PDA

View Full Version : [Mafia]heap Challenge: The Returning 2 - Return of the Return Signup Thread.



spasm
April 16 2013, 11:42:59 AM
You all know the rules, post here if you want to play. I'll be using few roles this game to keep it simple. Each day will end at 6PM CST (daythread time).

Roles:

1. Sherrif - Can investigate on person a day.
2. Doctor - Can protect one person a day, dies if they protect a mafia member.
3. Don - Sends in the mafia vote, if he dies all the mafia members vote.
4. Mafia - Evil dirty mafia.


Signups:
1. Steph
2. XenosisReaper
3. Smuggo
4. Kilabi
5. Lana Torrin
6. Cullnean
7. FMAR
8. Tyrus Tenebros
9. Nicho Void
10. Cue
11. Nobody_Holme
12. dpidcoe
13. Darkflare
14. Pratell
15. Toxic
16. Lobbyz
17. Bentguru
18. Dr. Boomtown
19. Devec
20. Varcaus

XenosisReaper
April 16 2013, 11:53:11 AM
Hello, I endorse this product or service (sign me up)

Smuggo
April 16 2013, 11:55:37 AM
I'm in.

Kilabi
April 16 2013, 11:55:41 AM
LOOK A DAT SIGNUP.

Lana Torrin
April 16 2013, 12:20:07 PM
I guess I'll sign up for a first day lynching. Depending on how Hast takes a joke I may be playing with my alt.

I have 1 question. Will the Don show as mafia or not to the Sherrif? Oh and will we get reveal on death?

OK, 2 questions, I have 2 questions.. Will the Don show as mafia or not to the Sherrif? Will we get reveal on death? Oh and will we get told when the doctor saves someone?

3 questions! I have 3 questions....

[/python]

spasm
April 16 2013, 12:24:43 PM
Don shows as mafia, reveals on death, doctor saves will be told.

Lana Torrin
April 16 2013, 12:36:44 PM
Don shows as mafia, reveals on death, doctor saves will be told.

Neat.. So can I play or have I been derping too much lately?

spasm
April 16 2013, 01:06:31 PM
Everyone can play

XenosisReaper
April 16 2013, 01:10:29 PM
Everyone can play

Apart from Quackbot

cullnean
April 16 2013, 01:10:43 PM
On it like vomit

Tapatalk 2

F*** My Aunt Rita
April 16 2013, 01:11:43 PM
o/

Kilabi
April 16 2013, 01:12:44 PM
Don shows as mafia, reveals on death, doctor saves will be told.

Neat.. So can I play or have I been derping too much lately?



Your play last game was only bad as it was easy to exploit from the mafia side while offering no proper advantage to you. Which when I think about it means it was very bad. :P

Lana Torrin
April 16 2013, 01:27:38 PM
Don shows as mafia, reveals on death, doctor saves will be told.

Neat.. So can I play or have I been derping too much lately?



Your play last game was only bad as it was easy to exploit from the mafia side while offering no proper advantage to you. Which when I think about it means it was very bad. :P

It didn't start off being a play, I thought I was in the discussion thread. I tried to make it a play after I realized what I had done and I DID manage to get our doc talking to me, but yeah, too far gone by then. No one believes me when I say im not mafia despite never actually lieing in the game.

Edit: So yeah, basically im stupid but for different reasons than you pointed out.

Tyrus Tenebros
April 16 2013, 02:12:36 PM
I'm in like Varcaus on Prom night

Kilabi
April 16 2013, 02:22:15 PM
I'm in like Varcaus on Prom night

So you are coming alone?

Nicho Void
April 16 2013, 02:23:55 PM
Here.

Smuggo
April 16 2013, 02:26:19 PM
I'm in Varcaus on Prom night

nbs

Tyrus Tenebros
April 16 2013, 02:29:05 PM
I'm in like Varcaus on Prom night

So you are coming alone?

I'm playing for 30 seconds then i'll be finished?

