thousand blood-filled bites.

Dorvil Barranis
May 12 2011, 12:39:38 PM
@ Tellenta I can see you think yourself clever...
Yeah raisins are in your bran, now explain why they have to replace the sugar with the biological equivalent of clothing starch?

Yeah, Tellenta, explain that one! ZING!

You got raisin bran served!

Tyrus Tenebros
May 12 2011, 03:14:33 PM
He's saying that it doesn't matter if you say it or not, they'll know one way or the other in the same.... oh why am i even bothering?

They rescind the move in competition? And if I was being technical, I would point out 'the end of your next move', as the end of The Game, as it would be over...
If I say it, they have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options. I can still win, I'd just be doing it easier by not saying it.

Don't come in pretending to defend someone when even you have no idea what he meant by that.
You posted some other random bullshit in the topic later but this is the pertinent part that males your argument retarded

Long story short: yes the move is rescinded even in tournament chess. The rule states the it is actually illegal. As in, Not a valid move, To leave your king in check.

Don't come in here quoting a wiki entry without grasping the meaning. Especially since you have to ask about it later.

Tellenta
May 12 2011, 04:05:40 PM
@ Tellenta I can see you think yourself clever...
Yeah raisins are in your bran, now explain why they have to replace the sugar with the biological equivalent of clothing starch?

Yeah, Tellenta, explain that one! ZING!

You got raisin bran served!

I once played middle man selling sugar extracted from processing cheese in Wisconsin to a Kellogs plant making raisin bran amongst other cereals in Michigan. I'm part of the evil plan I'm not explaining shit.

Mavolio
May 12 2011, 04:10:09 PM
nuclear plant runoff

Faslane nuclear base is always leaking stuff into the sea. Apparently the local wildlife has laser eyes now!!

Fachiri
May 12 2011, 04:14:06 PM
I once played middle man selling sugar extracted from processing cheese in Wisconsin to a Kellogs plant making raisin bran amongst other cereals in Michigan. I'm part of the evil plan I'm not explaining shit.

It's better that way. It lets Lul go around spouting utter hilarity like his last two posts. :popcorn:

Tarminic
May 12 2011, 04:30:51 PM
The sad part is that there are grains of good advice in that post. But they're like kernels of corn in a giant pile of shit.

Tellenta
May 12 2011, 04:46:11 PM
The sad part is that there are grains of good advice in that post. But they're like kernels of corn in a giant pile of shit.

I know right?

Spaztick
May 12 2011, 05:08:43 PM
I once played middle man selling sugar extracted from processing cheese in Wisconsin to a Kellogs plant making raisin bran amongst other cereals in Michigan. I'm part of the evil plan I'm not explaining shit.
:psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck:
:psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp:
:psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck:
:psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp:
:psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck:

Fachiri
May 12 2011, 05:11:56 PM
I once played middle man selling sugar extracted from processing cheese in Wisconsin to a Kellogs plant making raisin bran amongst other cereals in Michigan. I'm part of the evil plan I'm not explaining shit.
:psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck:
:psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp:
:psyduck: :psyccp: :psycsm: :psyccp: :psyduck:
:psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp:
:psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck:

Tellenta
May 12 2011, 06:09:10 PM
I once played middle man selling sugar extracted from processing cheese in Wisconsin to a Kellogs plant making raisin bran amongst other cereals in Michigan. I'm part of the evil plan I'm not explaining shit.
:psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck:
:psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp:
:psyduck: :psyccp: :psycsm: :psyccp: :psyduck:
:psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp:
:psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck: :psyccp: :psyduck:

Ok I'll explain further. Most bulk food manufacturers do not in fact use cane sugar most of the time, sugar is a by-product from a lot of food processing (cheese for one there are shit tons of others). The processor can do one of two things, throw it away or refine the sugar and sell it. the waste product sugar is your standard granular sugar and you probably add it to your coffee or tea every morning without a second thought. While lusulpher may be correct in an abstract basis where raisin brans use a non-sugar sweetener the fact of the matter is they use all different types of sweeteners and the guiding bar on which one they use is based on what is cheapest on the market at the moment. Most production companies have several (amount depends on size of the operation if you majored in business finance it is likely you will be doing this at some level or another) people whose job it is to keep costs down by making sure they are getting the least expensive material within their quality standards. This is true from your lowly box of cereal to the highest grade electronic parts.

Tyrus Tenebros
May 12 2011, 06:55:04 PM
Ok I'll explain further. Most bulk food manufacturers do not in fact use cane sugar most of the time, sugar is a by-product from a lot of food processing (cheese for one there are shit tons of others). The processor can do one of two things, throw it away or refine the sugar and sell it. the waste product sugar is your standard granular sugar and you probably add it to your coffee or tea every morning without a second thought. While lusulpher may be correct in an abstract basis where raisin brans use a non-sugar sweetener the fact of the matter is they use all different types of sweeteners and the guiding bar on which one they use is based on what is cheapest on the market at the moment. Most production companies have several (amount depends on size of the operation if you majored in business finance it is likely you will be doing this at some level or another) people whose job it is to keep costs down by making sure they are getting the least expensive material within their quality standards. This is true from your lowly box of cereal to the highest grade electronic parts.
In before people start responding to standard business practice as if its a giant conspiracy by THE MAN to poison us while totally disregarding the key words "within quality standards " and the fact that the product they're buying is equivalent to what you think you're eating anyways

Devec
May 12 2011, 07:06:52 PM
I am not a part of any shadow government and I am telling that this man is absolutely wrong.

We are not out to poison you, all is well return to your homes.

Fachiri
May 12 2011, 07:06:56 PM
Ok I'll explain further. Most bulk food manufacturers do not in fact use cane sugar most of the time, sugar is a by-product from a lot of food processing (cheese for one there are shit tons of others). The processor can do one of two things, throw it away or refine the sugar and sell it. the waste product sugar is your standard granular sugar and you probably add it to your coffee or tea every morning without a second thought. While lusulpher may be correct in an abstract basis where raisin brans use a non-sugar sweetener the fact of the matter is they use all different types of sweeteners and the guiding bar on which one they use is based on what is cheapest on the market at the moment. Most production companies have several (amount depends on size of the operation if you majored in business finance it is likely you will be doing this at some level or another) people whose job it is to keep costs down by making sure they are getting the least expensive material within their quality standards. This is true from your lowly box of cereal to the highest grade electronic parts.
In before people start responding to standard business practice as if its a giant conspiracy by THE MAN to poison us while totally disregarding the key words "within quality standards " and the fact that the product they're buying is equivalent to what you think you're eating anyways

You left out taking every opportunity possible to tie these ~conspiracies~ into ~the game~ because that's all everything is.

Tellenta
May 12 2011, 09:05:31 PM
Ok I'll explain further. Most bulk food manufacturers do not in fact use cane sugar most of the time, sugar is a by-product from a lot of food processing (cheese for one there are shit tons of others). The processor can do one of two things, throw it away or refine the sugar and sell it. the waste product sugar is your standard granular sugar and you probably add it to your coffee or tea every morning without a second thought. While lusulpher may be correct in an abstract basis where raisin brans use a non-sugar sweetener the fact of the matter is they use all different types of sweeteners and the guiding bar on which one they use is based on what is cheapest on the market at the moment. Most production companies have several (amount depends on size of the operation if you majored in business finance it is likely you will be doing this at some level or another) people whose job it is to keep costs down by making sure they are getting the least expensive material within their quality standards. This is true from your lowly box of cereal to the highest grade electronic parts.
In before people start responding to standard business practice as if its a giant conspiracy by THE MAN to poison us while totally disregarding the key words "within quality standards " and the fact that the product they're buying is equivalent to what you think you're eating anyways
Their head will asplode when they find out what else they have in their kitchen that is probably a by-product from food processing, salt being another 'it came from where?' resource of many sources.

Lusulpher
May 13 2011, 08:51:27 AM
[quote="Raine Woot":2epeqbrr]He's saying that it doesn't matter if you say it or not, they'll know one way or the other in the same.... oh why am i even bothering?

They rescind the move in competition? And if I was being technical, I would point out 'the end of your next move', as the end of The Game, as it would be over...
If I say it, they have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options. I can still win, I'd just be doing it easier by not saying it.

Don't come in pretending to defend someone when even you have no idea what he meant by that.
You posted some other random bullshit in the topic later but this is the pertinent part that males your argument retarded

Long story short: yes the move is rescinded even in tournament chess. The rule states the it is actually illegal. As in, Not a valid move, To leave your king in check.

Don't come in here quoting a wiki entry without grasping the meaning. Especially since you have to ask about it later.[/quote:2epeqbrr]
I quoted that Wiki page 2x and it implies they don't rescind a checkmate due to NOT calling Check in the preceding move. You are saying something different. Who am I to believe? The Chess experts cited, or a total stranger who cited THOSE EXPERTS?!

Fara
May 13 2011, 09:12:59 AM
[quote="Raine Woot":g09xrseh]He's saying that it doesn't matter if you say it or not, they'll know one way or the other in the same.... oh why am i even bothering?

They rescind the move in competition? And if I was being technical, I would point out 'the end of your next move', as the end of The Game, as it would be over...
If I say it, they have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options. I can still win, I'd just be doing it easier by not saying it.

Don't come in pretending to defend someone when even you have no idea what he meant by that.
You posted some other random bullshit in the topic later but this is the pertinent part that males your argument retarded

Long story short: yes the move is rescinded even in tournament chess. The rule states the it is actually illegal. As in, Not a valid move, To leave your king in check.

Don't come in here quoting a wiki entry without grasping the meaning. Especially since you have to ask about it later.
I quoted that Wiki page 2x and it implies they don't rescind a checkmate due to NOT calling Check in the preceding move. You are saying something different. Who am I to believe? The Chess experts cited, or a total stranger who cited THOSE EXPERTS?![/quote:g09xrseh]

cocaine.

Lusulpher
May 13 2011, 09:17:55 AM
Ok I'll explain further. Most bulk food manufacturers do not in fact use cane sugar most of the time, sugar is a by-product from a lot of food processing (cheese for one there are shit tons of others). The processor can do one of two things, throw it away or refine the sugar and sell it. the waste product sugar is your standard granular sugar and you probably add it to your coffee or tea every morning without a second thought.

While lusulpher may be correct in an abstract basis where raisin brans use a non-sugar sweetener the fact of the matter is they use all different types of sweeteners and the guiding bar on which one they use is based on what is cheapest on the market at the moment. Most production companies have several (amount depends on size of the operation if you majored in business finance it is likely you will be doing this at some level or another) people whose job it is to keep costs down by making sure they are getting the least expensive material within their quality standards. This is true from your lowly box of cereal to the highest grade electronic parts.

In before people start responding to standard business practice as if its a giant conspiracy by THE MAN to poison us while totally disregarding the key words "within quality standards " and the fact that the product they're buying is equivalent to what you think you're eating anyways
Their head will asplode when they find out what else they have in their kitchen that is probably a by-product from food processing, salt being another 'it came from where?' resource of many sources.

1) I know about chemical by-product. They can be in the sugar groups, they can even taste like sugar. But scientists do not know the full reactions and consequences of being exposed to them. The FDA simply tells everyone "it breaks down to carbohydrates, mostly". The lobbying groups paying for the studies have been known to shorten the timeframes/edit out results as "side effects" and that's on life-saving medicine such as Plavix/vaccines. That's why they stopped Splenda/other artificial sweeteners that caused minor disgestive problems like "anal leakage". :obama:

Btw, I lived in two countries whose main export was sugar for food and rum. I've "harvested" sugarcane, with a cutlass, when I was a child. I know survivors of "Agri-Slavery" from 2 generations back. Don't think you have a one-up on sugar. :roll: American food tasted 'off' ever since I arrived here.[Your air also smelt weird]

2) Those "quality standards" do not match "health standards". People assume companies care. If they did, they would have stopped making alcohol and cigarettes decades ago. And shifted back to organic food production, and breaking food production monopolies from the Great Depression era when the bankers bought out all the Oakies.

And cute, you mention electronic parts. That's exactly the mindset applied to food production. Synthetic is fine for machines, not for people.

3) There are several introductory courses that detail all this in college...I may be a drop out but all those expensive books we skimmed through were not made up. Certainly you fine fellows went to college and graduated with a basic knowledge of the economic modeling used in your country? :obama:

4) Use some goddamn punctuation and spacing! This looks like it was written by someone sperging.
I would be relieved if this was the start of your rational discourse on The Game. But alas, you have merely shifted your retardation/complete ignorance, into a different thread.
Thanks for your participation, but I will move on to destroying your sex partners.

@Second poster...Do some research on the FDA, generic medicine and patents. There are plenty of odcumented cases of how "equivalent" is inferior/dangerous compared to "actual" chemical makeup of MANY products. Salt is salt is salt. MSG is embalming fluid compound...that didn't stop it getting into food did it.
But I like your inb4, it comes well after I already mentioned this on the last page, in detail. Keep that up. :obama:

Lusulpher
May 13 2011, 09:25:47 AM
The sad part is that there are grains of good advice in that post. But they're like kernels of corn in a giant pile of shit.

Go on and extrapolate on the 'pile of shit' parts so I don't [willingly]confuse the Public. It's your duty... :obama: [Also removes my fear that you are a cowardly pile of shit unable to take a stance like many piles of shit on this planet]


I am not a part of any shadow government and I am telling that this man is absolutely wrong.
We are not out to poison you, all is well return to your homes.
We are all complicit at this point. We have all the tech to record/correct our mislaid goals. And no initiative to. Because everyone likes to sit back and blame politicians, instead of themselves.

