[SHC Repost] The Highsec Greifing Quiz

[Lorkin Desal]

Posted by KzIg on April 1st


I was quite impressed with this- very few people will get all the questions right:

http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/sto ... fer-test_1 (http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/story.php?title=high-sec-griefer-test_1)

Source

I only managed 11/20, just the wrong side of the mean score.

Larkonis: 15
The Crushah: 16
Jelek Coro: 17
Helicity: 19
Forte: 18
Me: 12
Durzel: 15

+more @ Link (http://assets.talkunafraid.co.uk/shc/viewtopic.php%3Ft=39882&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0.html)

[Mike deVoid]

Got 13/20 the first time round. 17/20 this time.

I'm learning.

[Dahak]

Question about shooting the pod after blowing up a thieving ship has the wrong answer marked as right.

Edit: Also it says "seating next to".

[dr axler]

Question about shooting the pod after blowing up a thieving ship has the wrong answer marked as right.

Edit: Also it says "seating next to".

is that the trick where you can shoot it but not blow it up?

[Tellenta]

I got a question wrong due to semantics. The I, you, my, your free-swapping got me lost.

[RoemySchneider]

12
8[

never fought much in high-sec -.- *excuse*

[noobcake]

oh look, the quiz with the incorrect answers marked as correct answers is back!

[Sparq]

12/20 :oops:


It has been a while since I did any of that stuff, kind of makes me want to get back into it though ...

EDIT: wait so the quiz is broken? Screw it then, I did think some of the more obvious answers I chose being wrong was strange, but not having my finger in the pie I figured a few things had changed, huh ... (or maybe I'm still shit!)

[Intigo]

So dumb.

[kzig]

oh look, the quiz with the incorrect answers marked as correct answers is back!

I forget, which ones did you consider spurious?

[Raz]

13/20 but some of my incorrect answers were pretty big derps on my part.

Still, surprisingly complicated. Glad I don't do any of this :highsec: shit.

[Rivqua]

15/20, actually ran out of time on the 20th question (which I knew, but had 3 seconds left /o\).

[Raz]

15/20, actually ran out of time on the 20th question (which I knew, but had 3 seconds left /o\).

There was a time limit? :o

[3rr0rc0d3]

14/20
Not bad, I guess.

[Lana Torrin]

15/20, actually ran out of time on the 20th question (which I knew, but had 3 seconds left /o\).

There was a time limit? :o

Yeah I remember that.. Tried to do it at work the first time and got 2 questions in and ran out of time because I got called away to do some actual work..

[lubica]

15/20, actually ran out of time on the 20th question (which I knew, but had 3 seconds left /o\).
16(20 with 7 seconds to spare 8-)

[spm1138]

14/20.

Now thinking I need to read up on podding mechanics in highsec.

[Skyly]

16

:-/

[PreZiDenT]

11. Skipped all questions with the word "remote" in it.

[Tellenta]

14/20.

Now thinking I need to read up on podding mechanics in highsec.

Think of aggression like kill rights, you can blow them up once during the allotted time period. Unless they dock their ship and fly around in a pod during aggression count down you don't get to kill it without concord showing up.

[spm1138]

Just curious about being able to aggress pods but not kill them. If I aggress a pod which then someone else kills do I then get CONCORDOKKEN?

[Lana Torrin]

Just curious about being able to aggress pods but not kill them. If I aggress a pod which then someone else kills do I then get CONCORDOKKEN?

Logically you would get GCC (and concorded) for agressing someone in highsec you cant legally agrees.. I mean you get concorded for agressing a ship without killing it..

The point of that question is that you can agress them because you were allowed to agress their ship before to kill it, and its not considered a podding until they are dead.. Shoot the pod and not kill them, well that's just fine with concord.

Now if you can agress someone (say they stole from you) and someone else kills their ship, then yes, you can shoot at their pod as long as you don't pod them.

[smagd]

And his question was not whether he was allowed to pod him without Concordokken.

His question was whether he'd get Concordokkened if somebody ELSE podded him, after having stopped shooting at the pod for half a laugh.

There's been amusing bugs like that in EVE forever, e. g. you're part of a gang and aggress a guy in a low-sec belt, but don't manage to kill him, and warp off. Wait out 15 minute timer, jump to high-sec. The guy is still in low sec (and you're in high-sec) and he gets killed by a different gang, and suddenly you're surrounded by Concord for participation in that kill incurring GCC.