Edit: just noticed Smuggo's edit. Loll'd

Cue1*
April 16 2013, 03:25:47 PM
Yea, sure. I'm in. Also, I want next game.

the thing from the buzz buzz

XenosisReaper
April 16 2013, 03:39:01 PM
So when will this start?

spasm
April 16 2013, 03:39:32 PM
So when will this start?

Either when I get 20 signups or wednesday.

Nobody_Holme
April 16 2013, 04:28:25 PM
Count me in.

Don't think I've actually lost one of these yet. This needs work.

XenosisReaper
April 16 2013, 04:42:17 PM
Count me in.

Don't think I've actually lost one of these yet. This needs work.

Day 1 lynch confirmed

cullnean
April 16 2013, 04:42:36 PM
Count me in.

Don't think I've actually lost one of these yet. This needs work.

Day 1 lynch confirmed



Tapatalk 2

dpidcoe
April 16 2013, 04:42:40 PM
I'm in despite my better judgement.

Kilabi
April 16 2013, 04:44:43 PM
Only Dark Flare can save holme now.

cullnean
April 16 2013, 04:52:31 PM
Only Dark Flare can save holme now.

Nah just means we are sorted for day 2

Tapatalk 2

Dark Flare
April 16 2013, 04:59:17 PM
mememe

Kilabi
April 16 2013, 05:00:43 PM
End of day one:

http://failheap-challenge.com/image.php?u=265&dateline=1363988629

pratell
April 16 2013, 05:03:16 PM
in o7

Toxic
April 16 2013, 05:08:45 PM
Im in!

Also I give DarkFlare fairly good odds of surviving day one, given xemo will be in this game :p

Nobody_Holme
April 16 2013, 05:09:59 PM
iit: people not realising i'm making a really early village idiot play. >.>

Toxic
April 16 2013, 05:11:11 PM
Just claim to be the third coronor, duh. Easy village idiot win!

LobbyZ
April 16 2013, 05:12:22 PM
I'm in totally

pratell
April 16 2013, 05:14:47 PM
looby as don calling it now

Toxic
April 16 2013, 05:16:35 PM
I'm in totally

#lobbyz

because :lobbyz:

Toxic
April 16 2013, 05:17:49 PM
Not to spam the thread, but someone alert chris to this game. We cant have a mafia game without the don.

LobbyZ
April 16 2013, 05:38:21 PM
Not to spam the thread, but someone alert chris to this game. We cant have a mafia game without the don.

please stop stalking chris

XenosisReaper
April 16 2013, 05:39:58 PM
Not to spam the thread, but someone alert chris to this game. We cant have a mafia game without the don.

please stop stalking chris

more like BabbyZ

(stop quoting Toxic, I have him on ignore for a reason)

Toxic
April 16 2013, 05:44:21 PM
:razor:

Bentguru
April 16 2013, 06:03:19 PM
in

Nobody_Holme
April 16 2013, 06:13:54 PM
The thing is.

Toxic is still a better poster than you.

spasm
April 16 2013, 07:26:48 PM
We can get this started tonight if 3 more sign up.

Toxic
April 16 2013, 07:27:47 PM
In that case you would need to add todays time to day one. As you would need to send out PMs with roles and give people a fair chance.

XenosisReaper
April 16 2013, 08:11:19 PM
The thing is.

Toxic is still a better poster than you.

[citation needed]

Dr.Boomtown
April 16 2013, 09:09:07 PM
sign me up

Devec
April 16 2013, 09:27:11 PM
I will partake. I was forced by spasm at gunpoint.


Because he is mafia

irl

Varcaus
April 16 2013, 09:31:05 PM
Me me me sign me up

Dr.Boomtown
April 16 2013, 09:42:44 PM
make sure everybody gets a PM to indicate the game is starting so theres none of that " YOU POST EARLY YOU ARE MAFIA "

Nobody_Holme
April 16 2013, 10:23:24 PM
Inb4 "you posted late, you must be mafia because you got a different PM and it was sent later".

spasm
April 16 2013, 10:35:43 PM
We got 20, I'm drawing out roles now. I'll send everyone a PM, including the villagers. So don't post anything until I put the thread up.