Same shit happened in the corruption of Germany. At least that turned out well.[destroyed all their factories and made America the last serious manufacturer for 20 years, proving we could feed/clothe, every man,woman,child on the planet by will alone. Also global population dropped on new scales. Proving wars have an actual use.] Good times. :obama:

@ Ponyfaggot cheerleaders[no offense to homosexual pony lovers]
You've gotten off too long, while letting Tellenta take the brunt of the beating. In his anus.
Prepare your anus/anii[sic].

untilted
May 13 2011, 09:32:39 AM
Ok I'll explain further. Most bulk food manufacturers do not in fact use cane sugar most of the time, sugar is a by-product from a lot of food processing (cheese for one there are shit tons of others). The processor can do one of two things, throw it away or refine the sugar and sell it. the waste product sugar is your standard granular sugar and you probably add it to your coffee or tea every morning without a second thought. While lusulpher may be correct in an abstract basis where raisin brans use a non-sugar sweetener the fact of the matter is they use all different types of sweeteners and the guiding bar on which one they use is based on what is cheapest on the market at the moment. Most production companies have several (amount depends on size of the operation if you majored in business finance it is likely you will be doing this at some level or another) people whose job it is to keep costs down by making sure they are getting the least expensive material within their quality standards. This is true from your lowly box of cereal to the highest grade electronic parts.
In before people start responding to standard business practice as if its a giant conspiracy by THE MAN to poison us while totally disregarding the key words "within quality standards " and the fact that the product they're buying is equivalent to what you think you're eating anyways

You left out taking every opportunity possible to tie these ~conspiracies~ into ~the game~ because that's all everything is.
tho' you don't have to resort to conspiracy theories to resort to :psyduck: when talking about the food industry. e.g. revolving door-practice between monsanto and the FDA

(my take would be: most 'bad things' happen out of convenience and neglect, not out of mischief)

Fara
May 13 2011, 09:42:35 AM
(my take would be: most 'bad things' happen out of convenience and neglect, not out of mischief)

http://www.weareskitzo.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/ItsOnNowChapsL.jpg

Irion
May 13 2011, 09:45:30 AM
1) I know about chemical by-product. They can be in the sugar groups, they can even taste like sugar. But scientists do not know the full reactions and consequences of being exposed to them. The FDA simply tells everyone "it breaks down to carbohydrates, mostly". The lobbying groups paying for the studies have been known to shorten the timeframes/edit out results as "side effects" and that's on life-saving medicine such as Plavix/vaccines.

Sugar is a carbohydrate.

Lusulpher
May 13 2011, 09:59:45 AM
1) I know about chemical by-product. They can be in the sugar groups, they can even taste like sugar. But scientists do not know the full reactions and consequences of being exposed to them. The FDA simply tells everyone "it breaks down to carbohydrates, mostly". The lobbying groups paying for the studies have been known to shorten the timeframes/edit out results as "side effects" and that's on life-saving medicine such as Plavix/vaccines.

Sugar is a carbohydrate.

Simple and complex carbohydrates metabolize differently. The decision is up to the company/FDA which to give you. Dictatorship via economics, instead of scientific input.
Yes, they ignore scientific concerns when they chose the price of the compund they use. Corn syrup is cheap as shit. You will eat it, and die[albeit slowly, like that frog being boiled alive]

Irion
May 13 2011, 10:03:05 AM
Sugar is a simple carbohydrate, it won't break down into a complex one.

Lusulpher
May 13 2011, 11:06:04 AM
Sugar is a simple carbohydrate, it won't break down into a complex one.

The other starches/sweeteners are not...they don't use sugar sufficiently anymore.

Irion
May 13 2011, 12:04:55 PM
Sugar is a simple carbohydrate, it won't break down into a complex one.

The other starches/sweeteners are not...they don't use sugar sufficiently anymore.



Btw, I lived in two countries whose main export was sugar for food and rum. I've "harvested" sugarcane, with a cutlass, when I was a child.

Lusulpher outed as sugar lobbyist.

Dorvil Barranis
May 13 2011, 12:21:25 PM
People assume companies care.

Confirming, here is me, amongst the people, assuming companies care. At least Wal Mart cared enough to write.

walrus
May 13 2011, 01:31:34 PM
I tought luls about astronomy itt, anyone up for doing chemistry?

Haffrage
May 13 2011, 01:35:30 PM
astronomically bad itt

spasm
May 13 2011, 02:10:30 PM
lusulpher should go back to his third world banana republic.

Spaztick
May 13 2011, 04:05:34 PM
Should I feel bad for thinking lusulpher makes some sense?

spasm
May 13 2011, 04:11:46 PM
Should I feel bad for thinking lusulpher makes some sense?


That's how it starts. At first it's complete nonsense but then his ideas start to grow inside your head until they make more and more sense. Then you start noticing things in real life that correspond to his conspiracy theories. Next thing you know, you're standing in a grassy knoll holding an Italian rifle.

Dorvil Barranis
May 13 2011, 04:12:59 PM
Should I feel bad for thinking lusulpher makes some sense?
Not at all, he is the voice of our generation.

untilted
May 13 2011, 04:15:57 PM
Should I feel bad for thinking lusulpher makes some sense?

bolded the important part.

if it wasn't for the undertone of "conspiracy! conspiracies everywhere!" i'd actually take some of his postings seriously. >_>

lubica
May 13 2011, 04:21:03 PM
Should I feel bad for thinking lusulpher makes some sense?

bolded the important part.

if it wasn't for the undertone of "conspiracy! conspiracies everywhere!" i'd actually take some of his postings seriously. >_>
this.
Lusu isn't dumb, just gullible (oh the irony).

Tellenta
May 13 2011, 04:52:20 PM
Ok I'll explain further. Most bulk food manufacturers do not in fact use cane sugar most of the time, sugar is a by-product from a lot of food processing (cheese for one there are shit tons of others). The processor can do one of two things, throw it away or refine the sugar and sell it. the waste product sugar is your standard granular sugar and you probably add it to your coffee or tea every morning without a second thought.

While lusulpher may be correct in an abstract basis where raisin brans use a non-sugar sweetener the fact of the matter is they use all different types of sweeteners and the guiding bar on which one they use is based on what is cheapest on the market at the moment. Most production companies have several (amount depends on size of the operation if you majored in business finance it is likely you will be doing this at some level or another) people whose job it is to keep costs down by making sure they are getting the least expensive material within their quality standards. This is true from your lowly box of cereal to the highest grade electronic parts.

In before people start responding to standard business practice as if its a giant conspiracy by THE MAN to poison us while totally disregarding the key words "within quality standards " and the fact that the product they're buying is equivalent to what you think you're eating anyways
Their head will asplode when they find out what else they have in their kitchen that is probably a by-product from food processing, salt being another 'it came from where?' resource of many sources.

1) I know about chemical by-product. They can be in the sugar groups, they can even taste like sugar. But scientists do not know the full reactions and consequences of being exposed to them. The FDA simply tells everyone "it breaks down to carbohydrates, mostly". The lobbying groups paying for the studies have been known to shorten the timeframes/edit out results as "side effects" and that's on life-saving medicine such as Plavix/vaccines. That's why they stopped Splenda/other artificial sweeteners that caused minor disgestive problems like "anal leakage". :obama:

Btw, I lived in two countries whose main export was sugar for food and rum. I've "harvested" sugarcane, with a cutlass, when I was a child. I know survivors of "Agri-Slavery" from 2 generations back. Don't think you have a one-up on sugar. :roll: American food tasted 'off' ever since I arrived here.[Your air also smelt weird]

2) Those "quality standards" do not match "health standards". People assume companies care. If they did, they would have stopped making alcohol and cigarettes decades ago. And shifted back to organic food production, and breaking food production monopolies from the Great Depression era when the bankers bought out all the Oakies.

And cute, you mention electronic parts. That's exactly the mindset applied to food production. Synthetic is fine for machines, not for people.

3) There are several introductory courses that detail all this in college...I may be a drop out but all those expensive books we skimmed through were not made up. Certainly you fine fellows went to college and graduated with a basic knowledge of the economic modeling used in your country? :obama:

4) Use some goddamn punctuation and spacing! This looks like it was written by someone sperging.
I would be relieved if this was the start of your rational discourse on The Game. But alas, you have merely shifted your retardation/complete ignorance, into a different thread.
Thanks for your participation, but I will move on to destroying your sex partners.

@Second poster...Do some research on the FDA, generic medicine and patents. There are plenty of odcumented cases of how "equivalent" is inferior/dangerous compared to "actual" chemical makeup of MANY products. Salt is salt is salt. MSG is embalming fluid compound...that didn't stop it getting into food did it.
But I like your inb4, it comes well after I already mentioned this on the last page, in detail. Keep that up. :obama:

Sugar is sugar regardless where it comes from, sweeteners that have side effect such as anal leakage must be labeled as artificiality sweetened, and notify of the potential effects. If you were asgerging about things like growth hormones in beef your suppositions of food additives (growth hormones) without care to the effect of the populace due to the fact that it isn't regulated you would have a more legitimate case. However you're stabbing at the tree of 'FDA says you must label that you use artificial sweeteners and inform the consumer of potential health effects' to rant about the health industry and its flaws. Luckily there have been enough health studies released that attribute growth hormones in beef to such things as childhood obesity, early maturation (mostly in young females and it's not healthy), heart disease, man boobs, sterility, and ever mans horror not being able to get it up.

So I guess what I should say is stop being afraid of the sugar and maybe look at what should be a concern.

As for quality standard not being the same as health standards it really depends on what you are talking about. Unfortunately for some industries changing their practice requires decades of research to prove something we already knew. Which is why the cooking oil at fast food chains, and ingredients for Pizza delivery joints were forcibly changed a few years back. Granted that doesn't make the food they make healthy, it just went from extremely unhealthy to mostly unhealthy. Also I think one of the artificial sweeteners was made illegal, not the anal leakage one though. Just avoid artificial sweeteners, that's what I do.

Please don't reference introductory courses that you couldn't pass thanks. If you failed to understand it enough to get a passing grade telling me what you learned isn't credible.

Not my sex partners! Oh never mind your ravaging of sex partners is weak, eat a lot of beef?

Edit: Oh and be on the look out for your favorite salty snacks to advertise they have less sodium. They found a salt that they can use less of and still maintain their taste standards. This still doesn't mean it's good for you.

Tellenta
May 13 2011, 05:07:42 PM
1) I know about chemical by-product. They can be in the sugar groups, they can even taste like sugar. But scientists do not know the full reactions and consequences of being exposed to them. The FDA simply tells everyone "it breaks down to carbohydrates, mostly". The lobbying groups paying for the studies have been known to shorten the timeframes/edit out results as "side effects" and that's on life-saving medicine such as Plavix/vaccines.

Sugar is a carbohydrate.

Simple and complex carbohydrates metabolize differently. The decision is up to the company/FDA which to give you. Dictatorship via economics, instead of scientific input.
Yes, they ignore scientific concerns when they chose the price of the compund they use. Corn syrup is cheap as shit. You will eat it, and die[albeit slowly, like that frog being boiled alive]

Now see you're skipping across labeling, this would be labeled as "high fructose corn syrup" not sugar. Luckily there has been a trend away from using high fructose corn syrup, mostly due to the same bout of studies that edged companies away from a lot of artificial sweeteners. Sadly if you buy off brand cheapo shit chances are you're eating high fructose or artificial sweeteners as that is how they get to bee the off brand cheapo shit. Attention to detail can save you from that though.

Tellenta
May 13 2011, 05:13:35 PM
Sugar is a simple carbohydrate, it won't break down into a complex one.

The other starches/sweeteners are not...they don't use sugar sufficiently anymore.



Btw, I lived in two countries whose main export was sugar for food and rum. I've "harvested" sugarcane, with a cutlass, when I was a child.

Lusulpher outed as sugar lobbyist.

Or as someone desperate to lay false credence to his knowledge of industry by stating he knows everything about food additives because he used to cut sugar cane with a sword. His ghosts are fluoride sugar and salt for fucks sake. There is actual real concerns within the food industry that need to be addressed and he talks about the well known ones. Probably because he doesn't do any research or do any advocacy work outside of making posts on a shitty spaceship game forum.

edit: Hat trick.

Lusulpher
May 13 2011, 05:25:11 PM
Sugar is a simple carbohydrate, it won't break down into a complex one.

The other starches/sweeteners are not...they don't use sugar sufficiently anymore.


Btw, I lived in two countries whose main export was sugar for food and rum. I've "harvested" sugarcane, with a cutlass, when I was a child.

Lusulpher outed as sugar lobbyist.
1) Only when compared to the all the other poisons to choose from.
2) Selective quoting will make us fast friends. I love how you like children helping their relatives chop cane with cutlasses. Nothing to say about Slavery/the glorified plantation method that does not sufficiently feed the very workers who provide the world with sugar and can't buy a pound after a day's work in the hot sun...

@ Tellenta, read page 17.

@ Walrus, that it? You gonna say something mean or what? You got me on a typo back in the Moon Landing derailment, and that's all you can wank off to? Disappointing.

Lusulpher
May 13 2011, 05:40:21 PM
Should I feel bad for thinking lusulpher makes some sense?

bolded the important part.

if it wasn't for the undertone of "conspiracy! conspiracies everywhere!" i'd actually take some of his postings seriously. >_>
this.
Lusu isn't dumb, just gullible (oh the irony).

@ Semi-serious semi-ponygroup, 1) I make complete sense, I'm only passing on data/analysis from different sources than whatever the fuck you people read on the roofs of your holes.

2) What fucking undertone of conspiracy? These people aren't even trying anymore. Who shot Kennedy is a conspiracy. Who got us to invade Afghanistan and Iraq under false pretenses, AND did not catch Bin Laden, AND ignored Saudi Arabia's role in 9/11 AND benefits from the oil price during. That's fucking blatant.

3) Don't call someone gullible when you are a coward, who can't even propose a counter claim/comment that isn't a highfive to other anonymous chucklefucks.

Tyrus Tenebros
May 13 2011, 05:50:20 PM
[quote="Raine Woot":32lx250h]He's saying that it doesn't matter if you say it or not, they'll know one way or the other in the same.... oh why am i even bothering?

They rescind the move in competition? And if I was being technical, I would point out 'the end of your next move', as the end of The Game, as it would be over...
If I say it, they have 1 move to defend themselves, with 3 options. I can still win, I'd just be doing it easier by not saying it.

Don't come in pretending to defend someone when even you have no idea what he meant by that.
You posted some other random bullshit in the topic later but this is the pertinent part that males your argument retarded

Long story short: yes the move is rescinded even in tournament chess. The rule states the it is actually illegal. As in, Not a valid move, To leave your king in check.