Navigator Six
April 19 2013, 11:57:44 AM
Would like to congratulate you guys on finally killing someone from the mafia. :highfive:

XenosisReaper
April 19 2013, 11:59:39 AM
wheres the out of game discussion thread?

Kilabi
April 19 2013, 12:01:57 PM
As long as the game is running there should be no discussion directly relating to the game. General mafia banter, why not, but not directly the running game.

XenosisReaper
April 19 2013, 12:03:47 PM
As long as the game is running there should be no discussion directly relating to the game. General mafia banter, why not, but not directly the running game.

I guess we should shut down IRC then

Nobody_Holme
April 19 2013, 12:47:40 PM
There's no way people can be stopped from talking.

Talking about suspicions (until proven) or the current day's votes, as a bare minimum, however, are taboo and if you mention them on irc/here while dead, you're a terrible person.

Kilabi
April 19 2013, 12:56:23 PM
insert: ...from dead people... to whereever it makes sense. While there is no way to stop it common sense should tell you you should stop influence a game you have been eliminated from.

Smuggo
April 19 2013, 01:00:58 PM
Solution: don't use IRC cause it's bad

Nobody_Holme
April 19 2013, 01:42:07 PM
Show us on the doll where irc touched you.

Lana Torrin
April 19 2013, 01:46:31 PM
Show us on the doll where irc touched you.

Its Smuggo, the IRC touched him EVERYWHERE

Nobody_Holme
April 19 2013, 05:36:59 PM
good point.

Bentguru
April 24 2013, 04:12:13 PM
Just from watching this must-lynch scenario I have a suggestion for future must-lynches.

In other games I have played, when it became a must lynch votes were not allowed to be changed. You could talk as much as you wanted, but once you bolded in a vote that was your permanent vote for the day. It worked pretty well and sped up the process so that it finished faster usually, since one incorrect vote by the village = automatic game over.

I propose we adopt this system.

Smuggo
April 24 2013, 04:16:30 PM
Yeah i agree.

TBH vote changing all the time is fucking shitty. If you're not sure, don't vote until you are.

Dark Flare
April 24 2013, 04:24:53 PM
Yeah i agree.

TBH vote changing all the time is fucking shitty. If you're not sure, don't vote until you are.

Voting super early for no reason is also what got Varcaus lynched as a villager

Nobody_Holme
April 24 2013, 05:14:06 PM
Preventing vote changing is just unreasonable to people who cant be on at day turnover. Also dumb.

EDIT:

Are people up for another game after this one? Hopefully with less retard.

dpidcoe
April 24 2013, 05:36:21 PM
Preventing vote changing is just unreasonable to people who cant be on at day turnover. Also dumb.

Lana Torrin
April 24 2013, 05:52:01 PM
Preventing vote changing is just unreasonable to people who cant be on at day turnover. Also dumb.

cullnean
April 24 2013, 05:54:15 PM
Preventing vote changing is just unreasonable to people who cant be on at day turnover. Also dumb.

EDIT:

Are people up for another game after this one? Hopefully with less retard.

No guarantees on the retardation

Tapatalk 2

Nobody_Holme
April 24 2013, 05:55:02 PM
Preventing vote changing is just unreasonable to people who cant be on at day turnover. Also dumb.

EDIT:

Are people up for another game after this one? Hopefully with less retard.

No guarantees on the retardation

Tapatalk 2

Fair point.
FMAR is not getting to be sheriff again though.

Lana Torrin
April 24 2013, 05:57:17 PM
Preventing vote changing is just unreasonable to people who cant be on at day turnover. Also dumb.

EDIT:

Are people up for another game after this one? Hopefully with less retard.

No guarantees on the retardation

Tapatalk 2

Fair point.
FMAR is not getting to be sheriff again though.

Bah. FMAR was a fine sheriff who just found nothing of use.

pratell
April 24 2013, 06:04:19 PM
Preventing vote changing is just unreasonable to people who cant be on at day turnover. Also dumb.

EDIT:

Are people up for another game after this one? Hopefully with less retard.

No guarantees on the retardation

Tapatalk 2

Fair point.
FMAR is not getting to be sheriff again though.

Bah. FMAR was a fine sheriff who just found nothing of use.

Your sheriff was fucking awful and got a confirmed villager lynched, in what way is that fine?

Bentguru
April 24 2013, 06:10:10 PM
Preventing vote changing is just unreasonable to people who cant be on at day turnover. Also dumb.

EDIT:

Are people up for another game after this one? Hopefully with less retard.

No vote switching for normal days is retarded yeah, but for must-lynches when there is not a whole lot of people or discussion it works.

If you're not on at end of day you can always vote earlier anyway.

Kilabi
April 24 2013, 06:20:14 PM
Also open the option to just not vote, wait for all villagers to vote and make it a tie with the left alive mafia. Exploitable as shit imho. Also dumb.

Nobody_Holme
April 24 2013, 06:22:07 PM
And about half of the people around think its a bad idea, so its not getting put in place. Next.

Bentguru
April 24 2013, 06:31:53 PM
Also open the option to just not vote, wait for all villagers to vote and make it a tie with the left alive mafia. Exploitable as shit imho. Also dumb.

not really. So long as a single villager votes for another villager the mafia are going to win under either system, it's not like they can't just time it and switch their vote immediately before the end of day anyway.

Lana Torrin
April 24 2013, 06:35:48 PM
I'm not sure I like being told when you are in a must lynch... Confirms the number of mafia.

Nobody_Holme
April 24 2013, 07:07:06 PM
Beats not being told and randomly losing without warning.

Varcaus
April 24 2013, 07:12:10 PM
Yeah i agree.

TBH vote changing all the time is fucking shitty. If you're not sure, don't vote until you are.

Voting super early for no reason is also what got Varcaus lynched as a villager

Because people cant understand the fact that you can change votes later

Dark Flare
April 24 2013, 07:34:06 PM
Yeah i agree.

TBH vote changing all the time is fucking shitty. If you're not sure, don't vote until you are.

Voting super early for no reason is also what got Varcaus lynched as a villager

Because people cant understand the fact that you can change votes later

No, it was a mistake by you and if you can't accept that you'll never get better at the game. There is no reason to vote that early unless Sheriff has a guilty. It just makes you look like a bandwagonner.

Varcaus
April 24 2013, 07:35:07 PM
Yeah i agree.

TBH vote changing all the time is fucking shitty. If you're not sure, don't vote until you are.

Voting super early for no reason is also what got Varcaus lynched as a villager

Because people cant understand the fact that you can change votes later

No, it was a mistake by you and if you can't accept that you'll never get better at the game. There is no reason to vote that early unless Sheriff has a guilty. It just makes you look like a bandwagonner.

He turned out to be guilty m8

Nobody_Holme
April 24 2013, 07:40:09 PM
That doesnt excuse your bad play.

Dark Flare
April 24 2013, 07:40:17 PM
Yeah i agree.

TBH vote changing all the time is fucking shitty. If you're not sure, don't vote until you are.

Voting super early for no reason is also what got Varcaus lynched as a villager

Because people cant understand the fact that you can change votes later

No, it was a mistake by you and if you can't accept that you'll never get better at the game. There is no reason to vote that early unless Sheriff has a guilty. It just makes you look like a bandwagonner.

He turned out to be guilty m8

That'll happen 1 in 5 times. Seriously, accept that following someone's suggestion that early in the day with very little evidence and not posting much yourself is really scummy, then you won't do it in future.

dpidcoe
April 24 2013, 08:01:36 PM
Preventing vote changing is just unreasonable to people who cant be on at day turnover. Also dumb.