Don't come in here quoting a wiki entry without grasping the meaning. Especially since you have to ask about it later.
I quoted that Wiki page 2x and it implies they don't rescind a checkmate due to NOT calling Check in the preceding move. You are saying something different. Who am I to believe? The Chess experts cited, or a total stranger who cited THOSE EXPERTS?![/quote:32lx250h]They would rescind the subsequent move if you failed to move out of check

White: Places Black King in Check
Black: Moves Unrelated Pawn
White: Takes Black King (or makes any other move, including putting black in to an otherwise legitimate checkmate)

Both White AND black's last move would be rescinded, and the game would (re)continue from the position when the original check took place. This rule effects the game forever, even if you don't notice the fault until 5-6 moves later.

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general ... cing-check (http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/not-noticing-check) - Cites the FIDE laws of chess


If during a game it is found that an illegal move, including failing to meet the requirements of the promotion of a pawn or capturing the opponent’s king, has been completed, the position immediately before the irregularity shall be reinstated. If the position immediately before the irregularity cannot be determined the game shall continue from the last identifiable position prior to the irregularity. The clocks shall be adjusted according to Article 6.13. The Articles 4.3 and 4.6 apply to the move replacing the illegal move. The game shall then continue from this re-instated position.

Obviously, if Black notices the check and protects his king, and then is subsequently put in to checkmate anyways on the next turn, he loses. I don't think you'd find anybody who would really disagree with that. But it still kills your analogy because the game continues in the same manner (the player in check responds to an identified threat to his king) whether or not anybody says a word or not, because its still clear that there is an immediate threat to the king. You gain absolutely no advantage whatsoever from not verbalizing (and are in fact prohibited from taking any advantage that is gained by failure to notice)

Tellenta
May 13 2011, 05:54:26 PM
3) Don't call someone gullible when you are a coward, who can't even propose a counter claim/comment that isn't a highfive to other anonymous chucklefucks.

Why so angry all the time? It's not their fault you're not worth the effort to talk to unless they are bored. You're a hack face up to it embrace it and keep on posting.

Mavolio
May 13 2011, 06:39:18 PM
Sugar doesn't make kids hyperactive btw. they did a study on it recently and showed it was just a placebo affect. I just thought i would mention that because i found it interesting, now i can eat all the sugar i want.

[youtube:3lvet5wk]JywK_5bT8z0[/youtube:3lvet5wk]


make us...love...children

edit: youtube link not working :/

Devec
May 13 2011, 06:49:33 PM
Arguing with you is a waste of time because everybody else is wrong and you are right and even if they come with evidence that your statements are in fact ill informed you are still right because that is the way it is. You are right everybody else is wrong, don't trust your neighbour he might be paedophile.

Meanwhile I am enjoying this glass of water which in no way has turned me into mindless zombie, I love you shadow government overlords.

Mavolio
May 13 2011, 06:51:05 PM
evidence that your statements are in fact ill informed you are still right because


because THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO THINK!!

Fachiri
May 13 2011, 06:51:53 PM
SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE!!!!!!!1!!!

Tellenta
May 13 2011, 06:52:33 PM
Sugar doesn't make kids hyperactive btw. they did a study on it recently and showed it was just a placebo affect. I just thought i would mention that because i found it interesting, now i can eat all the sugar i want.

[youtube:26gc5uba]3cHbfOkyCE[/youtube:26gc5uba]


make us...love...children

Youtube links have been broken recently btw. Whats the definition of hyper active that they were going for? I'm reasonably sure sugar is one of the foods that gives a quick temporary uptick in energy levels.

Devec
May 13 2011, 06:54:44 PM
[youtube:30i4ffd3]8Sp-VFBbjpE[/youtube:30i4ffd3]

Dorvil Barranis
May 13 2011, 07:05:11 PM
hy·per·ac·tive definition
Pronunciation: /?h?-p?-?rak-tiv/
Function: adj
: affected with or exhibiting hyperactivity
broadly : more active than is usual or desirable

If you prefer your children to be paperweights, then any activity at all is "more active then desirable"

Mavolio
May 13 2011, 07:15:51 PM
its been proven that overweight children are 145% harder to carry off than children that obtain a normal weight. So for the safety of your child only buy it chocolate.

Tellenta
May 13 2011, 07:25:15 PM
hy·per·ac·tive definition
Pronunciation: /?h?-p?-?rak-tiv/
Function: adj
: affected with or exhibiting hyperactivity
broadly : more active than is usual or desirable

If you prefer your children to be paperweights, then any activity at all is "more active then desirable"

If it was a study then they had a measurement defining hyperactivity. While that is a proper definition it's not very scientific in application. Whatever not important anyways.

Mavolio
May 13 2011, 07:35:52 PM
I think they just got some kids gave them sweets and then gave other kids sweets with no sugar and compared their reaction and it was exactly the same.

Haffrage
May 13 2011, 07:40:31 PM
somebody give me some reasons to not lock this thread

because seriously

Tellenta
May 13 2011, 07:43:49 PM
somebody give me some reasons to not lock this thread

because seriously

Fucking lock it, what is wrong with you?

Mavolio
May 13 2011, 07:44:55 PM
because we are secretly working for the Illuminati to get you to lock this thread in order to stop Lusulpher from exposing all out conspiracies we have kept quiet for over 1 million years.

Fachiri
May 13 2011, 07:47:07 PM
At least wait for the next Lul reply before locking it, tbh.

spasm
May 13 2011, 07:50:32 PM
somebody give me some reasons to not lock this thread

because seriously

It has some of the best content on this site. :monocledowns:

Spaztick
May 13 2011, 07:52:53 PM
somebody give me some reasons to not lock this thread

because seriously
These forums are maintained perfectly fine. :monocledowns:

Dorvil Barranis
May 13 2011, 07:54:19 PM
This is my favorite thread on FHC. Is that reason enough not to lock it? (or reason enough to lock it, depending on your mod style) :obama:

spasm
May 13 2011, 07:55:07 PM
inb4 hast locks it for having content.

Tellenta
May 13 2011, 07:59:13 PM
This is my favorite thread on FHC. Is that reason enough not to lock it? (or reason enough to lock it, depending on your mod style) :obama:

This thread has been played out though, I'd rather give lusulpher a clean slate to paint his next masterpiece locking is just a temporary loss until like the phoenix Lusulpher comes back from the ashes to bring joy and enlightenment to us all.

untilted
May 13 2011, 09:39:25 PM
This is my favorite thread on FHC. Is that reason enough not to lock it? (or reason enough to lock it, depending on your mod style) :obama:

This thread has been played out though, I'd rather give lusulpher a clean slate to paint his next masterpiece locking is just a temporary loss until like the phoenix Lusulpher comes back from the ashes to bring joy and enlightenment to us all.

may i call him philomena?

Tyrus Tenebros
May 13 2011, 10:17:40 PM
Don't lock it I'm still waiting for the next reply regarding the rules of chess.

lubica
May 13 2011, 10:38:30 PM
There goes my daily dose of :wtf:

Lusulpher
May 15 2011, 07:16:45 AM
This is my favorite thread on FHC. Is that reason enough not to lock it? (or reason enough to lock it, depending on your mod style) :obama:

This thread has been played out though, I'd rather give Lusulpher a clean slate to paint his next masterpiece locking is just a temporary loss until like the Phoenix Lusulpher comes back from the ashes to bring joy and enlightenment to us all.

may i call him Philomena?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philomena
I see you are unaware of my hostile view of the Catholic "Church" and their "religious practices".
And the correct metaphor is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandra.

@ Ponybloc Good, I have taught Tellenta, Fear. She mercifully asks that she be spared the pillaging him and her worthless sugar/anus lobbying bloc is feeling. :roll:

@ Chess guy,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Check_%28chess%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shogi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiangqi And it goes back to India, which also possesses a strict ancient 'caste system'. Works a lot like Feudalism, but meaner.
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/rule-question-calling-check That's less than a century of regulation...that's like asking pacifists where to put landmines.



U.S. Chess rules is not the ancient hierarchical Game I am speaking...or was your mention of a rule legislated in 2008 by the U.S. federation, a clever Chess move to distract entirely from the overarching message that [b]POOR PEOPLE ARE USED LIKE PAWNS IN EACH AND EVERY GENERATION SINCE THE INVENTION OF FIRE. SECRETLY OR OTHERWISE! :obama:
This would be wildly obvious if you have any awareness of your planet. Especially the political maneuvering of that much-glorified Warring States Period of Japanese History.
They used every trick in The Game. But most importantly they continued to delineate peasant from samurai and royals.
To the point of forced suicide[honour was used in place of religion], intentional forcing of Dutch religion/trade for weapons, peasants militarized from birth to defend some backwood farm/forest, and the use of shinobi for assassination of ministers/children/mistresses/generals on strict rules that much of the world did not see/would think rational. Mercenaries privatized themselves to capitalize on the absolute chaos all those egos created.[pre-Blackwater]
And the beginning of Daimyo "warlords" seizing power and hiding under the skirts of the now-hostage, Emperors to continue the puppet show.

Some of us know how to play, asshole. And I'm not even bothering to look further into this matter, I'm too insulted now.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%C3%A9d%C3%A9ration_Internationale_des_%C3%89chec s That organization motto/1970s Soviet conspiracy resigned my fucking patience. Fuck you. And the horse you rode in on.



Meanwhile in the news/Scoreboard:
-Republican Senator practices his Lordly right of primae noctis. Other CHRISTIAN Senators keep his sins under wraps, just like they do for the pedophiles in Congress[classic Feudalism CHurch coverup].
-US Corps of Engineers back at it on the Mississippi floodplains. Call me when someone buys up the farmland they triage.[Hey French Quarter, Black people said "Hi".] :obama:
-White person found alive in woods, husband lost still. Canadians, a real loss to Humanity.[although my sister says those French-Canadians are real bigots.]
-Congress faces down the oil companies on OUR TAX SUBSIDIES. They threaten the Peasant Government with raising gas prices at pump[which they all control from Texas headquarters, Osama should have flown a plane into that if he wanted to hurt America, or maybe boat-bomb some oil rigs. Oh yeah, he's not actually America's enemy. Just a pawn/scare tactic. I keep forgetting. :oops: But seriously, there are hundreds of undefended oil wells to bomb, some of them are not even manned, but the price of oil could be speculated by Wall Street to about 6USD/gal. Work with me here, Al Qaeda, you have done so well so far. I want global green tech this century. Liberate us from our Texas Taliban! :obama: ]
-White person found dead in woods. Non-Canadian, can't care.
-IMF guy gets plainclothes officers to arrest him, after they hunt him down for trying to rape his maid[classic Feudalist crime]...drunk civilians are not removed with plainclothes...no one treated as an American is. Different laws for upperclass rapists. Marquis De Sade would approve. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marquis_de_sade
-God's in Her Heaven. All's right with the world...
-More secret behaviours being revealed to Public, Public and media confused as to how societies like this can exist under their noses[how did John Kerry get in The Skull & Bones, how much soul do I have to trade in?].
Meanwhile, their spouses conspire how best to kill them or their granny when insurance/inheritance tax payout is optimal[Republican Presidency/Congress is the correct answer]. Enjoy your rat-poison. :obama:

Keep it coming world, I like it when you behave predictably. God knows people hate/fear change/improvement. Ignorance is bliss, Ignorance is comfort. Return to your homes. All is well. Return to your slumber. All is well.


Masturbating inside your bedroom, as you sleep. :obama:

fig
May 15 2011, 07:20:59 AM
POOR PEOPLE ARE USED LIKE PAWNS IN EACH AND EVERY GENERATION SINCE THE INVENTION OF FIRE. SECRETLY OR OTHERWISE!

:facepalm:

Haffrage
May 15 2011, 07:26:42 AM
PAWNS.

PAWNS IN THE GAME OF LIFE.

Fachiri
May 15 2011, 07:39:03 AM
[youtube:15mc5mbr]NTteNorSz_g[/youtube:15mc5mbr]

untilted
May 15 2011, 10:52:52 AM
This is my favorite thread on FHC. Is that reason enough not to lock it? (or reason enough to lock it, depending on your mod style) :obama:

This thread has been played out though, I'd rather give Lusulpher a clean slate to paint his next masterpiece locking is just a temporary loss until like the Phoenix Lusulpher comes back from the ashes to bring joy and enlightenment to us all.

may i call him Philomena?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philomena
I see you are unaware of my hostile view of the Catholic "Church" and their "religious practices".
And the correct metaphor is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandra.

it was actually a reference to MLP - in one episode a phoenix trolls one of the main characters of the series.

---------------------------------------------------------

to actually add content to this trainwreck of thread
[youtube:2o3uhhdm]AC7ANGMy0yo[/youtube:2o3uhhdm]

Devec
May 15 2011, 02:00:07 PM
The man is keeping us down, he is using us like pawns!

So what you discovered that some people are self-centered, money grabbing, cheating ass whipes? Well here is your golden star:

http://hookedonhouses.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/A-Gold-Star-well-done.jpg

But keep delivering the content and we will have many more laughs and facepalms to go around.

Tellenta
May 15 2011, 05:17:50 PM
[youtube:2saffkyw]AC7ANGMy0yo[/youtube:2saffkyw]

that and this new term


Ponyfaggot cheerleaders

makes this thread worth it tbh. Worth it in a good way of course.

Tyrus Tenebros
May 15 2011, 10:40:54 PM
Ok you can lock the thread now, discussion of chess became about what I expected it to. Also wanted to see how far the goalposts would move, and they moved pretty far.

(you still won't find anybody who accepts the direct capturing of the king as an acceptable ending to a chess game, chess games ALWAYS end by virtue of a checkmate, not an escapable check that a player fails to address)

(Also note I have never taken the position that the CHECK is revoked. the point is that any moves AFTER the check, vocalized are not, are revoked if the player in check fails to escape it by legal means)

edit: I read your post again sort of and no it was not a clever chess move to distract from the fact that historically chess was based on feudalism, which is neither news to anybody nor relevant to the enjoyment of the game. The capturing of the opponents king in a game called "Chess" (not necessarily the other historical variants you mentioned, speaking of moving goalposts) has not, for some time, been the ending of the game, but merely the position in which the king would be captured next turn.