EDIT:

Are people up for another game after this one? Hopefully with less retard.

No guarantees on the retardation

Tapatalk 2

Fair point.
FMAR is not getting to be sheriff again though.

Bah. FMAR was a fine sheriff who just found nothing of use.
*snort*

Varcaus
April 24 2013, 08:02:38 PM
Preventing vote changing is just unreasonable to people who cant be on at day turnover. Also dumb.

EDIT:

Are people up for another game after this one? Hopefully with less retard.

No guarantees on the retardation

Tapatalk 2

Fair point.
FMAR is not getting to be sheriff again though.

Bah. FMAR was a fine sheriff who just found nothing of use.
*snort*

Lana Torrin
April 25 2013, 09:20:13 AM
Bah you are all just terrible. Sheriff contradicts himself and yet you all still just vote with the wrong option.

Dark Flare
April 25 2013, 09:23:53 AM
They were both the wrong option and it nearly cost us the game. I'd say that's not ideal sheriffing.

Lana Torrin
April 25 2013, 09:25:51 AM
They were both the wrong option and it nearly cost us the game. I'd say that's not ideal sheriffing.

I believe im not allowed to post my opinion of that statement until the game is over. It may be another day yet.

Dark Flare
April 25 2013, 09:29:38 AM
You already did post your opinion when you said they chose the "wrong" option, as that implies there was a right one.

Seriously dead people on FHC are shit at not interfering.

Lana Torrin
April 25 2013, 09:46:16 AM
You already did post your opinion when you said they chose the "wrong" option, as that implies there was a right one.

Seriously dead people on FHC are shit at not interfering.

I was talking about the killing of cul.. The wrong option being to do as the sheriff said, not as he did.. No matter how you look at it the village killed a confirmed villager over an unknown.

That's happened and was in the past. I'm not commenting at all on whats going on now because that would be wrong of me.

Dark Flare
April 25 2013, 09:47:56 AM
You already did post your opinion when you said they chose the "wrong" option, as that implies there was a right one.

Seriously dead people on FHC are shit at not interfering.

I was talking about the killing of cul.. The wrong option being to do as the sheriff said, not as he did..

That's happened and was in the past. I'm not commenting at all on whats going on now because that would be wrong of me.

You're still saying the right option was to vote for me. (Which it isnt). Which affects the current gameplay. Seriously, how are deads on FHC so bad?

Lana Torrin
April 25 2013, 09:51:09 AM
You already did post your opinion when you said they chose the "wrong" option, as that implies there was a right one.

Seriously dead people on FHC are shit at not interfering.

I was talking about the killing of cul.. The wrong option being to do as the sheriff said, not as he did..

That's happened and was in the past. I'm not commenting at all on whats going on now because that would be wrong of me.

You're still saying the right option was to vote for me. (Which it isnt). Which affects the current gameplay. Seriously, how are deads on FHC so bad?

I have edited in the answer to that. Cul had been 'confirmed' by the sheriff as a villager where as you had not. The issue wasn't with the sheriff giving this info to the other confirmed villagers, it was all of the other people not believing it.

Dark Flare
April 25 2013, 09:52:49 AM
You already did post your opinion when you said they chose the "wrong" option, as that implies there was a right one.

Seriously dead people on FHC are shit at not interfering.

I was talking about the killing of cul.. The wrong option being to do as the sheriff said, not as he did..

That's happened and was in the past. I'm not commenting at all on whats going on now because that would be wrong of me.

You're still saying the right option was to vote for me. (Which it isnt). Which affects the current gameplay. Seriously, how are deads on FHC so bad?

I have edited in the answer to that. Cul had been 'confirmed' by the sheriff as a villager where as you had not. The issue wasn't with the sheriff giving this info to the other confirmed villagers, it was all of the other people not believing it.

And if they had believed it and killed me we'd be in the same situation.