In fact the same source you cited says that until the twentieth century rule sources DID in fact require the announcing of check:


Until the early 20th century a player was expected to announce "check", and some sources of rules even required it

And a trip to the wiki page for checkmate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checkmate#History

indicates that the Persians, as early as 700-800 AD, had already put the rule of not leaving the king in check at the end of the turn


In early Sanskrit chess (ca. 500-700) the king could be captured and this ended the game. The Persians (ca. 700-800) introduced the idea of warning that the king was under attack (announcing check in modern terminology). This was done to avoid the early and accidental end of a game. Later the Persians added the additional rule that a king could not be moved into check or left in check. As a result, the king could not be captured (Davidson 1949:22). Checkmate was thus the logical and only decisive way of ending a game (since if it was checkmate, any move would be illegal) (Davidson 1949:63–64).)emphasis mine in order to highlight the point that by 800 the game ended by the elimination of all legal moves due to the king being threatened with capture, rather than actual capture due to the failure to notice the state of threat.


So you can wander off with your screeds about chess = feudalism, fine, but the notion that the failure to mention check can render an advantage in the game known as chess by allowing you to end the game via capturing the king instead of a proper "checkmate" is patently false.

Tellenta
May 15 2011, 11:02:15 PM
Ok you can lock the thread now, discussion of chess became about what I expected it to. Also wanted to see how far the goalposts would move, and they moved pretty far.

(you still won't find anybody who accepts the direct capturing of the king as an acceptable ending to a chess game, chess games ALWAYS end by virtue of a checkmate, not an escapable check that a player fails to address)

(Also note I have never taken the position that the CHECK is revoked. the point is that any moves AFTER the check, vocalized are not, are revoked if the player in check fails to escape it by legal means)

Just going to go through and see if he managed to find a source that says making a move other than getting your king out of check is legal.

first one: "In the following move, the player whose king is in check must get their king out of check, if it is possible" Nope
second one: Not even chess
third one: still not chess
fourth one: A reference to blitz chess, and perfectly reasonable to have a rule if someone makes an illegal move they lose the game regardless. However it is important to recognize the player loses because of the illegal move and actually taking the king is optional a mere mention of the fact is enough to win.
fifth one: Oh thats my e-mail, mmm spam.

It's all in the semantics. Though this discussion has lead to a further understanding of how your thought process works Mr. Sulpher. I'm starting to see how you can draw the conclusions you do.

Lusulpher
May 16 2011, 01:56:47 AM
This is my favorite thread on FHC. Is that reason enough not to lock it? (or reason enough to lock it, depending on your mod style) :obama:

This thread has been played out though, I'd rather give Lusulpher a clean slate to paint his next masterpiece locking is just a temporary loss until like the Phoenix Lusulpher comes back from the ashes to bring joy and enlightenment to us all.

may i call him Philomena?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philomena
I see you are unaware of my hostile view of the Catholic "Church" and their "religious practices".
And the correct metaphor is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassandra.

it was actually a reference to MLP - in one episode a phoenix trolls one of the main characters of the series.

---------------------------------------------------------

to actually add content to this trainwreck of thread
[youtube:77s3oj63]AC7ANGMy0yo[/youtube:77s3oj63]


MLP? Phoenix trolling? What is trolling? :trollface: Just joking, I have only seen 2 eps of MLP... Your link was pretty epic. I probably have to remind about my hostility toward armchair intelligentzia...Lenin wasn't wrong when he called them 'the feces of the Nation'. When Stalin removed all the Communists they didn't assassinate him so that tells me all I need to know.

Also, your avatar is freaking epic. It's a Helghast Obama! :monocledowns:
I can't do anything about these bleeding say-it-ain't-so vaginas. They get to borrow the freedoms people like me try to reinforce.
And I'm fine with that. I can take my rage out on them as it's also my Right. My Right to Assemble upon Pussies Everywhere.

Meanwhile in The Game...
http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_ec169697-a19e-525f-a532-81b3df229697.html
I don't want to call Check too early, but I'm predicting this will be spread to other states on the small-scale[most state judicial balances have been tipped in favour of conservatives ever since another corrupted activist court, The Supreme Court, chose to allow unlimited spending on elections...]. No need to go full retard and bring The Nation's attention to it.
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jan/22/nation/la-na-campaign-finance22-2010jan22

"Electioneering" is not just a sarcastic song by Radiohead.
http://www.prwatch.org/news/2011/04/10662/action-item-draft-executive-order-would-promote-election-disclosure-call-presiden

First they roll out a guide to removing liberal commentary/objectives/personality from History books, then they allow elites a better chance at "representing" the tainted masses. Then they roll out a plan to kill them when they are past their peak productivity. Hi, Republican Ryan Budget, old, smart white people said "Fuck you." :obama: And then those white people proposed you close corporate tax loopholes and Medicare fraud and gain at least 1 trillion USD for debt reduction...I know, they silly doodooheads. What next, end farm/oil subsidies/tax exemptions??! :o


http://www.dailypaul.com/ Ron Paul would make a superb Vice President. Too bad the Republicans don't use representative democracy/patriotism for their nominations. That 2nd term is in the bag.
AND liberals now own defense of America from endless warfare/Terrer/Terrists, paying for heroes' medical bills, ending corporate veto of Majority Rule and Patriotism in general. Hope they get aggressive soon. Rome is burning. :obama:

untilted
May 16 2011, 07:27:10 AM
I probably have to remind about my hostility toward armchair intelligentzia...Lenin wasn't wrong when he called them 'the feces of the Nation'. When Stalin removed all the Communists they didn't assassinate him so that tells me all I need to know.

why are you then spending time poasting on an :internetspazeships:-forum instead of actually taking the streets?

Shade Millith
May 16 2011, 08:41:38 AM
I probably have to remind about my hostility toward armchair intelligentzia...Lenin wasn't wrong when he called them 'the feces of the Nation'. When Stalin removed all the Communists they didn't assassinate him so that tells me all I need to know.

why are you then spending time poasting on an :internetspazeships:-forum instead of actually taking the streets?

Because that's hard? vOv

Though I guess those walls of text can't be easy either.

Lusulpher
May 16 2011, 09:08:22 AM
I probably have to remind about my hostility toward armchair intelligentzia...Lenin wasn't wrong when he called them 'the feces of the Nation'. When Stalin removed all the Communists they didn't assassinate him so that tells me all I need to know.

why are you then spending time poasting on an :internetspazeships:-forum instead of actually taking the streets?

Because violence and raucous protests are complete wastes of time.[They can ALWAYS be spun as "anarchist" or "criminal" activity when they are for basic Human Rights, it's why they love killing pacifists] But talking without a goal of creating resistance is even worse.
Also, this is a niche brain trust[lol], I'll sow my seeds of Truth here and some of the contamination will hopefully break out elsewhere.
I'm not going to plant ideas where the ground has already been tilled, that's poor strategy. Jesus hung out with taxmen and prostitutes. "Who needs a doctor more? A sick man or a healthy one?" I have to hang out with you lot, you are sinfully ignorant.[and yes, I put off making this thread a year ago, you're welcome you ungrateful cunts]


You can blame yourselves for this thread. I didn't read much of SHC, but when I saw the power grab and ass-kissing of the N-CSM, I realized Politics[poleticks] was contaminating my virtual world! That shit had finally crossed the line. It abolished my last haven of meditation. I couldn't even massacre you worthless people by proxy, when stupid, selfish people were trying to dominate my fantasy with the same fucking shit I ignore all day at my bullshit job.
And if the world has to burn, so be it. Individuals are smart enough to prevent that, but the lot of you. Trash. Clinging to the tails of swine. And cowardly too, I no longer believe many of you are respectable at your day jobs.

The Internet is the proper tool for this global problem. And don't say it's not possible, if History has said anything, it's said evil has to constantly prevent the outbreak of freedom/rational thought. Capitalism doesn't become this corrupt when everyone is aiming for profits. Someone has to stay up late at night figuring how to cheat the competition and dupe the sheeple.




Stage 1 is still expose and correct the tainted/limited datapool[a never-ending battle, but totally doable by anyone] That alone can ruin the well-laid plans of centuries. Even worse if people continue to question every piece of data now that they have the tools on the table.

PBS exposing Mexican politics from early 1900s
Assassinations of Pancho Villa and Zapata for defending the citizenry...no such thing as pawns eh?

This Maximo puppet system is also very interesting. It's like all of modern Mexican history is one of Italian mafia...assassinations over agrarian reforms for the Peasantry. Setting up unions and rights ONLY to keep the puppet system in power. Appeasement to avoid their own version of The French Revolution.
They flew the Dictator Calles out to Texas...the details just make for the sweetest irony. :obama:

Oil company on film saying, if they bend to Mexican worker demands, "Well, we might as well go out of business". This is the 1930s...
NOW EVEN I KNOW HOW OLD THAT MOVE IS! IF you get a 5min rest break, we will go bankrupt even though we are making money hand-over-fist[goatse anyone?]

Mexico nationalized resources and made actual gains toward Socialism. They even allow refugees from Hitler's/Franco's Fascist states.[America does not] More puppetry and then a right wing betrayal.

Plaza de Tres Culturas Massacre, 1968, military ambushed unarmed civilians...[well before Tienanmen]. The businessmen have infiltrated the government again. The Military is the overseer from the usual plantation system, and as usual, is to keep the Means of Production away from the people who power them.[that's what scares greedy people you see, that people who work harder than them, keep their earnings :o keeps those fuckers up at night]

American immigration increases. Landless immigrants end up as slaves in America. Millions of acres back home, just not for them to profit from.[if you want people to stop coming to your country, you have to make sure everyone's country is not a corrupt cesspool filled with your neighbours' business interests]

Then the drug warlords backed by the CIA/DEA move in. Now they are the prototype for Afghanistan.

Same shit, old toilet. :obama:

Lusulpher
May 17 2011, 08:30:22 AM
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/sony/8495412/PlayStation-hack-Anonymous-issues-denial.html

BOOM! A new conspiracy...And against a group of hackers who whistleblew on some of the most heinous groups that suppress information in the world.

Shit is getting real. :obama:

Wall
May 17 2011, 09:08:37 AM
I notice you're not debating the check thing anymore.

Lusulpher
May 17 2011, 09:37:21 AM
I notice you're not debating the check thing anymore.

I notice you can't read. Hooked on Phonics might fix that.

Shaikar
May 17 2011, 09:42:35 AM
PRAWNS.

PRAWNS IN THE GAME OF LIFE.
AND DEFINITELY NOT SHRIMP

cpl_fisher
May 17 2011, 03:54:38 PM
Nazi
Hitler
possibly demon-assisted
immigrant
ancestors
ignoble
maneuvers
rage
penis
revolutions
Capitalism
Middle East
Revelations
Libya
Communists
Freedom
Social
reform
slavery
French
Vietnam
Democrats
Obama
Dick Cheney
taxes
America
Haiti
China
white
President
collapse
America
glory
banker
corporate
political
conspiracy
Progressive
kill
racist
coup
threat
Health Care
Reform
lobbies
Feudal
System
America's future
evolution
vote
oil
tobacco
medical services
weapons
intelligence
finance
minions
puppets
system
collapsing
cars
space
tourism
CLASS
hard work
immigrant
engineers
pennywise housewives
hard-working minorities


tl;dr: Politicians are all friends, prepare for the Revoultion and the obvious collapse of Capitalism. Or...enjoy being a slave. Anal only hurts twice? Might be time to educate your grandparents.

cpl_fisher, is that you?

I am just as :facepalm: as you are. I don't think there is one coherent thought in the entire OP. oh well, time for :popcorn: and :guinness:

lubica
May 17 2011, 06:40:52 PM
This is unsatisfactory. I demand a posting showdown!
Winner gets his own Psyduck emoticon version. Don't tell me you wouldn't abuse the fuck out of a psyduck wearing a turtle shell.

Tarminic
May 17 2011, 10:01:34 PM
So lusulpher, what is the important truth embedded into the content at http://www.timecube.com?

Wall
May 17 2011, 11:10:42 PM
I notice you're not debating the check thing anymore.

I notice you can't read. Hooked on Phonics might fix that.

I suppose you can link to me where you're still debating this point then? Last I saw was a solid rebuttal from Tyrus and Tellenta and not so much as a peep from you since.

Lusulpher
May 19 2011, 10:11:37 AM
So Lusulpher, what is the important truth embedded into the content at http://www.timecube.com?

All I got was that God can't be a male. I agreed. At least a hermaphrodite...rest was sorta racist.

Capitalize my name you asshat.


Avandia being pulled for increased chance of Heart Attack and Stroke by 41%...but it fixes Diabetes, so FDA will still allow it to be prescribed[Exercise/diet don't fix it, thank God]. Good thing corporations are stopping that 'ebil govment' from secretly poisoning us. :obama:

spasm
May 19 2011, 03:11:26 PM
Timecube is racist

[spoiler:16jq8v1v]http://onebit.us/images/hugepsyduck.gif[/spoiler:16jq8v1v]

TurielD
May 19 2011, 03:13:18 PM
Timecube is racist

[spoiler:ncgjqcpt]http://onebit.us/images/hugepsyduck.gif[/spoiler:ncgjqcpt]

OMG that's one awesome duck

Tellenta
May 19 2011, 03:35:24 PM
So Lusulpher, what is the important truth embedded into the content at http://www.timecube.com?

All I got was that God can't be a male. I agreed. At least a hermaphrodite...rest was sorta racist.

Capitalize my name you asshat.


Avandia being pulled for increased chance of Heart Attack and Stroke by 41%...but it fixes Diabetes, so FDA will still allow it to be prescribed[Exercise/diet don't fix it, thank God]. Good thing corporations are stopping that 'ebil govment' from secretly poisoning us. :obama:

If they tell us that they are poisoning us is it really secret?

James Snowscoran
May 19 2011, 07:01:17 PM
I'm confused...who are the bad guys, government or the corporations?

Fachiri
May 19 2011, 07:03:42 PM
I'm confused...who are the bad guys, government or the corporations?

The dirty sheeple who let this happen in the first place, obviously.

Raine Woot
May 19 2011, 07:41:47 PM
I'd completely forgotten about timecube, that's where I'd heard lusulpher before. Thanks, it was bothering me.

(never stop posting, lUSULPHER)

Lusulpher
May 20 2011, 08:04:46 AM
So Lusulpher, what is the important truth embedded into the content at http://www.timecube.com?

All I got was that God can't be a male. I agreed. At least a hermaphrodite...rest was sorta racist.

Capitalize my name you asshat.


Avandia being pulled for increased chance of Heart Attack and Stroke by 41%...but it fixes Diabetes, so FDA will still allow it to be prescribed[Exercise/diet don't fix it, thank God]. Good thing corporations are stopping that 'ebil govment' from secretly poisoning us. :obama:

If they tell us that they are poisoning us is it really secret?

IF it poisoned people anywhere past 5% they should have tried again or quit. 33%[memory pull] is placebo effect, so you might as well tell people a sugar pill cures their diabetes and zero side effect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placebo

Cancer treatment has less efficacy than it does, I do remember that, clearly.

And you think that is them telling you something they gave out is poison? :o
After DDT/Agent Orange/Mad Cow/cigarettes/alcohol, you should know better...
They will prescribe away until they are clear of liability fallout[see TEPCo. and Sendai] and quietly move on to the next big poison that they can charge to Medicare.
You ever told your doctors not to increase your eyeglass prescription? They don't give a fuck. And they know what the consequence off that is, but they WILL NOT reframe your original lenses. ESPECIALLY if you have Medicare.

This is the only thing they care about protecting.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=9501:JP




@ James Governments don't exist. Laws don't exist. Enforcement and Control of Information exist. It can make a pacifist a criminal, and a thieving murderer into President of The united States of America[several times]. :twisted:

All you have to do is say something is illegal and then kidnap people who possess that item. Hell, it's even profitable if I charge them my own personal ransom and let them off with a warning[parole is expensive it turns out, parole officers are honest about The Game]. Yes, it's illegal to make things illegal in America[Founding Fathers would be very mad right about now].

Yes, marijuana is legal to possess, with a taxed token for distribution. The Congress that seemingly can't win the War on Drugs, do not print those tokens. Catch 22 as law. They might as well say Game tokens, 'cuz you are getting played, voting and all that shit about drugs when they prescribe more addictive and costly ones to treat the same issues. :lol:


Now, you are thinking, that sounds like terrerism or Roman era-piracy. And doesn't it violate individual freedoms to deny someone usage of an item? Yes, to both.

But if you train a large enough mercenary force to maintain fear, you can get individuals to agree to anything else you come up with.
If you are clever, you can add some complex and seemingly-fair superstructure over it all. Even if the People notice all the parties involved are buddies from childhood pretending to defend them from corporations whoa re stealing all the tax savings for personal checkbooks.
Well, they are still under threat from the mercenary force(s). At a certain point, the country goes bankrupt and the parties run to their pre-determined resorts with billions. The mercenary force disbands, and the populace is left aimless in a 'Dark Age' until someone else scrapes it all together again. Then the Players show up and wiggle in.
History repeats.

Yes, this is an argument for anarchy.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy
Ooh, good analysis of information control http://nicholasdanger.blogspot.com/2006/11/v-for-vendetta-anarchy-vs-democracy.html

Eve: All this riot and uproar, V... is this Anarchy? Is this the Land of Do-As-You-Please?
V: No. This is only the land of take-what-you-want. Anarchy means "without leaders", not "without order". With anarchy comes an age or ordnung, of true order, which is to say voluntary order... this age of ordung will begin when the mad and incoherent cycle of verwirrung that these bulletins reveal has run its course... This is not anarchy, Eve. This is chaos.

FDA does not enforce "Food Safety", Theodore Roosevelt started that administration, he'd go in shooting if he could read their data pool.[his soldiers died to lax corporate regulation in the Cuban jungle]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White-collar_crime
Eventually we'll get around to using "equality" even in the justice system. As soon as they arrest the judges and police captains. :obama:

Tellenta
May 20 2011, 03:33:29 PM
I think my favorite thing about you is I can get a big ass post from you crowning with the concept that the FDA does nothing for food safety with one small sentence.

Lusulpher
May 21 2011, 05:05:09 PM
tl;dr: Deadworlds. Dark planets for a dark Universe. :emo:


http://io9.com/5802775/strange-new-planets-discovered-that-dont-orbit-stars

As if that isn't eerie enough with that doomey-sounding, stray-alien-planet Sumerian legend.[Einstein also validated on his imagination quote] :obama:

And you guys should probably find out they proved gravity is a wave-particle similar to light[quasar experiment]. So it can be manipulated also.[college textbooks on engineering should have it cited]
Don't be surprised if UFOs are really from other galaxies/dimensions. And are biding their time hoping we evolve a society...[no this is not a "civilization", it's a tedious game played by children]



Glorious comment!

Well, he's still spot on in this 1936 letter to C. L. Moore:

As for the Republicans — how can one regard seriously a frightened, greedy, nostalgic huddle of tradesmen and lucky idlers who shut their eyes to history and science, steel their emotions against decent human sympathy, cling to sordid and provincial ideals exalting sheer acquisitiveness and condoning artificial hardship for the non-materially-shrewd, dwell smugly and sentimentally in a distorted dream-cosmos of outmoded phrases and principles and attitudes based on the bygone agricultural-handicraft world, and revel in (consciously or unconsciously) mendacious assumptions (such as the notion that real liberty is synonymous with the single detail of unrestricted economic license or that a rational planning of resource-distribution would contravene some vague and mystical 'American heritage'…) utterly contrary to fact and without the slightest foundation in human experience? Intellectually, the Republican idea deserves the tolerance and respect one gives to the dead.
:nostradamus: War on Terrer. Immigration restiction. Church in Government. Reagonomics. Cold Warhawks. McCarthyism. Manifest Destiny. Lassezfaire Capitalism. :nostradamus:

Mavolio
May 21 2011, 05:35:00 PM
it's illegal to make things illegal in America[Founding Fathers would be very mad right about now].

Every time i go to United States of America they take my radioactive dirty bomb off me. Its like they just twist any law they want to just make arbitrary decisions about what we can and cant have. I bet that within 10 mins of taking my radioactive substances the security guards were out the back smoking it. ITS JUST NOT FAIR!

hippoking
May 21 2011, 05:39:39 PM
Today I drove past a road sign that someone had sprayed 'STOP CHEMTRAIL' over and I thought of Lusulphur.

Devec
May 21 2011, 06:01:42 PM
Clearly we are doomed, those spacemen must take me away.

Lusulpher
May 21 2011, 07:00:43 PM
it's illegal to make things illegal in America[Founding Fathers would be very mad right about now].

Every time i go to United States of America they take my radioactive dirty bomb off me. Its like they just twist any law they want to just make arbitrary decisions about what we can and cant have. I bet that within 10 mins of taking my radioactive substances the security guards were out the back smoking it. ITS JUST NOT FAIR!

You can have radioactive substances, just they have to be taxed as they are harmful to citizens around you and require special handling fees.
And you have to license for that in case you do make a dirty bomb/nuclear powered spaceship with lasers. They can't look like incompetent bureaucrats,who let a maniac blow up a city "cause of Right to Bear Arms"...that'd be as stupid as selling guns with no record check/mandatory gun training classes/psych eval... :roll:

You pay the fees, be an average citizen, and bam, you are doing cancer research in your home. Might even get a patent that the government will defend against corporations who already have a head-start on factories...
Regulation has never been the enemy of competition.
And My Rights end at Your safety.


Do you guys know what is on CNN?
They say cellphones might be dangerous to use...microwave radiation exposure might cause cancers...
I'll believe that when I believe second-hand smoke causes cancer. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :obama: [40x more poison without the filter, 4 packs in one session!]



Hint: The Tobacco executives knew that in 1955[you can read the meeting notes yourself, oddly, those doctors did not lose their license for not preventing mass poisoning]. Selling cigarettes is like legalized school shootings + ethnic purges + capital punishment. Except you headshot babies too. Cellphones will be playing the same narrative with high-voltage powerlines until the stock drops.

But The Game must be played if billions are at stake. :obama:

Lusulpher
May 21 2011, 07:12:44 PM
Today I drove past a road sign that someone had sprayed 'STOP CHEMTRAIL' over and I thought of Lusulphur.

"Chemtrail" came into the vernacular due to Monsanto and their heavy usage of Agent Orange in Vietnam...

You might think that is funny, but that shit is the second DDT. Children are being born "incomplete". All the veterans of that conflict were told they were crazy about the chemtrails from the tankercraft. AS THEY WERE GOING CRAZY!
[VC included, and Agent O is not real, until they said it was, so we believe them instead of our patriots :roll: ]


Most of Monsanto's products are linked to mass sterility. With a track record like that, they should be out of business...until you realize that might be their actual business.
"The death of birth." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto

And yes, population control is becoming more necessary as assets are being accumulated by people who no longer need them as efficiency rises. Massive stagnant pools of resources that are larger than the outputs of entire continents.
But Socialism is not an option for this Feudalism. They preferred retroactive birth control up until recent calculation. Killing a consumer is blasphemy, unless technology renders the consumer obsolete, i.e. non-Human, robotic, digitized Production model.
The only thing that will extend the current model is if American consumption RAMPS UP to Chinese levels. That forfeits getting out of National Debt. Obama/America's life depends on spending money that never existed. :lol:

Lusulpher
May 22 2011, 01:31:04 PM
Waiting for that Doomsday "prophet" to get lynched. Everybody knows you don't discuss End Of World class events unless you have funding to stave them off. This kind of funding.
[youtube:3vzkez3a]yuA_CyUdjkE[/youtube:3vzkez3a]

Or, 15mil USD to deflect asteroids from Earth[no country wants to foot that size bill, left NASA hanging :roll: ] I'm sure Sir Branson will save us[just saying this to keep you calm...Branson can't even get money for the space elevator and we all know what that would do to Humanity's concepts of space travel]



So that leaves the DIY crowd. And this guy has stepped up. :monocledowns:
[youtube:3vzkez3a]A3EAJex1RVo[/youtube:3vzkez3a]
My comment:
"So for about 40,000-80,000 USD I can build a complex of hydroponic? farms in most corners of the world, even deserts/tundra? AND it recycles all those bullshit shipping containers rusting away? Cool. World hunger no longer an actual problem."

It really is a cheap solution that caused food/resource buffering/shelter on the micro-scale. He should go into business, Humans love convenience...Other companies have already started.[Now that nukes are back on the table with neutron warheads and cluster targeting, M.A.D. is no longer viable, "pre-emptive striking" is]
[youtube:3vzkez3a]0qA7U6-A14c[/youtube:3vzkez3a]
Their conceptualized demo. Colbert Report covered that the bunkers also have an additional bunker option away from the "communal bunker", BELOW the bunker complex...The Game...they just keep playing it. :obama:
[youtube:3vzkez3a]7T9heta_qLI[/youtube:3vzkez3a]

And then the technocrats threw in their bid on the Macro scale years ago.
[youtube:3vzkez3a]DqplP-E8Dvw[/youtube:3vzkez3a]

Wall
May 23 2011, 12:18:37 AM
Almost right. These bunker complexes aren't being designed for the world's elite, that's the narritive we are supposed to believe. But the reality is once you get into "The Game" you realize they are just pawns being sacrificed to block an uncalled check to the real King. Penguins, working through their human proxies, to set up a sanctuary for a post-global warming world.

It's obvious once you realize how deftly penguins have manipulated researchers into vastly under-estimating their intelligence, then factor in global warming trends. Note that the largest number of technological breakthroughs in human history have occurred since we began exploring the poles. Penguins trading technology for labor. Past penguin civilization collapsed as Mars atmosphere thinned, but Earth-based outposts survived.

Also the largest number of world-wide and large scale conflicts. Not all penguins are on the same page about the direction to take Earth.

After fucking up both their own planet and the moon (see NASA cover-up of abandoned penguin facilities....photographic evidence altered, mysterious 'blacking out' of background really just to erase visible horizon-line structures). Not to mention the cover-up of other penguin-astronaut evidence, i.e. the "face on mars" facility where mankind was genetically bred from monkeys to be the primary labor force of the penguin empire.

Tyrus Tenebros
May 23 2011, 03:33:32 AM
Almost right. These bunker complexes aren't being designed for the world's elite, that's the narritive we are supposed to believe. But the reality is once you get into "The Game" you realize they are just pawns being sacrificed to block an uncalled check to the real King. Penguins, working through their human proxies, to set up a sanctuary for a post-global warming world.

It's obvious once you realize how deftly penguins have manipulated researchers into vastly under-estimating their intelligence, then factor in global warming trends. Note that the largest number of technological breakthroughs in human history have occurred since we began exploring the poles. Penguins trading technology for labor. Past penguin civilization collapsed as Mars atmosphere thinned, but Earth-based outposts survived.

Also the largest number of world-wide and large scale conflicts. Not all penguins are on the same page about the direction to take Earth.

After fucking up both their own planet and the moon (see NASA cover-up of abandoned penguin facilities....photographic evidence altered, mysterious 'blacking out' of background really just to erase visible horizon-line structures). Not to mention the cover-up of other penguin-astronaut evidence, i.e. the "face on mars" facility where mankind was genetically bred from monkeys to be the primary labor force of the penguin empire.

http://www.nerdnirvana.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/yo-dawg-at-first-i-was-like.jpg

Lusulpher
May 24 2011, 05:51:25 AM
Almost right. These bunker complexes aren't being designed for the world's elite, that's the narritive we are supposed to believe. But the reality is once you get into "The Game" you realize they are just pawns being sacrificed to block an uncalled check to the real King. Penguins, working through their human proxies, to set up a sanctuary for a post-global warming world.

It's obvious once you realize how deftly penguins have manipulated researchers into vastly under-estimating their intelligence, then factor in global warming trends. Note that the largest number of technological breakthroughs in human history have occurred since we began exploring the poles. Penguins trading technology for labor. Past penguin civilization collapsed as Mars atmosphere thinned, but Earth-based outposts survived.

Also the largest number of world-wide and large scale conflicts. Not all penguins are on the same page about the direction to take Earth.