Seriously, as Sheriff calling guilty on someone you know is villager and simultaneously calling guilty on someone you haven't investigated is not good. By any stretch of the imagination.

Toxic
April 25 2013, 10:13:59 AM
We need a forum-medal-award made for FMAR.

Kilabi
April 25 2013, 10:46:23 AM
We need a forum-medal-award made for FMAR.

Seconding this. ^^


Also no matter if something happened in the past or not, talking about it as fact, wrong, right or whatever influences a running game. No matter how you put it. Someone who did not make up his mind reading over what others think even if they are dead influences what they think.

XenosisReaper
April 25 2013, 10:49:27 AM
Count this a signup for the next game

Now I need to prepare my smug gloating posts for tonight

Zeekar
April 25 2013, 10:57:20 AM
Count this a signup for the next game

Now I need to prepare my smug gloating posts for tonight

I want to play as well. !

Nobody_Holme
April 25 2013, 11:07:41 AM
i'd run the next game if people want, but wont have time to organise things until saturday.

If someone wants to take it before then, go to it. (also, sign me up so i can firstday FMAR)

Kilabi
April 25 2013, 11:11:48 AM
We need a new thread for that. Would be up for another of course.

Dark Flare
April 25 2013, 11:12:01 AM
Can the next game please have a Vigilante.

cullnean
April 25 2013, 11:20:36 AM
Can the next game please have a Vigilante.

only if its me tbh

Toxic
April 25 2013, 11:29:58 AM
And a village idiot. Possibly with more consequences if you lynch/whack the idiot. Will force people into more carefully considering their vote.

Lana Torrin
April 25 2013, 11:32:26 AM
Can the next game please have a Vigilante.

only if its me tbh

Oh God not again

Kilabi
April 25 2013, 11:53:54 AM
Last vigilante shot 2 villagers the first 2 days iirc. Idiot can be fun but also leads to stupid shit while the last 2 games were actually kind of good.

Nobody_Holme
April 25 2013, 11:54:27 AM
Honestly, I'm more of a fan of slightly more exotic and intertwined roles.

The ones that give people individual win conditions rather than things that can affect the main game's win condition, though.

Lana Torrin
April 25 2013, 11:58:31 AM
As long as we dont have undetectable mafia im good with just about anything. The Don role was the only crappy thing I have seen so far. (Although a Don in name only role would work fine)

Cue1*
April 25 2013, 02:45:48 PM
Yea, sure. I'm in. Also, I want next game.

the thing from the buzz buzz

I called running the next game. Have a plan that I hope will be quite fun.

the thing from the buzz buzz

cullnean
April 25 2013, 02:46:35 PM
Last vigilante shot 2 villagers the first 2 days iirc. Idiot can be fun but also leads to stupid shit while the last 2 games were actually kind of good.

I killed the lunatic

Tapatalk 2

Toxic
April 25 2013, 02:49:25 PM
Yea, sure. I'm in. Also, I want next game.

the thing from the buzz buzz

I called running the next game. Have a plan that I hope will be quite fun.

the thing from the buzz buzz

No. No, no, no, NO!

You stay the hell away from running anymore "all the sheriffs are crazy and only 1 mafia" games :p

Nobody_Holme
April 25 2013, 03:12:50 PM
I'll admit, if its got that same set of wierd rules, I'll be upset.

I like experimenting, though. Also private roles that players don't know about unless. They receive said role.

Cue1*
April 25 2013, 03:35:57 PM
Yea, sure. I'm in. Also, I want next game.

the thing from the buzz buzz

I called running the next game. Have a plan that I hope will be quite fun.

the thing from the buzz buzz

No. No, no, no, NO!

You stay the hell away from running anymore "all the sheriffs are crazy and only 1 mafia" games :p

There was only one crazy sheriff! Anyway, going with a bit more standard rules.

the thing from the buzz buzz

Nobody_Holme
April 25 2013, 05:00:29 PM
Go forth and create us a thread then?