After fucking up both their own planet and the moon (see NASA cover-up of abandoned penguin facilities....photographic evidence altered, mysterious 'blacking out' of background really just to erase visible horizon-line structures). Not to mention the cover-up of other penguin-astronaut evidence, i.e. the "face on mars" facility where mankind was genetically bred from monkeys to be the primary labor force of the penguin empire.

http://www.nerdnirvana.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/yo-dawg-at-first-i-was-like.jpg

Your image better be a Pen^2. or you are a terrible poster... :obama:
http://www.mmodomination.com/Anime/NGE.jpg
It wasn't. :facepalm:

Btw, his/her character is a reference to a conspiracy that involved DNA integration in the plot of that show. Was that intentional, Wall? :psyduck:

Tellenta
May 24 2011, 06:14:36 AM
Your image better be a Pen^2. or you are a terrible poster... :obama:


Don't expect to much from the posters around here Mr. Sulpher. They do their best.

Lusulpher
May 29 2011, 06:21:15 AM
..........................http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43187290/ns/health-health_care/

Reaction: :obama: :roll: :) :twisted: :monocledowns: :lol: :nostradamus: :obama:

Not enough :kekeke: for my smug.


Pfizer killing consumers[and bystanders] with plausible deniability since 2006[and ofc well-before that]

Spaztick
May 29 2011, 06:24:42 AM
I don't even know what's going on anymore. Time for more detail into why lulsulpher is the prodigy of Hitler:

Multifarious avenues of approach vie for attention as potential retorts to Lulsulpher's harebrained, scary conjectures. The following paragraphs are intended as an initial, open-ended sketch of how bad the current situation is. Lulsulpher is filled with unrighteousness, wickedness, and maliciousness. Of that I am certain because Lulsulpher uses vulgar language and makes obscene gestures at those whose opinions differ from his. I explained the reason for that just a moment ago. If you don't mind, though, I'll go ahead and explain it again. To begin with, it's his belief that my letters demonstrate a desire to cripple his enemies politically, economically, socially, morally, and psychologically. I can't understand how anyone could go from anything I ever wrote to such a demented, materialistic idea. In fact, my letters generally make the diametrically opposite claim, that Lulsulpher has blood on his hands. Yet he pretends to be an innocent lamb who has our best interests at heart. We all know the reality: If Lulsulpher really had our best interests at heart, he wouldn't pull the levers of prætorianism and oil the gears of gangsterism.

Lulsulpher's plaints have created a tactless universe devoid of logic and evidence. Only within this universe does it make sense to say that a knowledge of correct diction, even if unused, evinces a superiority that covers cowardice or stupidity. Only within this universe does it make sense to force us to tailor our litanies just to suit his distasteful whims. And, only if we catalogue his swindles and perversions can we destroy this psychotic universe of his and offer true constructive criticism—listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem. While we do nothing, those who infiltrate and then dominate and control the mass media are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we maintain social tranquillity.

Yes, I realize that Lulsulpher's stolid confreres accept on faith that you and I are objects for Lulsulpher to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings, but for the sake of brevity I've had to express myself in simplified terms. If fanaticism were an Olympic sport, he would clinch the gold medal. He uses obscure words like "thymolsulphonephthalein" and "hexosemonophosphoric" to conceal his agenda to label everyone he doesn't like as a racist, sexist, fascist, communist, or some equally terrible "-ist". I find that having to process phrases with long words like those makes me feel hoodwinked, inferior, definitely frustrated, and angry. That's why I strive for utmost clarity whenever I explain to others that if Lulsulpher gets his way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of favoritism and indescribable horror. That's why I'm telling you that it's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to preach a message of community and brotherly love. It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader.

Lulsulpher is like a Judas goat, leading us all to the slaughter. If you doubt this, just ask around. He keeps trying to condone universal oppression. And if we don't remain eternally vigilant, he will truly succeed. No one that I speak with or correspond with is happy about this situation. Of course, I don't speak or correspond with uncouth, unmannerly serpents, Lulsulpher's shock troops, or anyone else who fails to realize that Lulsulpher dreams of a time when he'll be free to propound ideas that are widely perceived as representing outright gnosticism. That's the way he's planned it, and that's the way it'll happen—not may happen but will happen—if we don't interfere, if we don't enlighten the mind of Man and improve him as a rational, moral, and social being.

Since I don't know Lulsulpher that well, I'll have to be a bit presumptuous when I say that he has planted his jackals everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance Lulsulpher's ability to trick academics into abandoning the principles of scientific inquiry, but it also provides irrefutable evidence that even if one isn't completely conversant with current events, the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that I recently checked out one of his recent tracts. Oh, look; Lulsulpher is again saying that the best way to serve one's country is to censor any incomplicitous catch-phrases. Raise your hand if you're surprised. Seriously, though, no one has a higher opinion of Lulsulpher than I, and I think Lulsulpher is a foul-mouthed sponger.

Despite some perceptions to the contrary, I, for one, wonder what would happen if Lulsulpher really did make today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what he has planned for the future. There's a spooky thought. I've heard him say that his balmy gestapo is a respected civil-rights organization. Was that just a slip of the lip, or is Lulsulpher secretly trying to sensationalize all of the issues? I can give you only my best estimate, made after long and anxious consideration, but I do not pose as an expert in these matters. I can say only that while he and other unscrupulous common blood-stained criminals sometimes differ on the details and scale of their upcoming campaigns of terror they never fail to agree on the basic principle and substance. Hence, it is imperative that you understand that we must tackle the multinational death machine that Lulsulpher is currently constructing. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time.

Selfish, illiberal crackpots like Lulsulpher always lie. Even an occasional truth is intended only to cover up a bigger falsification and is therefore, itself, a deliberate untruth. I try never to argue with him because it's clear he's not susceptible to reason. Already, some salacious heretics have begun to ridicule, parody, censor, and downgrade opposing ideas, and with terrifying and tragic results. What warnings will follow from their camp is anyone's guess.

Lulsulpher claims that he has a "special" perspective on defeatism that carries with it a "special" right to sound the standard "they're out to get us" call and rally his vassals to force people to act in ways far removed from the natural patterns of human behavior. That story is full of more holes than a cheap hooker with a piercing fetish and a heroin habit. He's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is Lulsulpher's gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to galvanize the unsophisticated herd into enthusiastically supporting his mumpish cop-outs. A Lulsulpher-controlled culture that cheers on Lulsulpher's suppression of nonconformity, dissent, and other unpopular words is every bit as chilling as one that seeks merely to create a desolation and call it peace. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that thanks to his gormless apologues, crime and lawlessness amount mingy palookas is now far more rife than ever before? We should be able to look into our own souls for the answer. If we do, I suspect we'll find that my long-term goal is to uplift individuals and communities on a global scale to operate on today's real—not tomorrow's ideal—political terrain. Unfortunately, much remains to be done. As you may have noticed, if Lulsulpher gets his way, none of us will be able to test the assumptions that underlie his tirades. Therefore, we must not let Lulsulpher spawn a society in which those with the most deviant lifestyle, dastardly behavior, or personal failures are given the most by the government.

I have observed increasing activity by Lulsulpher and his coalition of uncompromising schemers and dictatorial bludgers to find a pretext for inciting an atmosphere of violence and endangerment toward the good men, women, and children of this state. I submit that everyone should stop and mull that assertion. Then, people will understand why Lulsulpher would have us believe that five-crystal orgone generators can eliminate mind-control energies that are being radiated from secret, underground, government facilities. Not surprisingly, his evidence for that utterly annoying claim is top-heavy with anonymous sources and, to put it mildly, he has a checkered track record for accuracy. I claim it would be more accurate for Lulsulpher to say that if you've never seen him instill distrust and thereby create a need for his nugatory views, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself.

At the risk of sounding hopelessly craven, Lulsulpher is not the only one who needs to reassess his assumptions. Think about the worst sorts of sinful cockalorums there are. They too should realize that Lulsulpher's companions have the gall to accuse me of feeding information from sources inside the government to organizations with particularly filthy agendas. Were these unsavory weirdos born without a self-awareness gene? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it boils down essentially to this: To confront and reject all manifestations of extremism, we have to work diligently and effectively to halt the adulation heaped upon argumentative worrywarts. Furthermore, Lulsulpher's subliminal psywar campaigns cause nothing but trouble. This issue is coming to the fore because someone once said to me, "Lulsulpher has, shall we say, questionable priorities." This phrase struck me so forcefully that I have often used it since. In a nutshell, Lulsulpher has somehow managed to convince himself that he is entitled to create an atmosphere that may temporarily energize or exhilarate but which, at the same time, will pose the gravest of human threats.

Lulsulpher has had his say, and this is mine. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and pursue virtue and knowledge. His adulators portray themselves as fervent believers in freedom of speech and expression but are loath to reveal that it's possible that Lulsulpher doesn't realize this because he has been ingrained with so much of Jacobinism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we treat the blows of circumstance. He has been hindering economic growth and job creation. If there were any semblance of decency left in his army of depraved geeks that ought to be an affront to it. Sadly, that's a big "if"; we all know that we need to make a cause célèbre out of exposing Lulsulpher's animadversions for what they really are. Unfortunately, reaching that simple conclusion sometimes seems to be above human reason. But there is a wisdom above human, and to that we must look if we are ever to empower the oppressed to control their own lives.

The one thing that's central to all of Lulsulpher's hate-filled, licentious campaigns is a desire to sully a profession that's already held in low esteem. I call this the New Conformism. The old conformism was concerned only with attacking the very fabric of this nation. Although that was bad enough, Lulsulpher keeps saying that his blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, he alleges that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. Naturally, this is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. I won't bore you with the details, but suffice it to say that Lulsulpher plans to make a mockery of the term "institutionalization" faster than you can say "incomprehensibleness". I'd like to see him try to get away with such a plan; that should be good for a laugh. You see, most people have already observed that Lulsulpher refers to a variety of things using the word "nondenominationalism". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, he's saying that it's okay to cure the evil of discrimination with more discrimination, which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, there's no shortage of sin in the world today. It's been around since the Garden of Eden and will definitely persist as long as Lulsulpher continues to blame our societal problems on handy scapegoats.

I might have been dreaming but I believe I once heard Lulsulpher admit, sotto voce, that he knows how to lie. It's too bad he doesn't yet understand the ramifications of lying. The salient point here is that he has—not once, but several times—been able to defile the air and water in the name of profit without anyone stopping him. How long can that go on? As long as his polyloquent subliminal psywar campaigns are kept on life support. That's why we have to pull the plug on them and expose false prophets who preach that he has achieved sainthood. Lulsulpher keeps talking about the importance of his cause. As far as I can tell, his "cause" is to vilify our history, character, values, and traditions. He deeply believes—and wants us to believe as well—that his cause is just, that it's moral, and that the world will love him for promoting it. In reality, Lulsulpher's fantasy is to make a fetish of the virtues of unpatriotic, peremptory terrorism. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of pauperism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that Lulsulpher's goal is to commit senseless acts of violence against anyone daring to challenge his disingenuous theories. How tactless is that? How anti-democratic? How stubborn?

Throughout human history, mephitic twits have always been deceitful. So it should come as no surprise that it's easy for Lulsulpher to bombastically declaim my proposals. But when is he going to provide an alternative proposal of his own? This can be answered most easily by stating that he says that truth is merely a social construct. Yet he also wants to cause the destruction of human ambition and joy. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because I would like to give you an example of how headlong he can be. Lulsulpher has admitted that he intends to destroy our sense of safety in the places we ordinarily imagine we can flee to. Okay, that may have been a particularly bald-faced and unsubtle example, but Lulsulpher will probably never understand why he scares me so much. And he does scare me: His recommendations are scary, his screeds are scary, and most of all, his peuplade appears to be growing in number. I honestly pray that this is analogous to the flare-up of a candle just before extinction, yet I keep reminding myself that when I first became aware of his covert invasion into our thought processes, all I could think was how he believes that he is perched atop the moral high ground. If so, then maybe Lulsulpher should climb down to scavenge for some facts before claiming that the sun rises just for him.

I realize that faddism is a tremendous problem in our society, but does it constantly have to be thrown in our faces? To ask that question another way, what does Lulsulpher hope to achieve by repeatedly applying his lips to the posteriors of the most bestial curmudgeons you'll ever see? As you ponder the answer to that question, consider that in public, Lulsulpher vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, Lulsulpher never fails to create new (and reinforce existing) prejudices and misconceptions. There is historical precedent for his dissertations. Specifically, for as far back as I can remember, Lulsulpher has been delivering an additional blow to dignity and self-worth. Given how one mutinous activity always leads to another, it should come as no surprise that difficult times lie ahead. Fortunately, we have the capacity to circumvent much of the impending misery by working together to get people to sign a petition to limit Lulsulpher's ability to cause trouble.

I want to find the common ground that enables others to shine a light on Lulsulpher's efforts to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet. That may seem simple enough, but if you think that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved, then think again. Now, more than ever, we must see through the haze of clericalism. The important point here is not that Lulsulpher's randy philosophies exhibit the patina of chauvinism. The vital matter is that in the Old Testament, the Book of Kings relates how the priests of Baal were slain for deceiving the people. I'm not suggesting that there be any contemporary parallel involving Lulsulpher, but when I say that Lulsulpher's communiqués defy common sense, this does not, I repeat, does not mean that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to sharpen intergroup tensions. This is a common fallacy held by tendentious present-day robber barons.

Lulsulpher has not increased our safety, security, or happiness by creating widespread psychological suffering. All he's increased by doing that is the girth of his bloated ego. He coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his ventures sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. I guess that my take on this is that Lulsulpher believes that it's okay for him to indulge his every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. That's just wrong. He further believes that the peak of fashion is to reinforce the concept of collective guilt that is the root of all prejudice. Wrong again!

Think about that for a minute. Let it sink in. It should soon become clear that Lulsulpher's combative form of obstructionism is like a forest fire. Once it is started, none can set bounds to the resulting conflagration. The only option is to replace today's chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose. While doing so won't put a stop to obstructionism, it will demonstrate decisively that Lulsulpher is trying hard to convince a substantial number of gutless blockheads to eavesdrop on all types of private conversations. He presumably believes that the "hundredth-monkey phenomenon" will spontaneously incite flagitious goofballs to behave likewise. The reality, however, is that given the amount of misinformation that Lulsulpher is circulating, I must sincerely point out that his lickspittles hammer a few more nails into the coffin of freedom, as though it were a disgrace to seek liberty, equality, and fraternity. If you doubt this, just ask around.

Lulsulpher's fastidious taradiddles have caused insufferable tatterdemalions to descend upon us like a swarm of locusts, plunging us into the dark abyss of annihilation. You may find it instructive to contrast the things I like with the things that Lulsulpher likes. I like listening to music. Lulsulpher likes casting the world into nuclear holocaust. I like kittens and puppies. Lulsulpher likes disarming us morally, making us rootless and defenseless, and then destroying us. I like spending time with friends. Lulsulpher likes threatening anyone who's bold enough to state that I have a scientist's respect for objective truth. That's why I'm telling you that given a choice of having Lulsulpher exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in managing both the news and the entertainment that gets presented to us or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day.

Lulsulpher never tires of telling us that courtesy and manners don't count for anything. That's why I feel obligated to respond by reminding everyone that sometime in the future Lulsulpher will deprive people of dignity and autonomy. Fortunately, that hasn't happened...yet. But it will really happen if we don't scrap the entire constellation of deranged ideas that brought us to our present point. I conclude this letter with an appropriate quote: "Trotskyism is a growing threat to society and should be outlawed." I believe we all know who said that, don't we?

I sit in sad repose as I put pen to paper concerning an issue I find most deeply disturbing. I will start this discussion by arguing that Lulsulpher's denunciations are not modeled on democracy as envisaged by philosophers of the Enlightenment, but on the anti-democratic principles of snobbism. Then, I will present evidence that it is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by Lulsulpher's heinous, discourteous press releases. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and combat the materialistic ideology of adversarialism that has infected the minds of so many contemptuous bourgeoisie. I don't know when Chekism became chic, but we have a choice. Either we let ourselves be led like lambs to the slaughter by Lulsulpher and his devotees or we defy the international enslavement of entire peoples. While I don't expect you to have much trouble making up your mind you should nevertheless consider that I normally prefer to listen than to speak. I would, however, like to remind Lulsulpher that my only wonder is, Why doesn't he point a critical finger at himself for a change? The answer is quite simple. I already listed several possibilities, but because Lulsulpher lacks the ability to remember beyond the last two seconds of his life I will restate what I said before for his sake: He justifies his cheeky nature by denying that his favorite activities include cheating, lying, and tricking people into believing that his vices are the only true virtues. But it goes further than that; he has brainwashed a large number of people into believing that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. Alas, we can't change people's minds overnight, and we can't instantly and totally dispel the delusions implanted by Lulsulpher's scummy lies, but we can shatter the illusion that Lulsulpher has a fearless dedication to reason and truth. That might help a few brainwashees see that what Lulsulpher is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly putrid activity.

Like fire, Lulsulpher is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. But don't take my word for it; ask any scornful killjoy you happen to meet. Still, he would have us besmirch the memory of some genuine historic figures. May God, in his restraining mercy, forbid that we should ever do this most coldhearted and disaffected thing! He does not tolerate any view that differs from his own. Rather, Lulsulpher discredits and discards those people who contradict him along with the ideas that they represent.

Let's be honest here: Knowledge and wisdom are Lulsulpher's enemies. He understands that by limiting education and enlightenment, he can fool more people into believing that those of us who oppose him would rather run than fight. Sadly, those with the least education are those who would benefit most from the knowledge that anyone who hasn't been living in a cave with his eyes shut and his ears plugged knows that one could truthfully say that the absence of necessary historiographical context makes Lulsulpher's bunco games extremely difficult to accept. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that he has been making a ham-handed effort to show that he has answers to everything. I'm guessing that most people are starting to realize that such claims are a distortion of the truth and that we desperately need to combat these lies by raising the quality of debate on issues surrounding Lulsulpher's immature, uncontrollable memoirs.

Lulsulpher has commented that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as his comment is lacking in common sense. Although there's no denying that what may seem insignificant or humorous to him is often hurtful and confusing to others, it may be somewhat more controversial to allege that our real enemies are not people living in a distant land whose names we don't know and whose culture we don't understand. Our real enemies are Lulsulpher and all others who sugarcoat the past and dispense false optimism for the future. His ballyhoos are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk"—an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well—because I should note that several things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how human life is expendable.

The antithesis of feckless, caustic autism is moral, religious, and cultural solidarity among the people of a nation. I know you're wondering why I just wrote that. I'll explain shortly, but first, I should state that Lulsulpher thinks that he can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. However, I shall do my utmost to give direction to a universal human development of culture, ethics, and morality.

The choice we face as a nation is whether to run our country ourselves or let sappy, disreputable hoodwinkers run it for us. And that's where we are right now. I, not being one of the many obscene, wicked backstabbers of this world, plan to work within the system to persuade my fellow citizens that the best advice I can give to a group is to begin the invigorating, rejuvenating process of eschewing debauched pauperism, not because I lack the courage for more drastic steps but because whenever anyone states the obvious—that thanks to Lulsulpher, I'm now suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome—discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "Does Lulsulpher believe, deep in the adytum of his own mind, that he has his moral compass in tact?" Please do not stop reading here, presuming that the answer is apparent and that no further knowledge is needed. Such is clearly not the case. In fact, I'd bet no one ever told you that Lulsulpher's shock troops have been seen opening the gates of Hell. Lulsulpher claimed he would take responsibility for this anti-democratic behavior, but in fact he did nothing to fix matters or punish the culprits. This proves that I certainly hope you're not being misled by the "new Lulsulpher". Only his methods and tactics have changed. Lulsulpher's goal is still the same: to feed information from sources inside the government to organizations with particularly licentious agendas. That's why I'm telling you that if Lulsulpher can't cite the basis for his claim that escapism is the only alternative to anti-intellectualism then he should just shut up about it. :obama:

Lulsulpher presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear. Then, in private, he devises new schemes to replace our natural soul with an artificial one. Did you know that some antisocial thought police want to help him hand over the country to disorganized, parasitic goofballs? Others just want to ride the Marxism bandwagon. In either case, Lulsulpher is entirely sententious, as he has proved to my complete satisfaction.

Lulsulpher has long wanted to prevent anyone from stating publicly that seeing him worsen an already unstable situation is a nauseating and disgusting spectacle. Why do I bring that up? Because by studying his repression of ideas in its extreme, unambiguous form one may more clearly understand why just because Lulsulpher and his winged monkeys don't like being labelled as "incomprehensible, slatternly mingy-types" or "impulsive ochlocrats" doesn't mean the shoe doesn't fit. There are those who are informed and educated about the evils of alcoholism, and there are those who are not. Lulsulpher is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that's why many of us are too naïve and trusting. It takes a lot of convincing to get us to see a person as inherently warped or inherently intellectually challenged. Alas, Lulsulpher is doing all he can to provide us with unmistakable proof that he is inherently both. For instance, Lulsulpher is known for walking into crowded rooms and telling everyone there that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. Try, if you can, to concoct a statement better calculated to show how shabby Lulsulpher is. You can't do it. Not only that, but the blatant ignorance and social maladjustment of his initiatives will deny the obvious when you least expect it. Stated differently, even when Lulsulpher bespeaks us fair to our faces he expresses quite different thoughts behind our backs. But there's the rub; Lulsulpher has produced a large number of mealymouthed insinuations. I'm sorry that I can't give each of these the angry retort that it deserves, but I can say that our conception of Trotskyism still remains a good deal less clear than we would wish. That's just a fancy way of saying that if society were a beer bottle—something, I believe, that Lulsulpher holds in high regard—he would indeed be the nauseating bit at the bottom that only the homeless like to drink.

Lulsulpher's patsies often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear. Lulsulpher would like to see patriotism, honor, and personal responsibility fall into desuetude. This is not rhetoric. This is reality. The point is that if everyone spent just five minutes a day thinking about ways to chastise him for not doing any research before spouting off, we'd all be a lot better off. Is five minutes a day too much to ask for the promise of a better tomorrow? I hope not, but then again, many people have witnessed Lulsulpher make despotism socially acceptable. Lulsulpher generally insists that his witnesses are mistaken and blames his garrulous deeds on money-grubbing, nugatory despots. It's like he has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, I'm not a pompous person. I'd like nothing more than to extend my hand in friendship to Lulsulpher's hatchet men and convey my hope that in the days to come we can work together to nourish children with good morals and self-esteem. Unfortunately, knowing them, they'd rather appropriate sacred symbols for power-drunk purposes because that's what Lulsulpher wants.

Not to change the subject or anything, but I've tried to explain to Lulsulpher's inconsiderate henchmen that Lulsulpher's remarks are so pigheaded, so laughable, so aberrant that there are really no earth words to describe exactly how I feel about them. :obama: As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that I am not interested in debating Lulsulpher. One can't have a debate with someone who is so willingly ignorant of the most basic tenets of the subject being discussed. Is there, or is there not, an unbalanced plot to convince innocent children to follow a path that leads only to a life of crime, disappointment, and destruction, organized through the years by mad proletariats? The answer to this all-important question is that not only has the plot existed, but it is now on the verge of complete fulfilment. To summarize my views: Lulsulpher is a waste product of biological evolution. :obama:

It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will unmistakably be considered ugly by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it must be stated that Lulsulpher derives sadistic pleasure in the misfortune of others. Some background is in order: On a television program last night I heard one of this country's top scientists conclude that, "Lulsulpher will fail if we unite." That's exactly what I have so frequently argued, and I am pleased to have my view confirmed by so eminent an individual. While some of his op-ed pieces are very attractive on the surface and are doubtlessly entertaining, they ultimately serve to remake the world to suit his own mealymouthed needs. I indubitably hope you're not being misled by the "new Lulsulpher". Only his methods and tactics have changed. Lulsulpher's goal is still the same: to hamstring our efforts to give parents the means to protect their children. That's why I'm telling you that teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain—with a straight face—that you and I are objects for Lulsulpher to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that the suggestion that Lulsulpher's publicity stunts are all sweetness and light is wrong, absurd, and offensive. Nevertheless, Lulsulpher's functionaries like to suggest such things to distract attention from the truth, which is that Lulsulpher's flunkies believe that "Lulsulpher's diatribes are not worth getting outraged about." First off, that's a lousy sentence. If they had written instead that Lulsulpher apparently wants to use us to fulfill his deplorable mission then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, we are at a crossroads. One road leads into the light of a bright, shining future in which disorderly weasels like Lulsulpher are absolutely absent :obama: . The other road leads into the darkness of teetotalism. The question, therefore, is: Who's driving the bus? The answer is almost totally obvious—this isn't rocket science, you know. The key is that my only wonder is, Where do gin-swilling blusterers like Lulsulpher come from, and what are we going to do with them? I have searched numerous sources for answers to that question. No two sources seem to agree on any given point except for one, that we are at war. Don't think we're not just because you're not stepping over dead bodies in the streets. We're at war with Lulsulpher's devious newsgroup postings. We're at war with his laughable revenge fantasies. And we're at war with his self-satisfied protests. As in any war, we ought to be aware of the fact that we must all face the storm and stress of lifting the fog from Lulsulpher's thinking. This exercise will, at the very least, demonstrate to the world that Lulsulpher recently claimed that society is supposed to be lenient towards the most ghastly slaves to fashion you'll ever see. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from him a hundred times before.

Does Lulsulpher really know anything about the threats he claims to support? No, he doesn't. Although he likes to pontificate about how he is a refined gentleman with the soundest education and morals you can imagine, the truth is that sadism is sustained by rigid ideological categories. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to him.

If you hear Lulsulpher spouting off about how the purpose of life is self-gratification, you should tell him that he doesn't believe in the right to free speech, except for people who agree with him. Better yet, tell him to stop getting his opinions from hostile, cantankerous doomsday prophets and start doing some research of his own. I insist that we should refer to him using the sobriquet "Homophobic Lulsulpher" because he's so thoroughly homophobic, not to mention brown-nosing. Regular readers of my letters probably take that for granted, but if I am to take up the mantle and honor our nation's glorious mosaic of cultures and ethnicities, I must explain to the population at large that he says that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie. If I were to compile a list of his forays into espionage, sabotage, and subversion, it would fill an entire page and perhaps even run over onto the following one. Such a list would surely make every sane person who has passed the age of six realize that when you tell Lulsulpher's coadjutors that it is irresponsible to accept everything at face value, they begin to get fidgety and their eyes begin to wander. They really don't care. They have no interest in hearing that some people say that that isn't sufficient evidence to prove that he is secretly scheming to quash other people's opinions. And I must agree; one needs much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there, for anyone who isn't afraid to look at it. Just look at the way that it's debatable whether he easily impresses his expositors using big words like "homeotransplantation". However, no one can disagree that it's astonishing that Lulsulpher has been able for so long to get away with assailing all that is holy. I can't think of anything that better illustrates the failure of our justice system to deal with such nutty, ribald loons.

Now let's have some fun and examine a few of Lulsulpher's more ridiculous statements. First, Lulsulpher said that our unalienable rights are merely privileges that he can dole out or retract. That's rather morbid, isn't it? Later on, he claimed that disdainful, stubborn anthropophagi and annoying dastardly-types should rule this country. What this really means is that he wants to turn the social order upside-down so that the dregs on the bottom become the scum on the top. I might add: He is always prating about how cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. (He used to say that we can trust him not to contaminate clear thinking with his oleaginous complaints, but the evidence is too contrary so he's given up on that score.)

It has been said that in order to maintain harmony with my conscience I must provide a trenchant analysis of Lulsulpher's false-flag operations. That makes sense to me. I believe it's true. But it indeed implies that a central fault line runs through each of Lulsulpher's slogans. Specifically, Lulsulpher uses the word "pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated.

Even when the facts don't fit, Lulsulpher sometimes tries to use them anyway. He still maintains, for instance, that he is a protective bulwark against the advancing tyranny of obtuse foppotees. If his attempts to thrust all of us into scenarios rife with personal animosities and petty resentments have spurred us to investigate the development of simplism as a concept, then Lulsulpher may have accomplished a useful thing. As a consistently mortified observer of his opinions, I can't help but want to subject his perceptions to the rigorous scrutiny they warrant. Given his record of shady dealings, we can say that what I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of a termagant wacko. It's a fact. I have no set opinion as to whether or not Lulsulpher's ideas must not go unchallenged. I do, however, honestly maintain that honest people will admit that few things are more sanctified to him than irreligionism. Concerned people are not afraid to give peace a chance. And sensible people know that Lulsulpher's henchmen argue that the worst classes of cruel propagandists there are should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers. These are the same balmy saboteurs who calumniate helpless crybabies. This is no coincidence; Lulsulpher can out-reason the most loud anarchists I've ever seen but not anyone else. Hence and therefore, he has the nerve to call those of us who delegitimize him "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that most people want to be nice; they want to be polite; they don't want to give offense. And because of this inherent politeness, they step aside and let Lulsulpher talk about you and me in terms that are not fit to be repeated.

And, more important, Lulsulpher really shouldn't defy the rules of logic. That's just plain common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate his biases are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity. He's bad enough when he's alone, but Lulsulpher is even worse when he's joined by cheeky, cynical gauleiters. The odds are more than ten to one that he has no moral courage nor even a desire to be honest and forthright. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. For the sake of clarity, let me quickly note that Lulsulpher's apostles are too lazy to tell Lulsulpher what we all think of him—and boy, do I have some choice words I'd like to use. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that my goal is to get people to sign a petition to limit Lulsulpher's ability to cause trouble. I might not be successful at achieving that goal, but I undeniably do have to try.

From a public-policy perspective, Lulsulpher's older antics were uncouth enough. His latest ones are definitely beyond the pale. I could tell Lulsulpher that most other blathering goof-offs are not as corrupt as they seem, although he obviously doesn't care. I could tell him that his claim of fairness is demonstrably false, but he wouldn't believe me. He probably also doesn't care that his ramblings resonate with the deviltry of clericalism. So let me appeal to whatever small semblance of reason Lulsulpher may be capable of when I tell him that I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness—not in a dark, mudslinging world run by insensitive, empty-headed warmongers.

Lulsulpher's Ponzi schemes may not be traditional for an atrabilious champion of deceit, lies, theft, plunder, and rapine, but Lulsulpher has been trying to convince us that his anecdotes are Holy Writ. That argument fails to take into account the reality that if Lulsulpher had lived the short, sickly, miserable life of a chattel serf in the ages "before technocracy" he wouldn't be so keen to make today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what he has planned for the future. Maybe he'd even begin to realize that in a recent essay, he stated that goading loquacious moochers into hurling epithets at his opponents is essential for the safety and welfare of the public. Since the arguments he made in the rest of his essay are based in part on that assumption, he should be aware that it just isn't true. Not only that, but he apparently believes that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of moral relativism. You and I know better than that. You and I know that it wasn't so long ago that people like you and me were free to promote peace, prosperity, and quality of life, both here and abroad. Recently, that's become a lot harder to do. What happened that changed things so much? To put it briefly, Lulsulpher happened. By slandering those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass, Lulsulpher has managed to destroy that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world.

There appears to be some disagreement in the community regarding the number of times that Lulsulpher has been seen paralyzing any serious or firm decision and thereby becoming responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. Some say once; some say five times; some say a dozen times or more. The point is not to quibble over numbers or anything like that but rather to clarify that the basal lie that underlies all of Lulsulpher's psychotic, mischievous fulminations is that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune. Translation: Women are spare parts in the social repertoire—mere optional extras. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that if Lulsulpher can't be reasoned out of his prejudices, he must be laughed out of them. If Lulsulpher can't be argued out of his selfishness, he must be shamed out of it. Something recently occurred to me that might occur to Lulsulpher, as well, if he would just turn down the volume of his voice for a moment: I can guarantee the readers of this letter that Lulsulpher is good at stirring his sycophants into a frenzied lunacy of hatred and vengeance. Doing so blinds them to the fact that he wants to control every aspect of our lives. Lulsulpher wants us to rise, fall asleep, work, and live at the beat of a drum. Then, once we're molded into a uniform mass, we'll be incapable of seeing that we must avoid the extremes of a pessimistic naturalism and an optimistic humanism by combining the truths of both. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to address a number of important issues. You must be the one to pronounce the truth and renounce the lies. And you must inform your fellow man that Lulsulpher thinks we want him to rewrite and reword much of humanity's formative works to favor misoneism. Excuse me, but maybe his emotional involvement with allotheism obscures his ability to see things objectively. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time he tried to diminish society's inducements to good behavior. Now that you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a surprise that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, get concerned when I see Lulsulpher muster enough force to stultify art and retard the enjoyment and adoration of the beautiful. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would impose a particular curriculum, vision of history, and method of pedagogy on our school systems. I am referring, of course, to the likes of Lulsulpher.

[youtube:iglqk8qp]pmM61kSMTR0[/youtube:iglqk8qp]

Squad broken.

Lusulpher
May 29 2011, 07:02:58 AM
*Terrorist fist jab*
[youtube:8lw64g9h]pmM61kSMTR0[/youtube:8lw64g9h]

So you have resorted to text-bombing because you hate freedom and facts. Cool. Only proves my point that denial is the symptom of increasing cognitive dissonance.[and that sheeple are scum]

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/mon-may-16-2011-jon-ronson
Just because you interrupted my Daily Show binging.

Yeah, shows Comcast corrupting the FCC to create a monopoly to gouge customers[explains why my 2 most-viewed channels went to a different package last month. Those dinglyballed fuckrasslers!!!!!! I say "why", because I'd have to be stupid not to figure that out from it's precision. Precision is intent.]
This commentary only tells me "how".


Much like that video of yours tells you "why" the most powerful individuals are meeting under the banner of a syndicate that pledges no allegiance to any one nation, only money, their God.

Over the years the "how" trickles out, and you sup it up like warm, fetid milk. I hope you choke. :obama:

Also, 'The Psychopath Test' had all those smug things like facts and data to confirm my Game Theory. But you probably don't trust statistics from experts. Glad that tinfoil keeps your stupid from penetrating my brain.
http://img860.imageshack.us/img860/2747/tinfoilstopsstupid.png

Tarminic
May 29 2011, 08:27:48 AM
Reaction: :obama: :roll: :) :twisted: :monocledowns: :lol: :nostradamus: :obama:
Not enough :kekeke: for my smug.]
How the fuck can that be a valid reaction? :lol:

My reaction to your reaction: :? :facepalm: :roll: :arrow: :emo: :evil: :nostradamus: :razor: ;) :tesseract:

lubica
May 29 2011, 12:18:04 PM
ahaha, this page is gold

Sacul
May 29 2011, 12:42:03 PM
**MIND BLOWIN SH!T BLASTING FACT i just thought of SERIOUS LIFE CHANGING MINDSET***
you know how there are molecules, cells, etc. in our body to make us function and live? imagine that each one US is a molecule or cell. such as for say, everything that we do, is effecting another bigger macromolecule than us which is owned by some next level god. imagine as if the belief of god influences change in the "human" we are serving

like for having sex, it is achieveing some sort of anabolic pathway in the molecule of a BIGGER CELL THAN US

do you guys understand what im trying to say? another example would be drinking coffee and this results in a change in a endothermic gland of the bigger molecule causing another change. imagine us as so small and insignificant, such as a macro molecule, and than compare us to the human we are serving get it?

WE ARE A CELL LADIES AND GENTLEMEN!!!

Devec
May 29 2011, 01:50:32 PM
So I've heard how you all love Lusulphers posts so as to make sure you can enjoy it at home as well here is the recipe.

One Lusulpher post
Number of serves: one internet thread

Ingredients:
- 1 cup of paranoia
- 2 spoons of smileys
- 100 grams of bold statements
- 100 grams of facts, make sure you pick the ones with a core of truth
- 150 grams of underlined important words
- 2 cups of the man is keeping us down
- 1 liter of water - make sure it is distilled, tap water will not do!
- 2-3 internet links which will serves are your base source
- 4 spoons of gullibility

Instructions:
Take a bowl and start mixing your cup of paranoia with 2 cups of the man is keeping us down, 100 gram facts, 1 liter of distilled water and 4 spoons of gullibility. Now start mixing that mess till it forms a creamy like substance which smells an awful lot like the truth. Take your mix and spread it out over a prepared white sheet. Take your underlined important words and bold statements and sprinkle them over the sheet. Add smileys to indicate your overall reaction to your own story, the placing should be random. Now to finish it all off add your internet links within places of interest. You should now have a raw post, good job.

Take your sheet and let it dry for a few minutes, make sure that you should feel smug after reading it. If you don't feel so, change some words and letterings around until you do. Now let it dry for a few more minutes until it becomes a solid manifestation of the truth. Congratulations you now have a post!

Now you have to post this post somewhere, a dedicated thread would be best where you can add multiple servings. Your forum of choice would be one where educated neckbeards live who have been brainwashed by the system. A forum about spaceships or any technological subjects would be best. As soon as you have posted the truth wait for the unbelievers and once they have responded take their posts and bake it into another one of your posts.

This is all you need to know how to make one lusulpher post, enjoy your internet posting!

Fara
May 29 2011, 02:25:43 PM
lmao.. just lmao.

Reed Tiburon
May 30 2011, 12:44:50 AM
lock this shitty fucking thread

lubica
May 30 2011, 07:30:40 AM
lock this shitty fucking thread

You have no taste for the finer arts of political dicussions, you damn pleb.

Tyrus Tenebros
May 30 2011, 08:14:52 AM
Your image better be a Pen^2. or you are a terrible poster... :obama:


Don't expect to much from the posters around here Mr. Sulpher. They do their best.
Fuck right off, I killed him in the chess rules debate.

Fachiri
May 30 2011, 08:32:31 AM
Your image better be a Pen^2. or you are a terrible poster... :obama:


Don't expect to much from the posters around here Mr. Sulpher. They do their best.
Fuck right off, I killed him in the chess rules debate.

Sarcasm :razor:

Reed Tiburon
May 30 2011, 09:40:27 AM
lock this shitty fucking thread

You have no taste for the finer arts of political dicussions, you damn pleb.
politics you say. tastes p. good :obama:

Lusulpher
May 30 2011, 12:46:31 PM
Wow, you guys really are mediocre.

Obligatory @Devec: The cake is a a lie. :obama:




Reaction: :obama: :roll: :) :twisted: :monocledowns: :lol: :nostradamus: :obama:
Not enough :kekeke: for my smug.]
How the fuck can that be a valid reaction? :lol:
My reaction to your reaction: :? :facepalm: :roll: :arrow: :emo: :evil: :nostradamus: :razor: ;) :tesseract:

I'm glad you can have a multi-tiered reaction to my reaction.
Now did you open your medicine cabinet and google some of the steroid-based products they are introducing as 'treatments for chronic conditions' instead of the proven fast-acting ones?[Yes, I am thinking of my brother's inhaler which might as well be a placebo].

From diet pills to allergy medication, it's all going downhill pretty fast, and the FDA is just skipping hand in hand with these faggots.

Here's hoping your grandparents/parent dies of a stroke while maintaining their cholesterol level. :guinness:

spasm
May 30 2011, 01:03:06 PM
You should tell your brother to stop using his inhaler, that's how they're keeping him down.

Lusulpher
May 30 2011, 01:44:24 PM
You should tell your brother to stop using his inhaler, that's how they're keeping him down.

Durrrr. They had him replace his normal inhaler for Advair, and it is not to be used for an actual asthma attack, AND you have to clean your mouth of the residue after each use. They fucking know it's useless/harmful.

And I couldn't even get through all the appointment bullshit to get my own inhaler. An appointment weeks in advance for an inhaler...incompetence on all levels.

Medical Industry less useful than proper breathing exercises. :facepalm:

Fachiri
May 30 2011, 05:30:59 PM
Oh look, Lul having absolutely no idea what he's talking about. Big surprise.

Reed Tiburon
May 31 2011, 01:04:00 PM
You should tell your brother to stop using his inhaler, that's how they're keeping him down.

Durrrr. They had him replace his normal inhaler for Advair, and it is not to be used for an actual asthma attack, AND you have to clean your mouth of the residue after each use. They fucking know it's useless/harmful.

And I couldn't even get through all the appointment bullshit to get my own inhaler. An appointment weeks in advance for an inhaler...incompetence on all levels.

Medical Industry less useful than proper breathing exercises. :facepalm:
Clearly a conspiracy by the man to discredit those with respiratory problems - or as they are known in the oppressor's propaganda, "mouthbreathers." :obama:

Kransthow
May 31 2011, 01:27:12 PM
You should tell your brother to stop using his inhaler, that's how they're keeping him down.

Durrrr. They had him replace his normal inhaler for Advair, and it is not to be used for an actual asthma attack, AND you have to clean your mouth of the residue after each use. They fucking know it's useless/harmful.

And I couldn't even get through all the appointment bullshit to get my own inhaler. An appointment weeks in advance for an inhaler...incompetence on all levels.

Medical Industry less useful than proper breathing exercises. :facepalm:
Clearly a conspiracy by the man to discredit those with respiratory problems - or as they are known in the oppressor's propaganda, "mouthbreathers." :obama:
http://i.imgur.com/sanuG.png

cpl_fisher
May 31 2011, 05:04:42 PM
How is this thread still going?

Fara
May 31 2011, 05:07:07 PM
How is this thread still going?

was about to ask the same :derper:

EchoEpsilon23
May 31 2011, 05:14:55 PM
How is this thread still going?

was about to ask the same :derper:

Off the rails!

Devec
May 31 2011, 05:32:05 PM
How is this thread still going?

was about to ask the same :derper:

Off the rails!

This thread didn't have any rails to start with, it just ties random pieces of metal to each other and calls it that.

Tellenta
May 31 2011, 06:16:34 PM
How is this thread still going?

was about to ask the same :derper:

It goes like most other threads, one post at a time. The really is no topic other than to button mash about something random. Make something up, make fun of lusulpher, decide to support lusulpher for giggles, or talk about chess. It all fits.

Hast
May 31 2011, 06:18:30 PM
I was about to ask if I should just lock this or let it keep going. Because fuck reading through this thread.

Hast
May 31 2011, 06:19:43 PM
Fuck it, when even fisher says it should die then it should probably die.